[Bug 1821568] Review Request: elxreno - Java implementation of multi-cast DNS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821568



--- Comment #2 from Michael  ---
Fixed. Thank you for your review!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821568] Review Request: elxreno - Java implementation of multi-cast DNS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821568

Vasiliy Glazov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Vasiliy Glazov  ---
Approved.

Just remove executable bit from README.md

Also it is review for dead package.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java
  to get additional checks
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
  Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jmdns
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
 "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0 GNU Lesser General Public License
 (v2.1 or later)", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License
 (v2.1 or later)", "Apache License 2.0". 115 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/vascom/1821568-jmdns/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for 

[Bug 1821568] Review Request: elxreno - Java implementation of multi-cast DNS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821568

Vasiliy Glazov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||vasc...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vasc...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821568] New: Review Request: elxreno - Java implementation of multi-cast DNS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821568

Bug ID: 1821568
   Summary: Review Request: elxreno - Java implementation of
multi-cast DNS
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: elxr...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ElXreno/jmdns/c84890997f07a090b7990768242a0a81cd834e92/jmdns.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2998/43082998/jmdns-3.5.5-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description: 
JmDNS is a Java implementation of multi-cast DNS
and can be used for service registration and discovery
in local area networks. JmDNS is fully compatible
with Apple's Bonjour.

Fedora Account System Username: elxreno


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1808467] Review Request: python-pysmt - Solver-agnostic library for SMT Formulae manipulation and solving

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808467



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-0271ba47b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1804538] Review Request: ghc-path-io - Interface to directory package for users of path

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804538



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9964ea9f5c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1808467] Review Request: python-pysmt - Solver-agnostic library for SMT Formulae manipulation and solving

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808467



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-6c4f9139d4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820391] Review Request: RediSearch - full-text search over Redis

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820391



--- Comment #4 from Nathan Scott  ---
(In reply to Andreas Gerstmayr from comment #3)
> (In reply to Nathan Scott from comment #2)
> > That is the latest release with a non-open-source license. :(
> 
> Hmm, that's quite unfortunate - so we'll be stuck on an outdated version
> forever if no volunteers are working on the open source fork :/

Indeed.  Fortunately it was a fairly mature version they forked from,
with good automated testing in place, and the sorts of features they're
now adding have tended to be scaling (clustering) related - not super
important for our immediate needs (and those of many other folk).

It is what it is.

> > [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
> > Note: Could not download Source0:
> > 
> > https://github.com/GoodFORM/RediSearch/archive/1.2.2/RediSearch-1.2.2.tar.gz
> > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
> > guidelines/SourceURL/
> 
> The git tag is prefixed with "v", which is missing in the URL.

Ah - thanks, fixed.

> > Unversioned so-files
> > 
> > RediSearch: /usr/lib64/redis/modules/redisearch.so
> 
> I guess this is not a problem, as no other binary is linking to it and redis

Yep, and its not visible to ldconfig in the Fedora location
(so no ldd search path will 'accidentally' find it)

> Package approved when the URL issue is fixed.

Thanks for the review!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809974] Review Request: python-cxxfilt - Python interface to c++filt/abi::__cxa_demangle

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-51763899a3 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-51763899a3 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-51763899a3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821546] New: Review Request: ghc-aeson-better-errors - Better error messages when decoding JSON values

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821546

Bug ID: 1821546
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-aeson-better-errors - Better error
messages when decoding JSON values
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-aeson-better-errors/ghc-aeson-better-errors.spec
SRPM URL:
https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-aeson-better-errors/ghc-aeson-better-errors-0.9.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description:
A small package which gives you the tools to build parsers to decode JSON
values, and gives good error messages when parsing fails. See also
.


Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43079964


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1815670] Review Request: python-claripy - An abstraction layer for constraint solvers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815670
Bug 1815670 depends on bug 1808467, which changed state.

