[Bug 1856312] Review Request: golang-github-hsiafan-vlog - Log library for go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856312 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820918] Review Request: chisel - TCP tunnel over HTTP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820918 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-14 06:42:38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826315] Review Request: golang-github-alexflint-arg - Struct-based argument parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826315 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-14 06:41:23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826318] Review Request: meshbird - Distributed private networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826318 Bug 1826318 depends on bug 1826315, which changed state. Bug 1826315 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alexflint-arg - Struct-based argument parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826315 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840628] Review Request: meg - Fetch many paths for many hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840628 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-14 06:40:53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1819251] Review Request: andriller - Android Forensic Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819251 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-14 06:26:08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839465] Review Request: dnsprobe - Tool to perform multiple DNS queries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839465 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-14 06:25:24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839389] Review Request: naabu - Fast port scanner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839389 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-14 06:24:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839483] Review Request: subfinder - Subdomain discovery tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839483 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-14 06:24:44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839489] Review Request: nuclei - Tool for configurable targeted scanning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839489 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-14 06:21:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856313] Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856313 --- Comment #2 from Lumír Balhar --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1) > Spec sanity: > > Why is this needed? IS the dependency generator not working here? > > Requires: python3dist(ipython) > Requires: python3dist(ipykernel) > Requires: python3dist(notebook) > Requires: python3dist(traitlets) > Requires: python3dist(widgetsnbextension) I don't know why, but the automatic runtime dependency generator does not work here and without explicit specification the result is: rpm -q --requires RPMS/python3-ipywidgets-7.5.1-1.fc33.noarch.rpm python(abi) = 3.9 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1 > + comments from bz1856310. %python_provide removed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856310] Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 --- Comment #5 from Lumír Balhar --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1) > Spec sanity: > > This is useless on rawhide: > > %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{pypi_name}} > > This is probably useless as well: > > # Remove bundled egg-info > rm -rf %{pypi_name}.egg-info > > Th rest looks reasonable from the fist glance. Both removed. > Generic: > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1180017] Review Request: rubygem-bugzilla - Bugzilla interface library for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180017 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Flags|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) | Last Closed||2020-07-14 04:08:33 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH --- Not that interested in it now. closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1180017] Review Request: rubygem-bugzilla - Bugzilla interface library for Ruby
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Akira TAGOH has canceled Package Review 's request for Akira TAGOH 's needinfo: Bug 1180017: Review Request: rubygem-bugzilla - Bugzilla interface library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180017 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH --- Not that interested in it now. closing. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1374070] Review Request: mediawiki123-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374070 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(ke...@scrye.com) | Last Closed||2020-07-14 03:14:14 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi --- This is no longer needed. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1374070] Review Request: mediawiki123-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Kevin Fenzi has canceled Package Review 's request for Kevin Fenzi 's needinfo: Bug 1374070: Review Request: mediawiki123-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374070 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi --- This is no longer needed. :) ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1282012] Review Request: palo-client-cpp - Palo Database C++ Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282012 Michael John Arnold changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2020-07-14 03:06:39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1282438] Review Request: palo-client-c - Palo Database C Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282438 Michael John Arnold changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed|2016-12-20 15:58:33 |2020-07-14 03:07:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1282438] Review Request: palo-client-c - Palo Database C Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282438 Bug 1282438 depends on bug 1282012, which changed state. Bug 1282012 Summary: Review Request: palo-client-cpp - Palo Database C++ Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282012 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856589] Review Request: openshadinglanguage - Advanced shading language for production GI renderers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856589 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- COPR repository with successful built: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/openshadinglanguage/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01553288-openshadinglanguage/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856589] New: Review Request: openshadinglanguage - Advanced shading language for production GI renderers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856589 Bug ID: 1856589 Summary: Review Request: openshadinglanguage - Advanced shading language for production GI renderers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: luya_...