[Bug 1853829] Review Request: python-jose - JOSE implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853829 --- Comment #3 from c...@redhat.com --- The latest SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/cqi/python-jose/fedora-32-x86_64/01518042-python-jose/python-jose.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/cqi/python-jose/fedora-32-x86_64/01518042-python-jose/python-jose-3.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853617] Review Request: rtklib - Program Package for GNSS Positioning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853617 --- Comment #2 from Vasiliy Glazov --- 1. doc subpackage corrected. 2. Source0 corrected 3. Fixed %setup -q 4. Patch clarified as "All 69 commits ahead of tomojitakasu:rtklib_2.4.3". 5. Install -p added. 6. libs subpackage created. SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3506/46623506/rtklib-2.4.3.b33-2.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851463] Review Request: python-django-uuslug - A Django slugify application that guarantees uniqueness and handles unicode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851463 --- Comment #7 from c...@redhat.com --- Hi Vasiliy, The issue is fixed. PTAL. SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/cqi/python-nitrate-tcms/fedora-32-x86_64/01518150-python-django-uuslug/python-django-uuslug.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/cqi/python-nitrate-tcms/fedora-32-x86_64/01518150-python-django-uuslug/python-django-uuslug-1.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849302] Review Request: golang-storj-drpc - Light replacement for gprc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849302
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Package APPROVED.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 1 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1849302-golang-storj-
drpc/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in golang-
storj-drpc-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should tr
[Bug 1836686] Review Request: python-gcsfs - Convenient Filesystem interface over GCS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836686 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #1) > - You need to add Sphinx-rtd-theme: > > + sphinx-build-3 docs/source html > Running Sphinx v2.2.2 > Configuration error: > There is a programmable error in your configuration file: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sphinx/config.py", line 361, in > eval_config_file > execfile_(filename, namespace) > File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sphinx/util/pycompat.py", line 81, > in execfile_ > exec(code, _globals) > File "/builddir/build/BUILD/gcsfs-0.6.2/docs/source/conf.py", line 124, in > > import sphinx_rtd_theme > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sphinx_rtd_theme' > > > BuildRequires: python3-sphinx > BuildRequires: python3-sphinx_rtd_theme > BuildRequires: python3-numpydoc Added. > > - Tests fail due to missing a dep: > > pytest-3.9 -v gcsfs/tests -k 'not test_request_header' > = test session starts [...] > > > Seems these tests need network access. BR added and condition for tests added. %changelog * Wed Jun 24 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0.6.2-2 - Condition for tests - Update BR (rhbz#1836686) Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-gcsfs.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-gcsfs-0.6.2-2.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835367] Review Request: python-chm - Python package for CHM files handling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835367 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter --- You can go on with the import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840632] Review Request: python-pymc3 - Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter --- - Binary eggs must be removed in %prep - License: ASL 2.0 and MIT and BSD" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837798] Review Request: golang-github-elves-elvish - Elvish shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837798 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-05 08:41:09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830763] Review Request: python-markdown-math - Math extension for Python-Markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830763 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- You can import the package now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830765] Re-Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830765 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- Can you please provide the updated files? Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851562] Review Request: python-django-contrib-comments - The code formerly known as django.contrib.comments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851562 --- Comment #5 from c...@redhat.com --- SPEC is updated. SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/cqi/python-nitrate-tcms/fedora-32-x86_64/01518157-python-django-contrib-comments/python-django-contrib-comments.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/cqi/python-nitrate-tcms/fedora-32-x86_64/01518157-python-django-contrib-comments/python-django-contrib-comments-1.9.2-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853888] New: Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853888 Bug ID: 1853888 Summary: Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: anesa.le...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec and SRPM url : https://filebin.net/72pfbe4j3alvw5c8 (expires in one week) Package tested on COPR : https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lewisanesa/CodeColla/build/1517990/ Code hosted on my git server : git clone git://codecolla.com/libltk Description: Ladspa V3 ToolKit is a general purpose toolkit enabling object oriented programming in c. It is aimed to be simple, without memory leaks, and enabling a runtime without any alloc or free system call. More software based on LTK are yet to come, and more info on man LTK once installed. Fedora Account System Username: lewisanesa Email: anesa.le...