[Bug 1855219] Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover - Collect a minimal file coverage data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855219 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover-0.0.7-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libperl.so.5.32()(64bit) 1 libpthread.so.0()(64bit) 1 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(File::Spec) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.32.0) 1 perl(Path::Tiny) >= 0.048 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Test2::API) >= 1.302166 1 perl(Test2::EventFacet) >= 1.302166 1 perl(Test2::Util::HashBase) 1 perl(warnings) 1 perl(XSLoader) 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover-0.0.7-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Test2::EventFacet::Coverage) = 0.07 1 perl(Test2::Plugin::Cover) = 0.07 1 perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover = 0.0.7-1.fc33 1 perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover(x86-64) = 0.0.7-1.fc33 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Resolution: Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1295710] Review Request: wml - WML is a free and extensible Webdesigner's off-line HTML generation toolkit for Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295710 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(nmavrogi@redhat.c | |om) | Last Closed||2020-07-10 06:47:23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1295710] Review Request: wml - WML is a free and extensible Webdesigner's off-line HTML generation toolkit for Unix
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos has canceled Package Review 's request for Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos 's needinfo: Bug 1295710: Review Request: wml - WML is a free and extensible Webdesigner's off-line HTML generation toolkit for Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295710 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1676544] Review Request: nodejs-event-stream - Construct pipes of streams of events
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676544 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC|t...@compton.nu | Assignee|t...@compton.nu |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(t...@compton.nu) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1674192] Review Request: nodejs-spdx-ranges - List of SPDX standard license ranges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674192 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC|t...@compton.nu | Assignee|t...@compton.nu |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(t...@compton.nu) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1674192] Review Request: nodejs-spdx-ranges - List of SPDX standard license ranges
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Tom Hughes has canceled Package Review 's request for Tom Hughes 's needinfo: Bug 1674192: Review Request: nodejs-spdx-ranges - List of SPDX standard license ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674192 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269001] Review Request: tinycbor - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269001 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC|t...@compton.nu | Assignee|t...@compton.nu |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(t...@compton.nu) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1676544] Review Request: nodejs-event-stream - Construct pipes of streams of events
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Tom Hughes has canceled Package Review 's request for Tom Hughes 's needinfo: Bug 1676544: Review Request: nodejs-event-stream - Construct pipes of streams of events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676544 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1269001] Review Request: tinycbor - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Library
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Tom Hughes has canceled Package Review 's request for Tom Hughes 's needinfo: Bug 1269001: Review Request: tinycbor - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269001 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1074411] Review Request: nodejs-extend - A port of jQuery.extend for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074411 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC|t...@compton.nu | Assignee|t...@compton.nu |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(t...@compton.nu) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1074411] Review Request: nodejs-extend - A port of jQuery.extend for Node.js
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Tom Hughes has canceled Package Review 's request for Tom Hughes 's needinfo: Bug 1074411: Review Request: nodejs-extend - A port of jQuery.extend for Node.js https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074411 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1265759] Review Request: mingw-drmingw - Just-in-Time (JIT) debugger for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265759 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(t.sailer@alumni.e | |thz.ch) | --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer --- Update to 0.9.2: https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-drmingw.spec https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-drmingw-0.9.2-1.fc33.src.rpm copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1544028/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1265759] Review Request: mingw-drmingw - Just-in-Time (JIT) debugger for MinGW
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Thomas Sailer has canceled Package Review 's request for Thomas Sailer 's needinfo: Bug 1265759: Review Request: mingw-drmingw - Just-in-Time (JIT) debugger for MinGW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265759 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer --- Update to 0.9.2: https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-drmingw.spec https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-drmingw-0.9.2-1.fc33.src.rpm copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1544028/ ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Thomas Sailer has canceled Package Review 's request for Thomas Sailer 's needinfo: Bug 851819: Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer --- Update to 2.0.3: https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-sparsehash.spec https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-sparsehash-2.0.3-1.fc33.src.rpm copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1544026/ ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(t.sailer@alumni.e | |thz.ch) | --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer --- Update to 2.0.3: https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-sparsehash.spec https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-sparsehash-2.0.3-1.fc33.src.rpm copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1544026/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419032] Review Request: mingw-jimtcl - MinGW small embeddable Tcl interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419032 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer --- Hi Robert-André, thanks for the review! I have fixed the rpmlint errors and updated to 0.79: https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-jimtcl-0.79-1.fc33.src.rpm https://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw-jimtcl.spec copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1544025/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419032] Review Request: mingw-jimtcl - MinGW small embeddable Tcl interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419032 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com | |) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1419032] Review Request: mingw-jimtcl - MinGW small embeddable Tcl interpreter