@thefinalzone.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/openshadinglanguage/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01553288-openshadinglanguage/openshadinglanguage.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/openshadinglanguage/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01553288-openshadinglanguage/openshadinglanguage-1.11.6.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Open Shading Language (OSL) is a small but rich language for programmable shading in advanced renderers and other applications, ideal for describing materials, lights, displacement, and pattern generation. Fedora Account System Username:luya -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1537677] Review Request: nomad-firewall - UFW control module for KDE Plasma 5 and Nomad Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537677 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(kevin@tigcc.tical | |c.org) | Last Closed||2020-07-14 02:21:52 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler --- I think we can close this at this point. The review got stalled because the reviewer demanded changes that were not actually required by the packaging guidelines (at least at the time of the review). In the meantime, the package got renamed upstream to nx-firewall. I also found that the user interface is highly impractical to use (see https://github.com/nx-desktop/nx-firewall/issues/15 and https://github.com/nx-desktop/nx-firewall/issues/16 ) and the issues have not been addressed. (In fact, not much has happened upstream other than the rename.) And the plan upstream is still to rewrite everything to use another backend ( https://github.com/nx-desktop/nx-firewall/issues/21 ). So I decided against shipping this package in Kannolo, and hence lost interest in it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1537677] Review Request: nomad-firewall - UFW control module for KDE Plasma 5 and Nomad Desktop
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Kevin Kofler has canceled Package Review 's request for Kevin Kofler 's needinfo: Bug 1537677: Review Request: nomad-firewall - UFW control module for KDE Plasma 5 and Nomad Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537677 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler --- I think we can close this at this point. The review got stalled because the reviewer demanded changes that were not actually required by the packaging guidelines (at least at the time of the review). In the meantime, the package got renamed upstream to nx-firewall. I also found that the user interface is highly impractical to use (see https://github.com/nx-desktop/nx-firewall/issues/15 and https://github.com/nx-desktop/nx-firewall/issues/16 ) and the issues have not been addressed. (In fact, not much has happened upstream other than the rename.) And the plan upstream is still to rewrite everything to use another backend ( https://github.com/nx-desktop/nx-firewall/issues/21 ). So I decided against shipping this package in Kannolo, and hence lost interest in it. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837107] Review Request: 7kaa - Seven Kingdoms: Ancient Adversaries (claiming ownership of package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-cd5132634d has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-cd5132634d \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cd5132634d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854202] Review Request: golang-github-instrumenta-kubeval - Validate your Kubernetes configuration files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854202 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8755e3db8b has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-8755e3db8b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8755e3db8b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854202] Review Request: golang-github-instrumenta-kubeval - Validate your Kubernetes configuration files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854202 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-49e3e8d996 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-49e3e8d996 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-49e3e8d996 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1831602] Review Request: spectrographic - Turn an image into sound
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831602 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/spectrographic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856557] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Fedora Pagure ||releng/issue/9600 --- Comment #1 from Mat Booth --- This is a re-review for unretirement: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9600 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856556] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856556 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Fedora Pagure ||releng/issue/9599 --- Comment #1 from Mat Booth --- This is a re-review for unretirement: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9599 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856554] Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856554 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Fedora Pagure ||releng/issue/9597 --- Comment #1 from Mat Booth --- This is a re-review for unretirement: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9597 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856555] Review Request: maven-indexer - Standard for producing indexes of Maven repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856555 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Fedora Pagure ||releng/issue/9598 --- Comment #1 from Mat Booth --- This is a re-review for unretirement: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9598 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856553] Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Fedora Pagure ||releng/issue/9596 --- Comment #1 from Mat Booth --- This is a re-review for unretirement: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9596 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856552] Review Request: jchardet - Java port of Mozilla's automatic character set detection algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856552 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Fedora Pagure ||releng/issue/9595 --- Comment #1 from Mat Booth --- This is a re-review for unretirement: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9595 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821724] Review Request: golang-github-gobwas-pool - Go Pooling Helpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821724 Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi --- Hello Fabian, Thank you for your updates. Package Approved. Please update the version before you import. The newer version, which includes the LICENSE file, has released 13 days ago. :) Best, Hirotaka Wakabayashi Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