@gmail.com Please consider review my package for fedora official repositories inclusion. My web server isn't ready to host files but if filebin expires, feel free to send me an email. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1832392] Review Request: python-typeguard - Run-time type checker for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832392 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Christopher Brown from comment #11) > Built fine against F32 with python 3.8 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46086263 > > Upstream don't appear to be testing with python 3.9 yet. > Thoughts? Add a condition to limit the tests to Python 3.8. You have to remove the all *.egg stuff in %prep. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1832392] Review Request: python-typeguard - Run-time type checker for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832392 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol | |ter.ch) | --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter --- Latest release is 2.9.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1842662] Review Request: ismrmrd - ISMRM Raw Data Format (ISMRMRD)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842662 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #4) > (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #1) > > - The license seems to be "ISMRMRD SOFTWARE LICENSE JULY 2013" according > > LICENSE. > > Should be a MIT license. Good for Fedora. No, it's not. It looks like a variant of MIT that is not listed (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT). I'm no licensing expert, let's wait till FE-Legal is lifted. > > One file contains a MPL header [1]. Can you please check this? > > [1] > > https://github.com/ismrmrd/ismrmrd/blob/ > > 87b6f6b68fd53702f4f36d1a277ed4b9c865cd26/cmake/FindPugiXML.cmake > > > > That's a CMake file, not a source file neither a file needed in runtime. > Listing its license is not necessary. It's part of the source. If there is not need for the file remove it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837107] Review Request: 7kaa - Seven Kingdoms: Ancient Adversaries (claiming ownership of package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #17 from Andy Mender ---
Super big thanks for such a thorough review :)
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #16)
> - Use install -p to keep timestamps
Done
> - Use a better name for your archive:
>
> https://github.com/the3dfxdude/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-
> %{version}.tar.gz
Done.
>
> - There is some BSD code:
>
> BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
> ---
> 7kaa-2.15.3/include/misc_uuid.h
> 7kaa-2.15.3/src/misc_uuid.cpp
>
> Add it to the license field and add a comment explaining the licenses
> breakdown:
>
> # Main program: GPLv2+
> # misc_uuid: BSD
> License: GPLv2+ and BSD
Done. I also re-ran licensecheck on the entire sources, since a new version
came out this weekend. There are some mentions of FSF All Permissive License
for m4 files. Should that also be included?
>
> - Own this dir by removing the glob:
>
> %{_datadir}/%{name}/
I always mess this up. Done.
> - Split the data into a noarch data subpackage that you Requires from the
> main package:
>
> [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
> is arched.
> Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 105809920 bytes in /usr/share
> 7kaa-2.15.3-5.fc33.x86_64.rpm:105809920
> See:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Guidelines
> (...)
This is totally my fault. The original package would split out music and data
files. No idea why I merged the data package back into the main package. Fixed.
> Issues:
> ===
> - Package does not use a name that already exists.
> Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/7kaa
> See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
> guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
Makes sense, since the package was orphaned :).
SPEC URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AndyMender/7kaa-rpm/f32/7kaa.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/AndyMender/7kaa-rpm/blob/f32/7kaa-2.15.4-1.fc32.src.rpm?raw=true
COPR build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymenderunix/7kaa/build/1518257/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851562] Review Request: python-django-contrib-comments - The code formerly known as django.contrib.comments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851562
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "Expat License". 281 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/vascom/1851562-python-django-contrib-
comments/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is no
[Bug 1851405] Review Request: bee2 - cryptographic library which implements cryptographic algorithm and protocols standardized in Belarus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851405
--- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
(In reply to Кощеев from comment #12)
> > %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 7
> It doesn't work that way:
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/kashcheyeu/bee2/epel-8-
> x86_64/01517970-bee2/builder-live.log
>
> Spec URL:
> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kashcheyeu/bee2/fedora-32-
> x86_64/01517971-bee2/bee2.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kashcheyeu/bee2/srpm-builds/
> 01517971/bee2-2.0.5-6.20200702git2d8ccce.fc32.src.rpm
My bad it requires at least CMake 3.13.
