[Bug 1809918] New: Review Request: afdko - Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809918 Bug ID: 1809918 Summary: Review Request: afdko - Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: vishalvijayragha...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vishalvvr/afdko/fedora-31-x86_64/01279729-afdko/afdko.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vishalvvr/afdko/fedora-31-x86_64/01279729-afdko/afdko-3.0.1-2.fc31.src.rpm Description: The AFDKO is a set of tools for building OpenType font files from PostScript and TrueType font data. Fedora Account System Username: vishalvvr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809910] New: Review Request: python-registry - Read access to Windows Registry files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809910 Bug ID: 1809910 Summary: Review Request: python-registry - Read access to Windows Registry files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-registry.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-registry-1.3.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/williballenthin/python-registry Description: python-registry is a pure Python library that provides read-only access to Windows NT Registry files. These include NTUSER.DAT, userdiff, and SAM. The interface is two-fold: a high-level interface suitable for most tasks, and a low level set of parsing objects and methods which may be used for advanced study of the Windows NT Registry. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42169178 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-registry-1.3.1-1.fc31.src.rpm python-registry.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userdiff -> user diff, user-diff, diffuse 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-registry-1.3.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python3-registry.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userdiff -> user diff, user-diff, diffuse python3-registry.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809908] Review Request: R-profvis - Interactive Visualizations for Profiling R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809908 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: R-profvis - |b'R-profvis' - |Interactive Visualizations |b'Interactive |for Profiling R Code |Visualizations for | |Profiling R Code' | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809908] New: Review Request: b'R-profvis' - b'Interactive Visualizations for Profiling R Code'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809908 Bug ID: 1809908 Summary: Review Request: b'R-profvis' - b'Interactive Visualizations for Profiling R Code' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-profvis.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-profvis-0.3.6-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: b'Interactive visualizations for profiling R code.' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809908] Review Request: b'R-profvis' - b'Interactive Visualizations for Profiling R Code'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809908 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42168989 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809884] New: Review Request: ghc-iso8601-time - Convert to/from the ISO 8601 time format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809884 Bug ID: 1809884 Summary: Review Request: ghc-iso8601-time - Convert to/from the ISO 8601 time format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-iso8601-time/ghc-iso8601-time.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-iso8601-time/ghc-iso8601-time-0.1.5-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Conversion functions between Haskell time types and the ISO 8601 format, which is often used for printing times, e.g. JavaScript's 'new Date().toISOString()'. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42167328 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809879] New: Review Request: python-makeelf - ELF reader-writer library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809879 Bug ID: 1809879 Summary: Review Request: python-makeelf - ELF reader-writer library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-makeelf.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-makeelf-0.3.2-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/v3l0c1r4pt0r/makeelf Description: MakeELF is a Python library to parse, modify and create ELF binaries. It provides following features: - easy to use, standard Python interface - reading existing ELF files to Python representation - modification of every aspect of ELF format structures - ability to skip any validation to test other parsers for potential errors - creating new valid ELF files with just one step Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42166532 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-makeelf-0.3.2-1.fc31.src.rpm python-makeelf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parsers -> parser, parses, parers 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-makeelf-0.3.2-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python3-makeelf.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parsers -> parser, parses, parers 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 cli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #7 from cli...@gmail.com --- @Miro Hroncok Is it ok to provide python2 script for epel7? If so, I would keep it like this because then the package doesn't require installation of python3 into minimal rhel7/centos7 environments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #6 from cli...@gmail.com --- @chedi toueiti I took review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807945 Is this package (preproc) approved by you? I didn't see any particular issues according to the review you provided. Please, let me know -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807945] Review Request: python-gilt - gilt is a GIT layering tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807945 --- Comment #3 from cli...@gmail.com --- Please mainly see issues at the beginning of the review. There is no %check but if you believe it is not necessary I am ok with it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807945] Review Request: python-gilt - gilt is a GIT layering tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807945
cli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cli...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from cli...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package is missing Requires so runtime does not work, see NOTES at the end
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
Installs properly only on f32, not on f31
- Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
Note: Package contains %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
