[Bug 1846175] Review Request: trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175



--- Comment #14 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/trojan


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821496] Review Request: open-policy-agent - Open source, general-purpose policy engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821496



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/open-policy-agent


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1849255] Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
   ||roject.org
   Severity|unspecified |medium




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1849255] Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255



--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  ---
This library is basically a blocker for F33 moving to ghc-8.8.3 (LTS 15/16): or
more precisely network-3.0:

$ grep "BuildRequires:  ghc-network-bsd" */*.spec
ghc-MissingH/ghc-MissingH.spec\035:BuildRequires:  ghc-network-bsd-prof
ghc-aws/ghc-aws.spec\049:BuildRequires:  ghc-network-bsd-prof
ghc-happstack-server/ghc-happstack-server.spec\037:BuildRequires: 
ghc-network-bsd-prof
ghc-hslogger/ghc-hslogger.spec\029:BuildRequires:  ghc-network-bsd-prof
ghc-network-multicast/ghc-network-multicast.spec\023:BuildRequires: 
ghc-network-bsd-prof
gitit/gitit.spec\075:BuildRequires:  ghc-network-bsd-prof


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1801352] Review Request: raysession - Ray Session is a GNU/Linux session manager for audio programs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352

Vasiliy Glazov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ycollette.nos...@free.fr



--- Comment #30 from Vasiliy Glazov  ---
*** Bug 1848934 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848934] Raysession package for Fedora

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848934

Vasiliy Glazov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-06-20 02:51:06



--- Comment #1 from Vasiliy Glazov  ---
Already exist https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/raysession

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1801352 ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1849255] New: Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255

Bug ID: 1849255
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-network-bsd/ghc-network-bsd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-network-bsd/ghc-network-bsd-2.8.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description:
This package reexports the "Network.BSD" module split from the
 package.

See newer versions of  for more information.


Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45895397


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846175] Review Request: trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175

yanqiy...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1847451] Review Request: gio-qt - Gio wrapper for Qt applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847451



--- Comment #2 from yanqiy...@gmail.com ---
No longer requesting sponsor for this.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1847451] Review Request: gio-qt - Gio wrapper for Qt applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847451

yanqiy...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1844308] Review Request: python-uvicorn - The lightning-fast ASGI server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844308

Itamar Reis Peixoto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br



--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto  ---
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #1)
> Requires additionally a later httptools [1] and uvloop [2] release.

can you send a pull request to python-httptools ?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1839242] Review Request: python-ouimeaux - Open source control for Belkin WeMo devices

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d1145e9bb9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-d1145e9bb9 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d1145e9bb9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1844837] Review Request: asnip - ASN detail retriever

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844837

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-649417a450 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-649417a450 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-649417a450

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821546] Review Request: ghc-aeson-better-errors - Better error messages when decoding JSON values

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821546

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-ef04d49c8a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-ef04d49c8a \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ef04d49c8a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1840296] Review Request: uhubctl - USB hub per-port power control

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840296



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-817ca3db32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-817ca3db32 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-817ca3db32

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848049] Review Request: python-pysignals - a signal dispatcher for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848049

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-814311f7cf has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-814311f7cf \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-814311f7cf

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1762755] Review Request: vim-trailing-whitespace - Highlights trailing whitespace in red and provides :FixWhitespace to fix it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762755



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-e53b85d48f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e53b85d48f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1762755] Review Request: vim-trailing-whitespace - Highlights trailing whitespace in red and provides :FixWhitespace to fix it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762755

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-15a43e14ca has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-15a43e14ca


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1844850] Review request: antimicroX - Graphical program used to map keyboard buttons and mouse controls to a gamepad

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844850



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-939340c81f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-939340c81f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1844850] Review request: antimicroX - Graphical program used to map keyboard buttons and mouse controls to a gamepad

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844850

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-7f022a8b41 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f022a8b41


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821496] Review Request: open-policy-agent - Open source, general-purpose policy engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821496



