[Bug 1722397] Review Request: R-rhub - Connect to 'R-hub'

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722397



--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-rhub

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722295] Review Request: R-usethis - Automate Package and Project Setup

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722295



--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-usethis

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722293] Review Request: R-pkgdown - Make Static HTML Documentation for a Package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722293



--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-pkgdown

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722291] Review Request: R-rsconnect - Deployment Interface for R Markdown Documents and Shiny Apps

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722291



--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-rsconnect

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720843] Review Request: python-pysnooper - Poor man's debugger for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720843



--- Comment #3 from Lumír Balhar  ---
You can use PyPI source tarball which includes tests in the latest version. The
latest version is 0.2.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722393] Review Request: R-devtools - Tools to Make Developing R Packages Easier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722393



--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
Oops, sorry, I forgot to upload the fixed ones:

Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/R-devtools.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/R-devtools-2.0.2-2.fc30.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720949] Review Request: NZBGet - A very efficient Usenet Downloader

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720949



--- Comment #4 from Chris Caron  ---
Thanks again for such a speedy response; I addressed all your concerns but a
few:

>  unrar is not available in Fedora, only rpmfusion. Are you sure is is 
> mandatory?

Unfortunately it is; just about all binary postings on Usenet require to be
unrar'ed.  Do you foresee this as a problem? I forgot about unrar's strange
license causing it to sit in other repo's. I also found this link
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Unrar.

> nzbget.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate ['/var/log/nzbget']

The out-of-the-box nzbget configuration has log rotate already built into it.
The daemon itself does the log rotating.  Should I patch the configuration file
to not do this by default and provide a logrotate?  Or is it acceptable as it
is?

>  - Notify upstream about the wrong FSF address:

Done; i did a pull request for the next release and created a small patch file
for this one.
Source: https://github.com/nzbget/nzbget/pull/648

> nzbget.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/nzbget.conf 640


I cleaned up most of these entries and changed this one to just read 660 which
may still trigger this error.  The big problem is this file contains passwords
in clear text, so I'd like the file to be as restricted as possible and only
accessible by the nzbget user and root. I strongly advise keeping the 'other
user without write/read permissions here.  Is this okay?  Perhaps you have a
better suggestion for this?

As for the content you're interested in:
spec:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lead2gold/nzbget/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00942866-nzbget/nzbget.spec
srpm:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lead2gold/nzbget/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00942866-nzbget/nzbget-21.0-1.fc31.src.rpm


Chris

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1712980] Review Request: libslirp - A general purpose TCP-IP emulator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712980



--- Comment #16 from Cole Robinson  ---
Fixed in qemu-4.0.0-4.fc31

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1353169] Review Request: python-nikola - A static website and blog generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
Bug 1353169 depends on bug 1718687, which changed state.

Bug 1718687 Summary: Review Request: python-typogrify - Filters to enhance web 
typography, including support for Django & Jinja templates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718687

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1718687] Review Request: python-typogrify - Filters to enhance web typography, including support for Django & Jinja templates

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718687

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-06-21 00:24:10



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-ghp-import2-1.0.1-2.fc29, python-micawber-0.4.1-2.fc29,
python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc29, python-typogrify-2.0.7-2.fc29 has been pushed
to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1718686] Review Request: python-ghp-import2 - A GitHub Pages import tool

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718686

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-06-21 00:24:08



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-ghp-import2-1.0.1-2.fc29, python-micawber-0.4.1-2.fc29,
python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc29, python-typogrify-2.0.7-2.fc29 has been pushed
to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1353169] Review Request: python-nikola - A static website and blog generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
Bug 1353169 depends on bug 1718686, which changed state.

Bug 1718686 Summary: Review Request: python-ghp-import2 - A GitHub Pages import 
tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718686

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1353169] Review Request: python-nikola - A static website and blog generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
Bug 1353169 depends on bug 1718685, which changed state.

