[Bug 1469767] Review Request: systemd-swap - Creating hybrid swap space from zram swaps, swap files and swap partitions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469767 --- Comment #23 from Raphael Groner --- SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/util/systemd-swap.spec SRPM: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/util/systemd-swap-3.3.0-3.fc29.src.rpm Thanks for the review. Please let me know when you need a review for your packages and I can look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684940] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-missinggo - Stuff that supplements Go's stdlib, or isn't significant enough to be in its own repo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684940 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-anacrolix-missinggo-2.0.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1687010] Review Request: golang-github-koofr-koofrclient - Go Koofr client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687010 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-koofr-koofrclient-0-0.1.20190325git7f32759.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645264] Review Request: golang-github-euank-kmsg-parser - A simpler parser for the /dev/kmsg format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645264 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-euank-kmsg-parser-2.0.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1688983] Review Request: golang-uber-multierr - Combine one or more Go errors together
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688983 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-uber-multierr-1.1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1687007] Review Request: golang-github-hpcloud-tail - Go package for reading from continously updated files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687007 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-hpcloud-tail-1.0.0-1.20190325gita1dbeea.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689080] Review Request: golang-github-opentracing - OpenTracing API for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689080 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-opentracing-1.1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684938] Review Request: golang-github-docopt - A command-line arguments parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684938 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-docopt-0.6.2-1.20190325gitee0de3b.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1695362] Review Request: python-metaextract - get metadata for python modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695362 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-metaextract-1.0.5-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4c19bf6c09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 572515] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572515 J. Scheurich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muft...@web.de --- Comment #59 from J. Scheurich --- It looks like, there is a OpenGL2 related bug in Fedoras 30/31 (x86_64) jogl: $ wget http://wdune.ourproject.org/examples/Triangle.java ... $ javac -cp /usr/lib/java/gluegen2-rt.jar:/usr/lib/java/jogl2.jar Triangle.java $ java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib64/jogl2/ -cp .:/usr/lib/java/gluegen2-rt.jar:/usr/lib/java/jogl2.jar TriangleException in thread "main" com.jogamp.opengl.GLException: Profile GL2 is not available on null, but: [GLProfile[GLES1/GLES1.hw], GLProfile[GLES2/GLES3.hw], GLProfile[GL2ES1/GLES1.hw], GLProfile[GL4ES3/GL4.hw], GLProfile[GL2ES2/GL4.hw], GLProfile[GL4/GL4.hw], GLProfile[GLES3/GLES3.hw], GLProfile[GL4/GL4.hw], GLProfile[GL3/GL4.hw], GLProfile[GL2GL3/GL4.hw]] at com.jogamp.opengl.GLProfile.get(GLProfile.java:991) at com.jogamp.opengl.GLProfile.get(GLProfile.java:1004) at Triangle.main(Triangle.java:55) The same runs without problems under Ubuntu 18.04 (x86_64) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698871] Review Request: supercollider - Object oriented programming environment for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698871 --- Comment #4 from Tristan Cacqueray --- Thank you for the quick review Robert-André. I've addressed your comment in the pagure distgit: https://pagure.io/supercollider-distgit and I pushed the new version at Spec|SRPM urls. Here are some notes about fedora-review output: - There are header files in the debugsource package, not sure why or if it's an issue. - incorrect-fsf-address fixes are proposed here: https://github.com/timblechmann/nova-tt/pull/3 and there: https://github.com/timblechmann/nova-simd/pull/7 - Obsoleted m4 macros fix proposed here: https://github.com/supercollider/portaudio/pull/2 - Then about licensecheck, I'm not sure how it works with the header libraries, should we list all their licenses ? (e.g. expat, bsd, boost, ...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1695362] Review Request: python-metaextract - get metadata for python modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695362 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-metaextract-1.0.5-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6b3b9670f2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1672047] Review Request: smoldyn - A particle-based spatial stochastic simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672047 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- smoldyn-2.58-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8b4bc36582 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694805] Review Request: python-zeep - A fast and modern Python SOAP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694805 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-14 00:01:52 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-zeep-3.3.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699593] Review Request: rust-timer - Simple timer to schedule execution of closures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699593 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34158595 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699593] New: Review Request: rust-timer - Simple timer to schedule execution of closures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699593 Bug ID: 1699593 Summary: Review Request: rust-timer - Simple timer to schedule execution of closures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-timer.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-timer-0.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: A simple timer. Use it to schedule execution of closures after a delay or at a given timestamp. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699591] Review Request: rust-fuzzy-matcher - Fuzzy Matching Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699591 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34158477 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699591] New: Review Request: rust-fuzzy-matcher - Fuzzy Matching Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699591 Bug ID: 1699591 Summary: Review Request: rust-fuzzy-matcher - Fuzzy Matching Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-fuzzy-matcher.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-fuzzy-matcher-0.2.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Fuzzy matching algorithms in Rust. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1696361] Review Request: golang-github-certifi-gocertifi - Carefully curated collection of root certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696361 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- LGTM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699308] Review Request: go-avif - AVIF (AV1 Still Image File Format) encoder for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699308 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- New in rpm doesn't necessarily mean approved by guidelines though. However, since they're all over existing specs I'm not going to block on it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699586] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699586 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34157861 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699585] Review Request: rust-vte - Parser for implementing terminal emulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699585 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1689282 |1699586 (rust-utf8parse) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689282 [Bug 1689282] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699586 [Bug 1699586] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689282] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689282 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1699585 (rust-vte) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699585 [Bug 1699585] Review Request: rust-vte - Parser for implementing terminal emulators -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699586] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699586 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1699585 (rust-vte) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699585 [Bug 1699585] Review Request: rust-vte - Parser for implementing terminal emulators -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689282] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689282 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|rust-utf8parse | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699586] New: Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699586 Bug ID: 1699586 Summary: Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-utf8parse.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-utf8parse-0.1.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Table-driven UTF-8 parser. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699585] Review Request: rust-vte - Parser for implementing terminal emulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699585 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1689282 (rust-utf8parse) --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Successful COPR build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/rusttests/build/883114/ Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689282 [Bug 1689282] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689282] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689282 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1699585 (rust-vte) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699585 [Bug 1699585] Review Request: rust-vte - Parser for implementing terminal emulators -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689282] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689282 --- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-utf8parse.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-utf8parse-0.1.1-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699585] New: Review Request: rust-vte - Parser for implementing terminal emulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699585 Bug ID: 1699585 Summary: Review Request: rust-vte - Parser for implementing terminal emulators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-vte.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-vte-0.3.3-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Parser for implementing virtual terminal emulators in Rust. The parser is implemented according to Paul Williams' ANSI parser state machine. The state machine doesn't assign meaning to the parsed data and is thus not itself sufficient for writing a terminal emulator. Instead, it is expected that an implementation of the Perform trait which does something useful with the parsed data. The Parser handles the book keeping, and the Perform gets to simply handle actions. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698242] Review Request: gamehub - All your games in one place
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- gamehub-0.13.1.80-3.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9aedd06612 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689282] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689282 --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34156810 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699487] Review Request: kim-api - Open Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models KIM API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699487 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Junghans --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3) > LGTM, package approved. Thanks. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/11065 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689282] Review Request: rust-utf8parse - Table-driven UTF-8 parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689282 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-utf8parse.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-utf8parse-0.1.1-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699487] Review Request: kim-api - Open Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models KIM API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699487 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- LGTM, package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699487] Review Request: kim-api - Open Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models KIM API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699487
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Junghans ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Not used:
>
> BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
Removed
>
> - Missing isa:
>
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
Added
>
> - mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/share/cmake/kim-api
>
> →
>
> mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/cmake/kim-api
Changed
>
> - Own %{_libexecdir}/kim-api
>
> %dir %{_libexecdir}/kim-api
Added
>
> - In onder to avoid unirtentional soname bumps, globbing the major soname
> version is now forbidden, be more specific instead:
>
> %{_libdir}/libkim-api.so.*
Added, %global sover
>
> - use %global, not %define
Changed
> [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/kim-api
Fixed.
> [!]: Buildroot is not present
> Note: Invalid buildroot found: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
> See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
Fixed.
> [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in kim-api
> , kim-api-devel , kim-api-examples
Fixed
> [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
> Note: %define requiring justification: %define compdir %(pkg-config
> --variable=completionsdir bash-completion), %define compdir
> "/etc/bash_completion.d"
Fixed
Spec URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/kim-api.spec
SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/kim-api-2.0.2-2.fc31.src.rpm
TaskID: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34155946
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699581] Review Request: rust-tuikit - Toolkit for writing TUI applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699581 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34155600 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699581] New: Review Request: rust-tuikit - Toolkit for writing TUI applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699581 Bug ID: 1699581 Summary: Review Request: rust-tuikit - Toolkit for writing TUI applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-tuikit.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-tuikit-0.2.6-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Tuikit is a TUI library for writing terminal UI applications. Highlights: - Thread safe. - Support non-fullscreen mode as well as fullscreen mode. - Support Alt keys, mouse events, etc. - Buffering for efficient rendering. Tuikit is modeld after termbox which views the terminal as a table of fixed-size cells and input being a stream of structured messages. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699563] Review Request: erlang-mqtree - Index tree for MQTT topic filters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699563
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- ASL 2.0 and BSD:
BSD (unspecified)
-
mqtree-1.0.2/c_src/uthash.h
Add it to license and add a comment explaining the license breakdown.
Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issue before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated",
"Apache License (v2.0)", "BSD (unspecified)". 3 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/erlang-mqtree/review-erlang-
mqtree/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOUL
[Bug 1699561] Review Request: reicast - Sega Dreamcast emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699561
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not used in Fedora
- Packager: is not used in Fedora
- This should not be used without good reason:
%define debug_package %{nil}
If your package don't generate debug symbols, you need to find why.
- Use %global, not %define
- Make %setup quiet with -q:
%setup -qn reicast-emulator-r%{version}
- Not needed:
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- Use %set_build_flags to set Fedora default build flags:
%build
%set_build_flags
- make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
- make install PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT → %make_install
PREFIX=%{_prefix}
- Not needed:
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
- Just use
%{_datadir}/%{name}
in %files to own all the files there
- Glob the .gz extension for man pages as the compression might change in the
future:
%{_mandir}/man1/reicast.1.*
%{_mandir}/man1/reicast-joyconfig.1.*
- Validate the .desktop file in %install or %check:
desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/reicast.desktop
- Remove the env in this too:
sed -i 's/\/usr\/bin\/env python/\/usr\/bin\/python3/g'
shell/linux/tools/reicast-joyconfig.py
- You need to add a %changelog
- Use a better name for your archive:
Source0:
https://github.com/reicast/reicast-emulator/archive/r%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- Why not add ARM and aarch64 then?
# It can run on ARM and potentially any platform without JIT though.
ExclusiveArch: x86_64 %{ix86} %{arm} aarch64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699487] Review Request: kim-api - Open Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models KIM API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699487
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Not used:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
- Missing isa:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
- mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/share/cmake/kim-api
→
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/cmake/kim-api
- Own %{_libexecdir}/kim-api
%dir %{_libexecdir}/kim-api
- In onder to avoid unirtentional soname bumps, globbing the major soname
version is now forbidden, be more specific instead:
%{_libdir}/libkim-api.so.*
- use %global, not %define
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Common Development and Distribution
License (v1.0)", "Common Development and Distribution License (v3.0)",
"Artistic License". 16 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/kim-api/review-kim-
api/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/kim-api
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/cmake(rapidjson-
devel, glm-devel, libwbxml-devel, python3-uranium, bash-completion,
python3-uranium-lulzbot, cmake-filesystem, cereal-devel, paraview-
devel, websocketpp-devel, libmodman-devel, viennacl-devel),
/usr/share/cmake/Modules(libwbxml-devel, python3-uranium, libmodman-
devel, python3-uranium-lulzbot, cmake-filesystem, libsolv-devel,
viennacl-devel)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x
[Bug 1698871] Review Request: supercollider - Object oriented programming environment for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698871
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not used in Fedora
- Please split you BR/RR one per line for clarity
- Missing isa:
Requires: supercollider%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
- Use the default %cmake macro instead of cobbling your own
export CFLAGS="%{build_cflags} -fext-numeric-literals"
export CXXFLAGS="%{build_cxxflags} -fext-numeric-literals"
%cmake -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON \
-DSYSTEM_BOOST=ON \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=TRUE \
%{cmakearch} %{?geditver} \
..