Still, you need to split the libraries into a libs subpackages like Björn
'besser82' Esser asked, or rename the package bee2-libs since you're not
shipping any binary anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853829] Review Request: python-jose - JOSE implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853829 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- LGTM, package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853617] Review Request: rtklib - Program Package for GNSS Positioning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853617
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
- Consider asking upstream for a separate LICENSE file. Add the bug report URL
as a comment in the meantime.
- See if you can split /usr/share/rtklib into a noarch data subpackage:
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 25538560 bytes in /usr/share
rtklib-2.4.3.b33-2.fc33.x86_64.rpm:25507840
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Guidelines
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License",
"LGPL (v2.1 or v3)". 1031 files have unknown license. Detailed output
of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/rtklib/review-
rtklib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]:
[Bug 1836686] Review Request: python-gcsfs - Convenient Filesystem interface over GCS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836686
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License". 96 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-gcsfs/review-python-
gcsfs/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
[Bug 1837107] Review Request: 7kaa - Seven Kingdoms: Ancient Adversaries (claiming ownership of package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- > Done. I also re-ran licensecheck on the entire sources, since a new version > came out this weekend. There are some mentions of FSF All Permissive License > for m4 files. Should that also be included? If it's not in the resulting binary, it doesn't matter. M4 files are just artifacts for building, they don't matter. Package approved. You still need to find a sponsor: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853617] Review Request: rtklib - Program Package for GNSS Positioning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853617 --- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov --- I will report about separate license file to upstream. And I think I can remove most of data from /usr/share as it not needed for application. And it done in rtklib debian package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853617] Review Request: rtklib - Program Package for GNSS Positioning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853617 --- Comment #5 from Vasiliy Glazov --- Spec changed according to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853888] Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853888
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@lyes.eu
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Lyes Saadi ---
Hello :)!
You seem to be new here! You should consider reading thoroughly this page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
I am not a sponsor, so I won't do a proper review of your package. But, I've
got some advices :P.
---
1. Store your project online, on a permanent place, preferably on a forge.
Mainly because the Source tag have to be a URL (except if you have to clean the
package before of some prohibited content or you use revision control, but you
at least need to provide the URL from where you got the code in a comment), see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/.
A forge is an ideal choice for that, I would recommend GitHub, GitLab, Pagure,
SourceHut, Bitbucket... etc.
Also, fix your url. For me at least, `codecolla.com:10734` is unreachable.
---
2. Please fix your indentation and separate different sections.
Your indentation is huge and inconsistent. Maybe you use 2-tab indentation? Use
spaces instead, it will render more nicely and will be more readable.
Also, we tend to separate these sections with 1 or more blank lines: Package
Information (Name-Version-Release-Summary), Upstream Information
(License-URL-Source[-Architecture]), BuildRequires, Requires, Description,
Prep, Build, Install, Files, Changelog.
Example:
```
Name: LTK
Version:1.5.3
Release:11%{?dist}
Summary:Ladspa v3 ToolKit
License:GPLv3
URL:codecolla.com:10734
Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRequires: gcc
BuildRequires: glibc-devel
BuildRequires: make
BuildRequires: libunwind-devel
Requires: libunwind
%description
Ladspa V3 ToolKit is a general purpose toolkit
enabling object oriented programming in c.
%prep
%setup -q -c
%build
make NAME=%{name} VERSION=%{version}
%install
[...]
```
See how much nicer and cleaner it looks ;)?
---
3. Use `%make_build NAME=%{name} VERSION=%{version}`.
This will allow for parallel build and is recommended for more consistency
between packages ;).
Even better, you could just add NAME := libLTK and VERSION := 1.5.3 to the
Makefile, so you'd only have to call `%make_build`.
---
4. Add the installation process to the Makefile.
In an `install` target, and replace all that with `%make_install`. This will
make it way more readable and easier to maintain.