--- Comment #2 from Olivier Lemasle  ---
Thank you Robert-André


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1813182] Review Request: python-jaraco-collections - Collection objects similar to those in stdlib by jaraco

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813182



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jaraco-collections


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846175] Review Request: trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #13 from Jerry James  ---
This package is APPROVED.  I have sponsored yanqiyu into the packager group.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1844794] Review Request: openelp - Open Source EchoLink Proxy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844794

Scott K Logan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Scott K Logan  ---
Updated to the latest release:

Spec URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/openelp/openelp.spec
SRPM URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/openelp/openelp-0.8.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45882807


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1847772] Review Request: ocaml-psmt2-frontend - Parser and typechecker for an extension of SMT-LIB 2

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847772

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9725835ab9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9725835ab9


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1821496] Review Request: open-policy-agent - Open source, general-purpose policy engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821496

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Bump to 0.21.0


 - License ok
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1762755] Review Request: vim-trailing-whitespace - Highlights trailing whitespace in red and provides :FixWhitespace to fix it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762755



--- Comment #7 from Igor Raits  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vim-trailing-whitespace


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1762755] Review Request: vim-trailing-whitespace - Highlights trailing whitespace in red and provides :FixWhitespace to fix it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762755

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/vim-trailing-
 whitespace/review-vim-trailing-whitespace/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working UR

[Bug 1821305] Review Request: zgrab2 - Application Layer Scanner

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821305

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Bump to 0.1.7

 - License seems co be ISC and ASL 2:0:

License:ISC and ASL 2.0

 - There's an API mismatch:

# github.com/zmap/zgrab2
_build/src/github.com/zmap/zgrab2/utility.go:52:39: parser.ParseCommandLine
undefined (type *flags.Parser has no field or method ParseCommandLine)
/usr/lib/golang/pkg/tool/linux_amd64/buildid -w $WORK/b168/_pkg_.a # internal


Seems to be linked to zflags. 1.4.0-beta.1 has ParseCommandLine.



Zcrypto needs updating too:

# github.com/zmap/zgrab2/modules/http
_build/src/github.com/zmap/zgrab2/modules/http/scanner.go:229:31: undefined:
"github.com/zmap/zcrypto/tls".SigAndHash


After all this is updated, it works:

 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved. Please fix the License before import.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820918] Review Request: chisel - TCP tunnel over HTTP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820918



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chisel


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1849183] New: Review Request: golang-gitlab-ianbruene-kommandant - Command line meta-interpreter for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849183

Bug ID: 1849183
   Summary: Review Request: golang-gitlab-ianbruene-kommandant -
Command line meta-interpreter for Go
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: de...@fateyev.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora32/golang-gitlab-ianbruene-kommandant.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora32/golang-gitlab-ianbruene-kommandant-0.6.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
Description: Kommandant exists to ease the creation of command line interfaces
for Go programs. It is a near-port of Python’s cmd module, with the caveat
that Go is a compiled language and cannot do introspection as easily. Despite
this mismatch the useful concepts are still useful after translation, and the
user-visible behavior will be the same.

Fedora Account System Username: dfateyev

Rawhide scratch builds for this package:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45874316


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820855] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-requestlog - Simple request logging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820855



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-jpillora-requestlog


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1818892] Review Request: webanalyze - Tool to uncovers technologies used on websites

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818892



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/webanalyze


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1849182] New: Review Request: golang-gitlab-esr-fqme - Mines configuration files to discover full name and email address

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849182

Bug ID: 1849182
   Summary: Review Request: golang-gitlab-esr-fqme - Mines
configuration files to discover full name and email
address
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: de...@fateyev.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora32/golang-gitlab-esr-fqme.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora32/golang-gitlab-esr-fqme-0.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
Description: Fqme is Fully Qualified Me, a Go module that mines configuration
files to
discover your full name and email address.

