[Bug 1819257] Review Request: tiedot - NoSQL database

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819257

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-e2c5487284 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-e2c5487284 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e2c5487284

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820856] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-ansi - Easy to use ANSI control codes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820856

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-fc518aff29 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-fc518aff29 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fc518aff29

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839889] Review Request: python-angr - A multi-architecture binary analysis toolkit

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839889
Bug 1839889 depends on bug 1839888, which changed state.

Bug 1839888 Summary: Review Request: python-pyvex - A Python interface to 
libVEX and the VEX intermediate representation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839888

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839888] Review Request: python-pyvex - A Python interface to libVEX and the VEX intermediate representation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839888

W. Michael Petullo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2020-06-04 04:03:35




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887
Bug 1839887 depends on bug 1839888, which changed state.

Bug 1839888 Summary: Review Request: python-pyvex - A Python interface to 
libVEX and the VEX intermediate representation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839888

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1832632] Review Request: python-authres - RFC 8601 Authentication-Results Headers generation and parsing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832632



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b674044bb9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b674044bb9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843751] New: Review Request: cvise - Super-parallel Python port of the C-Reduce

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843751

Bug ID: 1843751
   Summary: Review Request: cvise - Super-parallel Python port of
the C-Reduce
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mpola...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://people.redhat.com/~mpolacek/tmp/cvise.spec
SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/~mpolacek/tmp/cvise-1.4.0-0.fc32.src.rpm
Description:
C-Vise is a super-parallel Python port of the C-Reduce. The port is fully
compatible to the C-Reduce and uses the same efficient
LLVM-based C/C++ reduction tool named clang_delta.

C-Vise is a tool that takes a large C, C++ or OpenCL program that
has a property of interest (such as triggering a compiler bug) and
automatically produces a much smaller C/C++ or OpenCL program that
has the same property. It is intended for use by people who discover
and report bugs in compilers and other tools that process C/C++ or OpenCL code.
Fedora Account System Username: mpolacek


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1833477] Review Request: ocaml-sexp-conv - Generate S-expression conversion functions from type definitions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833477
Bug 1833477 depends on bug 1833474, which changed state.

Bug 1833474 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-inline-test - Syntax extension 
for writing inline tests in OCaml code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833474

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1833476] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-fields-conv - Generate accessor & iteration functions for OCaml records

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833476
Bug 1833476 depends on bug 1833474, which changed state.

Bug 1833474 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-inline-test - Syntax extension 
for writing inline tests in OCaml code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833474

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1833475] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-compare - Generate comparison functions from types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833475
Bug 1833475 depends on bug 1833474, which changed state.

Bug 1833474 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-inline-test - Syntax extension 
for writing inline tests in OCaml code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833474

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1833478] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-variants-conv - Generate accessor & iteration functions for OCaml variant types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833478
Bug 1833478 depends on bug 1833474, which changed state.

Bug 1833474 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-inline-test - Syntax extension 
for writing inline tests in OCaml code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833474

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1833474] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-inline-test - Syntax extension for writing inline tests in OCaml code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833474

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-04 02:54:41



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-433ac926c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1836626] Review Request: maven-jaxb2-plugin - Provides the capability to generate java sources from schemas

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836626

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-04 02:54:39



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-cee0a57c10 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820915] Review Request: bettercap - Tool for 802.11, BLE/Ethernet reconnaissance and MITM attacks

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820915
Bug 1820915 depends on bug 1820844, which changed state.

Bug 1820844 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-bettercap-nrf24 - Allows 
interaction with nRF24LU1+ based dongles and the RFStorm firmware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820844

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839877] Review Request: alacarte - Menu editor for the GNOME desktop

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839877

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-04 02:54:26



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-3d80bb2ec4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1832632] Review Request: python-authres - RFC 8601 Authentication-Results Headers generation and parsing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832632



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-df96a9bedb has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820844] Review Request: golang-github-bettercap-nrf24 - Allows interaction with nRF24LU1+ based dongles and the RFStorm firmware

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820844

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-04 02:54:31



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-be97f837fa has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1836319] Review Request: hanyang-gothic-a1-fonts - Elegant Korean and Latin font family

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836319



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-842506d133 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820972] Review Request: ohmybackup - Scan for backup directories and backup files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820972

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-04 02:54:35



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c5a4dce827 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820850] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-tld - TLD parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820850



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-bb9b673217 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1836542] Review Request: studio-controls - Studio control for audio devices

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836542



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-57cc51bbd2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820850] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-tld - TLD parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820850

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-04 02:49:43



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-2ec9503e5a has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820915] Review Request: bettercap - Tool for 802.11, BLE/Ethernet reconnaissance and MITM attacks

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820915
Bug 1820915 depends on bug 1820850, which changed state.