---
5. Add the compiler flags!
By adding `%set_build_flags` in a separate line before `%make_build` or, by
adding `%{optflags}` after `%make_build` like that: `%make_build %{optflags}`.
See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_compiler_flags.
---
6. Add a license to the package by including it in the tarball.
And add in the `%files` section `%license LICENSE`. GPLv3 requires that the
license be distributed with the program.
---
7. Remove the photos from the tarball.
You don't install them, and they add an unnecessary weight. And if they are not
Licensed in GPLv3, it could be a Licensing violation.
---
8. Remove the `%postun`.
```
%postun
rm -f %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so
rm -f %{_includedir}/%{name}
```
It is done automatically.
---
9. Add a devel subpackage for the includes and unversioned.so.
If you don't know how to do this, look at packages like libhandy for example:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libhandy/blob/master/f/libhandy.spec
But generally, just add this after the `%description` section:
```
%packagedevel
Summary:Development files for %{name}
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
%descriptiondevel
The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for
developing applications that use %{name}.
```
And this after the `%files` section:
```
%files devel
%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so
%{_includedir}/%{name}.%{version}
%{_includedir}/%{name}
%{_includedir}/%{name}.%{version}/instance.h
%{_includedir}/%{name}.%{version}/utils.h
```
And remove those lines from the other files section.
10. Version your changelogs.
You don't need to do that for older changelogs, but, at least, the last one:
```
* Sat Jul 04 2020 Lewis ANESA - 1.5.3-11
- Merge branch 'logs'
```
11. Rename the spec or the package.
The package and the spec should have the exact same name. I would recommend
renaming the package `libLTK` -> `ltk`, unless you really want your package to
be uppercase (RPM is case-sensitive, it will be harder to install), also the
lib suffix isn't necessary in Fedora.
I hope I've covered them all :P.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
[Bug 1845667] Review Request: qxmledit - Powerful XML editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845667
--- Comment #2 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #1)
> - Group is not used in Fedora
Fixed.
> - Use the %{qmake_qt5} macro
Fixed.
> - None of this is needed anymore:
> %post
> %postun
> %post -n libqxmledit -p /sbin/ldconfig
> %postun -n libqxmledit -p /sbin/ldconfig
Fixed.
> - Add a comment above the patch to explain why it is needed. Give your
> patch a more explicit name.
Fixed.
> - Shouldn't the lang files go with the binary?
> %files -n libqxmledit -f %{bigname}.lang
Fixed.
> - In order to avoid unintentional soname bump, we recommend not globbing
> the major soname version, instead be more specific:
>
> %{_libdir}/libQXmlEdit*.so.*
Fixed.
> - Please explain the breakdown of the licenses in a comment:
> License:LGPLv2+ and GPLv3 and zlib
Fixed.
> Source0:
> https://github.com/lbellonda/qxmledit/archive/%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-
> %{version}.tar.gz
> →
> Source0:
> https://github.com/lbellonda/qxmledit/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.
> tar.gz
Fixed.
> - Add an explicit BR against gcc-c++
Fixed.
> - The PDF is big, please split it in a separate doc noarch subpackage:
Fixed.
> - Split the description to stay below 80 characters per line:
Fixed.