[Bug 1856553] Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856556 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856556 [Bug 1856556] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856557] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856556 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856556 [Bug 1856556] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856556] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856556 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1856553, 1856557 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 [Bug 1856553] Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 [Bug 1856557] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856553] Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1856557 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 [Bug 1856557] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856557] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856553 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 [Bug 1856553] Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856552] Review Request: jchardet - Java port of Mozilla's automatic character set detection algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856552 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856554 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856554 [Bug 1856554] Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856554] Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856554 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856555 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856555 [Bug 1856555] Review Request: maven-indexer - Standard for producing indexes of Maven repositories -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856555] Review Request: maven-indexer - Standard for producing indexes of Maven repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856555 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1856554 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856554 [Bug 1856554] Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856554] Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856554 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1856552 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856552 [Bug 1856552] Review Request: jchardet - Java port of Mozilla's automatic character set detection algorithm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856557] New: Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 Bug ID: 1856557 Summary: Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mat.bo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/trilead-ssh2.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/trilead-ssh2-217-13.jenkins8.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: mbooth Description: Trilead SSH-2 for Java is a library which implements the SSH-2 protocol in pure Java (tested on J2SE 1.4.2 and 5.0). It allows one to connect to SSH servers from within Java programs. It supports SSH sessions (remote command execution and shell access), local and remote port forwarding, local stream forwarding, X11 forwarding and SCP. There are no dependencies on any JCE provider, as all crypto functionality is included. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856556] New: Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856556 Bug ID: 1856556 Summary: Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mat.bo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/svnkit.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/svnkit-1.8.12-7.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: mbooth Description: SVNKit is a pure java Subversion client library. You would like to use SVNKit when you need to access or modify Subversion repository from your Java application, as a standalone program and plugin or web application. Being a pure java program, SVNKit doesn't need any additional configuration or native binaries to work on any OS that runs java. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856553] New: Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 Bug ID: 1856553 Summary: Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mat.bo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/jsch-agent-proxy.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/jsch-agent-proxy-0.0.8-11.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: mbooth Description: jsch-agent-proxy is a proxy program to OpenSSH ssh-agent and Pageant included Putty. It will be easily integrated into JSch, and users will be allowed to use those programs in authentications. This software has been developed for JSch, but it will be easily applicable to other ssh2 implementations in Java. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856555] New: Review Request: maven-indexer - Standard for producing indexes of Maven repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856555 Bug ID: 1856555 Summary: Review Request: maven-indexer - Standard for producing indexes of Maven repositories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mat.bo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/maven-indexer.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/maven-indexer-6.0.0-4.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: mbooth Description: Apache Maven Indexer (former Sonatype Nexus Indexer) is the defacto standard for producing indexes of Maven repositories. The Indexes are produced and consumed by all major tools in the ecosystem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856554] New: Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856554 Bug ID: 1856554 Summary: Review Request: maven-archetype - Maven project templating toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mat.bo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/maven-archetype.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/maven-archetype-3.1.2-2.