Bug 1808467 Summary: Review Request: python-pysmt - Solver-agnostic library for 
SMT Formulae manipulation and solving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808467

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1808467] Review Request: python-pysmt - Solver-agnostic library for SMT Formulae manipulation and solving

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808467

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-04-07 03:23:12



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-113cabaedf has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1804538] Review Request: ghc-path-io - Interface to directory package for users of path

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804538

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-04-07 03:23:09



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-57fb96868f has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821069] Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-ddc5f06fcb has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-ddc5f06fcb \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ddc5f06fcb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809884] Review Request: ghc-iso8601-time - Convert to/from the ISO 8601 time format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809884



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-ad8aa9d474 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-ad8aa9d474 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ad8aa9d474

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809974] Review Request: python-cxxfilt - Python interface to c++filt/abi::__cxa_demangle

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-29a5924ba9 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-29a5924ba9 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-29a5924ba9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809974] Review Request: python-cxxfilt - Python interface to c++filt/abi::__cxa_demangle

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-412743fe76 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-412743fe76

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821069] Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-63e2f86d68 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-63e2f86d68 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-63e2f86d68

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809884] Review Request: ghc-iso8601-time - Convert to/from the ISO 8601 time format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809884

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-1e95ed200a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-1e95ed200a \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1e95ed200a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809974] Review Request: python-cxxfilt - Python interface to c++filt/abi::__cxa_demangle

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9dbc76c843 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-9dbc76c843 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9dbc76c843

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821523] New: Review Request: musl - Fully featured lightweight standard C library for Linux

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821523

Bug ID: 1821523
   Summary: Review Request: musl - Fully featured lightweight
standard C library for Linux
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ngomp...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/musl.spec
SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/musl-1.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description:
musl is a new C standard library to power a new generation
of Linux-based devices. It is lightweight, fast, simple,
free, and strives to be correct in the sense of standards
conformance and safety.

Fedora Account System Username: ngompa


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821497] New: Review Request: -

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821497

Bug ID: 1821497
   Summary: Review Request:  - 
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: msm1...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:

SRPM URL:

Description: 
Fedora Account System Username: msm1365


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821346] Review Request: golang-github-yashtewari-glob-intersection - Go package to check if the intersection of two regexp-style globs is non-empty

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821346

Olivier Lemasle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1821496





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821496
[Bug 1821496] Review Request: open-policy-agent - Open source, general-purpose
policy engine
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821496] Review Request: open-policy-agent - Open source, general-purpose policy engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821496

Olivier Lemasle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1821346
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821346
[Bug 1821346] Review Request: golang-github-yashtewari-glob-intersection - Go
package to check if the intersection of two regexp-style globs is non-empty
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821496] New: Review Request: open-policy-agent - Open source, general-purpose policy engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821496

Bug ID: 1821496
   Summary: Review Request: open-policy-agent - Open source,
general-purpose policy engine
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: o.lema...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/open-policy-agent.spec
SRPM URL:
https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/open-policy-agent-0.18.0-1.fc33.src.rpm

Description:

The Open Policy Agent (OPA) is an open source, general-purpose policy engine
that enables unified, context-aware policy enforcement across the entire
stack.
OPA is hosted by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) as an
incubating-level project.

Fedora Account System Username: olem


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1797301] Review Request: perl-Array-IntSpan - Handles arrays using integer ranges

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797301

Sandro Mani  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed|2020-02-11 23:50:37 |2020-04-06 21:39:48




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821459] New: Review Request: golang-github-aryann-difflib - Library for diffing two sequences of text

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821459

Bug ID: 1821459
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-aryann-difflib - Library
for diffing two sequences of text
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-aryann-difflib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-aryann-difflib-0-0.1.20200406gite206f87.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/aryann/difflib

Description:
difflib is a simple library written in Go for diffing two sequences of text.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43069519

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint golang-github-aryann-difflib-0-0.1.20200406gite206f87.fc31.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint
golang-github-aryann-difflib-devel-0-0.1.20200406gite206f87.fc31.noarch.rpm 
golang-github-aryann-difflib-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/aryann/difflib/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821450] New: Review Request: golang-github-casbin - An authorization library for ACL, RBAC and ABAC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821450

Bug ID: 1821450
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-casbin - An
authorization library for ACL, RBAC and ABAC
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-casbin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-casbin-2.2.2-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/casbin/casbin

Description:
An authorization library that supports access control models like ACL, RBAC,
ABAC in Golang.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43068293

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint golang-github-casbin-*
golang-github-casbin.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) forACL -> fora Cl,
fora-cl, oracle
golang-github-casbin.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint golang-github-casbin-devel-2.2.2-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 
golang-github-casbin-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/casbin/casbin/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158