SPEC: https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qxmledit/qxmledit.spec
(old SPEC:
https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qxmledit/qxmledit-0.9.15-1.spec)
SRPM:
https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qxmledit/qxmledit-0.9.15-2.fc32.src.rpm
Koji builds:
- f31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46643065
- f32: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46643067
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840632] Review Request: python-pymc3 - Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632 --- Comment #7 from Sergio Pascual --- Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "binary egg". I can't find any "*.egg" file in the distribution. OTOH, there is a new 3.9 version with an additional dependency (fastprogress) that I will package also. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851405] Review Request: bee2 - cryptographic library which implements cryptographic algorithm and protocols standardized in Belarus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851405 --- Comment #14 from Кощеев --- Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kashcheyeu/bee2/fedora-32-x86_64/01518435-bee2/bee2.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kashcheyeu/bee2/srpm-builds/01518435/bee2-2.0.5-7.20200702git2d8ccce.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844113] Review Request: golang-github-christrenkamp-goxpath - XPath 1.0 implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844113 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:12 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a2f58e34b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844526] Review Request: python-ssdp - Python library for Simple Service Discovery Protocol (SSDP)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844526 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:03 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c765145ca6 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821174] Review Request: golang-github-azure-ntlmssp - NTLM/Negotiate authentication over HTTP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821174 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:14 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3fa42fa712 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822914] Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nmap - Nmap XML parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:05 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-678e053183 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840314] Review Request: ldeep - LDAP enumeration utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840314 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:01 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a7440a284c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844385] Review Request: python-hstspreload - Chromium HSTS Preload list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844385 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-afeb51d11b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844392] Review Request: python-httpcore - Minimal low-level HTTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844392 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ca754ab1ef has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840298] Review Request: ldapdomaindump - Active Directory information dumper via LDAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:10 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e24612a47b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822954] Review Request: aquatone - Tool for Domain Flyovers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822954 Bug 1822954 depends on bug 1822914, which changed state. Bug 1822914 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nmap - Nmap XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822914 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825657] Review Request: lazpaint - Simple image editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825657 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:27 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b61920bc33 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844114] Review Request: golang-github-masterzen-winrm - Command-line tool and library for Windows remote command execution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844114 Bug 1844114 depends on bug 1821174, which changed state. Bug 1821174 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-azure-ntlmssp - NTLM/Negotiate authentication over HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821174 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844119] Review Request: shellz - Utility to tracking and controlling shells and tunnels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844119 Bug 1844119 depends on bug 1821159, which changed state. Bug 1821159 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-reiver-telnet - Telnet(s) client and server implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821159 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839489] Review Request: nuclei - Tool for configurable targeted scanning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839489 Bug 1839489 depends on bug 1839464, which changed state. Bug 1839464 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryabledns - Retryable DNS client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839464 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839464] Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryabledns - Retryable DNS client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839464 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:29 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d557a96bdb has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821159] Review Request: golang-github-reiver-telnet - Telnet(s) client and server implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821159 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:07 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-107ae97164 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845423] Review Request: python-hass-data-detective - Tools for studying Home Assistant data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845423 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:26 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4f5857a13a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1836686] Review Request: python-gcsfs - Convenient Filesystem interface over GCS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836686 Bug 1836686 depends on bug 1836663, which changed state. Bug 1836663 Summary: Review Request: python-google-auth-oauthlib - Google oAuth Authentication Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836663 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844114] Review Request: golang-github-masterzen-winrm - Command-line tool and library for Windows remote command execution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844114 Bug 1844114 depends on bug 1844113, which changed state. Bug 1844113 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-christrenkamp-goxpath - XPath 1.0 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844113 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822106] Review Request: golang-github-dghubble-oauth1 - Go OAuth1 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822106 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:34 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8ec7e50f54 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1836663] Review Request: python-google-auth-oauthlib - Google oAuth Authentication Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836663 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:31 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-35faeaf9ef has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839465] Review Request: dnsprobe - Tool to perform multiple DNS queries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839465 Bug 1839465 depends on bug 1839464, which changed state. Bug 1839464 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryabledns - Retryable DNS client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839464 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822107] Review Request: golang-github-dghubble-twitter - Client library for the Twitter API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822107 Bug 1822107 depends on bug 1822106, which changed state. Bug 1822106 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-dghubble-oauth1 - Go OAuth1 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822106 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840711] Review Request: dnsgen - Generates DNS names from existing domain names