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: mbooth Description: Archetype is a Maven project templating toolkit. An archetype is defined as an original pattern or model from which all other things of the same kind are made. The names fits as we are trying to provide a system that provides a consistent means of generating Maven projects. Archetype will help authors create Maven project templates for users, and provides users with the means to generate parameterized versions of those project templates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856552] New: Review Request: jchardet - Java port of Mozilla's automatic character set detection algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856552 Bug ID: 1856552 Summary: Review Request: jchardet - Java port of Mozilla's automatic character set detection algorithm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mat.bo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/jchardet.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/jchardet-1.1-20.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: mbooth Description: jchardet is a java port of the source from Mozilla's automatic charset detection algorithm. The original author is Frank Tang. What is available here is the java port of that code. The original source in C++ can be found from http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/intl/chardet/. More information can be found at http://www.mozilla.org/projects/intl/chardet.html. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1173656] Review Request: jags - Just Another Gibbs Sampler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173656 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- Well, that's weird. Not sure why mock would fail when koji succeeds. I can reproduce it though, but only in mock with --isolation=nspawn: pdflatex: fatal: Could not undump 233630 8-byte item(s) from /builddir/.texlive2020/texmf-var/web2c/pdftex/pdflatex.fmt. mktexfmt [INFO]: /builddir/.texlive2020/texmf-var/web2c/pdftex/pdflatex.fmt installed. make[2]: *** [Makefile:674: jags_developer_manual.pdf] Error 1 When I run mock with --isolation=simple, it works as expected. Perhaps that's what koji uses? License tag fixed in -2. New Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/jags.spec New SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/jags-4.3.0-2.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763 --- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tex-cjw -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763 --- Comment #15 from W. Michael Petullo --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/tex-cjw.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/tex-cjw-20090907-5.fc32.src.rpm - Simplify package name to cjw - Remove texmf definition from first line of specification -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856421] Review Request: python-iniconfig - Brain-dead simple parsing of ini files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856421 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-iniconfig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856421] Review Request: python-iniconfig - Brain-dead simple parsing of ini files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856421 --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok --- Thank You, Robert-André, I'm well, you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837107] Review Request: 7kaa - Seven Kingdoms: Ancient Adversaries (claiming ownership of package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-cd5132634d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cd5132634d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1831602] Review Request: spectrographic - Turn an image into sound
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831602 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854202] Review Request: golang-github-instrumenta-kubeval - Validate your Kubernetes configuration files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854202 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-49e3e8d996 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-49e3e8d996 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1831602] Review Request: spectrographic - Turn an image into sound
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831602 --- Comment #2 from Artur Iwicki --- simpleaudio and wavio are now packaged, so here's a new build: spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/spectrographic-0.9.3-2/spectrographic.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/spectrographic-0.9.3-2/spectrographic-0.9.3-2.fc32.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47142852 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856464] Review Request: ufdbGuard - A URL filter for squid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856464 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- - ufdbGuard.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/ufdbGuard/GPL Notify upstream about their use of an obsolete FSF address (do not patch it). - ufdbGuard.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/sbin/ufdbAnalyse ufdbGuard.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/sbin/ufdbGenTable ufdbGuard.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/sbin/ufdbgclient ufdbGuard.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/sbin/ufdbguardd ufdbGuard.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/sbin/ufdbhttpd Not sure what to do about this, I couldn't find any call to setuid/setgid in the source. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_macros = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License (v2)", "GNU Lesser General Public License", "Expat License", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Public domain". 225 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ufdbGuard/review- ufdbGuard/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and systemd_postun in
[Bug 1856421] Review Request: python-iniconfig - Brain-dead simple parsing of ini files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856421 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Hello Miro, I hope you are good. Package is approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Expat License". 18 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-iniconfig/review-python- iniconfig/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lis