Markku Korkeala  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|markku.korke...@kapsi.fi




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158

Markku Korkeala  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821419] Review Request: olang-github-chromedp-cdproto - Generated commands, types, and events for the Chrome DevTools Protocol domains

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821419

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1821417
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821417
[Bug 1821417] Review Request: golang-github-knq-sysutil - Provides cross
platform system utilities
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821419] New: Review Request: olang-github-chromedp-cdproto - Generated commands, types, and events for the Chrome DevTools Protocol domains

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821419

Bug ID: 1821419
   Summary: Review Request: olang-github-chromedp-cdproto -
Generated commands, types, and events for the Chrome
DevTools Protocol domains
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-chromedp-cdproto.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-chromedp-cdproto-0-0.1.20200406git7e00b02.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/chromedp/cdproto

Description:
Package cdproto contains the generated commands, types, and events for the
Chrome DevTools Protocol domains.

Koji scratch build:
fails due to missing dependency

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint golang-github-chromedp-cdproto-0-0.1.20200406git7e00b02.fc31.src.rpm 
golang-github-chromedp-cdproto.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint
golang-github-chromedp-cdproto-devel-0-0.1.20200406git7e00b02.fc31.noarch.rpm 
golang-github-chromedp-cdproto-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/chromedp/cdproto/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821417] Review Request: golang-github-knq-sysutil - Provides cross platform system utilities

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821417

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1821419





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821419
[Bug 1821419] Review Request: olang-github-chromedp-cdproto - Generated
commands, types, and events for the Chrome DevTools Protocol domains
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821417] New: Review Request: golang-github-knq-sysutil - Provides cross platform system utilities

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821417

Bug ID: 1821417
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-knq-sysutil - Provides
cross platform system utilities
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-knq-sysutil.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-knq-sysutil-0-0.1.20200406git15668db.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/knq/sysutil

Description:
Package sysutil provides cross platform system utilities.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43066765

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint
golang-github-knq-sysutil-devel-0-0.1.20200406git15668db.fc31.noarch.rpm 
golang-github-knq-sysutil-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/knq/sysutil/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint golang-github-knq-sysutil-0-0.1.20200406git15668db.fc31.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809884] Review Request: ghc-iso8601-time - Convert to/from the ISO 8601 time format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809884



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-ad8aa9d474 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ad8aa9d474


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809884] Review Request: ghc-iso8601-time - Convert to/from the ISO 8601 time format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809884



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-1e95ed200a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1e95ed200a


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821393] New: Review Request: pagure-cli - Pagure client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821393

Bug ID: 1821393
   Summary: Review Request: pagure-cli - Pagure client
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pagure-cli/pagure-cli.spec
SRPM URL:
https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pagure-cli/pagure-cli-0.2-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description:
A command-line Pagure client for querying projects and users.


Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43065864


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821069] Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069



--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Thanks for the quick review, Jared. Please do let me know if I can review
packages for you in the future :)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821069] Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-ddc5f06fcb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ddc5f06fcb


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820391] Review Request: RediSearch - full-text search over Redis

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820391

Andreas Gerstmayr  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Andreas Gerstmayr  ---
(In reply to Nathan Scott from comment #2)
> That is the latest release with a non-open-source license. :(

Hmm, that's quite unfortunate - so we'll be stuck on an outdated version
forever if no volunteers are working on the open source fork :/



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[X]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[X]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[X]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[X]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[X]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 296960 bytes in 32 files.
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
 Note: Could not download Source0:

https://github.com/GoodFORM/RediSearch/archive/1.2.2/RediSearch-1.2.2.tar.gz
 See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
 guidelines/SourceURL/
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[X]: Latest version is packaged.

[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330



--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

Issues:
===

- The LICENSE file is missing. Include
https://github.com/Apipie/apypie/blob/master/LICENSE 
  manually or wait till https://github.com/Apipie/apypie/pull/67 is merged and
a new release available at PyPI.
- All %description should end with a period.
- "Requires:   python%{python3_pkgversion}-requests >= 2.4.2" could be
removed and the dependency generator used
 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_automatically_generated_dependencies
 
- Please add your e-mail address to the changelog entries.