Bug 1718685 Summary: Review Request: python-smartypants - Python with the 
SmartyPants
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718685

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1718685] Review Request: python-smartypants - Python with the SmartyPants

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718685

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-06-21 00:24:06



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-ghp-import2-1.0.1-2.fc29, python-micawber-0.4.1-2.fc29,
python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc29, python-typogrify-2.0.7-2.fc29 has been pushed
to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1353169] Review Request: python-nikola - A static website and blog generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
Bug 1353169 depends on bug 1718682, which changed state.

Bug 1718682 Summary: Review Request: python-micawber - a small library for 
extracting rich content from urls
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718682

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1718682] Review Request: python-micawber - a small library for extracting rich content from urls

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718682

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-06-21 00:24:05



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-ghp-import2-1.0.1-2.fc29, python-micawber-0.4.1-2.fc29,
python-smartypants-2.0.1-2.fc29, python-typogrify-2.0.7-2.fc29 has been pushed
to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1712980] Review Request: libslirp - A general purpose TCP-IP emulator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712980

Cole Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|ERRATA  |RAWHIDE



--- Comment #15 from Cole Robinson  ---
Fixed in qemu-4.0.0-4.fc31

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1662170] Review Request: ssh-tools - collection of various tools using ssh

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662170



--- Comment #5 from sven.w...@gmx.de ---
1) Fixed mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs of rpmlint
2) Use "install -p" to keep file timestamps
3) Use a glob for man pages

Not sure about the archive name.
I packaged ssh-tools already for other distros which use this URL scheme from
Github

Also not sure about the other rpmlint warning.
Maybe I should rename the binary in a future release,
so it won't be recognized as spelling error.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1708175] Review Request: python-prawcore - Low-level communication layer for PRAW 4+ library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708175

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2019-15f90aa72a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-15f90aa72a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720724] Review Request: rust-liboverdrop - Configuration library, with directory overlaying and fragments dropins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720724

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-06-20 22:11:23



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722656] Review Request: python-sybil - Automated testing for the examples in your documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722656

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1708161




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708161
[Bug 1708161] Review Request: python-testfixtures - A collection of helpers and
mock objects for unit tests
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722656] New: Review Request: python-sybil - Automated testing for the examples in your documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722656

Bug ID: 1722656
   Summary: Review Request: python-sybil - Automated testing for
the examples in your documentation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-sybil.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-sybil-1.2.0-1.fc30.src.rpm

Project URL: https://sybil.readthedocs.io/

Description:
This library provides a way to test examples in your documentation by parsing
them from the documentation source and evaluating the parsed examples as part
of your normal test run. Integration is provided for the three main Python
test runners.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35667348

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-sybil-1.2.0-1.fc30.src.rpm 
python-sybil.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %check
python-sybil.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_version}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-sybil-1.2.0-1.fc30.noarch.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1708161] Review Request: python-testfixtures - A collection of helpers and mock objects for unit tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708161

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1722656




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722656
[Bug 1722656] Review Request: python-sybil - Automated testing for the examples
in your documentation
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722642] New: Review Request: python-acora - A Python multi-keyword text search engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722642

Bug ID: 1722642
   Summary: Review Request: python-acora - A Python multi-keyword
text search engine
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-acora.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-acora-2.2-1.fc30.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/scoder/acora

Description:
Acora is 'fgrep' for Python, a fast multi-keyword text search engine.

Based on a set of keywords and the Aho-Corasick algorithm, it generates a
search automaton and runs it over string input, either unicode or bytes.

Acora comes with both a pure Python implementation and a fast binary module
written in Cython. However, note that the current construction algorithm is
not suitable for really large sets of keywords (i.e. more than a couple of
thousand).

