[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib - Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 --- Comment #38 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vcglib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1789749] Review Request: elements-alexandria - A lightweight C++ utility library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789749 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- elements-alexandria-2.14.1-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d9df0fd5cc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1789749] Review Request: elements-alexandria - A lightweight C++ utility library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789749 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- elements-alexandria-2.14.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2a1796ec10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787714] Review Request: wireguard-tools - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714 --- Comment #33 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wireguard-tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1342815] Review Request: openmp - Support for the OpenMP language in LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342815 --- Comment #7 from Darcy --- OpenMP works for my purposes. Thanks to those involved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1342815] Review Request: openmp - Support for the OpenMP language in LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342815 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #6 from Susi Lehtola --- There's been no activity in 11 months, can this be closed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787714] Review Request: wireguard-tools - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714 --- Comment #32 from Joe Doss --- Thank you so much Neal!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785069] Review request: lector -- ebook reader and collection manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785069 --- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin --- The error Is: DEBUG util.py:582: Error: DEBUG util.py:582: Problem: conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:582:- nothing provides python3-djvulibre >= 0.8.4 needed by lector-0.5.1-1.fc32.noarch I hade approved it in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786210 You need to file a Releng bug to get it unretired and attributed to you: https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue Use the template "package_unretirement" Don't forget to specify all the branches you want unretired (f31, f30…) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785069] Review request: lector -- ebook reader and collection manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785069 --- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Andrew Toskin from comment #8) > Updated package spec. > > Spec URL: > https://gitlab.com/terrycloth/packaging-lector/uploads/ > 751796450ddf418b29a2b548b7b65c15/lector.spec > > SRPM URL: > https://gitlab.com/terrycloth/packaging-lector/uploads/ > 85ed14ac37eeb2cdd85a20058ed8627a/lector-0.5.1-1.fc32.src.rpm > > > ...You'll notice some small changes to the dependencies again. In Bug > #1785073, I learned that python-markdown can't be backported for Fedora 30 > without making backward-incompatible changes or breaks to other f30 > packages. The maintainer for python-lxml hasn't said anything yet in Bug > #1784998, but I'm guessing now that it wasn't backported to f30 for similar > reasons. So I've decided to focus on f31+ after all. > > RPM Lint output looks good to me now, though there are maybe a few remaining > issues that I'm unsure about. When running fedora-review, I see a lot of > lines like this in the terminal output: > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:06 ago on Mon Jan 13 14:50:39 2020. > Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 > Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 > Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:09 ago on Mon Jan 13 14:50:39 2020. > Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 > Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 > Failed to set locale, defaulting to C.UTF-8 > > Not sure if that's something I should worry about or not, if localizations > are already compiled and they don't get to get find_lang'd or whatever, like > we'd discussed. > > fedora-review.txt also includes an Installation Errors section: > > Installation errors > --- > INFO: mock.py version 1.4.21 starting (python version = 3.7.5)... > Start: init plugins > INFO: selinux enabled > Finish: init plugins > INFO: Signal handler active > Start: run > Start: chroot init > INFO: calling preinit hooks > INFO: enabled root cache > INFO: enabled dnf cache > Start: cleaning dnf metadata > Finish: cleaning dnf metadata > INFO: enabled HW Info plugin > Mock Version: 1.4.21 > INFO: Mock Version: 1.4.21 > Finish: chroot init > INFO: installing package(s): > /home/terrycloth/creating/packaging/Lector/review-lector/results/lector-0.5. > 1-1.fc32.noarch.rpm > ERROR: Command failed: ># /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ > --releasever 32 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local > --disableplugin=spacewalk install > /home/terrycloth/creating/packaging/Lector/review-lector/results/lector-0.5. > 1-1.fc32.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts > > ...Even though ./review-lector/results/build.log shows no errors. Not sure > yet what this means either. Search fos "Error:" in root.log: it should tell you what packages are missing to install lector. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib - Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: vcglib |Review Request: vcglib - |Visualization and Computer |Visualization and Computer |Graphics Library|Graphics Library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773924] Review Request: xdp-tools - Utilities and example programs for use with XDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773924 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-01-14 16:57:12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1784230] Review Request: ikona - Icon Preview for Plasma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784230 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Sorry didn't see the mails. Package is approved but youstill need to find a sponsor. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773924] Review Request: xdp-tools - Utilities and example programs for use with XDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773924 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdp-tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1790217] Review Request: rust-fern - Simple, efficient logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790217
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jerry James ---
Looks good. This package is APPROVED.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is
[Bug 1790217] Review Request: rust-fern - Simple, efficient logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790217 --- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40499636 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #37 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Refreshing flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1789749] Review Request: elements-alexandria - A lightweight C++ utility library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789749 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elements-alexandria -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1790838] Re-Review Request: libcint - General Gaussian-type orbitals integrals for quantum chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790838 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||libcint Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1790838] Re-Review Request: libcint - General Gaussian-type orbitals integrals for quantum chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790838 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1790882 (python-pyscf) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790882 [Bug 1790882] Review Request: python-pyscf - Python module for quantum chemistry -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1790882] Review Request: python-pyscf - Python module for quantum chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790882 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1790838 Alias||python-pyscf Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790838 [Bug 1790838] Re-Review Request: libcint - General Gaussian-type orbitals integrals for quantum chemistry -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1790882] New: Review Request: python-pyscf - Python module for quantum chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790882 Bug ID: 1790882 Summary: Review Request: python-pyscf - Python module for quantum chemistry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: susi.leht...@iki.fi QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/python-pyscf.spec SRPM URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/python-pyscf-1.7.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jussilehtola Description: Python‐based simulations of chemistry framework (PySCF) is a general‐purpose electronic structure platform designed from the ground up to emphasize code simplicity, so as to facilitate new method development and enable flexible computational workflows. The package provides a wide range of tools to support simulations of finite‐size systems, extended systems with periodic boundary conditions, low‐dimensional periodic systems, and custom Hamiltonians, using mean‐field and post‐mean‐field methods with standard Gaussian basis functions. To ensure ease of extensibility, PySCF uses the Python language to implement almost all of its features, while computationally critical paths are implemented with heavily optimized C routines. Using this combined Python/C implementation, the package is as efficient as the best existing C or Fortran‐based quantum chemistry programs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1790838] New: Re-Review Request: libcint - General Gaussian-type orbitals integrals for quantum chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790838 Bug ID: 1790838 Summary: Re-Review Request: libcint - General Gaussian-type orbitals integrals for quantum chemistry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: susi.leht...@iki.fi QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/libcint.spec SRPM URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/libcint-3.0.19-1.fc31.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jussilehtola Description: libcint is an open source library for analytical Gaussian integrals. It provides C/Fortran API to evaluate one-electron / two-electron integrals for Cartesian / real-spherical / spinor Gaussian type functions. This is a re-review request for a package that was retired in August due to FTBFS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1789783] Review Request: php-webimpress-http-middleware-compatibility - Compatibility library for Draft PSR-15 HTTP Middleware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789783 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-01-14 10:54:55 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet --- Built in rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