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 13 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in
 /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1821330-python-
 apypie/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version i

[Bug 1821069] Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-63e2f86d68 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-63e2f86d68


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821346] Review Request: golang-github-yashtewari-glob-intersection - Go package to check if the intersection of two regexp-style globs is non-empty

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821346

Olivier Lemasle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #2 from Olivier Lemasle  ---
FAS username: olem


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821346] Review Request: golang-github-yashtewari-glob-intersection - Go package to check if the intersection of two regexp-style globs is non-empty

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821346



--- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43063480


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821346] New: Review Request: golang-github-yashtewari-glob-intersection - Go package to check if the intersection of two regexp-style globs is non-empty

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821346

Bug ID: 1821346
   Summary: Review Request:
golang-github-yashtewari-glob-intersection - Go
package to check if the intersection of two
regexp-style globs is non-empty
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: o.lema...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews//golang-github-yashtewari-glob-intersection.spec
SRPM URL:
https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews//golang-github-yashtewari-glob-intersection-0-0.1.20200406git5c77d91.fc33.src.rpm

Description:

Go package to check if the set of strings matched by the intersection of two
regexp-style globs is non-empty.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821330] New: Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330

Bug ID: 1821330
   Summary: Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for
Apipie
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ogajd...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ogajduse/apypie/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01328520-python-apypie/python-apypie.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ogajduse/apypie/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01328520-python-apypie/python-apypie-0.2.1-1.fc33.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/Apipie/apypie

Description: Python bindings for the Apipie - Ruby on Rails API documentation
tool.

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ogajduse/apypie/build/1328520/

Fedora Account System Username: ogajduse


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1790091] Review Request: androwarn - Static code analyzer for malicious Android applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790091



--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Yes, I have. Using the dep generator again to avoid missing requirements.

(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
>  - Haven't you forgotten python3dist(X)?
> 
> Requires:   python3dist(future)
> Requires:   python3dist(jinja2)
> Requires:   python3dist(play_scraper)

%changelog
* Fri Mar 27 2020 Fabian Affolter  - 1.6.1-3
- Enable dep generator and fix requirements handling

Updated files:
Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/androwarn.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/androwarn-1.6.1-3.fc31.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1787452] Review Request: python-devtools - Dev tools for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787452



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks for the feedback.

(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
>  - Wrong summary:
> 
> %package -n python-%{pypi_name}-doc
> Summary:sphinxcontrib-asyncio documentation

Fixed

>  - The main subpackage doesn't depend on -doc and the LICENSE is only in the
> doc package. Either make python3-%{pypi_name} depend on
> python-%{pypi_name}-doc or include the license in python3-%{pypi_name}.

License added

>  - Some tests fail:

Exclude the three failing tests

%changelog
* Fri Mar 27 2020 Fabian Affolter  - 0.5.1-3
- Exclude three failing tests
- Use license from tarball

* Mon Jan 06 2020 Fabian Affolter  - 0.5.1-2
- Fix description
- Add license (rhbz#1787452)

Updated files:
Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-devtools.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-devtools-0.5.1-3.fc31.src.rpm

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43062526


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158

Markku Korkeala  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||markku.korke...@kapsi.fi



--- Comment #6 from Markku Korkeala  ---
I can't seem find to a way to do that, I suspect that the packager group rights
have not been propageted to my bugzilla account. I have sort this one out
first, terrible sorry about this.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821305] Review Request: zgrab2 - Application Layer Scanner

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821305

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
 Depends On||1819317
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471
[Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819317
[Bug 1819317] Review Request: golang-github-zmap-zflags - Go command line
option parser
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1819317] Review Request: golang-github-zmap-zflags - Go command line option parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819317

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1821305





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821305
[Bug 1821305] Review Request: zgrab2 - Application Layer Scanner
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821305] New: Review Request: zgrab2 - Application Layer Scanner

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821305

Bug ID: 1821305
   Summary: Review Request: zgrab2 - Application Layer Scanner
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/zgrab2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/zgrab2-0.1.5-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/zmap/zgrab2

Description:
Go Application Layer Scanner.

Koji scratch build:
fails due to missing dependencies

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint zgrab2-0.1.5-1.fc31.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint zgrab2-0.1.5-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm 
zgrab2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary http
zgrab2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zgrab2
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1797301] Review Request: perl-Array-IntSpan - Handles arrays using integer ranges

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797301



--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Array-IntSpan


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158



--- Comment #5 from chedi toueiti  ---
thanks for your time, to finalize the process you will have to take the bug,
change the status to POST and set the fedora-review flags to "+".


