[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 Aashi Rana changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aashirana...@gmail.com Flags|needinfo?(ma...@envfor.delh |needinfo?(aashirana4uu@gmai |i.nic.in) |l.com) --- Comment #101 from Aashi Rana --- HI! I am Aash Rana, visit more info my sites: https://www.aashirana.com http://roshniroy.co.in http://shivaniroy.co.in -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821120] New: Review Request: wlogout - wayland based logout menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821120 Bug ID: 1821120 Summary: Review Request: wlogout - wayland based logout menu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bob.hep...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wlogout/fedora-31-x86_64/01328886-wlogout/wlogout.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wlogout/fedora-31-x86_64/01328886-wlogout/wlogout-1.1.1-2.fc31.src.rpm Description: A wayland based logout menu. Fedora Account System Username: wef Note that fedora-review incorrectly flags the /etc/wlogout/* files as 'not configuration'. They are exactly that - configuration files. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Expat License", "*No copyright* Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bhepple/tmp/wlogout/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/bash- completion(flatpak, breezy, libmbim, chocolate-doom, cpu-x, clevis, kmod, python3-trezor, docopt, lightdm, ffsend, the_silver_searcher, etckeeper, darcs, buildah, devscripts-checkbashisms, sway, maven, swaylock, tio, vagrant, beaker-client, yadifa-tools, calf, source- highlight, reprepro, toolbox, filesystem, licensecheck, zeitgeist, exa, rpmlint, bash-completion, tracker, cowsay, dotnet-host, mercurial-py3, zola, restic, dnf, swayidle, lxi-tools, mtr, pdfgrep, why3, glib2, pbuilder, cmake-data, python3-catkin_tools, awscli, bubblewrap, lxc, zypper, falkon, unar, tealdeer, skim, rtags, skopeo, cobbler, fedpkg, nitrokey-app, yadifa, exercism, clufter-cli, eg, devscripts, mercurial-py2, docker-compose, nnn, git-core, ethtool, git-annex, rkt, task, plowshare, ModemManager, dconf-editor, ripgrep, policycoreutils, datamash, hstr, ldc, stratis-cli, subversion, bodhi- client, python-django-bash-completion, gammu, gpaste, rpmspectool, fd- find, rpmdevtools, fedmod, libqmi, driverctl), /usr/share/bash- completion/completions(flatpak, breezy, libmbim, chocolate-doom, cpu-x, clevis, libappstream-glib, kmod, python3-trezor, docopt, lightdm, nbdkit-bash-completion, ffsend, firewalld, the_silver_searcher, etckeeper, buildah, devscripts-checkbashisms, sway, maven, swaylock, tio, vagrant, coccinelle-bash-completion, kompose, beaker-client, yadifa-tools, calf, source-highlight, reprepro, toolbox, filesystem, licensecheck, zeitgeist, exa, rpmlint, bash-completion, tracker, cowsay, dotnet-host, mercurial-py3, zola, restic, dnf, swayidle, lxi-tools, mtr, pdfgrep, why3, glib2, pbuilder, cmake-data, ndctl, python3-catkin_tools, awscli, libguestfs-bash- completion, bubblewrap, libnbd-bash-completion, lxc, zypper, lastpass- cli, falkon, unar, tealdeer, skim, rtags, skopeo, gtatool, cobbler, fedpkg, nitrokey-app, yadifa, exercism, clufter-cli, eg, devscripts, mercurial-py2, docker-compose, nnn, git-core, ethtool, git-annex, rkt, tig, task, firejail, plowshare, opensc, ModemManager, dconf-editor, ripgrep, calibre, datamash, nordugrid-arc-hed, minipro, hstr, ldc, GMT-common, python3-pip, xss-lock, stratis-cli, subversion, bodhi- client, python-django-bash-completion, gammu, gpaste, rpmspectool, fd- find, rpmdevtools, fedmod, libqmi, driverctl), /usr/share/fish(zola, bat, flatpak,
[Bug 1819554] Review Request: wob - A lightweight overlay volume/backlight/progress/anything bar for Wayland
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819554
--- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple ---
Hi Fabian
Thanks for the review!
I've fixed the second 2 issues.
As for the MD5SUM error, upstream has done something funny with the download
links - on the 0.8 release page, the wob-0.8.tar.gz file has no README.md file
while the file downloaded with 'spectool -g' does have it. I've downloaded a
fresh one with spectool and fedora-review is now happy.