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35663432

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-acora-2.2-1.fc30.src.rpm 
python-acora.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fgrep -> grep, f grep
python-acora.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unicode -> Unicode,
uni code, uni-code
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint *acora*
python3-acora.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fgrep -> grep, f
grep
python3-acora.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unicode ->
Unicode, uni code, uni-code
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722626] New: Review Request: herbstluftwm - A manual tiling window manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722626

Bug ID: 1722626
   Summary: Review Request: herbstluftwm - A manual tiling window
manager
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: j...@sinervo.fi
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
http://sham1.sinervo.fi/files/rpm-review/herbstluftwm/herbstluftwm.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sham1.sinervo.fi/files/rpm-review/herbstluftwm/herbstluftwm-0.7.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: herbstluftwm is a manual tiling window manager for X11 using Xlib
and Glib. 
Its main features can be described with:

- The layout is based on splitting frames into subframes which can be split 
again or can be filled with windows;
- Tags (or workspaces or virtual desktops or …) can be added/removed at 
runtime. Each tag contains an own layout exactly one tag is viewed on each 
monitor. The tags are monitor independent;
- It is configured at runtime via ipc calls from herbstclient. So the 
configuration file is just a script which is run on startup.
Fedora Account System Username: sham1

This is an unretiring of this package, and as per the procedure, any package
that has been retired for 8 or more weeks needs to be re-reviewed.

A koji scract build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35659379

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722597] Review Request: python-minikerberos - A Kerberos manipulation library in Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722597

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||python-minikerberos



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722614] Review Request: python-minidump - A Python library to parse and read Microsoft minidump file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722614

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||python-minidump



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722597] Review Request: python-minikerberos - A Kerberos manipulation library in Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722597

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1722621 (pypykatz)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722621
[Bug 1722621] Review Request: pypykatz - A Python implementation of Mimikatz
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722614] Review Request: python-minidump - A Python library to parse and read Microsoft minidump file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722614

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1722621 (pypykatz)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722621
[Bug 1722621] Review Request: pypykatz - A Python implementation of Mimikatz
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722621] Review Request: pypykatz - A Python implementation of Mimikatz

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722621

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1722597, 1722614




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722597
[Bug 1722597] Review Request: python-minikerberos - A Kerberos manipulation
library in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722614
[Bug 1722614] Review Request: python-minidump - A Python library to parse and
read Microsoft minidump file format
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722621] Review Request: pypykatz - A Python implementation of Mimikatz

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722621

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
  Alias||pypykatz




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471
[Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722621] New: Review Request: pypykatz - A Python implementation of Mimikatz

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722621

Bug ID: 1722621
   Summary: Review Request: pypykatz - A Python implementation of
Mimikatz
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pypykatz.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pypykatz-0.0.7-1.fc30.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/skelsec/pypykatz

Description:
Mimikatz implementation in pure Python. It's optimized for offline parsing, 
but has options for live credential dumping as well.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35658287

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint pypykatz-0.0.7-1.fc30.src.rpm 
pypykatz.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Mimikatz -> Kamikaze
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint *pypykatz*
pypykatz.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Mimikatz -> Kamikaze
pypykatz.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pypykatz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722597] Review Request: python-minikerberos - A Kerberos manipulation library in Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722597



--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter  ---
* Thu Jun 20 2019 Fabian Affolter  - 0.0.10-1
- Update to latest upstream release 0.0.10

Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-minikerberos.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-minikerberos-0.0.10-1.fc30.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1719798] Review Request: svt-av1 - Scalable Video Technology for AV1 Encoder

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719798



--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/svt-av1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720768] Review Request: python-neurosynth - Neurosynth is a Python package for large-scale synthesis of functional neuroimaging data.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720768



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-neurosynth

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722614] New: Review Request: python-minidump - A Python library to parse and read Microsoft minidump file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722614

Bug ID: 1722614
   Summary: Review Request: python-minidump - A Python library to
parse and read Microsoft minidump file format
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-minidump.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-minidump-0.0.6-1.fc30.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/skelsec/minidump

Description:
A Python library to parse and read Microsoft minidump file format. Can create
minidumps on Windows machines using the windows API (implemented with ctypes).