Fedora Account System Username: dfateyev

Rawhide scratch builds for this package:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45874295


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1849180] New: Review Request: golang-github-termie-shutil - Golang port of python's shutil

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849180

Bug ID: 1849180
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-termie-shutil - Golang
port of python's shutil
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: de...@fateyev.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora32/golang-github-termie-shutil.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora32/golang-github-termie-shutil-0-0.1.20200618gitbcacb06.fc32.src.rpm
Description: High-level Filesystem Operations (for Go)
A direct port of a few of the functions from Python's shutil package for
high-level filesystem operations.
Functions so far: we support Copy, CopyFile, CopyMode and CopyTree.

Fedora Account System Username: dfateyev

Rawhide scratch builds for this package:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45874257


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1849178] New: Review Request: golang-github-ianbruene-difflib - Difflib package's Go implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849178

Bug ID: 1849178
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-ianbruene-difflib -
Difflib package's Go implementation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: de...@fateyev.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora32/golang-github-ianbruene-difflib.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora32/golang-github-ianbruene-difflib-1.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
Description: Go-difflib is an as yet partial port of python 3's difflib
package.

The following publicly visible classes and functions have been ported:
 - SequenceMatcher
 - Differ
 - unified_diff()
 - context_diff()}

Fedora Account System Username: dfateyev

Rawhide scratch builds for this package:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45874209


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1813182] Review Request: python-jaraco-collections - Collection objects similar to those in stdlib by jaraco

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813182

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820918] Review Request: chisel - TCP tunnel over HTTP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820918



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks for the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820855] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-requestlog - Simple request logging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820855

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |golang-github-jpillora-requ |golang-github-jpillora-requ
   |estlog- Simple request  |estlog - Simple request
   |logging |logging




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820855] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-requestlog- Simple request logging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820855



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks for the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1818892] Review Request: webanalyze - Tool to uncovers technologies used on websites

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818892



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks for the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848800] Review Request: rust-openat - Wrapper around openat, symlinkat, and similar system calls

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848800

Artem  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-06-19 18:03:49




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1762755] Review Request: vim-trailing-whitespace - Highlights trailing whitespace in red and provides :FixWhitespace to fix it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762755



--- Comment #5 from Artem  ---
Hi eclipseo! Fixed. And for metainfo changed to CC-BY-SA-3.0.

https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-32-x86_64/01488662-vim-trailing-whitespace/vim-trailing-whitespace.spec

https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/vim-airline/fedora-32-x86_64/01488662-vim-trailing-whitespace/vim-trailing-whitespace-1.0-1.20191209git6b7cdec.fc32.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1643764] Review Request: intelhex - A python library for manipulating Intel HEX file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643764

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
  Flags|needinfo?(pbrobinson@gmail. |
   |com)|
Last Closed||2020-06-19 17:32:59



--- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson  ---
Thanks, and pushed to rawhide.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1643778] Review Request: pyOCD - Tool for programming and debugging Arm Cortex-M microcontrollers using CMSIS-DAP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643778
Bug 1643778 depends on bug 1643764, which changed state.

Bug 1643764 Summary: Review Request: intelhex - A python library for 
manipulating Intel HEX file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643764

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1643764] Review Request: intelhex - A python library for manipulating Intel HEX file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643764



--- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/intelhex


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1847772] Review Request: ocaml-psmt2-frontend - Parser and typechecker for an extension of SMT-LIB 2

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847772



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-psmt2-frontend


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1847772] Review Request: ocaml-psmt2-frontend - Parser and typechecker for an extension of SMT-LIB 2

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847772

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License
 (v2)", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0". 16 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/ocaml-psmt2-frontend/review-ocaml-
 psmt2-frontend/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[-]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all s

[Bug 1813181] Review Request: python-jaraco-text - Module for text manipulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813181



--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jaraco-text


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846175] Review Request: trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175



--- Comment #12 from Jerry James  ---
This looks good.  If you still need a sponsor, send email to me at
loganje...@gmail.com so we can discuss the matter.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/systemd,
 /usr/lib/systemd/system

 This is normal for simple systemd services.