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158



--- Comment #4 from Markku Korkeala  ---
Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158



--- Comment #3 from chedi toueiti  ---
fixed 
new build at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/chedi/python-packages/build/1329329/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821026] Review Request: clojure-core-specs-alpha - library to describe Clojure core macros and functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821026



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clojure-core-specs-alpha


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821025] Review Request: clojure-spec-alpha - Clojure library to describe the structure of data and functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821025



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clojure-spec-alpha


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1796401] Review Request: python-requre - REQuest REcording your python code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796401



--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-requre


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1819554] Review Request: wob - A lightweight overlay volume/backlight/progress/anything bar for Wayland

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819554



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wob


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821069] Review Request: python-steps - STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-steps


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1807753] Review Request: ydotool - Generic command-line automation tool

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753



--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ydotool


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1819148] Review Request: act - Automatic Component Toolkit

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819148



--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Try adding:

   -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1819148] Review Request: act - Automatic Component Toolkit

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819148



--- Comment #3 from Weiping  ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)

> I can build the package just fine, see the copr builds. How are you using
> fedora-review?

fedora-review -u https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819148

See https://linux.die.net/man/1/fedora-review for more detail.

It seems a issue related kernel or complier, I try to enlarge limitation
of lock memory, but doesn't work.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1817811] Review Request: python-scramp - An implementation of the SCRAM protocol

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817811



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-5abe9def21 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1814682] Review Request: rshim - rshim driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682

l...@mellanox.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(mschmidt@redhat.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #28 from l...@mellanox.com ---
Michal (and Honggang),

Any advices what the next step would be? Do I need to provide new version to
fix anything? Michal, Honggang mentioned that I need to be added into fedora
packager group (comment 15 above). Is it something you could help or any
suggestions? Or are we waiting for the verification be complete first? This is
my first fedora package. I'll need some guidance and a 'sponsor' according to
the wiki
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Thanks!
Liming


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1805928] Review Request: elementary-planner - Task manager with Todoist support designed for GNU/Linux

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928

Fabio Valentini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(ego.cordatus@gmai
   ||l.com)



--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini  ---
Can you please respond to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928#c3 ?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1805928] Review Request: elementary-planner - Task manager with Todoist support designed for GNU/Linux

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-58dad2a040 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1817811] Review Request: python-scramp - An implementation of the SCRAM protocol

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817811



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-a4e17e0c55 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1808306] Review Request: ulauncher - Linux Application Launcher

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808306



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-a2e5d126bf has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158



--- Comment #2 from Markku Korkeala  ---
Below is the review, otherwise looks good, but there are two rpmlint errors,
can you fix those?

python3-click-help-colors.noarch: E: useless-provides python-click-help-colors
python3-click-help-colors.noarch: E: useless-provides
python38-click-help-colors



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 25 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
python-click-help-colors/python-click-help-
 colors/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 122880 bytes in 11 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file conta

[Bug 1536230] Review Request: rmd - User-space daemon for resource management (RMD)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536230



--- Comment #8 from Neil Horman  ---
ping, still waiting on the srpm and spec files


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821208] Review Request: srt - Secure, Reliable, Transport

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821208

Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2020-04-06 10:23:49



--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  ---
Seems like srt is already in fedora. Closing.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809974] Review Request: python-cxxfilt - Python interface to c++filt/abi::__cxa_demangle

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-29a5924ba9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-29a5924ba9


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809974] Review Request: python-cxxfilt - Python interface to c++filt/abi::__cxa_demangle

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9dbc76c843 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9dbc76c843


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809974] Review Request: python-cxxfilt - Python interface to c++filt/abi::__cxa_demangle

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-51763899a3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-51763899a3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1809974] Review Request: python-cxxfilt - Python interface to c++filt/abi::__cxa_demangle

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-412743fe76 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-412743fe76


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821208] Review Request: srt - Secure, Reliable, Transport

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821208

Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  ---
Seems like epel7 build fails with gnutls (but not when openssl is picked).
I will provide dedicated patch to fix build on epel7 with gnutls given packages
that will use srt are using gnutls already. (ffmpeg,vlc).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158