Bug 1820850 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-tld - TLD parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820850

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1832632] Review Request: python-authres - RFC 8601 Authentication-Results Headers generation and parsing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832632

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-04 02:49:42



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-ef2626f500 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1836319] Review Request: hanyang-gothic-a1-fonts - Elegant Korean and Latin font family

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836319

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-06-04 02:49:36



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-fbf910e034 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1823117] Review Request: opensurge - 2D retro platformer inspired by Sonic games

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823117
Bug 1823117 depends on bug 1836319, which changed state.

Bug 1836319 Summary: Review Request: hanyang-gothic-a1-fonts - Elegant Korean 
and Latin font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836319

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1836542] Review Request: studio-controls - Studio control for audio devices

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836542

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-35f8ea00ac has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1824848] Review Request: jc - JSONifies the output of dozens of commands

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848



--- Comment #33 from Kelly Brazil  ---
Can I request someone else become the packager? I am the author of this
application, so I'm not sure if it is appropriate for me to be the package
maintainer.  Other distros like OpenSuse, NixOS, FreeBSD ports, and macOS
Homebrew have their own package maintainers of this software.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839241] Review Request: rust-xcb - Rust bindings and wrappers for XCB

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839241

Stefano Figura  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||stef...@figura.im
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|stef...@figura.im
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839258] Review Request: rust-wayland-commons - Common types and structures used by wayland-client and wayland-server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839258

Stefano Figura  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839258] Review Request: rust-wayland-commons - Common types and structures used by wayland-client and wayland-server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839258

Stefano Figura  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||stef...@figura.im
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|stef...@figura.im
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 858060] Review Request: qpid-snmpd - SNMP agent for qpid broker

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858060

Ernie  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ibove...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(iboverma@redhat.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #17 from Ernie  ---
Irina, If this was never imported, can you retire the package or orphan it. I'm
not sure how to do either.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1825657] Review Request: lazpaint - Simple image editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825657



--- Comment #2 from Artur Iwicki  ---
Updated to v.7.1.3.

spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/lazpaint-7.1.3-1/lazpaint.spec
srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/lazpaint-7.1.3-1/lazpaint-7.1.3-1.fc32.src.rpm
koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45378301


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1835367] Review Request: python-chm - Python package for CHM files handling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835367



--- Comment #7 from Luis Bazan  ---
Hi Fabian 

Any update?

cheers,


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839259] Review Request: rust-wayland-scanner - Wayland Scanner for generating rust APIs from XML wayland protocol files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839259



--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim  ---
Will correct spelling and bump the version when importing (and also file a typo
PR with upstream), thanks for catching!

~ took 3s 
✦ ❯ fedpkg request-repo rust-wayland-scanner 1839259
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25455


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839257] Review Request: rust-wayland-sys - FFI bindings to the various libwayland-*.so libraries

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839257



--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim  ---
Thanks! The new version must have landed after I created the spec, will update
when checking in the files.

~ 
✦ ❯ fedpkg request-repo rust-wayland-sys 1839257
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25454


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1708161] Review Request: python-testfixtures - A collection of helpers and mock objects for unit tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708161

Mohamed El Morabity  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #11 from Mohamed El Morabity  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 95 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/mohamed/Documents/1708161-python-testfixtures/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and 

[Bug 1708161] Review Request: python-testfixtures - A collection of helpers and mock objects for unit tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708161



--- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter  ---
%changelog
* Wed Jun 03 2020 Fabian Affolter  - 6.14.1-1
- Exclude the failing tests for now
- Update to latest upstream release 6.14.1

Updated files:
Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-testfixtures.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-testfixtures-6.14.1-1.fc31.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842475] Review Request: python-publicsuffix2 - Get a public suffix for a domain name using the Public Suffix List

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842475



--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter  ---
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #2)
> Package Review
> ==
> 
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
> 
> 
> Issues:
> ===
> - Package contains BR: python3-devel

Sorry, *must* was missing.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843426] Review Request: perl-Test2 - Framework for writing test tools that all work together

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843426



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
Branch request 
Unretirement request 


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842475] Review Request: python-publicsuffix2 - Get a public suffix for a domain name using the Public Suffix List

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842475



--- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Thanks for the quick review, Fabian.

What's wrong with BR: python3-devel?