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Thomas Sailer has canceled Package Review 's request for Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 's needinfo: Bug 1419032: Review Request: mingw-jimtcl - MinGW small embeddable Tcl interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419032 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851562] Review Request: python-django-contrib-comments - The code formerly known as django.contrib.comments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851562 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-79d93fe9d0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-79d93fe9d0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853829] Review Request: python-jose - JOSE implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853829 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7ee6fbfccd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7ee6fbfccd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1275216] Review Request: giza - Scientific plotting library for C/Fortran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275216 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) --- Comment #7 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dominique.martine ||t...@cea.fr) --- Comment #17 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1267453] Review Request: rubygem-emoji - A Ruby gem. For emoji.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267453 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ilya.gradina@gmai ||l.com) --- Comment #2 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 989866] Review Request: discord - A program that generates beats for brainwave entrainment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989866 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) --- Comment #11 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1152246] Review Request: joda-timezones - Timezone data for joda-time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152246 --- Comment #5 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157255] Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157255 --- Comment #30 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1197048] Review Request: felix-ipojo-metadata - Apache Felix iPOJO Metadata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197048 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i ||t) --- Comment #2 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1138476] Review Request: percona-toolkit - A MySQL Toolkit by Percona
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138476 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) --- Comment #10 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1038593] Review Request: lftpfs - Filesystem with caching based on FUSE and LFTP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038593 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) --- Comment #2 from Package Review --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686307] Review Request: python-distributed - Distributed scheduler for Dask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686307 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(quantum.analyst@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Yep, still trying to figure out the test failures though, unfortunately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1686307] Review Request: python-distributed - Distributed scheduler for Dask
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Elliott Sales de Andrade has canceled Package Review 's request for Elliott Sales de Andrade 's needinfo: Bug 1686307: Review Request: python-distributed - Distributed scheduler for Dask https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686307 --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Yep, still trying to figure out the test failures though, unfortunately. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398004] Review Request: mingw-mpg123 - MP3 decoding library for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398004 Yaakov Selkowitz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(yselkowi@redhat.c | |om) | Last Closed||2020-07-10 01:13:14 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- Someone please feel free to adopt and revive this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(m...@flyn.org)| --- Comment #9 from W. Michael Petullo --- This review request is still valid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1398004] Review Request: mingw-mpg123 - MP3 decoding library for MinGW
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Yaakov Selkowitz has canceled Package Review 's request for Yaakov Selkowitz 's needinfo: Bug 1398004: Review Request: mingw-mpg123 - MP3 decoding library for MinGW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398004 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- Someone please feel free to adopt and revive this. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review W. Michael Petullo has canceled Package Review 's request for W. Michael Petullo 's needinfo: Bug 533763: Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763 --- Comment #9 from W. Michael Petullo --- This review request is still valid. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1130103] Review Request: blink - Real-time communications client using SIP protocol
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Orion Poplawski has canceled Package Review 's request for Orion Poplawski 's needinfo: Bug 1130103: Review Request: blink - Real-time communications client using SIP protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130103 --- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski --- I think this is more in the submitter's court. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1130103] Review Request: blink - Real-time communications client using SIP protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130103 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(or...@nwra.com) |needinfo?(pa...@hubbitus.in ||fo) --- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski --- I think this is more in the submitter's court. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1848047] Review Request: xtb - Semiempirical Extended Tight-Binding Program Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848047 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-93209a0fc4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1848765] Review Request: golang-github-dravenk-webthing - Implementation of a Web Thing server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848765 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4737639071 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Bug 505154 depends on bug 1848047, which changed state. Bug 1848047 Summary: Review Request: xtb - Semiempirical Extended Tight-Binding Program Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848047 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825673] Review Request: padthv1 - An old-school polyphonic additive synthesizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825673 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7cfba5677e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1471294] Review Request: c-icap - HTTP proxy ICAP server