[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 11 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
 systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
 Note: Systemd service file(s) in trojan
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.

[Bug 1832632] Review Request: python-authres - RFC 8601 Authentication-Results Headers generation and parsing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832632



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b674044bb9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846175] Review Request: trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: Trojan - an |Review Request: trojan - an
   |unidentifiable proxy|unidentifiable proxy
   |software|software




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846175] Review Request: Trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||loganje...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #11 from Jerry James  ---
I will take this review.  Do you still need a sponsor?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848761] Review Request: rust-diskonaut - Terminal disk space visual navigator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848761

Artem  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-06-19 16:16:55




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848779] Review Request: rust-ostree-sys - FFI bindings to libostree-1

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848779

Artem  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-06-19 16:16:25




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1840296] Review Request: uhubctl - USB hub per-port power control

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840296



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-2543be3b8c has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-2543be3b8c \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2543be3b8c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848799] Review Request: rust-argparse - Powerful command-line argument parsing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848799

Artem  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-06-19 16:08:56




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1813182] Review Request: python-jaraco-collections - Collection objects similar to those in stdlib by jaraco

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813182



--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge  ---
Thank you for your review.

I've fixed the license and adopted the tests switch from the other jaraco
package Charalampos proposed.


SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-jaraco-collections.spec
SRPM:
http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-jaraco-collections-3.0.0-2.fc32.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820918] Review Request: chisel - TCP tunnel over HTTP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820918

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Bump to 1.6.0


 - License ok
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1820855] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-requestlog- Simple request logging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820855

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848799] Review Request: rust-argparse - Powerful command-line argument parsing library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848799



--- Comment #1 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-argparse


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1816295] Review Request: python-mysqlclient - MySQL/mariaDB database connector for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816295



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-mysqlclient


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1818870] Review Request: hulk - DoS tool using unique and obfuscated traffic

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818870



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hulk


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848800] Review Request: rust-openat - Wrapper around openat, symlinkat, and similar system calls

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848800



--- Comment #1 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-openat


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1819265] Review Request: onionscan - Tool for investigating the Dark Web

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819265

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848804] Review Request: rust-ostree - Rust bindings for libostree

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848804



--- Comment #1 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ostree


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848779] Review Request: rust-ostree-sys - FFI bindings to libostree-1

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848779



--- Comment #1 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ostree-sys


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848761] Review Request: rust-diskonaut - Terminal disk space visual navigator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848761



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-diskonaut


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1826439] Review Request: libvma - LD_PRELOAD-able library with standard BSD sockets API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439



--- Comment #22 from igor.ivanov...@gmail.com ---
Hi Michal,

I have updated libvma.spec to meet most of your requirements and added
additional patch as
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/igor-ivanov/libvma/pr/fedora-package/fedora/0002-Update-systemctl-files.patch

For others please look at my comments inline.

Thanks,
Igor

(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #21)
> Hi Igor,
> I have not added you to the packagers group yet. I have some questions and
> comments about the package.
> 
> libvma.spec:
> > BuildRequires: libibverbs-devel
> > BuildRequires: rdma-core-devel
> 

Done

> These days, libibverbs-devel is provided by rdma-core-devel.
> 
> > BuildRequires: libnl3-devel
> 
> Your config/m4/nl.m4 uses PKG_CHECK_MODULES, so you should BR
> pkgconfig(libnl-route-3.0) instead.
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> PkgConfigBuildRequires/
> 

Done

> > %build
> > export revision=%{use_rel}
> 
> This seems unnecessary. I did not find anything referencing the "revision"
> environment variable in your build system.
> 

It is used during configure to set VMA_SVN_REVISION.

> > %install
> > %{make_build} DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install
> 
> You should use %{make_install} instead.
> 

Corrected but following rules as
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_why_the_makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used
permit original usage.