See: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782
The package contains globing under %files: see %{python3_sitelib}/*
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "Apache License
(v2.0)". 36 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/clime/rpkg-util/preproc/copr-
build-1258044/review-python-gilt/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.8,
/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or
[Bug 1804307] Review Request: python-jack-client - JACK Audio Connection Kit (JACK) Client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804307 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(michel@michel-slm | |.name) | --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Re-reviewing now -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1794971] Review Request: musescore - Music Composition & Notation Software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794971 --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #4) > (In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #3) > > Looks mostly fine. APPROVED. > > Thank you, Michel! I appreciate the review. I hope I have not wasted your > efforts, however. I am on the verge of abandoning the rename due to > persistent font problems that can be traced directly back to the rename. > I'll work with it a little more and see if I can resolve the issues, but if > it looks like it's going to take a lot of work, I will probably not go > forward with this. Yikes! no worries. Is the package name hardcoded in some places? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1804529] Review Request: pam-cryptsetup - PAM module for updating LUKS-encrypted volumes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804529 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808573] Review Request: python-periodictable - Extensible periodic table of the elements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808573 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan --- That works. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807239] Review Request: glyphography-newscycle-fonts - A realist sans-serif font family based on News Gothic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807239 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-81bb6949e9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-81bb6949e9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801522] Review Request: golang-github-otiai10-mint - The very minimum assertion for Golang testing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801522 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-afd22e1bba has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-afd22e1bba -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok --- If "default python" means /usr/bin/python than yes. Other than that, both versions are available in RHEL 7 and python3-pyparsing is in EPEL 7 (however I don't see that one in EPEL 6). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1704522] Review Request: zork - Public Domain source code to the original DUNGEON game (Zork I)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704522 Justin W. Flory changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dominik@greysecto ||r.net) --- Comment #8 from Justin W. Flory --- Hi Dominik, could you please re-review or set the fedora-review flag once more? Today I learned there is a time quota on the fedora-review flag: $ fedpkg request-repo zork 1704522 Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over 60 days ago I'll get this packaged up once I can request the dist-git repo. Sorry to be a bother. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1704522] Review Request: zork - Public Domain source code to the original DUNGEON game (Zork I)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704522 Justin W. Flory changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1704522] Review Request: zork - Public Domain source code to the original DUNGEON game (Zork I)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704522 Justin W. Flory changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jflo...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #7 from Justin W. Flory --- SPEC URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jwflory/rpmbuild/b82e9c1f8069c35f26827cd08b9e86cf4007d187/rpmbuild/SPECS/zork.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/jwflory/rpmbuild/blob/b82e9c1f8069c35f26827cd08b9e86cf4007d187/rpmbuild/SRPMS/zork-1.0.2-3.fc31.src.rpm?raw=true So I finally got around to this. I was putting it off because I misread the gcc warnings as blocking the review. I opened the ticket, noticed the fedora-review flag was set, and felt quite silly. :-) Going to move on with packaging this. I pushed a new package version to address #1 and #3 of the above. I'll work on engaging with upstream to see if anything can be done about #2. Dropping the needsinfo and will request a dist-git repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1760617] Review Request: mmc - A GPU mesh-based Monte Carlo photon simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-626c7c163e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-626c7c163e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809814] New: Review Request: protonvpn-cli - Linux command-line client for ProtonVPN written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809814
Bug ID: 1809814
Summary: Review Request: protonvpn-cli - Linux command-line
client for ProtonVPN written in Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jflo...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jwflory/rpmbuild/master/rpmbuild/SPECS/protonvpn-cli.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/jwflory/rpmbuild/blob/master/rpmbuild/SRPMS/protonvpn-cli-2.2.2-4.fc31.src.rpm?raw=true
Description: ProtonVPN-CLI is a full rewrite of the bash protonvpn-cli in
Python, which adds more features and functionality with the purpose of
improving readability, speed and reliability.
Fedora Account System Username: jflory7
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[?]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[?]: Buildroot is not present
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query
[Bug 1773716] Review Request: golang-github-gehirninc-crypt - Pure Go crypt(3) Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773716
--- Comment #8 from Brandon Perkins ---
(In reply to Brandon Perkins from comment #7)
> (In reply to Ryan O'Hara from comment #5)
> > Rpmlint (installed packages)
> >
> > perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> > perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> > LANGUAGE = (unset),
> > LC_ALL = (unset),
> > LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
> > LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
> > are supported and installed on your system.
> > perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
> > perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> > perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> > LANGUAGE = (unset),
> > LC_ALL = (unset),
> > LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
> > LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
> > are supported and installed on your system.
> > perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
> >
> > - I can't seem to avoid this. Is it really a problem?
>
> I'm still looking at this, but I doubt it since it is still running.
>
SOLVED: run fedora-review with the LANG environment variable set to C.utf8:
$ LANG=C.utf8 fedora-review -b 1773716
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1773716
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1773716
INFO: --> SRPM url:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281732-golang-github-gehirninc-crypt/golang-github-gehirninc-crypt-0-0.2.20191113git6c0105a.fc31.src.rpm
INFO: --> Spec url:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-gehirninc-crypt.spec
INFO: Using review directory:
/home/bperkins/git/haproxytech/1773716-golang-github-gehirninc-crypt
INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files
INFO: Downloading (Source0):
https://github.com/GehirnInc/crypt/archive/6c0105aabd460ae06c87afeb5a47c869f6a7557e/crypt-6c0105aabd460ae06c87afeb5a47c869f6a7557e.tar.gz
INFO: Running checks and generating report
INFO: Results and/or logs in:
/home/bperkins/git/haproxytech/1773716-golang-github-gehirninc-crypt/results
INFO: Reading configuration from /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg
INFO: Reading configuration from /etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg
INFO: Build completed
WARNING: Package golang-github-gehirninc-crypt-debuginfo-0-0.2.fc33 not built
WARNING: Package golang-github-gehirninc-crypt-debugsource-0-0.2.fc33 not built
INFO: Installing built package(s)
INFO: Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
INFO: ExclusiveArch dependency checking disabled, enable with EXARCH flag
Review template in:
/home/bperkins/git/haproxytech/1773716-golang-github-gehirninc-crypt/review.txt
fedora-review is automated tool, but *YOU* are responsible for manually
reviewing the results and finishing the review. Do not just copy-paste
the results without understanding them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1760617] Review Request: mmc - A GPU mesh-based Monte Carlo photon simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-402060f3b7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-402060f3b7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1760617] Review Request: mmc - A GPU mesh-based Monte Carlo photon simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617 Qianqian Fang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-03-03 21:41:48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801893] Review Request: golang-github-mohae-deepcopy - Deep copy things
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801893 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-159ce67893 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-159ce67893 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #4 from cli...@gmail.com --- I still have epel7 rather associated with python2. I believe that's the default python there still (at least in a container). I believe for rhel8/epel8 I am enabling python3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797130] Review Request: golang-github-google-jsonnet - Implementation of Jsonnet in pure Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797130 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b1f1c0fbfa has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b1f1c0fbfa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1694894] Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-03-03 20:53:30 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- aeskeyfind-1.0-7.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801889] Review Request: golang-github-benlaurie-gds-registers - Go API for GDS registers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801889 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-benlaurie-gds-registers-0-0.1.20200303git6355673.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-654f302536 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797364] Review Request: perl-HarfBuzz-Shaper - Access to a small subset of the native HarfBuzz library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797364 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HarfBuzz-Shaper-0.021-4.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-dc44d79108 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802337] Review Request: golang-github-marten-seemann-qpack - A (minimal) QPACK implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802337 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-marten-seemann-qpack-0.1.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a6e9b0d76c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802357] Review Request: golang-github-viant-toolbox - Go utility library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802357 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-viant-toolbox-0.30.0-1.fc31~bootstrap has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a7b420c12d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795045] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-dnspod - DNSPod Go API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795045 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8548e1874f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8548e1874f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767234] Review Request: python-volatility3 - Volatility 3: The volatile memory extraction framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767234 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags||fedora-review- Last Closed||2020-03-03 20:02:21 --- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok --- Sorry, this package is not legally acceptable in Fedora, see: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/OHECHDPLDJ7LLFUZXQMBBAXEXYTQMXOR/ I suggest contacting upstream and asking them nicely whether they are Ok to ship a under the terms of BSD 2-Clause Plus Patent License. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795045] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-dnspod - DNSPod Go API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795045 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-296597f4df has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-296597f4df -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773716] Review Request: golang-github-gehirninc-crypt - Pure Go crypt(3) Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773716 Brandon Perkins changed: What|Removed |Added Comment #7 is|1 |0 private|| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801516] Review Request: golang-github-google-monologue - Monitor that checks that Certificate Transparency Logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801516 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d9d75cc0f2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d9d75cc0f2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1760617] Review Request: mmc - A GPU mesh-based Monte Carlo photon simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617 --- Comment #40 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mmc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1804529] Review Request: pam-cryptsetup - PAM module for updating LUKS-encrypted volumes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804529 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- SPEC URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/admin/pam-cryptsetup.spec SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/admin/pam-cryptsetup-0.1-0.2.20190823.7b42892.fc30.src.rpm So parenthesizing an expression no longer suppresses a warning (my diff sort of worked because I also subtracted by 1 in two call sites; not sure why on Fedora 30/31 the first strcpy did not trigger a warning). Since -Wall is part of the Fedora default compiler flags I don't want to touch it, but I've reworked the patch to now use #pragma for the entire block where helper.c does strcpy and then verify the null terminator is in place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809303] Review Request: alsa-sof-firmware - Sound Open Firmware binary files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809303 --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Kysela --- Thanks. I created requests for f32,f31,f30 right now.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809303] Review Request: alsa-sof-firmware - Sound Open Firmware binary files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809303 --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede --- Have you already requested a f32 branch? If not you need to run: fedpkg request-branch --repo alsa-sof-firmware f32 It's been a while since I last did this, but sometimes it takes some time for ACLs, etc. to get applied to new branches, so sometimes just waiting say 1 hour and then trying again helps. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809723] Review Request: python-stdio-mgr - Context manager for mocking/wrapping stdin/stdout/stderr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809723 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1809711 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809711 [Bug 1809711] Review Request: restview - ReStructuredText viewer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809711] Review Request: restview - ReStructuredText viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809711 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1809723 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809723 [Bug 1809723] Review Request: python-stdio-mgr - Context manager for mocking/wrapping stdin/stdout/stderr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809723] New: Review Request: python-stdio-mgr - Context manager for mocking/wrapping stdin/stdout/stderr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809723 Bug ID: 1809723 Summary: Review Request: python-stdio-mgr - Context manager for mocking/wrapping stdin/stdout/stderr Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-stdio-mgr.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-stdio-mgr-1.0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://www.github.com/bskinn/stdio-mgr Description: While some functionality here is more or less duplicative of redirect_stdout and redirect_stderr in contextlib within the standard library, it provides (i) a much more concise way to mock both stdout and stderr at the same time, and (ii) a mechanism for mocking stdin, which is not available in contextlib. Koji scratch build: fails due to missing deps rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-stdio-mgr-1.0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm python-stdio-mgr.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stdin -> stein, stain, stdio python-stdio-mgr.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stdout -> stout, std out, std-out python-stdio-mgr.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stderr -> std err, std-err, stander python-stdio-mgr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US duplicative -> duplication, duplicate, multiplicative python-stdio-mgr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stdout -> stout, std out, std-out python-stdio-mgr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stderr -> std err, std-err, stander python-stdio-mgr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US contextlib -> context lib, context-lib, contextualize python-stdio-mgr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stdin -> stein, stain, stdio 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-stdio-mgr-1.0.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stdin -> stein, stain, stdio python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stdout -> stout, std out, std-out python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stderr -> std err, std-err, stander python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US duplicative -> duplication, duplicate, multiplicative python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stdout -> stout, std out, std-out python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stderr -> std err, std-err, stander python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US contextlib -> context lib, context-lib, contextualize python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stdin -> stein, stain, stdio 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-stdio-mgr-1.0.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stdin -> stein, stain, stdio python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stdout -> stout, std out, std-out python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stderr -> std err, std-err, stander python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US duplicative -> duplication, duplicate, multiplicative python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stdout -> stout, std out, std-out python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stderr -> std err, std-err, stander python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US contextlib -> context lib, context-lib, contextualize python3-stdio-mgr.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stdin -> stein, stain, stdio 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809303] Review Request: alsa-sof-firmware - Sound Open Firmware binary files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809303 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Kysela --- It seems that I cannot push to the f32 branch. Any idea? The master branch contains the initial spec file with those changes: - fixed the %license tag - added %dir to all directories like linux-firmware does (I've not added Requires: linux-firmware, because this package does not really depends on it) - added Conflicts: alsa-firmware <= 1.2.1-6 (rawhide, f32) - recoded files and directories gathering (something like linux-firmware does for the simple future updates) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1804288] Review Request: golang-gvisor - A container sandbox runtime focused on security, efficiency, and ease of use.