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Orion Poplawski has canceled Package Review 's request for Orion Poplawski 's needinfo: Bug 1471294: Review Request: c-icap - HTTP proxy ICAP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471294 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- Not using this. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843279] Review Request: baresip - Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843279 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7bde0cb4f9 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1848047] Review Request: xtb - Semiempirical Extended Tight-Binding Program Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848047 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-10 01:01:13 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1083e8a472 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1471294] Review Request: c-icap - HTTP proxy ICAP server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471294 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(or...@nwra.com) | Last Closed||2020-07-10 01:01:19 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- Not using this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825673] Review Request: padthv1 - An old-school polyphonic additive synthesizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825673 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4bd0b91566 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1848765] Review Request: golang-github-dravenk-webthing - Implementation of a Web Thing server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848765 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-10 01:00:56 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-10534db8f9 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853120] Review request: zlib-ng - a zlib implementation with optimizations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853120 Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 00:44:37 --- Comment #6 from Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #4) > Consider using to the new cmake macros, %cmake_build and %cmake_install > instead of %make_build and %make_install Done. The package has been built and I think we can close this now. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855459] Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855459 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1853823 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853823 [Bug 1853823] rust-glib-0.10.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855458] Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855458 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1855459 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855459 [Bug 1855459] Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855459] Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855459 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1855458 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855458 [Bug 1855458] Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855459] New: Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855459 Bug ID: 1855459 Summary: Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jist...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org//rust-glib-macros.spec SRPM URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org//rust-glib-macros-0.10.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855458] New: Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855458 Bug ID: 1855458 Summary: Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jist...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org//rust-proc-macro-crate.spec SRPM URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org//rust-proc-macro-crate-0.1.4-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Replacement for crate (macro_rules keyword) in proc-macros. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855458] Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855458 --- Comment #1 from Josh Stone --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46885621 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855456] Review Request: rust-pretty-hex - Pretty hex dump of bytes slice in the common style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855456 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1854100 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854100 [Bug 1854100] rust-gstreamer-0.16.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855456] New: Review Request: rust-pretty-hex - Pretty hex dump of bytes slice in the common style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855456 Bug ID: 1855456 Summary: Review Request: rust-pretty-hex - Pretty hex dump of bytes slice in the common style Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jist...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org//rust-pretty-hex.spec SRPM URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org//rust-pretty-hex-0.1.1-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Pretty hex dump of bytes slice in the common style. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855456] Review Request: rust-pretty-hex - Pretty hex dump of bytes slice in the common style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855456 --- Comment #1 from Josh Stone --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46885226 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855409] Review Request: rust-system-deps - Declarative dependencies in Cargo.toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855409 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787336] Review Request: python-aiohttp-socks - Proxy connector for aiohttp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787336 Jonny Heggheim changed: What|Removed |Added CC||heg...@gmail.com, ||igor.ra...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(igor.raits@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #3 from Jonny Heggheim --- Looks like this package is already maintained by igor.ra...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855094] Review Request: pveclib - Library for simplified access to PowerISA vector operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855094 --- Comment #3 from Steven Jay Munroe --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #2) > It is already packaged https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pveclib and you > are the owner. > > Do you require help to update it? You don't need a review for an update. ... > > fedpkg update --type enhancement --bugs XX (add a bug number if needed) Sorry I lost all the bread crumbs from the last time (11 months ago). So yes I could use some help. Also I need a reminder (doc link) for how to apply my pagure.keys. In the meantime I will review the fedpkg doc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849300] Review Request: golang-github-zeebo-admission - Admission is a package for processing a bunch of udp packets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849300 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7851a6ceda has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-7851a6ceda \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7851a6ceda See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849302] Review Request: golang-storj-drpc - Light replacement for gprc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849302 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1d0bbf264a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-1d0bbf264a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1d0bbf264a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854898] Review Request: uresourced - Dynamically allocate resources to the active user