Python guidelines say:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_dependencies

Dependencies

Packages building for Python 3 will need BuildRequires: python3-devel.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1836567] Review Request: python-graphql-core - GraphQL implementation for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836567

Javier Peña  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol
   ||ter.ch)




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1708161] Review Request: python-testfixtures - A collection of helpers and mock objects for unit tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708161

Mohamed El Morabity  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #9 from Mohamed El Morabity  ---
Version 6.14.1 is available ;)

Spec file looks good at first sight.

Some tests fail on Rawhide and F32 (but not on F31). The same test fail with
the latest upstream release. An issue with Python >= 3.8?
https://paste.centos.org/view/65157bb7


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1708161] Review Request: python-testfixtures - A collection of helpers and mock objects for unit tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708161

Mohamed El Morabity  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pikachu.2...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1813181] Review Request: python-jaraco-text - Module for text manipulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813181

Charalampos Stratakis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||cstra...@redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Charalampos Stratakis  ---
I've recently package another one from the jaraco namespace, you can check it
out here, might help fixing the issues:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843273


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843516] New: Review Request: php-composer-semver3 - Semver library version 3

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843516

Bug ID: 1843516
   Summary: Review Request: php-composer-semver3 - Semver library
version 3
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/composer/php-composer-semver3.git/plain/php-composer-semver3.spec?id=44ebeb70db8712ef169741970e3c93b09796ae53
SRPM URL:
https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-composer-semver3-3.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm
Description: 
Semver library version 3 that offers utilities, version constraint
parsing and validation.

Originally written as part of composer/composer, now extracted and
made available as a stand-alone library.

Autoloader: /usr/share/php/Composer/Semver3/autoload.php


Fedora Account System Username:  remi



---


New dependency of upcoming Composer v2
Changes from v2 to v3
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/composer/php-composer-semver3.git/diff/php-composer-semver3.spec?id=44ebeb70db8712ef169741970e3c93b09796ae53


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843426] Review Request: perl-Test2 - Framework for writing test tools that all work together

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843426

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
Source file is ok
Summary is ok
License is ok
Description is ok
URL and Source0 are ok
All tests passed
BuildRequires are ok

$ rpm -qp --requires perl-Test2-0.44-3.el7.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c |
grep -v rpmlib
  1 perl(base)
  1 perl(Carp)
  1 perl(Config)
  1 perl(Exporter)
  1 perl(File::Spec)
  1 perl(File::Temp)
  1 perl(IPC::SysV)
  1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
  1 perl(Scalar::Util)
  1 perl(Storable)
  1 perl(strict)
  1 perl(Test2::API)
  1 perl(Test2::API::Instance)
  1 perl(Test2::API::Stack)
  1 perl(Test2::Event)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Bail)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Diag)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Exception)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Note)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Ok)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Plan)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Skip)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Subtest)
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Waiting)
  1 perl(Test2::Formatter)
  1 perl(Test2::Hub)
  1 perl(Test2::Hub::Interceptor)
  1 perl(Test2::Hub::Interceptor::Terminator)
  1 perl(Test2::Hub::Subtest)
  1 perl(Test2::IPC::Driver)
  1 perl(Test2::Util)
  1 perl(Test2::Util::ExternalMeta)
  1 perl(Test2::Util::HashBase)
  1 perl(Test2::Util::Trace)
  1 perl(warnings)
Binary requires are Ok.

$ rpm -qp --provides perl-Test2-0.44-3.el7.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
  1 perl(Test2) = 0.44
  1 perl-Test2 = 0.44-3.el7
  1 perl(Test2::API) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::API::Breakage) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::API::Context) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::API::Instance) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::API::Stack) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Bail) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Diag) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Exception) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Note) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Ok) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Plan) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Skip) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Subtest) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Event::Waiting) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Formatter) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Formatter::TAP) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Hub) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Hub::Interceptor) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Hub::Interceptor::Terminator) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Hub::Subtest) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::IPC) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::IPC::Driver) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::IPC::Driver::Files) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Util) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Util::ExternalMeta) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Util::HashBase) = 0.44
  1 perl(Test2::Util::Trace) = 0.44
Binary provides are Ok.

$ rpmlint ./perl-Test2*
perl-Test2.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US refactoring -> re
factoring, re-factoring, factorizing
perl-Test2.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test2/ HTTP
Error 404: Not Found
perl-Test2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US refactoring -> re
factoring, re-factoring, factorizing
perl-Test2.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test2/ HTTP
Error 404: Not Found
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Rpmlint is ok - URL warning is ok because Test2 is part of Test-Simple now.