> > %files
> > %{_libdir}/%{name}.so*
> 
> So the package contains something like this:
> libvma.so -> libvma.so.9.1.0
> libvma.so.9 -> libvma.so.9.1.0
> libvma.so.9.1.0
> 
> Since libvma.so is to be used only for LD_PRELOAD and no program should be
> linked against it (and have DT_NEEDED for it),:
>  1. is there a point in versioning the library?
>  2. does it have to be installed in the linker's default path? Would it make
> more sense to have it as %{_libdir}/libvma/libvma.so ?
> 

livma has own extra api with vma_extra.h header file and admits direct linkage.

> 
> Do you actually use configure_options for anything? I don't think it's
> common for Fedora packages to have macros like that "just in case". 
> 

This option is used to provide flexibility in final binary libvma version.
For example: this option can be used to enable tso support (--enable-tso) that
increases throughput
but not ready to be included by default.

> use_rel - This is fascinating. The macro not only determines the value of
> the Release tag, it also influences the build where its value gets used for
> version compatibility checks and encoded in version strings. To me the
> mechanism seems needlessly complicated and I fail to see the benefit of it.
> Also, are you aware that sometimes automatic scripts (e.g. release
> engineering mass rebuilds) bump the Release fields in Fedora spec files?
> Normally in RPM, Version is the upstream version and Release serves
> packaging needs.
> 

I removed it
but it is used in pair with configure_options to differentiate packages for the
customers on our side.

> 30-libvma-limits.conf:
> > # Default limits that are needed for proper work of libvma
> > # Read more about this topic in the VMA's User Manual
> 
> Can you point me to where in the manual is this discussed?
> 
> > * -   memlockunlimited
> > *  soft   memlockunlimited
> > *  hard   memlockunlimited
> 
> Does having the package installed give every user on the system the
> permission to mlock unlimited amounts of RAM? Is that really necessary?
> Could it be at least limited to a user group?
> 

There is such recommendation at
https://docs.mellanox.com/display/VMAv902/VMA+Installation+Options that forces
to
https://github.com/Mellanox/libvma/wiki/VMA-over-RHEL-7.x-with-inbox-driver#4-common-configurations


> vma.service:
> > [Unit]
> > Description=VMA Daemon. Version: 9.1.0-0
> 
> Please consider dropping the version from the Description. No other service
> has that. 
> 

Done

> > After=network.target syslog.target
> 
> syslog.target became irrelevant and was removed in 2013. Please remove that
> dependency. I am aware some packages still have that, but it's just
> cargo-cult now. 
> 
> > Requires=network.target
> 
> This does not make sense for your daemon. See man systemd.special(7) about
> the intended use of network.target.
> 

Done

> > [Service]
> > Type=forking
> > Restart=on-failure
> > ExecStart=/usr/sbin/vma start
> > ExecStop=/usr/sbin/vma stop
> 
> /usr/sbin/vma is a SysV initscript. That's terrible.
> Why not start the deamon binary directly?:
> ExecStart=/usr/sbin/vmad
> (And maybe set KillSignal if needed.)
> 

It does support of some systems easier for us. 

> > ExecReload=/usr/sbin/vma restart
> 
> You must not fake the reload operation with restart. If the service cannot
> do a reload, just do not define ExecReload. 
> 
> > RestartForceExitStatus=1 SIGTERM
> 
> It's unusual to need to use this setting. There may be a good reason for it,
> but please d

[Bug 1819251] Review Request: andriller - Android Forensic Tools

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819251

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 73 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/andriller/review-andriller/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
 desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[

[Bug 1818892] Review Request: webanalyze - Tool to uncovers technologies used on websites

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818892

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1813182] Review Request: python-jaraco-collections - Collection objects similar to those in stdlib by jaraco

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813182

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - nitpick: Escape macros in comments:

#%%check
#%%{__python3} setup.py test

 - What's the License? None is not acceptable, The license file says MIT:

License:MIT

 - Probably not needed anymore:

BuildConflicts: python3dist(pytest) = 3.7.3

Conflicts:  python3dist(pytest) = 3.7.3

 - Requires are autodetected for Python nowadays




Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 21 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/python-jaraco-collections/review-python-
 jaraco-collections/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.9/site-
 packages/jaraco(python3-jaraco-classes, python3-jaraco),
 /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/jaraco/__pycache__(python3-jaraco-
 classes, python3-jaraco)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[!]: Package does not generate any conflict.
 Note: Package contains Conflicts: tag(s) needing fix or justification.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- 

[Bug 1727505] Review Request: python-bluepyopt - Bluebrain Python Optimisation Library (bluepyopt)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727505



--- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
There's an infrastructure outage at the moment. The infra team is moving to a
new data centre, and it'll be completed at the end of July:
https://status.fedoraproject.org

They had some issues today, so it should be back up in some time:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MAGJJTVR777ARZ4TVMBQQ3YK6RC7ODE6/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1813181] Review Request: python-jaraco-text - Module for text manipulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813181

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package is approved but don't forget to add your changelog entry before import.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0", "SIL Open Font
 License 1.1", "*No copyright* SIL Open Font License 1.1", "*No
 copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License (v3)", "*No copyright*
 Public domain", "Expat License". 30462 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/hfg-
 gmuend-openmoji-fonts/review-hfg-gmuend-openmoji-
 fonts/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary 

[Bug 1727505] Review Request: python-bluepyopt - Bluebrain Python Optimisation Library (bluepyopt)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727505



--- Comment #17 from Anil Tuncel  ---
Thanks Ankur for the information.

> Comment 16
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request

This URL you mentioned above is not responding. Do you know if the same
information is available elsewhere? 

Best
Anil


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1813181] Review Request: python-jaraco-text - Module for text manipulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813181

Matthias Runge  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(mru...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge  ---
Ah sorry about that. Thank you for checking again and thank you for the
reminder.

Charamplos proposal solves all the issues, thank you very much!

Updated
SPEC: http://matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-jaraco-text.spec
SRPM:
http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-jaraco-text-3.2.0-1.fc33.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1813181] Review Request: python-jaraco-text - Module for text manipulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813181

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(mru...@redhat.com
   ||)



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #4)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> >  - Source0:   
> > https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/j/%{pypi_name}/%{pypi_name}-
> > %{version}.tar.gz → Source0:%{pypi_source}
> > 
> >  - Please use a glob or it won't work for Python >= 3.10
> > 
> > %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info
> > 
> >  - License is MIT:
> > 
> > License:MIT
> > 
> >  - Not installable:
> > 
> > DEBUG util.py:600:  Error: 
> > DEBUG util.py:600:   Problem: conflicting requests
> > DEBUG util.py:600:- nothing provides python3dist(importlib-resources)
> > needed by python3-jaraco.text-3.2.0-1.fc33.noarch
> > DEBUG util.py:600:- nothing provides python3dist(pytest-black-multipy)
> > needed by python3-jaraco.text-3.2.0-1.fc33.noarch
> > DEBUG util.py:600:- nothing provides python3dist(pytest-checkdocs) >=
> > 1.2.3 needed by python3-jaraco.text-3.2.0-1.fc33.noarch
> > DEBUG util.py:602:  (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable
> > packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
> 
> 
> Thank you for your review. I'm sorry that I missed this for so long.
> 
> The dependencies were misdeclarations. They are test dependencies. I'll be
> working through these slowly
> to get tests running during build in a subsequent update.
> 
> jaraco.text is blocking cherrypy updates right now.
> 
> SPEC: http://matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-jaraco-text.spec
> SRPM: http://matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-jaraco-text-3.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm

You're missing:

BuildRequires:  python3dist(setuptools-scm)


Also the package is still not installable:

DEBUG util.py:621:   Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides python3dist(importlib-resources)
needed by python3-jaraco.text-3.2.0-1.fc33.noarch
DEBUG util.py:623:  (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages
or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Take a look at  Charalampos Stratakis SPEC and update it accordingly? Requires
are not needed as they are auto detected now.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1818870] Review Request: hulk - DoS tool using unique and obfuscated traffic

