[Bug 1833612] Review Request: ttyd - Share your terminal over the web
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833612
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "BSD 3-clause "New" or
"Revised" License". 45 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/vascom/1833612-ttyd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package
[Bug 1833612] Review Request: ttyd - Share your terminal over the web
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833612 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto --- (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #2) ok, changed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833842] Review Request: pg_activity - Top like application for PostgreSQL server activity monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833842
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vasc...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
1. Change
License:PostgreSQL License
to
License:PostgreSQL
2. Remove -n pg_activity-%{version}
3. Add license file to package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833785] Review Request: pgcli - CLI for Postgres Database. With auto-completion and syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833785
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vasc...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Remove
-n %{pypi_name}-%{version}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833612] Review Request: ttyd - Share your terminal over the web
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833612
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vasc...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Instead
%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}
%patch0 -p1
use
%autosetup -p1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833470] Review Request: ocaml-stdio - Jane Street Standard I/O library for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9d10500c1b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-9d10500c1b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9d10500c1b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833854] New: Review Request: input-wacom - Linux kernel driver for Wacom devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833854 Bug ID: 1833854 Summary: Review Request: input-wacom - Linux kernel driver for Wacom devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: victort...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://victortyau.fedorapeople.org/Wacom/input-wacom.spec SRPM URL: https://victortyau.fedorapeople.org/Wacom/input-wacom-0.45.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: The Linux Wacom Project manages the drivers, libraries, and documentation for configuring and running Wacom tablets under the Linux operating system. Fedora Account System Username: victortyau -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 leenaji changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leenaji9...@gmail.com --- Comment #116 from leenaji --- (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #1) > do you want me to review it ? https://maalsell.com/blog/ https://easypractice.in/ https://udaipurmirror.com/ http://code-kit.com/ https://kartora.com/ Target page for Udaipur -https://udaipurcallgirlsandescort.com Target page for Jaipur - https://udaipurcallgirlsandescort.com/jaipur-escorts.html Target page for jaisalmer - https://udaipurcallgirlsandescort.com/jaisalmer-escorts.html Target page for jodhpur - https://udaipurcallgirlsandescort.com/jodhpur-escorts-service.html Target for mount Abu - https://udaipurcallgirlsandescort.com/mount-abu-escorts.html http://hotescortsudaipur.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833842] New: Review Request: pg_activity - Top like application for PostgreSQL server activity monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833842 Bug ID: 1833842 Summary: Review Request: pg_activity - Top like application for PostgreSQL server activity monitoring Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/pg_activity.spec SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/pg_activity-1.6.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Top like application for PostgreSQL server activity monitoring Fedora Account System Username: itamarjp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #18 from Jeff Law --- Robert-Andre, Is there something Yongkui could be doing to move this forward? Red Hat's tools team is definitely interested in poking at openosc to see if/how it can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of FORTIFY_SOURCE and improvements that are made in that area (particularly as we spin up LTO-by-default) and as a potential alternate implementation. If there's something Red Hat's tools team can/should be doing to help move this package forward, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks, Jeff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833469] Review Request: ocaml-fieldslib - OCaml record fields as first class values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469 dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. ||com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833470] Review Request: ocaml-stdio - Jane Street Standard I/O library for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9d10500c1b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9d10500c1b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823419] Review Request: gnucobol - COBOL compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419 dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. ||com --- Comment #11 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com --- Calling ldconfig and install-info in %post and %postun is no longer required, both is handled by rpm file triggers in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830529] Re-Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Retro side-scrolling platformer game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830529 --- Comment #3 from Artur Iwicki --- @Andrea: Updated. As for the double asterisk, well, I've been doing that for icons since always, but I see that a single asterisk works too, so I may change that if it's preferable. @Dennis: Thanks, I've changed that in the AppData file. spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/seahorse-adventures-1.2-1/seahorse-adventures.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/seahorse-adventures-1.2-1/seahorse-adventures-1.2-1.fc32.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44324597 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833472] Review Request: ocaml-compiler-libs-janestreet - OCaml compiler libraries repackaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833472 dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833472] Review Request: ocaml-compiler-libs-janestreet - OCaml compiler libraries repackaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833472
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com ---
I think the name is good as it is and way better than
ocaml-ocaml-compiler-libs.