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35657665

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-minikerberos-0.0.7-1.fc30.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint *minidump*
minidump.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C minidump
minidump.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary minidump
python3-minidump.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minidumps ->
mini dumps, mini-dumps, minimums
python3-minidump.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctypes ->
types, c types
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1721564] Review Request: rust-zincati - Update agent for Fedora CoreOS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721564



--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-zincati

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720724] Review Request: rust-liboverdrop - Configuration library, with directory overlaying and fragments dropins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720724



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-liboverdrop

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722597] New: Review Request: python-minikerberos - A Kerberos manipulation library in Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722597

Bug ID: 1722597
   Summary: Review Request: python-minikerberos - A Kerberos
manipulation library in Python
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-minikerberos.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-minikerberos-0.0.7-1.fc30.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/skelsec/minikerberos

Description:
Kerberos manipulation library in pure Python.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35656638

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-minikerberos-0.0.7-1.fc30.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-minikerberos-0.0.7-1.fc30.noarch.rpm 
python3-minikerberos.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ccache2kirbi
python3-minikerberos.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ccacheedit
python3-minikerberos.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kerberoscomm
python3-minikerberos.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kirbi2ccache
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1721564] Review Request: rust-zincati - Update agent for Fedora CoreOS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721564



--- Comment #9 from Robert Fairley  ---
SCM repo request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/12524

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720724] Review Request: rust-liboverdrop - Configuration library, with directory overlaying and fragments dropins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720724



--- Comment #2 from Robert Fairley  ---
SCM repo requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/12523

Will make an update to the RPM to use `%generate_buildrequires` as a follow-up.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720890] Review Request: python-dtfabric - A tool to manage data types and structures, as used by libyal

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720890

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2019-8ac4c04f54 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8ac4c04f54

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720885] Review Request: python-dfdatetime - A Python module for digital forensics date and time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720885

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2019-6b218f01f5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6b218f01f5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722534] Review Request: rifiuti2 - A Windows Recycle Bin analyser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722534

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
  Alias||rifiuti2




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471
[Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722534] New: Review Request: rifiuti2 - A Windows Recycle Bin analyser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722534

Bug ID: 1722534
   Summary: Review Request: rifiuti2 - A Windows Recycle Bin
analyser
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rifiuti2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rifiuti2-0.7.0-1.fc30.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/abelcheung/rifiuti2

Description:
Rifiuti2 is a for analyzing Windows Recycle Bin INFO2 file. Analysis of
Windows Recycle Bin is usually carried out during Windows computer forensics.
Rifiuti2 can extract file deletion time, original path and size of deleted
files and whether the trashed files have been permanently removed.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35651507

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint rifiuti2-0.7.0-1.fc30.src.rpm 
rifiuti2.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) analyser -> analyses, analyzer,
analysis
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint rifiuti2-*
rifiuti2.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) analyser -> analyses,
analyzer, analysis
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1721719] Review Request: rust-os_pipe - Cross-platform library for opening OS pipes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721719



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-os_pipe

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720861] Review Request: ioc-writer - A tool to create and edit OpenIOC objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720861

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2019-339b0045ae has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-339b0045ae

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1721718] Review Request: rust-shared_child - Library for using child processes from multiple threads

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721718



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-shared_child

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1721730] Review Request: rust-duct - Library for creating shell pipelines

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721730



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-duct

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1721738] Review Request: rust-roff - ROFF (man page format) generation library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721738



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-roff

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1721741] Review Request: rust-man - Generate structured man pages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721741



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-man

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720865] Review Request: artifacts - A collection of digital forensic artifacts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720865

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2019-87ca6ac1cd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-87ca6ac1cd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1718076] Review Request: golang-github-jacobsa-reqtrace - A lightweight request tracing package for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718076

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722393] Review Request: R-devtools - Tools to Make Developing R Packages Easier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722393

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 + RPM build errors:

BUILDSTDERR: error: File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/R-devtools-2.0.2-1.fc31.x86_64/usr/share/R/library/devtools/NEWS
BUILDSTDERR: File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/R-devtools-2.0.2-1.fc31.x86_64/usr/share/R/library/devtools/NEWS

   It's NEWS.md:

%doc %{rlibdir}/%{packname}/NEWS.md


 - RPM build errors:

BUILDSTDERR: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/WORDLIST
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/rstudio/addins.dcf
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/CONDUCT.md
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/NEWS.md
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/appveyor.yml
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/codecov.yml
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/cran-comments.md
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/gpl-v3.md
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/mit-license.txt
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/omni-README
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/packagename-package.r
BUILDSTDERR:   
/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/readme-rmd-pre-commit.sh
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/revdep.R
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/template.Rproj
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/test-example.R
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/testthat.R
BUILDSTDERR:/usr/share/R/library/devtools/templates/travis.yml

%{rlibdir}/%{packname}/rstudio
%{rlibdir}/%{packname}/templates
%{rlibdir}/%{packname}/WORDLIST


 - Ask upstream for a license file


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2 or later)". 202 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/R-devtools/review-R-
 devtools/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec

[Bug 1720843] Review Request: python-pysnooper - Poor man's debugger for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720843

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lbal...@redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
*** Bug 1722479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722479] Review Request: python-pysnooper - Never use print for debugging again

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722479

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2019-06-20 13:32:45



--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1720843 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720454] Review Request: ghc-vty - A simple terminal UI library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720454



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-vty

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720456] Review Request: ghc-http-directory - Http directory listing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720456



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-http-directory

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722397] Review Request: R-rhub - Connect to 'R-hub'

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722397

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 74 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/R-rhub/review-R-
 rhub/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /et

[Bug 1722479] New: Review Request: python-pysnooper - Never use print for debugging again

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722479

Bug ID: 1722479
   Summary: Review Request: python-pysnooper - Never use print for
debugging again
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lbal...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-pysnooper.spec
SRPM URL:
https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-pysnooper-0.2.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: PySnooper - Never use print for debugging again! You're trying to
figure out why your Python code isn't doing what you think it should be doing.
You'd love to use a full-fledged debugger with breakpoints and watches, but you
can't be bothered to set one up right now. You want to know which lines are
running and which aren't, and what the values of the values of the local
variables are. Most people would use print lines, in strategic locations, some
of them showing the values of variables. PySnooper lets you do the same, except
instead of carefully crafting the right print lines, you just add one decorator
line to the function you're interested in. You'll get a play-by-play log of
your function, including which lines ran and when, and exactly when local
variables were changed.
Fedora Account System Username: lbalhar

Scratch builds:
- rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35648490
- Fedora 30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35648500

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722295] Review Request: R-usethis - Automate Package and Project Setup

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722295

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)",
 "Creative Commons Attribution Public License (v4.0)", "Expat License",
 "*No copyright* Apache License". 224 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/R-usethis/review-R-usethis/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[-]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is

[Bug 1722293] Review Request: R-pkgdown - Make Static HTML Documentation for a Package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722293

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 211 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/R-pkgdown/review-R-pkgdown/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} 

[Bug 1722291] Review Request: R-rsconnect - Deployment Interface for R Markdown Documents and Shiny Apps

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722291

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Remove the shebang:

R-rsconnect.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/R/library/rsconnect/resources/environment.py /usr/bin/env python
R-rsconnect.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/R/library/rsconnect/resources/environment.py 644 /usr/bin/env python


Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 127 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/R-rsconnect/review-R-
 rsconnect/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectu

[Bug 1699130] Review Request: golang-github-envoyproxy-control-plane - Go implementation of data-plane-api

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699130
Bug 1699130 depends on bug 1699098, which changed state.

Bug 1699098 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-gogo-googleapis - Googleapis 
generated with gogoprotobuf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699098

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699098] Review Request: golang-github-gogo-googleapis - Googleapis generated with gogoprotobuf

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699098

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:50:05



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Will build during the mass rebuild.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699127] Review Request: golang-github-envoyproxy-protoc-gen-validate - Protoc plugin to generate polyglot message validators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699127
Bug 1699127 depends on bug 1699110, which changed state.