[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 --- Comment #20 from Brandon Nielsen --- New spec URL: https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/msp430-elf-toolchain.git/plain/msp430-elf-toolchain.spec?id=a1b5d4b24db937c84945ddbeda43545e2ea6cc83 New SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/srpm-builds/01550916/msp430-elf-toolchain-9.2.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm This is the latest upstream source. The messages from comment 17 still appear. Also note that the strip workaround[0] for msp430 compiled files has changed somewhat, it is now dependent on bash, and now assumes the file passed to the __strip macro is the last argument, not the second. This works around issues caused by the introduction of brp-strip-lto in F33+[1]. I also removed the obsoletes because msp430-gcc has been retired for more Fedora releases than are officially supported so it felt unnecessary, and rpmlint complained about it being unversioned. 0 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175942#c6 1 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789099 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854202] Review Request: golang-github-instrumenta-kubeval - Validate your Kubernetes configuration files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854202 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8755e3db8b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8755e3db8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854202] Review Request: golang-github-instrumenta-kubeval - Validate your Kubernetes configuration files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854202 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-13 19:01:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856464] Review Request: ufdbGuard - A URL filter for squid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856464 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- - It is not needed: %{?systemd_requires} BuildRequires: systemd Instead depend on: BuildRequires: systemd-rpm-macros - Patch0: ufdbGuard-common.patch Add a comment explaining why the patch is needed. - Not needed: %install rm -rf %{buildroot} ← - Please use macros for directories: %configure \ --with-ufdb-user=ufdb \ --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --with-ufdb-bindir=%{_sbindir} \ --with-ufdb-piddir=%{_localstatedir}/run/ufdbguard \ --with-ufdb-mandir=%{_mandir} \ --with-ufdb-images_dir=%{_sharedstatedir}/ufdbguard/images \ --with-ufdb-logdir=%{_localstatedir}/log/ufdbguard \ --with-ufdb-samplesdir=%{_sharedstatedir}/ufdbguard/samples \ --with-ufdb-config=%{_sysconfdir}/ufdbguard \ --with-ufdb-dbhome=%{_sharedstatedir}/ufdbguard/blacklists \ --with-ufdb-imagesdir=%{_sharedstatedir}/ufdbguard/images - %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build - %{__make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} mkdirsredhatcentos install → %make_install mkdirsredhatcentos - Don't use macros starting with __, they are for RPM private use, use the normal binaries: for i in $(find doc/ -type f -name '*.1'); do install -p -D -m 0644 $i %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ done for i in $(find doc/ -type f -name '*.8'); do install -p -D -m 0644 $i %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/ done install -p -D -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_unitdir}/ufdbGuard.service install -p -D -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/ufdbGuard - Don't mix both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}, standardize on one - Macros again: %dir %{_sharedstatedir}/ufdbguard/ %attr(-, ufdb, ufdb) %dir %{_localstatedir}/log/ufdbguard/ %{_sharedstatedir}/ufdbguard/* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856310] Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 --- Comment #4 from Lumír Balhar --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #3) > [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: > /usr/share/jupyter/nbextensions/jupyter-js-widgets(sagemath-jupyter) > … > [!]: Package does not generate any conflict. I am waiting for a reply in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856311 > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. There are no tests upstream. > Generic: > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) I'll fix that during the initial import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854202] Review Request: golang-github-instrumenta-kubeval - Validate your Kubernetes configuration files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854202 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-instrumenta-kubeval -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856464] New: Review Request: ufdbGuard - A URL filter for squid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856464 Bug ID: 1856464 Summary: Review Request: ufdbGuard - A URL filter for squid Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: gw...@protonmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description: ufdbGuard is a free URL filter for Squid with additional features like SafeSearch enforcement for a large number of search engines, safer HTTPS visits and dynamic detection of proxies (URL filter circumventors). ufdbGuard supports free and commercial URL databases that can be downloaded from various sites and vendors. You can also make your own URL database for ufdbGuard. SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/ufdbGuard/ufdbGuard.spec SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/ufdbGuard/ufdbGuard-1.34.5-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855986] Review Request: python-wavio - Read and write WAV files as numpy arrays
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855986 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-wavio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1142508] Review Request: rubygem-true - Testing framework for Sass libraries
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Vít Ondruch has canceled Package Review 's request for Vít Ondruch 's needinfo: Bug 1142508: Review Request: rubygem-true - Testing framework for Sass libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142508 --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch --- Closing as stalled review. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1142508] Review Request: rubygem-true - Testing framework for Sass libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142508 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(vondruch@redhat.c | |om) | Last Closed||2020-07-13 15:33:36 --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch --- Closing as stalled review. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1132670] Review Request: rubygem-compass-core - The Compass core stylesheet library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132670 Bug 1132670 depends on bug 1142508, which changed state. Bug 1142508 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-true - Testing framework for Sass libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142508 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856163] Review Request: python-vcversioner - Use version control tags to discover version numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856163 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- The PR for adding the COPYING (https://github.com/habnabit/vcversioner/pull/11) file to the PyPI release tarball is open for almost three and a half years. The GitHub tarball includes the tests and the license file. From my point of view, would be easier to use the actual upstream source than downloading and handling two files manually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856421] Review Request: python-iniconfig - Brain-dead simple parsing of ini files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856421 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1855480 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855480 [Bug 1855480] pytest-6.0.0rc1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856421] New: Review Request: python-iniconfig - Brain-dead simple parsing of ini files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856421 Bug ID: 1856421 Summary: Review Request: python-iniconfig - Brain-dead simple parsing of ini files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-iniconfig.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-iniconfig-1.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: iniconfig is a small and simple INI-file parser module having a unique set of features: * tested against Python2.4 across to Python3.2, Jython, PyPy * maintains order of sections and entries * supports multi-line values with or without line-continuations * supports "#" comments everywhere * raises errors with proper line-numbers * no bells and whistles like automatic substitutions * iniconfig raises an Error if two sections have the same name. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856163] Review Request: python-vcversioner - Use version control tags to discover version numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856163 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto --- description updated, but the tarball I think upstream expect people to use from PyPi https://github.com/habnabit/vcversioner/blob/master/vcversioner.py#L199 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856310] Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok --- Preliminary review: Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 16 files have unknown license. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/jupyter/nbconfig, /usr/share/jupyter/nbextensions, /usr/share/jupyter, /etc/jupyter/nbconfig/notebook.d, /etc/jupyter [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/jupyter/nbextensions/jupyter-js-widgets(sagemath-jupyter) [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [!]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [?]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original
[Bug 1844308] Review Request: python-uvicorn - The lightning-fast ASGI server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844308 --- Comment #7 from Carl George 🤠 --- In a rawhide container, I can install python3-uvicorn and run the example application from the GitHub readme. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856312] Review Request: golang-github-hsiafan-vlog - Log library for go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856312 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856253] Review Request: python-natlas-libnmap - Python library for nmap tasks, parse and compare/diff scan results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856253 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- - Include docs/ as %doc? Package approved. Thanks a lot for all your help with my own packages! Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 32 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-natlas- libnmap/review-python-natlas-libnmap/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with
[Bug 1855986] Review Request: python-wavio - Read and write WAV files as numpy arrays
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855986 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Package approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-wavio/review-python- wavio/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary se
[Bug 1361659] Re-Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361659 --- Comment #39 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #38) > (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #37) > > Because you removed fedora-review? flag on 2016-09-08 I actually removed fedora-review+ and set fedora-review?, because the package should not have passed review and was removed. > I misread the history. Nevertheless your last action on this review as on > 2016-10-03. Correct. There were no updates from the submitter since then. I guess we can close this and let it be resubmitted with a new package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855984] Review Request: python-simpleaudio - Simple, asynchronous, cross-platform audio playback module for Python3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855984 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-simpleaudio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1361659] Re-Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361659 --- Comment #38 from Petr Pisar --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #37) > Because you removed fedora-review? flag on 2016-09-08 I misread the history. Nevertheless your last action on this review as on 2016-10-03. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1361659] Re-Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361659 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ppi...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #37 from Petr Pisar --- Because you removed fedora-review? flag on 2016-09-08, and a status of this bug was changed to NEW on 2020-05-26. A package under review has to have all these three properties synchronized. Otherwise the review bug falls into an inconsistent state and that break automation tools that operators over the reviews. After reading a history of hit bug, I got an impression that nobody works on this review. If this is not true, you can assign it to yourself, set fedora-review flag to ?, and move the state into ASSIGNED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856139] Review Request: python-flask-pymongo - PyMongo support for Flask applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856139 Rafael Fontenelle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. ||com.br) --- Comment #1 from Rafael Fontenelle --- The given SRPM file is actually the SPEC file. Please provide the actual SRPM for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856313] Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856313 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhron...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok --- Spec sanity: Why is this needed? IS the dependency generator not working here? Requires: python3dist(ipython) Requires: python3dist(ipykernel) Requires: python3dist(notebook) Requires: python3dist(traitlets) Requires: python3dist(widgetsnbextension) + comments from bz1856310. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856310] Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhron...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok --- Spec sanity: This is useless on rawhide: %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{pypi_name}} This is probably useless as well: # Remove bundled egg-info rm -rf %{pypi_name}.egg-info Th rest looks reasonable from the fist glance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856313] Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856313 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856188 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856188 [Bug 1856188] F33FailsToInstall: python3-ipython+notebook -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856310] Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856313 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856313 [Bug 1856313] Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856313] Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856313 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1856310 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 [Bug 1856310] Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856313] New: Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856313 Bug ID: 1856313 Summary: Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lbal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-ipywidgets.spec SRPM URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-ipywidgets-7.5.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks and the IPython kernel. Fedora Account System Username: lbalhar Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47113684 Depends on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856312] New: Review Request: golang-github-hsiafan-vlog - Log library for go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856312 Bug ID: 1856312 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-hsiafan-vlog - Log library for go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-hsiafan-vlog.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-hsiafan-vlog-0.6.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/hsiafan/vlog Description: Simple log library for go. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47113554 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-hsiafan-vlog-0.6.0-1.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-hsiafan-vlog.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-hsiafan-vlog-devel-0.6.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-hsiafan-vlog-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/hsiafan/vlog/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856310] Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856311 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856311 [Bug 1856311] Move widgetsnbextension into separated package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856310] New: Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856310 Bug ID: 1856310 Summary: Review Request: python-widgetsnbextension - Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lbal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-widgetsnbextension.spec SRPM URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-widgetsnbextension-3.5.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Interactive HTML widgets for Jupyter notebooks. Fedora Account System Username: lbalhar Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47113028 There is a conflict between this package and sagemath-jupyter (sagemath) which provides this inside its subpackage so I'll open a bug to remove it from there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1293630] Review Request: wallch - A wallpaper changer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293630 Jakub Jelen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(jje...@redhat.com | |) | Last Closed||2020-07-13 11:12:46 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelen --- I no longer care for this package and as it looks like the upstream is dead too, lets drop it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1293630] Review Request: wallch - A wallpaper changer
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Jakub Jelen has canceled Package Review 's request for Jakub Jelen 's needinfo: Bug 1293630: Review Request: wallch - A wallpaper changer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293630 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelen --- I no longer care for this package and as it looks like the upstream is dead too, lets drop it. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297011] Review Request: rubygem-mimemagic - Fast mime detection by extension or content
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297011 Jun Aruga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jar...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jun Aruga --- As a note, rubygem-mimemagic already exists in Fedora. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-mimemagic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Tadej Janež has canceled Package Review 's request for Ondrej Hudlicky 's needinfo: Bug 481272: Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 --- Comment #15 from Tadej Janež --- The latest release of webunit is 1.3.10 from May 5, 2010: https://pypi.org/project/webunit/#history I'm closing this as development of this software has clearly ended a long time ago. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 Tadej Janež changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(ohudlick@redhat.c | |om) | Last Closed||2020-07-13 08:53:44 --- Comment #15 from Tadej Janež --- The latest release of webunit is 1.3.10 from May 5, 2010: https://pypi.org/project/webunit/#history I'm closing this as development of this software has clearly ended a long time ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856253] Review Request: python-natlas-libnmap - Python library for nmap tasks, parse and compare/diff scan results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856253 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org