- make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} → %make_install
- The license file must be installed with %license, mot %doc:
%doc README*
%license COPYING
- .desktop files must be validated, see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_desktop_file_install_usage
desktop-file-validate
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/SuperColliderIDE.desktop
- Own %{_datadir}/SuperCollider
%dir %{_datadir}/SuperCollider
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699563] Review Request: erlang-mqtree - Index tree for MQTT topic filters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699563 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1683310 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683310 [Bug 1683310] ejabberd-19.02 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699563] New: Review Request: erlang-mqtree - Index tree for MQTT topic filters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699563 Bug ID: 1699563 Summary: Review Request: erlang-mqtree - Index tree for MQTT topic filters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rbar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@erlang/ejabberd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00883055-erlang-mqtree/erlang-mqtree.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@erlang/ejabberd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00883055-erlang-mqtree/erlang-mqtree-1.0.2-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: mqtree is an Erlang NIF implementation of N-ary tree to keep MQTT topic filters for efficient matching. Fedora Account System Username: bowlofeggs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699069] Review Request: deepin-kwin - KWin configuration for Deepin Desktop Environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699069
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Bump to 0.0.3.2
Version:0.0.3.2
- Ask upstream of a license file
- Split the description to stay below 80 characters per line:
deepin-kwin.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides a kwin
configuration that used as the new WM for Deepin Desktop Environment.
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v3 or later)". 75 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/deepin-kwin/review-deepin-
kwin/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
No
[Bug 1699561] Review Request: reicast - Sega Dreamcast emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699561 davidgf changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699561] New: Review Request: reicast - Sega Dreamcast emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699561 Bug ID: 1699561 Summary: Review Request: reicast - Sega Dreamcast emulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: da...@davidgf.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davidgfnet/reicast-fedora-packaging/r8.1/reicast.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/davidgfnet/reicast-fedora-packaging/releases/download/r8.1/reicast-8.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Hey there. I'd like to include Reicast in the Fedora packages (see reicast.com). I created the src.rpm package and tested it all in copr (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/davidgf/reicast/) Fedora Account System Username: davidgf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699061] Review Request: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin - Qt platform integration plugin for Deepin Desktop Environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699061
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- The description line is too long, try to split it:
%{repo} is the
%{summary}.
deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C qt5dxcb-plugin is
the Qt platform integration plugin for Deepin Desktop Environment.
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v3 or later)", "*No copyright*
GNU General Public License (v3 or later)". 28 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin/review-deepin-
qt5dxcb-plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstre
[Bug 1699030] Review Request: perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults - Object Oriented Authentication-Results Headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699030
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- %{__perl} → perl
- %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
→
perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1 NO_PERLLOCAL=1
OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
w/ BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 7.12
and:
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
→
%{make_install}
- As a result, not needed:
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \;
URL and Source addresses are Ok.
Source archive (SHA-256:
7ff59a229db597cc89e3aa9c2459145092061da0b77012376f142eb653f53cbccfd0121c0) is
original. Ok.
Summary verified from lib/Mail/AuthenticationResults.pm. Ok.
Description verified from lib/Mail/AuthenticationResults.pm. Ok.
License verified from lib/Mail/AuthenticationResults.pm and README. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults.spec
review-perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults/results/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults-1.20180923-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
review-perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults/results/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults-1.20180923-1.fc31.src.rpm
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpm -q -lv -p perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults-1.20180923-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
18:05:16
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1304 Sep 23 2018
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1241 Sep 23 2018
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults/README
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1074 Sep 23 2018
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults/README.md
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 457 Sep 23 2018
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults/dist.ini
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/licenses/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot18352 Sep 23 2018
/usr/share/licenses/perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1727 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2044 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::FoldableHeader.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1835 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Header.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1559 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Header::AuthServID.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2536 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Header::Base.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1405 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Header::Comment.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1492 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Header::Entry.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1421 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Header::Group.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1480 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Header::SubEntry.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1415 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Header::Version.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1536 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Parser.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1752 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Token.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1377 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Token::Assignment.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1368 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Token::Comment.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1373 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Token::QuotedString.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1369 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Token::Separator.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1366 Apr 13 18:02
/usr/share/man/man3/Mail::AuthenticationResults::Token::Space.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootro
[Bug 1672047] Review Request: smoldyn - A particle-based spatial stochastic simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672047 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- smoldyn-2.58-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-22ccddeb52 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1672047] Review Request: smoldyn - A particle-based spatial stochastic simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672047 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- smoldyn-2.58-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8b4bc36582 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1695323] Review Request: freeipa-healthcheck - Health check tool for FreeIPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695323 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- freeipa-healthcheck-0.1-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684948] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag - Declarative flag parsing for Go using struct tags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684948 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag-1.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1692133] Review Request: crossguid2 - Lightweight cross platform C++ GUID/UUID library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692133 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- crossguid2-0.2.2-1.20190126gitb151b7d.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1695371] Review Request: golang-github-masterminds-semver-1 - Work with semantic versions in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-masterminds-semver-1-1.4.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691608] Review Request: golang-github-mail-v2 - simple and efficient package to send emails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691608 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mail-v2-2.3.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689493] Review Request: python-zarr - An implementation of chunked, compressed, N-dimensional arrays for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-zarr-2.3.1-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1562526] Review Request: libfullock - A Fast User Level LOCK (FULLOCK) library for C and C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 15:32:31 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- libfullock-1.0.32-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694735] Review Request: js8call - Amateur Radio message passing using FT8 modulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- js8call-1.0.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1692190] Review Request: ccls - C/C++/ObjC language server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692190 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ccls-0.20190314-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691614] Review Request: golang-github-alexcesaro-quotedprintable-v3 - quoted-printable encoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691614 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-alexcesaro-quotedprintable-v3-3.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1688980] Review Request: golang-uber-atomic - Wrapper types for sync/atomic which enforce atomic access
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688980 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-uber-atomic-1.3.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691615] Review Request: golang-github-facebookarchive-inject - provides a reflect based injector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691615 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-facebookarchive-inject-0-0.1.20190326gitf23751c.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691117] Review Request: golang-github-facebookarchive-structtag - parsing of the defacto struct tag style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691117 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-facebookarchive-structtag-0-0.1.20190327git217e25f.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1690837] Review Request: golang-github-vividcortex-mysqlerr - MySQL server error constants
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690837 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-vividcortex-mysqlerr-0-0.1.20190326git6c6b55f.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1687008] Review Request: golang-github-koofr-httpclient - Go HTTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687008 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-koofr-httpclient-0-0.1.20190325git0378617.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650263] Review Request: golang-github-krolaw-dhcp4 - DHCP4 library written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650263 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-krolaw-dhcp4-0-0.1.20190325git7cead47.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1688394] Review Request: golang-github-rogpeppe-fastuuid - Fast generation of 192-bit UUIDs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688394 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-rogpeppe-fastuuid-1.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1696361] Review Request: golang-github-certifi-gocertifi - Carefully curated collection of root certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696361 --- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #8) > I don't see times in the prescribed Changelog format: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs > This is the new thangelog format in rpm 4.14. > Also, a heads up that upstream is thinking of switching from calver to > semver: > https://github.com/certifi/gocertifi/pull/10#issuecomment-481493704 > so you may want to start versioning at 0.2018.01.08 (or similar) to allow > for easier upgrades once they do that. > I've versioned it almost as you said: 0.0.20180108 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1696361] Review Request: golang-github-certifi-gocertifi - Carefully curated collection of root certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696361 --- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-certifi-gocertifi.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-certifi-gocertifi-0.0.20180118-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1646795] Review Request: linux-system-roles - Set of interfaces for unified system management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646795 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- linux-system-roles-1.0-9.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d5f9c35f8c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System --- playerctl-2.0.2-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1bac0790b1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649059] Review Request: golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter-ocagent - OpenCensus Go exporters for OpenCensus Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter-ocagent-0.4.12-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3af30c4f37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1697631] Review Request: golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt - Store and retrieve encrypted configs from etcd or consul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697631 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt-0.0.2-1.20190412gitb2862e3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ec119f9539 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643960] Review Request: golang-github-datadog-zstd - Zstd wrapper for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643960 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-datadog-zstd-1.3.5-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7230c9dd05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645286] Review Request: golang-github-gomodule-redigo - Go client for Redis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645286 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-gomodule-redigo-2.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ff78b19d23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1692376] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-gtk - Go binding for GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692376 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mattn-gtk-0-0.1.20190412gite9a6766.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4468f27fd9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699308] Review Request: go-avif - AVIF (AV1 Still Image File Format) encoder for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699308 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks for the review. I've removed the Require. Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/go-avif.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/go-avif-0.1.0-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 --- Comment #33 from J. Scheurich --- Spec URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/vcglib.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/vcglib-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: The Visualization and Computer Graphics Library (VCG for short) is a open source portable C++ templated library for manipulation, processing and displaying with OpenGL of triangle and tetrahedral meshes. Fedora Account System Username: muftii The following has been lost from %build: for i in `find vcg img wrap -type f`; do sed -i 's,eigenlib\/,eigen3\/,' $i done Now it is included -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1695362] Review Request: python-metaextract - get metadata for python modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695362 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-metaextract-1.0.5-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6b3b9670f2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1695362] Review Request: python-metaextract - get metadata for python modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695362 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-metaextract-1.0.5-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4c19bf6c09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
