[Bug 1723052] Review Request: python-geopy - A Python client for several popular geocoding web services

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723052



--- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
Another little ping?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1688810] Review Request: python-astunparse An AST unparser for Python.

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688810

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2019-11-07 02:12:44



--- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1667661 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1667661] Review Request: python-astunparse - An AST unparser for Python

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667661

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
 CC||ruslanpisa...@gmail.com



--- Comment #20 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
*** Bug 1688810 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1765727] Review Request: gap-pkg-circle - Adjoint groups of finite rings

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765727

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
gap-pkg-circle-1.6.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0b25fae248

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1767187] Review Request: golang-github-direnv-dotenv - Go dotenv parsing library for direnv

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767187

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-direnv-dotenv-0-0.1.20191105git4cce6d1.fc31 has been pushed to
the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-369eec29a9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1765917] Review Request: vitetris - Virtual terminal *tris clone

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765917

Antonio  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CANTFIX
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review-
Last Closed||2019-11-06 20:10:09



--- Comment #8 from Antonio  ---
I doubt that upstream will change the name of their software to support our
rules.
I close this ticket and abandon vitetris packaging.

Thanks to everyone.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1766771] Review Request: libicu64 - ICU Library version 64

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766771

Stephen Gallagher  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2019-11-06 20:06:05



--- Comment #13 from Stephen Gallagher  ---
Abandoning this package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1763285] Review Request: libnma - NetworkManager GUI library

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763285

Matthew Krupcale  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mkrupcale@matthewkrupcale.c
   ||om
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mkrupcale@matthewkrupcale.c
   ||om
  Flags||fedora-review?
   ||needinfo?(lkund...@v3.sk)



--- Comment #1 from Matthew Krupcale  ---
For the most part, this is close to ready, except for a few {Build,}Requires
and Obsoletes issues and license packaging details.

Since this is splitting off from network-manager-applet, I looked at that spec
file, and it seems to indicate that libnma{,-devel} should obsolete
libnm-gtk{,-devel}. However, this currently seems to obsolete a much older
NetworkManager-gtk-devel (also missing obsoletes on the main library package).

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


Issues:
===
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
  BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
  Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- %bcond_without should be used for defining with by default
  You may have this backwards for libnma_gtk4
  See: https://rpm.org/user_doc/conditional_builds.html
- -devel and -gtk4-devel should require arch-dependent library packages:
  Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
  and
  Requires: %{name}-gtk4%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
  respectively
  See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_requiring_base_package
- -gtk4 and -gtk4-devel subpackages should only be defined when
  %if %{with libnma_gtk4}
- Should Obsoletes: libnm-gtk{,-devel}
- %ldconfig_scriptlets is unnecessary on F28+
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets
- License should be "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" due to contents in shared/
  Should install COPYING.LGPLv2.1.
  This should be documented in the spec file as well.
  See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_multiple_licensing_scenarios
- License not installed with -gtk4
- Consider moving %{_datadir}/gtk-doc files to noarch -devel-doc subpackage
  See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

= MUST items =

C/C++:
[-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
 Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
 Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
 upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
 licenses manually.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[!]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number

[Bug 1765917] Review Request: vitetris - Virtual terminal *tris clone

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765917



--- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
The software (not just the package name) needs to be renamed to something that
is not infringing upon the tetris trademark. "virtual-tris" fails that test, it
relies on awareness of the "tetris" mark and causes confusion. 

Some suggestions that would be acceptable:

"virtual-falling-blocks"
"vifb"
"vt-falling-blocks"

and so on and so forth.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1766375] Review Request: python-timeunit - python port of java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766375



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-timeunit-1.1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a1299f4980

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1767252] Review Request: transflac - transcode FLAC to lossy formats

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767252



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
transflac-1.0.0-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-eea595139a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1762673] Review Request: python-bluepy - Python interface to Bluetooth LE

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762673



--- Comment #14 from Alessio  ---
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #13)
> The Makefile contains BLUEZ_PATH=./bluez-5.47. Perhaps it's as simple as
> pointing to the location of the content of bluez devel files on the disk.