Markku Korkeala  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||markku.korke...@iki.fi
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821208] New: Review Request: srt - Secure, Reliable, Transport

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821208

Bug ID: 1821208
   Summary: Review Request: srt - Secure, Reliable, Transport
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: kwiz...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/srt.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/srt-1.4.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
Description: Secure, Reliable, Transport
Fedora Account System Username: kwizart

rpmlint is clean
koji scratch build:
- epel7:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43058512
- fedora33:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43058542

This package is used by vlc


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821189] Package Review: Snakemake - Workflow management system to create reproducible and scalable data analyses

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821189

Aniket Pradhan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941
[Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821189] New: Package Review: Snakemake - Workflow management system to create reproducible and scalable data analyses

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821189

Bug ID: 1821189
   Summary: Package Review: Snakemake - Workflow management system
to create reproducible and scalable data analyses
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: aniketpradhan1...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://major.fedorapeople.org/snakemake/snakemake.spec
SRPM URL:
https://major.fedorapeople.org/snakemake/snakemake-5.12.3-1.fc32.src.rpm

The docs aren't building properly right now. I have filed a ticket upstream for
the same. I will include it in a subpackage as soon as it gets fixed.
Ticket: https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake/issues/296

I am also not sure if I should prefix a "python-" before the name of the
package as well, given snakemake is not a Python library or module.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821025] Review Request: clojure-spec-alpha - Clojure library to describe the structure of data and functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821025



--- Comment #2 from chedi toueiti  ---
If you will be kind take a look at this package review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821025] Review Request: clojure-spec-alpha - Clojure library to describe the structure of data and functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821025

chedi toueiti  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||chedi.toue...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|chedi.toue...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from chedi toueiti  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java
  to get additional checks


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
 Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Eclipse Public License (v1.0)", "*No
 copyright* Eclipse Public License (v1.0)". 9 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /mnt/56298eef-80c6-43f5-8aee-172b1d73d266/Projects/Fedora/swaps/copr-
 build-1328136/review-clojure-spec-alpha/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if av

[Bug 1821026] Review Request: clojure-core-specs-alpha - library to describe Clojure core macros and functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821026

chedi toueiti  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||chedi.toue...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|chedi.toue...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from chedi toueiti  ---
Looks good to me

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java
  to get additional checks


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
 Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Eclipse Public License (v1.0)", "*No
 copyright* Eclipse Public License (v1.0)". 9 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /mnt/56298eef-80c6-43f5-8aee-172b1d73d266/Projects/Fedora/swaps/copr-
 build-1328143/review-clojure-core-specs-alpha/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if av

[Bug 1821174] New: Review Request: golang-github-azure-ntlmssp - NTLM/Negotiate authentication over HTTP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821174

Bug ID: 1821174
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-azure-ntlmssp -
NTLM/Negotiate authentication over HTTP
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-azure-ntlmssp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-azure-ntlmssp-0-0.1.20200406git2b2be6c.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/Azure/go-ntlmssp

Description:
NTLM/Negotiate authentication over HTTP.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43057682

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint golang-github-azure-ntlmssp-0-0.1.20200406git2b2be6c.fc31.src.rpm 
golang-github-azure-ntlmssp.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint
golang-github-azure-ntlmssp-devel-0-0.1.20200406git2b2be6c.fc31.noarch.rpm 
golang-github-azure-ntlmssp-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/Azure/go-ntlmssp/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821172] New: Review Request: wl-gammactl - Small GTK GUI application to set contrast, brightness and gamma for wayland compositors

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821172

Bug ID: 1821172
   Summary: Review Request: wl-gammactl - Small GTK GUI
application to set contrast, brightness and gamma for
wayland compositors
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: bob.hep...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wl-gammactl/fedora-31-x86_64/01329134-wl-gammactl/wl-gammactl.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wl-gammactl/fedora-31-x86_64/01329134-wl-gammactl/wl-gammactl-0.1-0.1.20200406git.611846c.fc31.src.rpm

Description:

Small GTK GUI application to set contrast, brightness and gamma for
wayland compositors which support the wlr-gamma-control protocol
extension. Basically this is the example from here:
https://github.com/swaywm/wlroots/blob/master/examples/gamma-control.c
with a nice little GTK GUI slapped on to it. You can set contrast,
brightness and gamma using sliders and reset back to default values.