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854898 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f72c87d8dd has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-f72c87d8dd \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f72c87d8dd See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849299] Review Request: golang-github-zeebo-incenc - Incremental Encoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849299 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-17373e48dd has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-17373e48dd \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-17373e48dd See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1846782] Review Request: rubygem-rmail - MIME mail parsing and generation library for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846782 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7bd49974b9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-7bd49974b9` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7bd49974b9 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852339] Review Request: barrier - Use a single keyboard and mouse to control multiple computers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852339 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-dfc7491169 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-dfc7491169 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-dfc7491169 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855409] Review Request: rust-system-deps - Declarative dependencies in Cargo.toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855409 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1853816, 1853826, 1853819, ||1853820, 1853822, 1853824, ||1853827, 1854058, 1854059, ||1854060, 1854061, 1854062, ||1854063, 1854064, 1853832, ||1853814, 1853813 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853813 [Bug 1853813] rust-pangocairo-sys-0.11.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853814 [Bug 1853814] rust-pango-sys-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853816 [Bug 1853816] rust-atk-sys-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853819 [Bug 1853819] rust-gdk-pixbuf-sys-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853820 [Bug 1853820] rust-gdk-sys-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853822 [Bug 1853822] rust-gio-sys-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853824 [Bug 1853824] rust-glib-sys-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853826 [Bug 1853826] rust-cairo-sys-rs-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853827 [Bug 1853827] rust-gobject-sys-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853832 [Bug 1853832] rust-gtk-sys-0.10.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854058 [Bug 1854058] rust-gstreamer-audio-sys-0.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854059 [Bug 1854059] rust-gstreamer-base-sys-0.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854060 [Bug 1854060] rust-gstreamer-editing-services-sys-0.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854061 [Bug 1854061] rust-gstreamer-pbutils-sys-0.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854062 [Bug 1854062] rust-gstreamer-player-sys-0.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854063 [Bug 1854063] rust-gstreamer-sys-0.9.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854064 [Bug 1854064] rust-gstreamer-video-sys-0.9.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855308] Review Request: golang-github-timberio-datemath - Go library for parsing Elasticsearch datemath expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855308 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855409] New: Review Request: rust-system-deps - Declarative dependencies in Cargo.toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855409 Bug ID: 1855409 Summary: Review Request: rust-system-deps - Declarative dependencies in Cargo.toml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jist...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org//rust-system-deps.spec SRPM URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org//rust-system-deps-1.3.1-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Discover and configure system dependencies from declarative dependencies in Cargo.toml. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855409] Review Request: rust-system-deps - Declarative dependencies in Cargo.toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855409 --- Comment #1 from Josh Stone --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46877769 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #50 from Mattia Verga ---
Yonhan, the steps at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers should
work.
I suggest you to start over from the beginning, delete your local directory
where you cloned openosc repo, then follow these steps:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_a_Fedora_Account
(pay attention to point 4 of this step, the RSA SSH key installed on your
machine must match the key you uploaded into FAS. It may take an hour for the
key to be propagate in Fedora infrastructure after you uploaded it into FAS, so
just wait)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Configure_Your_Git
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Install_the_developer_client_tools
('dnf install fedora-packager' and 'echo "yourfasid" > ~/.fedora.upn')
Setup kerberos or, as I do, just run 'kinit yourfa...@fedoraproject.org'
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Check_out_the_module
At this point, if 'fedpkg clone' fails it means there's still something wrong,
do not just clone the repo anonymously...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855328] Review Request: golang-github-magefile-mage - A Make/rake-like dev tool using Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855328 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #49 from yon...@cisco.com --- I discovered that on my vm20, I can ssh connect to IPv6 address without issue, however, if its IPv4 address, then it will fail. fedorapeople.org has IPv6 address, therefore, I can ssh to it directly. pkgs.fedoraproject.org has only IPv4 address, thus I cannot ssh to it. the same issue for github.com URL, which has only IPv4 address. but I don't know how to configure proxy or do anything to find a workaround for my "fedpkg clone openosc" issue. so it seems that this ssh approach will not work for me, I will explore the https approach next, which seems to require a graphical session to work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #48 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Sorry I can't help you much with this, I know nothing about networking stuff, try asking for help on the fedora-devel mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #47 from yon...@cisco.com --- oh, I think I found the root cause. it is due to routing issue in my vm20. debug2: resolving "pkgs.fedoraproject.org" port 22 debug2: ssh_connect_direct debug1: Connecting to pkgs.fedoraproject.org [38.145.60.17] port 22. debug1: connect to address 38.145.60.17 port 22: No route to host ssh: connect to host pkgs.fedoraproject.org port 22: No route to host [rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 ~]$ you can see, it says "No route to host". Again this may be due to the strict firewall. I run "traceroute pkgs.fedoraproject.org", and it displays different results from what I get from the new VM without firewall. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855328] New: Review Request: golang-github-magefile-mage - A Make/rake-like dev tool using Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855328 Bug ID: 1855328 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-magefile-mage - A Make/rake-like dev tool using Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: agerstm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-github-magefile-mage/golang-github-magefile-mage.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-github-magefile-mage/golang-github-magefile-mage-1.10.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: A Make/rake-like dev tool using Go Fedora Account System Username: agerstmayr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1847058] Review Request: mod_authn_otp - One-time password authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa --- I've sponsored you as a packager, as I've seen your work in Mageia and CentOS stuff and know you're very good at this. Congratulations on becoming a Fedora packager and welcome to the Fedora community! You can proceed to the next step in the package inclusion process. :) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1847058] Review Request: mod_authn_otp - One-time password authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa --- Based on the review, I think this is good to go! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1847058] Review Request: mod_authn_otp - One-time password authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058
--- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[-]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0", "Expat License".