Resolution:
Approved for EPEL 7


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843426] Review Request: perl-Test2 - Framework for writing test tools that all work together

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843426

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843273] Review Request: python-jaraco-envs - Classes for orchestrating Python (virtual) environments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843273



--- Comment #2 from Charalampos Stratakis  ---
Thanks Fabian!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1824848] Review Request: jc - JSONifies the output of dozens of commands

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848



--- Comment #32 from Petr Pisar  ---
Kelly, your package has already been approved (fedora-review flag is +).
You has not yet been sponsored into the packager group. Without that you cannot
request for creating a dist-git repository for the package.
According to
, you should
ask for the sponsorship at .


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686



--- Comment #50 from markusN  ---
Ah, I see. I have requested there to add PDAL to the list, it was immediately
done:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/PDAL/c/0850914050c8e76ca5bd933d0bfe1a58a5d5dfb0?branch=master


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843426] Review Request: perl-Test2 - Framework for writing test tools that all work together

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843426

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1843195





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843195
[Bug 1843195] perl-Test-Needs is wanted in EPEL7
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843426] New: Review Request: perl-Test2 - Framework for writing test tools that all work together

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843426

Bug ID: 1843426
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Test2 - Framework for writing
test tools that all work together
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test2/perl-Test2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test2/perl-Test2-0.44-3.el7.src.rpm
Description:
Test2 is a new Perl testing framework produced by forking Test::Builder,
completely refactoring it, adding many new features and capabilities.

Fedora Account System Username: ppisar

This is a rereview (bug #1306409) of a package for EPEL 7 only. The package was
replaced by another package in Fedora. RHEL 7 provides that another package in
an old version before the replacement.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1843273] Review Request: python-jaraco-envs - Classes for orchestrating Python (virtual) environments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843273

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 21 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1843273-python-jaraco-
 envs/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.9/site-
 packages/jaraco(python3-jaraco, python3-jaraco-classes),
 /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/jaraco/__pycache__(python3-jaraco,
 python3-jaraco-classes)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if 

[Bug 1843273] Review Request: python-jaraco-envs - Classes for orchestrating Python (virtual) environments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843273

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1842328] Review Request: python-zstandard - Zstandard bindings for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842328

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Unknown or
 generated", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)", "BSD 2-clause
 "Simplified" License", "Expat License". 103 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1842328-python-
 zstandard/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 102400 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no 

[Bug 1842328] Review Request: python-zstandard - Zstandard bindings for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842328

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1840632] Review Request: python-pymc3 - Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632



--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- rpmlint issues
- Ask upstream to include the licnese file in the source tarball
- Can you check the licensing. Looks like that there is also BSD/MIT licensed
code.
- Remove all possible available binary eggs in %prep

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License (v2.0)", "*No
 copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Expat License", "BSD
 (unspecified)". 425 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1840632-python-
 pymc3/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[!]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources 

[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686



--- Comment #49 from Sandro Mani  ---
That's due to the boost 1.73 rebuild which started 2020-05-28, see [1].

[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XEHCL2HROZQXQXQUWZF26VVCPAYFEGR5/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686



--- Comment #48 from markusN  ---
Well, still some issues - from the new BZ#1843094:

Your package (PDAL) Fails To Install in Fedora 33:

can't install PDAL-libs:
  - nothing provides libboost_filesystem.so.1.69.0()(64bit) needed by
PDAL-libs-2.1.0-6.fc33.x86_64

Again, a pointer would be welcome.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1819257] Review Request: tiedot - NoSQL database

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819257

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-e2c5487284 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e2c5487284


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1840632] Review Request: python-pymc3 - Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820856] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-ansi - Easy to use ANSI control codes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820856

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-fc518aff29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fc518aff29


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839477] Review Request: python-google-api-core - Core Library for Google Client Libraries

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839477

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Remove any possible available binary eggs must be removed in %prep. Please fix
that before importing. Thanks.

Package APPROVED.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
  Note: python3-pytest4 is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/deprecating-packages/


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)",
 "Apache License (v2.0)". 45 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in
 /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1839477-python-google-api-
 core/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[!]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as 

[Bug 1685922] Review Request: packit - A set of tools to integrate upstream open source projects into Fedora operating system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685922

Frantisek Lachman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 CC||flach...@redhat.com
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2020-06-03 07:04:56



--- Comment #20 from Frantisek Lachman  ---
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #19)
> Ping, any progress on this?
> 
> I see the bodhi-update filed. You can close this BZ then.

Sorry. Closing.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org