This was made to make the process of calibrating your monitor a bit
easier, since wayland support for color profiles is not yet
implemented. When you are satisfied with your settings, copy the given
command line and execute it at startup to make the settings load at
apply on every boot.

Keep in mind that it uses the same protocol extension as the
redshift fork
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redshift-wlr-gamma-control/

wl-gammactl will kick out any running redshift instance and fail to
start up. On second run it should work as expected. So unfortunately
only one can run at a time (?) for now.

Fedora Account System Username: wef

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "NTP License (legal
 disclaimer)". 16 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/bhepple/tmp/wl-gammactl/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package

[Bug 1821171] New: Review Request: golang-github-masterzen-simplexml - Go library to generate XML content from a naive DOM

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821171

Bug ID: 1821171
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-masterzen-simplexml - Go
library to generate XML content from a naive DOM
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-masterzen-simplexml.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-masterzen-simplexml-0-0.1.20200406git31eea30.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/masterzen/simplexml

Description:
Go library to generate XML content from a naive DOM.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43057641

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint
golang-github-masterzen-simplexml-0-0.1.20200406git31eea30.fc31.src.rpm 
golang-github-masterzen-simplexml.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint
golang-github-masterzen-simplexml-devel-0-0.1.20200406git31eea30.fc31.noarch.rpm
 
golang-github-masterzen-simplexml-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/masterzen/simplexml/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1819554] Review Request: wob - A lightweight overlay volume/backlight/progress/anything bar for Wayland

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819554



--- Comment #5 from Bob Hepple  ---
Spotted just in time - the license should be ISC - rebuilt:

SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wob/fedora-31-x86_64/01329192-wob/wob.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wob/fedora-31-x86_64/01329192-wob/wob-0.8-4.fc31.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158

chedi toueiti  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from chedi toueiti  ---
copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/chedi/python-packages/build/1329161/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821160] Review Request: golang-github-reiver-oi - Tools for the Go programming language's standard io package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821160

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1821159





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821159
[Bug 1821159] Review Request: golang-github-reiver-telnet - Telnet(s) client
and server implementations
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821159] Review Request: golang-github-reiver-telnet - Telnet(s) client and server implementations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821159

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1821160
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821160
[Bug 1821160] Review Request: golang-github-reiver-oi - Tools for the Go
programming language's standard io package
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821160] New: Review Request: golang-github-reiver-oi - Tools for the Go programming language's standard io package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821160

Bug ID: 1821160
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-reiver-oi - Tools for
the Go programming language's standard io package
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-reiver-oi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-reiver-oi-1.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/reiver/go-oi

Description:
Package oi provides useful tools to be used with the Go programming language's
standard "io" package.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43057508

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint golang-github-reiver-oi-1.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm 
golang-github-reiver-oi.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint golang-github-reiver-oi-devel-1.0.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
golang-github-reiver-oi-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/reiver/go-oi/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821159] New: Review Request: golang-github-reiver-telnet - Telnet(s) client and server implementations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821159

Bug ID: 1821159
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-reiver-telnet -
Telnet(s) client and server implementations
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-reiver-telnet.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-reiver-telnet-0-0.1.20200406git9ff0b2a.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/reiver/go-telnet

Description:
Package telnet provides telnet(s) client and server implementations,
for the Go programming language, in a style similar to the "net/http" library
that is part of the Go standard library, including support for middleware.

Koji scratch build:
fails due to missing dependency

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint golang-github-reiver-telnet-0-0.1.20200406git9ff0b2a.fc31.src.rpm 
golang-github-reiver-telnet.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint
golang-github-reiver-telnet-devel-0-0.1.20200406git9ff0b2a.fc31.noarch.rpm
golang-github-reiver-telnet-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/reiver/go-telnet/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821158] New: Review Request: python-click-help-colors - Colorization of help messages in Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158

Bug ID: 1821158
   Summary: Review Request: python-click-help-colors -
Colorization of help messages in Click
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: chedi.toue...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://chedi.fedorapeople.org/python-click-help-colors.spec
SRPM URL:
https://chedi.fedorapeople.org/python-click-help-colors-0.8-1.fc31.src.rpm
Description: Colorization of help messages in Click
Fedora Account System Username: chedi


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org