But looking at the Makefile, it uses also .c files, not only of the headers
provided by bluez-libs-devel RPM

BLUEZ_SRCS  = lib/bluetooth.c lib/hci.c lib/sdp.c lib/uuid.c

Isn't it?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1768893] Review Request: php-psr-event-dispatcher - Standard interfaces for event handling

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768893

Remi Collet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1712845




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712845
[Bug 1712845] php-symfony4-4.3.6 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769417] Review Request: php-psr-http-client - Common interface for HTTP clients

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769417

Remi Collet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1712845




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712845
[Bug 1712845] php-symfony4-4.3.6 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1767883] Review Request: minizip1.2 - Library for manipulation with .zip archives

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767883



--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/minizip1.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769417] New: Review Request: php-psr-http-client - Common interface for HTTP clients

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769417

Bug ID: 1769417
   Summary: Review Request: php-psr-http-client - Common interface
for HTTP clients
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/psr/php-psr-http-client.git/plain/php-psr-http-client.spec?id=76df5518cbad29d6a87b2615753800689e27a7f7
SRPM URL:
http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-psr-http-client-1.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm
Description: 
This repository holds all the common code related to PSR-18 (HTTP Client).

Please refer to the specification for a description:
https://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-18/


Autoloader: /usr/share/php/Psr/Http/Client/autoload.php


Fedora Account System Username: remi

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1767883] Review Request: minizip1.2 - Library for manipulation with .zip archives

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767883

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|smo...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769323] Review Request: python3-dateutil - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769323



--- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen  ---
Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python3-dateutil/python3-dateutil.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python3-dateutil/python3-dateutil-2.8.0-2.el7.src.rpm
Description:  Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module
Fedora Account System Username: stevetraylen

Builds now with mock.

And a scratch build to confirm -
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38805561

only epel7 now as setuptools_scm is required -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769407

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1762673] Review Request: python-bluepy - Python interface to Bluetooth LE

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762673



--- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter  ---
The Makefile contains BLUEZ_PATH=./bluez-5.47. Perhaps it's as simple as
pointing to the location of the content of bluez devel files on the disk.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1762673] Review Request: python-bluepy - Python interface to Bluetooth LE

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762673



--- Comment #12 from Brian J. Murrell  ---
I guess the question is why bluepy needs to use source files and cannot use the
bluez-libs-devel RPM.

Or maybe it can, and the RPM build just needs to do that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1767883] Review Request: minizip1.2 - Library for manipulation with .zip archives

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767883

Stephen John Smoogen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #9 from Stephen John Smoogen  ---
OK I am a-ok with this spec file. Thanks for letting me relearn how to do this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1766375] Review Request: python-timeunit - python port of java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766375



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-timeunit-1.1.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0c7c133b67

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1767252] Review Request: transflac - transcode FLAC to lossy formats

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767252



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
transflac-1.0.0-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e4e396c6bc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1766375] Review Request: python-timeunit - python port of java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766375

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-timeunit-1.1.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-796e1da0a8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1767252] Review Request: transflac - transcode FLAC to lossy formats

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767252



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
transflac-1.0.0-3.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3dc6c14887

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1763261] Review Request: z - Maintains a jump-list of the directories you actually use

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-11-06 13:44:57



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
z-1.9-0.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1764715] Review Request: python-django-health-check - Checks for various conditions and provides reports

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764715



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-django-health-check-3.11.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1767883] Review Request: minizip1.2 - Library for manipulation with .zip archives

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767883



--- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/minizip1.2-1.2.11-23.src.rpm
New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/minizip1.2.spec

Adds BuildRequires: gcc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1768447] Review Request: mcomix3 - User-friendly, customizable image viewer for comic books

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768447



--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mcomix3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769323] Review Request: python3-dateutil - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769323



--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen  ---
Apologies these do not build in mock, new packages hopefully on there way.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1764715] Review Request: python-django-health-check - Checks for various conditions and provides reports

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764715

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-11-06 12:50:39



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-django-health-check-3.11.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769297] Review Request: python-editdistance - Provides a fast implementation of the Levenshtein distance in Python

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769297



--- Comment #6 from Aniket Pradhan  ---
(In reply to Aniket Pradhan from comment #5)
> (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #2)
> > Aniket, please block "fedora-neuro" for all NeuroFedora related bugs---also
> > helps us keep track of our stuff.
> 
> What do you mean by "blocking fedora-neuro"? Is it adding the neuro sig to
> the cc-list, then I had done that already.