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818870



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks for the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1816295] Review Request: python-mysqlclient - MySQL/mariaDB database connector for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816295



--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks for reviewing this.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1816295] Review Request: python-mysqlclient - MySQL/mariaDB database connector for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816295

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1815729] Re-Review Request: mkdocs-bootswatch - Bootswatch themes for MkDocs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815729

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1698871] Review Request: supercollider - Object oriented programming environment for real-time audio and video processing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698871

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-06-19 11:56:23




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1662170] Review Request: ssh-tools - collection of various tools using ssh

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662170

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Looks good, package is approved but you sill need to find a sponsor:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1775667] Review Request: vpl - Voxel Processing Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775667

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+
   ||needinfo?(kvo...@redhat.com
   ||)



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1643764] Review Request: intelhex - A python library for manipulating Intel HEX file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643764

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+
   ||needinfo?(pbrobinson@gmail.
   ||com)



--- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.
Needinfo you cause it's been a while, sorry I missed the notification.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1772770] Review Request: beanstalk-client - C/C++ client for the beanstalkd work queue

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772770

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+
   ||needinfo?(d...@djc.id.au)



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
(In reply to Dan Callaghan from comment #3)
> I tried to request the repo for this package but fedpkg request-repo won't
> let me because this was approved more than 60 days ago. Oops. :-(
> 
> I will fix the soname glob as suggested, but I was intending to leave the
> license as is (using the debian/copyright file from upstream).
> 
> If you have no objections, could you please re-set the fedora-review+ flag
> and I will import the package.

Revalidated. Please import as soon as possible.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1818870] Review Request: hulk - DoS tool using unique and obfuscated traffic

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818870

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1833854] Review Request: input-wacom - Linux kernel driver for Wacom devices

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833854

ar...@unizar.es changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ar...@unizar.es



--- Comment #2 from ar...@unizar.es ---
Apparently there is a delay in updating these drivers. A Wacom One tablet works
in Fedora only as graphic tablet, the screen is recognized but it does not
work. It works in Ubuntu 20.04 and it also works in Fedora 32 after following
the instructions in
https://github.com/linuxwacom/input-wacom/wiki/Installing-input-wacom-from-source


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1762755] Review Request: vim-trailing-whitespace - Highlights trailing whitespace in red and provides :FixWhitespace to fix it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762755



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> https://github.com/bronson/vim-trailing-whitespace/issues/19

"Good question. I wrote it based on
https://vim.fandom.com/wiki/Highlight_unwanted_spaces, which is cc-by-sa. To
keep things easy, this one should probably be cc-by-sa too."

(In reply to Artem from comment #3)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> > I can't find any license anywhere, how do you know it's "Vim"?
> 
> I learned this from other maintainers and package in official repos so when
> there is no license then plugin is licensed under same license as Vim. But
> yes, need to investigate this more...

Please use the aforementioned license?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1848934] New: Raysession package for Fedora

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848934

Bug ID: 1848934
   Summary: Raysession package for Fedora
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ycollette.nos...@free.fr
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org,
vasc...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Raysession is a session manager for audio application.
When you work with jack, this tool will start all the applications and connect
all the audio / midi connectors.
This application is actively developped and is a python 3 / qt5 application

URL of the spec file:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ycollet/fedora-spec/master/raysession/raysession.spec

URL of the src.rpm file:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ycollet/linuxmao/fedora-32-x86_64/01470042-raysession/raysession-0.8.3-1.fc32.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1846175] Review Request: Trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175



--- Comment #10 from yanqiy...@gmail.com ---
Update: 
Richard Fontana  replied that:
> It seems to me it could be used with either GPLv2 or GPLv3 (though
> it's worded like a pre-GPLv2 "exception").

So the legal problem is solved. Will anyone continue this?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org