Two minor issues:
- Where did you obtain the minimum required version of dune from? Upstream's
opam file has a 1.0 and not 1.5.1.
- Contributing.md is imho not useful in a system package.
Beside that: package approved!
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 17 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dan/fedora-
scm/1833472-ocaml-compiler-libs-janestreet/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Ocaml:
[x]: This should never happen
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile
[Bug 1830529] Re-Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Retro side-scrolling platformer game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830529 Dennis Payne changed: What|Removed |Added CC||du...@identicalsoftware.com --- Comment #2 from Dennis Payne --- In appdata.xml, project license should be GPL-2.0+. Also can you add the OARS info: moderate Thanks for working on packaging this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833618] Review Request: samurai - ninja-compatible build tool written in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833618 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-10 16:40:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833472] Review Request: ocaml-compiler-libs-janestreet - OCaml compiler libraries repackaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833472 dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. ||com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833783] Review Request: python-pgspecial - Meta-commands handler for Postgres Database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833783 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1833785 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833785 [Bug 1833785] Review Request: pgcli - CLI for Postgres Database. With auto-completion and syntax highlighting -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833785] Review Request: pgcli - CLI for Postgres Database. With auto-completion and syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833785 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1833783 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833783 [Bug 1833783] Review Request: python-pgspecial - Meta-commands handler for Postgres Database -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833785] New: Review Request: pgcli - CLI for Postgres Database. With auto-completion and syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833785 Bug ID: 1833785 Summary: Review Request: pgcli - CLI for Postgres Database. With auto-completion and syntax highlighting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/pgcli.spec SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/pgcli-3.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: CLI for Postgres Database. With auto-completion and syntax highlighting Fedora Account System Username: itamarjp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833783] New: Review Request: python-pgspecial - Meta-commands handler for Postgres Database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833783 Bug ID: 1833783 Summary: Review Request: python-pgspecial - Meta-commands handler for Postgres Database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-pgspecial.spec SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-pgspecial-1.11.10-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: This package provides an API to execute meta-commands AKA "special", or "backslash commands") on PostgreSQL. Fedora Account System Username: itamarjp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1824848] Review Request: jc - JSONifies the output of dozens of commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848 --- Comment #18 from Artur Iwicki --- Please upload the latest spec and SRPM somewhere and provide the links, I'll do a proper review then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1576792] Review Request: python-webthing - HTTP Web Thing implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576792 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python3-webthing - HTTP Web |python-webthing - HTTP Web |Thing implementation|Thing implementation --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson --- SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/python-webthing.spec SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/python-webthing-0.13.0-1.fc32.src.rpmb koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44313044 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1338339] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338339 Till Hofmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2020-05-10 13:45:25 --- Comment #29 from Till Hofmann --- I found communication with upstream increasingly difficult, e.g., my patches to add compatibility with boost 1.6x [1] have been ignored without comment for over a year. I'm no longer interested in packaging openrave. [1] https://github.com/rdiankov/openrave/pull/625 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643764] Review Request: intelhex - A python library for manipulating Intel HEX file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643764 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643764] Review Request: intelhex - A python library for manipulating Intel HEX file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643764 --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson --- Updated: fixed 3 issues above and some other minor updates. SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/intelhex.spec SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/intelhex-2.2.1-4.fc32.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44311795 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830306] Review Request: git-revise - Efficiently update, split, and rearrange git commits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830306 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- This should also be "BuildArch: noarch", which will remove the need for disabling debuginfo subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833513] Review Request: jaxb-dtd-parser - SAX-like API for parsing XML DTDs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833513 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||jaxb-dtd-parser-1.4.3-1.fc3 ||3 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-10 09:27:58 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1505595 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833498] Review Request: jakarta-annotations - Jakarta Annotations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833498 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||jakarta-annotations-1.3.5-1 ||.