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804288 --- Comment #9 from Marc-Andre Lureau --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #8) > (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #7) > > Argh, it builds only on x86_64... > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42147689 > > > > Is it ok to make it x86-64 only for now? > > thanks > > Yeah but report each issues to upstream (int overflows for 32 bits arch and > other issues for others). Actually there are many errors. Digging in the code, I think it is supposed to be amd64 & arm64 only at this point, with arm being less maintained apparently... Annoying because I am mostly interested in netstack at this point (under pkg/tcpip) for bug 1804353. And that part is probably easier to fix for various archs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1804288] Review Request: golang-gvisor - A container sandbox runtime focused on security, efficiency, and ease of use.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804288 Marc-Andre Lureau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803223] Review Request: starlark - Starlark is a dialect of Python intended for use as a configuration language.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803223 --- Comment #2 from Alejandro --- I updated the spec file name. All the files are under the following URL: https://people.redhat.com/asaezmor/shared/golang-github-google-starlark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1760617] Review Request: mmc - A GPU mesh-based Monte Carlo photon simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617 --- Comment #39 from Qianqian Fang --- thanks Ankur for approving. I was able to fix the incorrect results with this patch https://github.com/fangq/mmc/commit/99312c3c1c8b9cfb932930a932c94f7a11aab976 now I free comfortable to move forward to create the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809711] New: Review Request: restview - ReStructuredText viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809711 Bug ID: 1809711 Summary: Review Request: restview - ReStructuredText viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/restview.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/restview-2.9.2-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://mg.pov.lt/restview/ Description: A viewer for ReStructuredText documents that renders them on the fly. Pass the name of a ReStructuredText document to restview, and it will launch a web server on localhost:random-port and open a web browser. Every time you reload the page, restview will reload the document from disk and render it. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42152602 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint restview-2.9.2-1.fc31.src.rpm restview.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US localhost -> local host, local-host, holocaust 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint restview-2.9.2-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python3-restview-2.9.2-1.fc31.noarch.rpm restview.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US localhost -> local host, local-host, holocaust restview.noarch: W: no-documentation restview.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary restview 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801516] Review Request: golang-github-google-monologue - Monitor that checks that Certificate Transparency Logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801516 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-fd9ad09b2b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fd9ad09b2b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808895] Review Request: rsakeyfind - Locate BER-encoded RSA private and public keys in memory images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808895 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter --- Mock build issue: + /usr/bin/make -O -j4 V=1 VERBOSE=1 -j4 g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wall -O4 -c -o rsakeyfind.o rsakeyfind.cpp make: g++: Command not found -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808895] Review Request: rsakeyfind - Locate BER-encoded RSA private and public keys in memory images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808895 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhron...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok --- Juts curious, why don't you use Python 3 on RHEL/EPEL as well? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802357] Review Request: golang-github-viant-toolbox - Go utility library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802357 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-viant-toolbox-0.30.0-1.fc32~bootstrap has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d8b81ff96c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809700] New: Review Request: hledger-ui - Curses-style user interface for the hledger accounting tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809700 Bug ID: 1809700 Summary: Review Request: hledger-ui - Curses-style user interface for the hledger accounting tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/hledger-ui/hledger-ui.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/hledger-ui/hledger-ui-1.14.2-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: This is hledger's curses-style interface. It is simpler and more convenient for browsing data than the command-line interface, but lighter and faster than hledger-web. hledger is a cross-platform program for tracking money, time, or any other commodity, using double-entry accounting and a simple, editable file format. It is inspired by and largely compatible with ledger(1). hledger provides command-line, curses and web interfaces, and aims to be a reliable, practical tool for daily use. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42151681 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801889] Review Request: golang-github-benlaurie-gds-registers - Go API for GDS registers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801889 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-31996c255f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-31996c255f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1804288] Review Request: golang-gvisor - A container sandbox runtime focused on security, efficiency, and ease of use.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804288 --- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #7) > Argh, it builds only on x86_64... > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42147689 > > Is it ok to make it x86-64 only for now? > thanks Yeah but report each issues to upstream (int overflows for 32 bits arch and other issues for others). Search "# g" to find errors in the logs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802337] Review Request: golang-github-marten-seemann-qpack - A (minimal) QPACK implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802337 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8575fcd51b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8575fcd51b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809684] New: Review Request: git-repair - Repairs a damanged git repisitory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809684 Bug ID: 1809684 Summary: Review Request: git-repair - Repairs a damanged git repisitory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/git-repair/git-repair.