No worries, I got what you were referring to. :P

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769297] Review Request: python-editdistance - Provides a fast implementation of the Levenshtein distance in Python

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769297



--- Comment #5 from Aniket Pradhan  ---
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #2)
> Aniket, please block "fedora-neuro" for all NeuroFedora related bugs---also
> helps us keep track of our stuff.

What do you mean by "blocking fedora-neuro"? Is it adding the neuro sig to the
cc-list, then I had done that already.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769297] Review Request: python-editdistance - Provides a fast implementation of the Levenshtein distance in Python

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769297



--- Comment #4 from Aniket Pradhan  ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> Splitting out the -devel subpackages seems bogus. The .so file is just the
> python module.
> Also, your -devel package is not installable.
> 
> Merge the -devel package back into the python3- package.
> Those .h files can be %excluded, they are not used at runtime.

Yeah... I did that because of the header file warning. I was not sure if they
are used during the runtime. I'll exclude them if that is the case.


(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> I forgot to add:
> > %{__python3} setup.py test
> > nosetests test
> 
> Why two calls? This second line could run with the wrong python versions on
> F<32.

%{__python3} setup.py test copies some the python module (.so) file to the
source directory. It also doesn't run the tests. If I don't run this, the tests
using nose fails. Hence I had added the two statements.
Sure, you are right. I should use nosetests-3 to run the test.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769323] Review Request: python3-dateutil - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769323



--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen  ---
Pressed return to quickly

This will be an epel6 and 7 package only. Both RHEL6 (python-dateutil) and 7 
(python2-dateutil) contain a python2 package already.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1768640] Review Request: mozjs68 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768640

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|klem...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember  ---
This looks good to me, thanks! Not doing a full review as this is essentially
just an update for an existing package.

Parallel installability seems to be done correctly so nothing should conflict
with existing mozjs52 and mozjs60 packages. Package naming is also correct for
parallel installable packages.

APPROVED (but please wait for the fesco python2 use exception before requesting
the repo and importing)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769323] New: Review Request: python3-dateutil - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769323

Bug ID: 1769323
   Summary: Review Request: python3-dateutil - Powerful extensions
to the standard datetime module
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: steve.tray...@cern.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python3-dateutil/python3-dateutil.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python3-dateutil/python3-dateutil-2.8.0-1.el7.src.rpm
Description:  Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module
Fedora Account System Username: stevetraylen

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769297] Review Request: python-editdistance - Provides a fast implementation of the Levenshtein distance in Python

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769297



--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
I forgot to add:
> %{__python3} setup.py test
> nosetests test

Why two calls? This second line could run with the wrong python versions on
F<32.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769297] Review Request: python-editdistance - Provides a fast implementation of the Levenshtein distance in Python

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769297

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com
 Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)



--- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Aniket, please block "fedora-neuro" for all NeuroFedora related bugs---also
helps us keep track of our stuff.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941
[Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769297] Review Request: python-editdistance - Provides a fast implementation of the Levenshtein distance in Python

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769297

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl



--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
Splitting out the -devel subpackages seems bogus. The .so file is just the
python module.
Also, your -devel package is not installable.

Merge the -devel package back into the python3- package.
Those .h files can be %excluded, they are not used at runtime.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1762673] Review Request: python-bluepy - Python interface to Bluetooth LE

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762673



--- Comment #11 from Alessio  ---
Did you read the upstream's answer? What do you think?

"bluepy uses a copy of some source files from the BlueZ project to build a C
language executable, bluepy-helper, which is a shim between Python and the
kernel's Bluetooth interface. It does not build or install any binaries which
are the same as what the BlueZ package provides - so at no point would you have
a "bluepy" and a "system" version of the same thing on your disk."

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1769297] New: Review Request: python-editdistance - Provides a fast implementation of the Levenshtein distance in Python

2019-11-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769297

Bug ID: 1769297
   Summary: Review Request: python-editdistance - Provides a fast
implementation of the Levenshtein distance in Python
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: aniketpradhan1...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://major.fedorapeople.org/python-editdistance/python-editdistance.spec
SRPM URL:
https://major.fedorapeople.org/python-editdistance/python-editdistance-0.5.3-1.fc31.src.rpm
Description: This library implements the Levenshtein distance with C++ and
Cython.
Fedora Account System Username: major

rpmlint output: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38799606

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org