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wob/fedora-31-x86_64/01328828-wob/wob.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wob/fedora-31-x86_64/01328828-wob/wob-0.8-3.fc31.src.rpm
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "ISC License", "NTP License (legal
disclaimer)". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bhepple/tmp/wob/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[
[Bug 1817811] Review Request: python-scramp - An implementation of the SCRAM protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817811 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b163ba0b13 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1811295] Review Request: intel-clear-sans-fonts - A versatile font family for screen, print, and Web
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-06 00:15:53 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-bbcc3e9d7d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821069] Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith ---
Package is APPROVED.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2)", "GNU Lesser General Public
License", "Apache License 2.0", "GNU General Public License (v3.0)",
"Expat License", "GPL (v3 or later)", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License GPL (v2)", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Public
domain BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "GPL (v2 or later)
(with incorrect FSF address)", "NTP License", "Boehm GC License". 459
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/jsmith/Documents/Fedora/1821069-python-steps/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.8/site-
packages/openmpi, /usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/mpich
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc
[Bug 1807753] Review Request: ydotool - Generic command-line automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753 --- Comment #17 from Bob Hepple --- Thanks Artem! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Luis, any progress here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821069] Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neuro-sig@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821069] New: Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069 Bug ID: 1821069 Summary: Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-steps/python-steps.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-steps/python-steps-3.5.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: STEPS is a package for exact stochastic simulation of reaction-diffusion systems in arbitrarily complex 3D geometries. Our core simulation algorithm is an implementation of Gillespie's SSA, extended to deal with diffusion of molecules over the elements of a 3D tetrahedral mesh. While it was mainly developed for simulating detailed models of neuronal signaling pathways in dendrites and around synapses, it is a general tool and can be used for studying any biochemical pathway in which spatial gradients and morphology are thought to play a role. STEPS also supports accurate and efficient computational of local membrane potentials on tetrahedral meshes, with the addition of voltage-gated channels and currents. Tight integration between the reaction-diffusion calculations and the tetrahedral mesh potentials allows detailed coupling between molecular activity and local electrical excitability. We have implemented STEPS as a set of Python modules, which means STEPS users can use Python scripts to control all aspects of setting up the model, generating a mesh, controlling the simulation and generating and analyzing output. The core computational routines are still implemented as C/C++ extension modules for maximal speed of execution. STEPS 3.0.0 and above provide early parallel solution for stochastic spatial reaction-diffusion and electric field simulation. Documentation can be found here: http://steps.sourceforge.net/manual/manual_index.html Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 yon...@cisco.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yon...@cisco.com --- Comment #12 from yon...@cisco.com --- Sorry for late response, and thanks for your comments! I did all the fixes. Since I changed the source code, I bumped the package version from v1.0.0 to v1.0.1 version. Spec file updated: Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yonhan/openosc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01328497-openosc/openosc.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yonhan/openosc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01328497-openosc/openosc-1.0.1-1.fc33.src.rpm The Copr build results: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/yonhan/openosc/build/1328497/ I added the below in Makefile.am to explicitly delete libopenosc.la file upon installation. I hope this is the right fix for autotools. install-exec-hook: cd $(DESTDIR)$(libdir) && rm $(lib_LTLIBRARIES Let me know if you have further comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815091] Review Request: python-adb - A Python implementation of the Android ADB and Fastboot protocols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815091 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > - Package is not installable: > > DEBUG util.py:621: Problem: conflicting requests > DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides (python3.8dist(m2crypto) >= 0.21.1 > with python3.8dist(m2crypto) <= 0.26.4) needed by > python3-adb-1.3.0-1.fc33.noarch > DEBUG util.py:623: (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable > packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) Upstream is moving to pycryptodome(x). %changelog * Sun Apr 05 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.3.0-2 - Fix requirements (rhbz#1815091) Updates files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-adb.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-adb-1.3.0-2.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810820] Review Request: quaternion - A Qt5-based IM client for Matrix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810820 Brendan Early changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-05 16:33:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810820] Review Request: quaternion - A Qt5-based IM client for Matrix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810820 Bug 1810820 depends on bug 1810819, which changed state. Bug 1810819 Summary: Review Request: libqmatrixclient - Qt5 library to write cross-platform clients for Matrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810819 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810819] Review Request: libqmatrixclient - Qt5 library to write cross-platform clients for Matrix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810819 Brendan Early changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-05 16:32:50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821037] New: Review Request: onednn - Deep Neural Network Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821037 Bug ID: 1821037 Summary: Review Request: onednn - Deep Neural Network Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kwiz...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/onednn.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/onednn-1.3-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Deep Neural Network Library Fedora Account System Username: kwizart Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43024919 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820915] Review Request: bettercap - Tool for 802.11, BLE/Ethernet reconnaissance and MITM attacks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820915 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|germano.massu...