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/git-repair/git-repair-1.20200102-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Git-repair can repair various forms of damage to git repositories. It is a complement to git fsck, which finds problems, but does not fix them. As well as avoiding the need to rm -rf a damaged repository and re-clone, using git-repair can help rescue commits you've made to the damaged repository and not yet pushed out. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42150522 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797260] Review Request: golang-github-cilium-ebpf - eBPF Library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797260 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Clang 10 is in Fedora 32+, but it looks like that's only used for tests. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802357] Review Request: golang-github-viant-toolbox - Go utility library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802357 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a7b420c12d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a7b420c12d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 --- Comment #2 from chedi toueiti --- If you have some time please check the folowing packages review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807945 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808023 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644
chedi toueiti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chedi.toue...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from chedi toueiti ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/chedi/1809644-preproc/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[!]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[!]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should
[Bug 1773717] Review Request: golang-github-haproxytech-models - HAProxy Go structs for API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773717 --- Comment #5 from Brandon Perkins --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-models.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281734-golang-github-haproxytech-models/golang-github-haproxytech-models-1.2.4-2.fc31.src.rpm Successful copr build: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281734-golang-github-haproxytech-models/ Changelog: * Mon Mar 02 2020 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.4-2 - Clean changelog * Wed Nov 13 2019 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.4-1 - Initial package RPM Lint: golang-github-haproxytech-models.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) structs -> struts, destructs, obstructs golang-github-haproxytech-models.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US structs -> struts, destructs, obstructs golang-github-haproxytech-models.src: W: no-%build-section golang-github-haproxytech-models-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) structs -> struts, destructs, obstructs golang-github-haproxytech-models-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US structs -> struts, destructs, obstructs golang-github-haproxytech-models-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/haproxytech/models/.goipath 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773720] Review Request: golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi - HAProxy Data Plane API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720 --- Comment #5 from Brandon Perkins --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281736-golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi/golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi-1.2.4-5.fc31.src.rpm Successful copr build: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281736-golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi/ Changelog: * Mon Mar 02 2020 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.4-5 - Clean changelog * Thu Nov 21 2019 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.4-4 - Suggest logrotate and fix logrotate configuration * Wed Nov 20 2019 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.4-3 - Add man page * Wed Nov 13 2019 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.4-2 - Implement systemd * Wed Nov 13 2019 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.4-1 - Initial package RPM Lint: golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi-debugsource.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug sources for package golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi. golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/haproxytech/dataplaneapi/.goipath 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773719] Review Request: golang-github-haproxytech-client-native - Go client for HAProxy configuration and runtime API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773719 --- Comment #5 from Brandon Perkins --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-client-native.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281735-golang-github-haproxytech-client-native/golang-github-haproxytech-client-native-1.2.6-2.fc31.src.rpm Successful copr build: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281735-golang-github-haproxytech-client-native/ Changelog: * Mon Mar 02 2020 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.6-2 - Clean changelog * Wed Nov 13 2019 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.6-1 - Initial package RPM Lint: golang-github-haproxytech-client-native.src: W: no-%build-section golang-github-haproxytech-client-native-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/haproxytech/client-native/.goipath 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773716] Review Request: golang-github-gehirninc-crypt - Pure Go crypt(3) Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773716 --- Comment #6 from Brandon Perkins --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-gehirninc-crypt.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281732-golang-github-gehirninc-crypt/golang-github-gehirninc-crypt-0-0.2.20191113git6c0105a.fc31.src.rpm Successful copr build: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281732-golang-github-gehirninc-crypt/ Changelog: * Mon Mar 02 2020 Brandon Perkins - 0-0.2.20200302git6c0105a - Clean changelog * Wed Nov 13 2019 Brandon Perkins - 0-0.1.20191113git6c0105a - Initial package RPM Lint: golang-github-gehirninc-crypt.src: W: no-%build-section golang-github-gehirninc-crypt-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/GehirnInc/crypt/.goipath 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773718] Review Request: golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser - HAProxy configuration parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773718 --- Comment #5 from Brandon Perkins --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281733-golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser/golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser-1.