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-10 08:44:15 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1505594 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820850] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-tld - TLD parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820850 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol ||ter.ch) --- Comment #1 from Germano Massullo --- Hello, can you package the newer 1.0.0 release? Thank you -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820850] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-tld - TLD parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820850 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|germano.massu...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833741] Review Request: python-colcon-lcov-result - Extension for colcon to provide test results using LCOV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833741 Scott K Logan changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-colcon-lcov-result/python-colcon-lcov-result.spec SRPM URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-colcon-lcov-result/python-colcon-lcov-result-0.4.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Scratch build: koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44296889 Description: An extension for colcon-core to provide aggregate coverage results using LCOV. LCOV is a graphical front-end for GCC's coverage testing tool gcov, producing the following coverage metrics: - Statement coverage - Function coverage - Branch coverage Fedora Account System Username: cottsay Target branches: rawhide, f32, f31, EPEL 7 rpmlint output: python-colcon-lcov-result.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcov -> gov, cove python3-colcon-lcov-result.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcov -> gov, cove 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Note: This package should join the other 28 packages in the colcon family that are already part of Fedora and EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833741] Review Request: python-colcon-lcov-result - Extension for colcon to provide test results using LCOV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833741 Scott K Logan changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-colcon-lcov-result/python-colcon-lcov-result.spec SRPM URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-colcon-lcov-result/python-colcon-lcov-result-0.4.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: An extension for colcon-core to provide aggregate coverage results using LCOV. LCOV is a graphical front-end for GCC's coverage testing tool gcov, producing the following coverage metrics: - Statement coverage - Function coverage - Branch coverage Fedora Account System Username: cottsay Target branches: rawhide, f32, f31, EPEL 7 rpmlint output: python-colcon-lcov-result.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcov -> gov, cove python3-colcon-lcov-result.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcov -> gov, cove 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Note: This package should join the other 28 packages in the colcon family that are already part of Fedora and EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833745] New: Review Request: python-colcon-ed - Extension for colcon to edit a file within a package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833745 Bug ID: 1833745 Summary: Review Request: python-colcon-ed - Extension for colcon to edit a file within a package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: log...@cottsay.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-colcon-ed/python-colcon-ed.spec SRPM URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-colcon-ed/python-colcon-ed-0.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44297950 Description: An extension for colcon-core to edit a file within a package. Fedora Account System Username: cottsay Target branches: rawhide, f32, f31, EPEL 7 rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Note: This package should join the other 28 packages in the colcon family that are already part of Fedora and EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833741] New: Review Request: python-colcon-lcov-result - Extension for colcon to provide test results using LCOV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833741 Bug ID: 1833741 Summary: Review Request: python-colcon-lcov-result - Extension for colcon to provide test results using LCOV Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: log...@cottsay.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-colcon-lcov-result/python-colcon-lcov-result.spec SRPM URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-colcon-lcov-result/python-colcon-lcov-result-0.4.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: An extension for colcon-core to provide aggregate coverage results using LCOV. LCOV is a graphical front-end for GCC's coverage testing tool gcov, producing the following coverage metrics: - Statement coverage - Function coverage - Branch coverage Fedora Account System Username: cottsay Target branches: rawhide, f32, f31, EPEL 7 rpmlint output: python-colcon-lcov-result.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcov -> gov, cove python3-colcon-lcov-result.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcov -> gov, cove 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Note: This package should join the other 28 packages in the colcon family that are already part of Fedora and EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828813] Review Request: bashtop - Resource monitor written in bash that shows usage and stats for processor, memory, disks, network and processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d093849ce8 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d093849ce8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d093849ce8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833272] Review Request: IPAddress - Library for handling IP addresses and subnets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833272 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-215104fa90 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-215104fa90 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-215104fa90 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