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820915] Review Request: bettercap - Tool for 802.11, BLE/Ethernet reconnaissance and MITM attacks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820915 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821026] New: Review Request: clojure-core-specs-alpha - library to describe Clojure core macros and functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821026 Bug ID: 1821026 Summary: Review Request: clojure-core-specs-alpha - library to describe Clojure core macros and functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: markku.korke...@iki.fi QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://korkeala.fedorapeople.org/clojure-core-specs-alpha/clojure-core-specs-alpha.spec SRPM URL: https://korkeala.fedorapeople.org/clojure-core-specs-alpha/clojure-core-specs-alpha-0.1.24-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Core.specs.alpha is a Clojure library containing specs to describe Clojure core macros and functions. Fedora Account System Username: korkeala This requires clojure-spec-alpha as a dependency, review request ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821025) Copr build against rawhide is availabe at: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/korkeala/clojure/build/1328143/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821025] New: Review Request: clojure-spec-alpha - Clojure library to describe the structure of data and functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821025 Bug ID: 1821025 Summary: Review Request: clojure-spec-alpha - Clojure library to describe the structure of data and functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: markku.korke...@iki.fi QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://korkeala.fedorapeople.org/clojure-spec-alpha/clojure-spec-alpha.spec SRPM URL: https://korkeala.fedorapeople.org/clojure-spec-alpha/clojure-spec-alpha-0.1.134-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Spec is a Clojure library to describe the structure of data and functions. Specs can be used to validate data, conform (destructure) data, explain invalid data, generate examples that conform to the specs, and automatically use generative testing to test functions. Fedora Account System Username: korkeala Copr build against rawhide is availabe at : https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/korkeala/clojure/build/1328136/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797301] Review Request: perl-Array-IntSpan - Handles arrays using integer ranges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797301 --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mani --- Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797301] Review Request: perl-Array-IntSpan - Handles arrays using integer ranges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797301
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Jared Smith ---
Package is APPROVED.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* Artistic License (v2.0)", "Artistic License
(v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 14 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/jsmith/Documents/Fedora/Reviews/1797301-perl-Array-
IntSpan/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Array(perl-Array-Utils, perl-Array-
Compare, perl-Array-Unique, perl-Array-Diff)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[Bug 1797301] Review Request: perl-Array-IntSpan - Handles arrays using integer ranges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797301 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |jsmith.fed...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807753] Review Request: ydotool - Generic command-line automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Link ID||Github ||ReimuNotMoe/ydotool/issues/ ||62 Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Artem --- This is really weird. Maybe regression of fedora-review itself which on Rawhide now. This should handled automatically: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libydotool.so.0.1.9 E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libydotool.so.0.1.9 > Is it normal for the review to take 39m or am I doing something wrong? Unfortunately this tools very slow, but 39m is too much and even on my PC it done faster this package. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820895] Review Request: cxxopts - Lightweight C++ command line option parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820895 --- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cxxopts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816279] Review Request: python-cx-oracle - Python interface to Oracle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816279 --- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cx-oracle -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815272] Review Request: python-pytenable - Python library to interface with Tenable's products and applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815272 --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pytenable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809918] Review Request: adobe-afdko - Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809918 --- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/adobe-afdko -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807365] Review Request: nuspell - Free and open source C++ spell checking library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807365 --- Comment #9 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuspell -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815272] Review Request: python-pytenable - Python library to interface with Tenable's products and applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815272 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820972] New: Review Request: ohmybackup - Scan for backup directories and backup files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820972 Bug ID: 1820972 Summary: Review Request: ohmybackup - Scan for backup directories and backup files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ohmybackup.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ohmybackup-0-0.1.20200405git50f2fce.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/tismayil/ohmybackup Description: Scan for backup directories and backup files. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43030345 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint ohmybackup-0-0.1.20200405git50f2fce.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ohmybackup*.rpm ohmybackup.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ohmybackup 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820972] Review Request: ohmybackup - Scan for backup directories and backup files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820972 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801758] Review Request: golang-github-otiai10-copy - Golang copy directory recursively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801758 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a6f0963d2e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a6f0963d2e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a6f0963d2e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