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Successful copr build: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bdperkin/haproxytech/fedora-31-x86_64/01281733-golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser/ Changelog: * Mon Mar 02 2020 Brandon Perkins - 1.2.0-1 - Upgrade to version 1.2.0 - Clean changelog * Wed Nov 13 2019 Brandon Perkins - 1.1.10-1 - Initial package RPM Lint: golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser.src: W: no-%build-section golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/haproxytech/config-parser/.goipath 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] New: Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 Bug ID: 1809644 Summary: Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cli...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/clime/preproc/fedora-31-x86_64/01282742-preproc/preproc.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/clime/preproc/fedora-31-x86_64/01282742-preproc/preproc-0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Simple text preprocessor implementing a very basic templating language. You can use bash code enclosed in triple braces in a text file and then pipe content of that file to preproc. preproc will replace each of the tags with stdout of the executed code and print the final rendered result to its own stdout. Fedora Account System Username: clime -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1804288] Review Request: golang-gvisor - A container sandbox runtime focused on security, efficiency, and ease of use.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804288 Marc-Andre Lureau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|NEW Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #7 from Marc-Andre Lureau --- Argh, it builds only on x86_64... https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42147689 Is it ok to make it x86-64 only for now? thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809261] Review Request: fixedptc - Fixed point math header only library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809261 --- Comment #2 from Damian Wrobel --- (In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #1) > Use the %set_build_flags macro instead. Done. > You should extract the licence from the file, e.g. using awk or head. I would prefer not to generate the license file, if possible. So, I contacted upstream to consider to include a separate license text file [1]. [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/fixedptc/code/merge-requests/2/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698871] Review Request: supercollider - Object oriented programming environment for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698871 --- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/supercollider -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801516] Review Request: golang-github-google-monologue - Monitor that checks that Certificate Transparency Logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801516 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-google-monologue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801893] Review Request: golang-github-mohae-deepcopy - Deep copy things
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801893 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-mohae-deepcopy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802343] Review Request: golang-github-alangpierce-forceexport - Access unexported functions from other packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802343 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-alangpierce-forceexport -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801843] Review Request: golang-github-antihax-optional - Optional parameters for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801843 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-antihax-optional -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809624] New: Review Request: algobox - Algorithmic software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809624 Bug ID: 1809624 Summary: Review Request: algobox - Algorithmic software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kwiz...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/algobox.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/algobox-1.0.3-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Algorithmic software Fedora Account System Username: kwizart Koji scratch build: f33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42147261 epel8: (unrelated failure with gcc) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42146955 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807979] Review Request: python-whois - Python package for retrieving WHOIS information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807979 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-whois -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801881] Review Request: golang-gopkg-redis-6 - Type-safe Redis client for Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801881 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-gopkg-redis-6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1804288] Review Request: golang-gvisor - A container sandbox runtime focused on security, efficiency, and ease of use.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804288 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-gvisor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809303] Review Request: alsa-sof-firmware - Sound Open Firmware binary files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809303 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/alsa-sof-firmware -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801522] Review Request: golang-github-otiai10-mint - The very minimum assertion for Golang testing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801522 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-otiai10-mint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797260] Review Request: golang-github-cilium-ebpf - eBPF Library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797260 --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin --- It's a new dependency for golang-github-opencontainers-runc. https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/blob/master/libcontainer/cgroups/ebpf/ebpf.go I don't know where else its used. I don't think https://github.com/cilium/ebpf/issues/43 is a problem, it's for people who built their ebpf with Clang 10. Maybe golang-github-cilium-ebpf is not compatible with it yet but that doesn't block ise in runc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797130] Review Request: golang-github-google-jsonnet - Implementation of Jsonnet in pure Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797130 --- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-google-jsonnet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795045] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-dnspod - DNSPod Go API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795045 --- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-nrdcg-dnspod -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698871] Review Request: supercollider - Object oriented programming environment for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698871 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Refreshed flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698871] Review Request: supercollider - Object oriented programming environment for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698871 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808573] Review Request: python-periodictable - Extensible periodic table of the elements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808573 --- Comment #4 from Antonio T. (sagitter) --- Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-periodictable/python-periodictable.spec SRPM URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-periodictable/python-periodictable-1.5.2-2.fc31.src.rpm - Switch to pytest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808877] Review Request: aesfix - correct bit errors in AES key schedule
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808877 --- Comment #2 from Michal Ambroz --- Spec URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/aesfix.spec SRPM URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aesfix-1.0.1-2.fc31.src.rpm > Start the summary with a Capital Letter. fixed > I don't have much experience with gpg, so I have to ask - any reason why this > can't be done in %prep? Obtaining and manually verifying the key is one-time process. To have some potential to verify a signature on a package, it should not be based solely on the signature iself. Here the search for the key is based actually on different package (aeskeyfind) and then it is applied to verify this package as well. As the keyring is not published by the upstream I have tried to get it from the public keyservers. To comply with the https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_verifying_signatures I have documented here how I obtained the key. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808877] Review Request: aesfix - correct bit errors in AES key schedule
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808877 Artur Iwicki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@svgames.pl Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki --- >Summary:correct bit errors in AES-128 key schedule Start the summary with a Capital Letter. ># The authenticator public key obtained from release 1.0.1 ># gpg2 -vv aeskeyfind-1.0.1.tar.gz.asc >... >Source2:gpgkey-12E404FFD3C931F934052D06B8841A919D0FACE4.gpg I don't have much experience with gpg, so I have to ask - any reason why this can't be done in %prep? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809261] Review Request: fixedptc - Fixed point math header only library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809261
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki ---
>export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" LDFLAGS="%{__global_ldflags}"
Use the %set_build_flags macro instead.
># Note: we do not have a separate license file,
># however, the header file contains the text of the license.
You should extract the licence from the file, e.g. using awk or head.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809469] Review Request: tidb-server - A distributed NewSQL database compatible with MySQL protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809469
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #2 from Artur Iwicki ---
>Group: Applications/Databases
The "Group:" tag is not used in Fedora.
>%clean
Ditto for the "%clean" section.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_tags_and_sections
>%description
%TiDB is an open-source NewSQL database that supports Hybrid Transactional and
Analytical Processing (HTAP) workloads. It is MySQL compatible and features
horizontal scalability, strong consistency, and high availability.
The description should be broken down into multiple lines, each one no longer
than 80 characters.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_summary_and_description
>%{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
>%{__install} -D -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/tidb/config.toml
Macro forms of system executables should not be used.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_macros
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809552] Review Request: python-asysocks - Socks5/Socks4 client and server library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809552 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1800998 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800998 [Bug 1800998] pypykatz-0.3.5 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809552] New: Review Request: python-asysocks - Socks5/Socks4 client and server library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809552 Bug ID: 1809552 Summary: Review Request: python-asysocks - Socks5/Socks4 client and server library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-asysocks.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-asysocks-0.0.2-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/skelsec/asysocks Description: A Python Socks5/Socks4 client and server library. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42141441 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-asysocks-0.0.2-1.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-asysocks-0.0.2-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809537] Review Request: python-pytest-ordering - Plugin to run your pytest tests in a specific order
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809537 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter --- Sorry, new Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42140500 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809537] New: Review Request: python-pytest-ordering - Plugin to run your pytest tests in a specific order
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809537 Bug ID: 1809537 Summary: Review Request: python-pytest-ordering - Plugin to run your pytest tests in a specific order Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-pytest-ordering.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-pytest-ordering-0.6-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/ftobia/pytest-ordering Description: pytest-ordering is a pytest plugin to run your tests in any order that you specify. It provides custom markers that say when your tests should run in relation to each other. They can be absolute (i.e. first, or second-to-last) or relative (i.e. run this test before this other test). Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42140112 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-pytest-ordering-0.6-1.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-pytest-ordering-0.6-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