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840711 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:43 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c3d7dae5b2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839482] Review Request: golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan - Urlscan.io client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839482 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:46 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0e03806a70 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839483] Review Request: subfinder - Subdomain discovery tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839483 Bug 1839483 depends on bug 1839482, which changed state. Bug 1839482 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan - Urlscan.io client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839482 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826313] Review Request: golang-github-alexflint-scalar - Parsing library for string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826313 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:39 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3ba265df35 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844803] Review Request: scanless - An online port scan scraper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844803 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:48 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0cae6b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839374] Review Request: terrier - Image and Container analysis tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839374 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:01:42 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-fcd1eaa1bd has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840614] Review Request: mass3 - Buckets enumerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840614 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:00 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-722994cb18 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822916] Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-nessus - Nessus XML parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822916 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:04 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-232d37cd25 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821922] Review Request: golang-github-olivere-env - Reading environment variables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821922 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:08 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8caab7cc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826315] Review Request: golang-github-alexflint-arg - Struct-based argument parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826315 Bug 1826315 depends on bug 1826313, which changed state. Bug 1826313 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alexflint-scalar - Parsing library for string https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826313 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826308] Review Request: golang-github-songgao-water - TUN/TAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-17d8fd27f9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840628] Review Request: meg - Fetch many paths for many hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840628 Bug 1840628 depends on bug 1840622, which changed state. Bug 1840622 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-tomnomnom-rawhttp - Making HTTP requests with complete control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840622 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843264] Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:24 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d6abc46c6c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822220] Review Request: golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic-6 - Elasticsearch 6 client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180 Bug 180 depends on bug 1821922, which changed state. Bug 1821922 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-olivere-env - Reading environment variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821922 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822210] Review Request: golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic-7 - Elasticsearch 7 client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822210 Bug 1822210 depends on bug 1821922, which changed state. Bug 1821922 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-olivere-env - Reading environment variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821922 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822214] Review Request: golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic-5 - Elasticsearch 5 client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822214 Bug 1822214 depends on bug 1821922, which changed state. Bug 1821922 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-olivere-env - Reading environment variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821922 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843268] Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 Bug 1843268 depends on bug 1843264, which changed state. Bug 1843264 Summary: Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839389] Review Request: naabu - Fast port scanner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839389 Bug 1839389 depends on bug 1839380, which changed state. Bug 1839380 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-phayes-freeport - Detect free and open TCP port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839380 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839380] Review Request: golang-github-phayes-freeport - Detect free and open TCP port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839380 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:20 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-cb8642f8ab has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843268] Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:26 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4db8b95483 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840622] Review Request: golang-github-tomnomnom-rawhttp - Making HTTP requests with complete control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840622 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:18 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-2731fff763 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843279] Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843279 Bug 1843279 depends on bug 1843268, which changed state. Bug 1843268 Summary: Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843279] Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843279 Bug 1843279 depends on bug 1843264, which changed state. Bug 1843264 Summary: Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822921] Review Request: golang-github-lair-framework-burp - BurpSuite XML parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822921 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:03 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-61c25e4b81 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839488] Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp - Familiar HTTP client interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839488 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:22 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-85a86aa2f0 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843279] Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843279 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:29 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-10aa8b2ff4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839489] Review Request: nuclei - Tool for configurable targeted scanning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839489 Bug 1839489 depends on bug 1839488, which changed state. Bug 1839488 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp - Familiar HTTP client interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839488 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839513] Review Request: golang-github-panjf2000-ants - Goroutine pool in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839513 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-06 01:02:11 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0dfe9bd3d5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844392] Review Request: python-httpcore - Minimal low-level HTTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844392 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e99b99b305 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825657] Review Request: lazpaint - Simple image editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825657 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-2065dcb73b has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826313] Review Request: golang-github-alexflint-scalar - Parsing library for string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826313 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3d5f6920c1 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840298] Review Request: ldapdomaindump - Active Directory information dumper via LDAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840298 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-27f2f2e5bc has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839374] Review Request: terrier - Image and Container analysis tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839374 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-831840cfe4 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840711] Review Request: dnsgen - Generates DNS names from existing domain names
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840711 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a9e12fabec has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840314] Review Request: ldeep - LDAP enumeration utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840314 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9fbc2b23e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844385] Review Request: python-hstspreload - Chromium HSTS Preload list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844385 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d37bcc8174 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844803] Review Request: scanless - An online port scan scraper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844803 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-049bc4431c has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825456] Review Request: libvirt-test-API - Python based regression tests for libvirt API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-aeb83bf598 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-aeb83bf598 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