Bug 1699110 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-lyft-protoc-gen-star - 
Protoc plugin library for efficient proto-based code generation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699110

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699103] Review Request: golang-github-iancoleman-strcase - Golang package for converting to snake_case or camelcase

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699103

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:49:11



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Not needed anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699110] Review Request: golang-github-lyft-protoc-gen-star - Protoc plugin library for efficient proto-based code generation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699110

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:49:26



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Not needed anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1698872] Review Request: golang-github-mwitkow-conntrack - Go middleware for net.conn tracking (prometheus/trace)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698872

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:48:44



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Will build during the mass rebuild.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699127] Review Request: golang-github-envoyproxy-protoc-gen-validate - Protoc plugin to generate polyglot message validators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699127
Bug 1699127 depends on bug 1699103, which changed state.

Bug 1699103 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-iancoleman-strcase - Golang 
package for converting to snake_case or camelcase
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699103

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1696885] Review Request: golang-github-audriusbutkevicius-recli - Reflection based cli (command line interface) generator for golang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696885

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:47:06



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Not needed anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699136] Review Request: golang-github-sean-seed - Securely seed go's random number generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699136

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:47:37



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Will build during the mass rebuild.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699130] Review Request: golang-github-envoyproxy-control-plane - Go implementation of data-plane-api

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699130
Bug 1699130 depends on bug 1699127, which changed state.

Bug 1699127 Summary: Review Request: 
golang-github-envoyproxy-protoc-gen-validate - Protoc plugin to generate 
polyglot message validators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699127

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699476] Review Request: golang-github-gofrs-uuid - Go implementation of Universally Unique Identifiers as defined in RFC-4122

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699476

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:45:11



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Will build in the mass rebuild.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1699127] Review Request: golang-github-envoyproxy-protoc-gen-validate - Protoc plugin to generate polyglot message validators

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699127

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:45:51



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Not needed anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1696361] Review Request: golang-github-certifi-gocertifi - Carefully curated collection of root certificates

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696361

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-06-20 11:40:54



--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Will build with the mass rebuild.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1720768] Review Request: python-neurosynth - Neurosynth is a Python package for large-scale synthesis of functional neuroimaging data.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720768

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Oops falled asleep.


Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722295] Review Request: R-usethis - Automate Package and Project Setup

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722295

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1722393




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722393
[Bug 1722393] Review Request: R-devtools - Tools to Make Developing R Packages
Easier
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722393] Review Request: R-devtools - Tools to Make Developing R Packages Easier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722393

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1722295, 1722397




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722295
[Bug 1722295] Review Request: R-usethis - Automate Package and Project Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722397
[Bug 1722397] Review Request: R-rhub - Connect to 'R-hub'
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722397] Review Request: R-rhub - Connect to 'R-hub'

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722397

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1722393




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722393
[Bug 1722393] Review Request: R-devtools - Tools to Make Developing R Packages
Easier
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722397] New: Review Request: R-rhub - Connect to 'R-hub'

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722397

Bug ID: 1722397
   Summary: Review Request: R-rhub - Connect to 'R-hub'
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-rhub.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-rhub-1.1.1-1.fc30.src.rpm

Description:
Run 'R CMD check' on any of the 'R-hub' ()
architectures, from the command line. The current architectures include
Windows, macOS, Solaris and various Linux distributions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1722393] New: Review Request: R-devtools - Tools to Make Developing R Packages Easier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722393

Bug ID: 1722393
   Summary: Review Request: R-devtools - Tools to Make Developing
R Packages Easier
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-devtools.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-devtools-2.0.2-1.fc30.src.rpm

Description:
Collection of package development tools.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1715809] Review Request: ghc-html-conduit - Parse HTML documents using xml-conduit datatypes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715809



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2019-53ecbfb142 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-53ecbfb142

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2019-4eee1adeae has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4eee1adeae

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1715809] Review Request: ghc-html-conduit - Parse HTML documents using xml-conduit datatypes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715809



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2019-53ecbfb142 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-53ecbfb142

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org