9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/ngompa/1847058-mod_authn_otp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpm
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #46 from yon...@cisco.com --- I think I have narrowed down the root cause for my vm20 not working with "fedpkg clone ssh://". It must be due to firewall setting. I have another VM which does not have this kind of strict firewall, and I uploaded my SSH id_rsa.pub key to fedora, and now I can successfully clone via SSH on this new VM: git clone --verbose ssh://yon...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc Cloning into 'openosc'... Enter passphrase for key '/users/yonhan/.ssh/id_rsa': remote: Enumerating objects: 3, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (3/3), done. remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) Receiving objects: 100% (3/3), done. However, this new VM is RedHat Linux 7.x version, which does not have fedpkg tool available. Can I just use git tool to do the push from this new RHEL7.x VM? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1847058] Review Request: mod_authn_otp - One-time password authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058 --- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa --- > BuildRequires: gcc make autoconf automake I generally recommend that you make this one per line, to be nice with git diff, but I'm not going to make you change it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855094] Review Request: pveclib - Library for simplified access to PowerISA vector operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855094 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- It is already packaged https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pveclib and you are the owner. Do you require help to update it? You don't need a review for an update. 1. cd pveclib 2. fedpkg switch-branch master (Make sure our changes go to master first) 3. Edit the SPEC to update it (Don't forget to bump version-release and add the corresponding changelog entry). 4. Download the new source: spectool -g *.spec; 5. Upload the new source to dist-git (remove any old archives first if it still there) fedpkg new-sources *.tar.gz 6. Test your changes with a scratch build: fedpkg --release f33 scratch-build --srpm --fail-fast If it fails, look at the logs to understand why. 7. If it's good, remove the SRPM from your repo: rm -f *.src.rpm 8. Stage your changes git add . 9. Commit your changes: fedpkg ci -cs 10. Push fedpkg push 11. Build fedpkg build 12. Then if you want to support other branches: fedpkg switch-branch f32 13. Import your changes from master: git merge master 14. Push & build for F32: fedpkg push fedpkg build 15. Request an update from bodhi: fedpkg update --type enhancement --bugs XX (add a bug number if needed) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851405] Review Request: bee2 - cryptographic library which implements cryptographic algorithm and protocols standardized in Belarus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851405 --- Comment #16 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- > bee2 (library) call it bee-libs make bee2-devel depends on bee-libs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855219] Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover - Collect a minimal file coverage data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855219 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854268] Review Request: opencsd - ARM coresight debug and trace decoder library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854268 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853888] Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853888
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
> gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libLTK.so -o bin/libLTK.so bin/instance.o bin/utils.o
> -lunwind
You didn't include the soname version here: ie -Wl,-soname,libLTK.so.X.Y.Z
> gcc -Wall -c -fPIC -pedantic -o bin/utils.o src/utils.c -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700
> -DLTKVER=\"1.6.2\" -Iinclude
36 gcc -Wall -c -fPIC -pedantic -o bin/instance.o src/instance.c
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -DLTKVER=\"1.6.2\" -Iinclude
these commands should respect the Fedora builds flags, i.e. use the previously
defined CFLAGS
I don't understand anything about your build script, it's over engineered, why
don't you write your SPEC file by hand, nothing change that much.
Also why do you use rpmbuild, it's not reproducible. Use a mock chroot for
testing:
1. Generate SRPM:
fedpkg --release f33 srpm
2. Test in a mockbuild:
fedpkg --release f33 mockbuild --mock-config fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ---no-clean
--no-cleanup-after
Also the Makefile needs to be fixed.
=
CC := gcc
IFLAGS := -Iinclude
CFLAGS += -Wall -c -fPIC -pedantic
AFLAGS := -shared -Wl,-soname,lib$(NAME).so.$(MAJOR)
LFLAGS := -lunwind
DFLAGS := -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -D$(NAME)VER=\"$(VERSION)\"
all : bin bin/lib$(NAME).so
bin/lib$(NAME).so : $(patsubst src/%.c,bin/%.o, $(shell ls src/*.c))
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(AFLAGS) -o $@.$(MAJOR) $^ $(LFLAGS)
bin/%.o : src/%.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $< $(DFLAGS) $(IFLAGS)
bin :
mkdir -p $@
clean :
rm -rf bin
===
%global major 1
Name: LTK
Version:1.6.1
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Ladspa v3 ToolKit
License:GPLv3
URL:https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lewisanesa/CodeColla
# git clone git://codecolla.com/libltk
# cd libtlk/PROJECT
# git archive --format tar.gz --prefix LTK-1.6.1/ v1.6.1 > LTK-1.6.1.tar.gz
Source0:%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRequires: gcc
BuildRequires: make
BuildRequires: glibc-devel
BuildRequires: libunwind-devel
%description
Ladspa V3 ToolKit is a general purpose toolkit
enabling object oriented programming in c.
%packagedevel
Summary:Development files for %{name}
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
%descriptiondevel
The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for
developing applications that use %{name}.
%prep
%autosetup
%build
%set_build_flags
%make_build NAME=%{name} VERSION=%{version} MAJOR=%{major}
%install
install -pm 0755 -D bin/lib%{name}.so.%{major}
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{major}
ln -s %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{version}
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{major}
ln -s %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{major}
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/%{name}
install -pm 0644 -D include/* %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/%{name}/
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3
install -pm 0644 -D man/*.3 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3/
%files
%license LICENSE
%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{major}*
%files devel
%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so
%{_includedir}/%{name}
%{_mandir}/man3/LTK*.3.*
%changelog
===
Not tested if it works. At least the build fails due to a Fedora security flag:
gcc -O2 -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
-Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wall -c
-fPIC -pedantic -o bin/utils.o src/utils.c -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700
-DLTKVER=\"1.6.1\" -Iinclude
src/utils.c: In function 'LTKBacktrace':
src/utils.c:208:2: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments
[-Werror=format-security]
208 | if(before_str) ptr += sprintf(ptr, before_str);
| ^~
src/utils.c:215:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments
[-Werror=format-security]
215 | if(indent_str) ptr += sprintf(ptr, indent_str);
| ^~
src/utils.c:218:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments
[-Werror=format-security]
218 | if(end_str) ptr += sprintf(ptr, end_str);
| ^~
src/utils.c:219:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments
[-Werror=format-security]
219 | else if(indent_str) ptr += sprintf(ptr, indent_str);
| ^~~~
src/utils.c:234:2: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments
[-Werror=format-security]
234 | if(after_str) ptr += sprintf(ptr, after_str);
| ^~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make: *** [Makefile:14: bin/utils.o] Error 1
Pl
[Bug 1849568] Review Request: sourcetrail - a free and open-source interactive source explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849568 Tom Stellard changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Tom Stellard --- You should add a comment explaining why parallel builds are disabled. Otherwise, LGTM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855308] New: Review Request: golang-github-timberio-datemath - Go library for parsing Elasticsearch datemath expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855308 Bug ID: 1855308 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-timberio-datemath - Go library for parsing Elasticsearch datemath expressions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: agerstm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/master/reviews/rpms/golang-github-timberio-datemath/golang-github-timberio-datemath.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/andreasgerstmayr/specs/raw/master/reviews/rpms/golang-github-timberio-datemath/golang-github-timberio-datemath-0-0.1.20200625git85899cb.fc32.src.rpm Description: Go library for parsing Elasticsearch datemath expressions Fedora Account System Username: agerstmayr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851205] Review Request: AusweisApp2 - Online identification with German ID card (Personalausweis)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851205 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849568] Review Request: sourcetrail - a free and open-source interactive source explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849568 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|tstel...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835452] Review Request: mlxbf-bootctl - Bootloader control for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835452 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1004030] Review Request: ovirt-scheduler-proxy - Scheduling Proxy for Open Virtualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004030 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1847058] Review Request: mod_authn_otp - One-time password authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1850262] Review Request: kissat - Keep It Simple SAT solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850262 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851463] Review Request: python-django-uuslug - A Django slugify application that guarantees uniqueness and handles unicode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851463 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django-uuslug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825587] Review Request: python-aiosmb - Asynchronous SMB protocol implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825587 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830712] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840865] Review Request: lv2lint - LV2 turtle language checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vasc...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1361659] Re-Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361659 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|domi...@greysector.net |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839083] Review Request: kwayland-server - Wayland server components built on KDE Frameworks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839083 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||kwayland-server-5.18.90-1.f ||c33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
