[Bug 1809405] Review Request: python-sumatra - Tool for managing and tracking projects based on numerical simulation and/or analysis, with the aim of supporting reproducible research

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809405



--- Comment #20 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Hey,

No worries, please take your time.

Unfortunately, meetings are harder to do. Could you ask your queries here in
the review ticket? (That's a perfectly normal + fine thing to do)

Cheers,
Ankur


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1857199] Review Request: mozjs78 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857199

František Zatloukal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-08-04 06:05:13




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1809405] Review Request: python-sumatra - Tool for managing and tracking projects based on numerical simulation and/or analysis, with the aim of supporting reproducible research

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809405

Ntish  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(nisharma@redhat.c |
   |om) |



--- Comment #19 from Ntish  ---
Hey Ankur,

Apologies, i got little busy and thie got out of my bucket somehow. I will pick
it up over weekend, Additionally, Can we have meeting for it over the weekend?

Regards
Nitish


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1861216] Review Request: aml - Another Main Loop

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861216



--- Comment #4 from Bob Hepple  ---
Thanks Aleksei,

Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/aml/fedora-31-x86_64/01592132-aml/aml.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/aml/fedora-31-x86_64/01592132-aml/aml-0.1.0-3.fc31.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1111691] Review Request: qore - multithreaded programming/scripting language

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691



--- Comment #42 from David Nichols  ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #41)
> > %global module_dir %{_libdir}/qore-modules
> > %global user_module_dir %{_datarootdir}/qore-modules/
> 
> Not a requirement, but %{_datadir} resolves to the same directory -
> "/usr/share".

ok done

> > Summary: Multithreaded Programming Language
> > Name: qore
> > Version: 0.9.4.5
> > Release: 1%{?dist}
> > License: LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or MIT
> > Group: Development/Languages
> > URL: http://qore.org
> > Source0: 
> > https://github.com/qorelanguage/qore/releases/download/release-%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
> > Requires: /usr/bin/env
> > BuildRequires: gcc-c++
> > BuildRequires: flex >= 2.5.31
> > BuildRequires: bison
> > BuildRequires: openssl-devel
> > BuildRequires: pcre-devel
> > BuildRequires: zlib-devel
> > BuildRequires: gmp-devel
> > BuildRequires: mpfr-devel
> > BuildRequires: doxygen
> > BuildRequires: pkgconfig
> > BuildRequires: bzip2-devel
> 
> Not a strict requirement, but I would split the initial tags into blocks and
> improve formatting a bit:
> %global module_dir %{_libdir}/qore-modules
> %global user_module_dir %{_datarootdir}/qore-modules/
> 
> Name:   qore
> Version:0.9.4.5
> Release:1%{?dist}
> Summary:Multithreaded Programming Language
> 
> License:LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or MIT
> Group:  Development/Languages
> URL:http://qore.org
> Source0:   
> https://github.com/qorelanguage/qore/releases/download/release-%{version}/
> %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
> 
> Requires:   /usr/bin/env
> BuildRequires:  gcc-c++
> BuildRequires:flex >= 2.5.31
> BuildRequires:bison
> BuildRequires:openssl-devel
> BuildRequires:pcre-devel
> BuildRequires:zlib-devel
> BuildRequires:gmp-devel
> BuildRequires:mpfr-devel
> BuildRequires:doxygen
> BuildRequires:pkgconfig
> BuildRequires:bzip2-devel

done

> > License:LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or MIT
> > Group:  Development/Languages
> 
> - I would add a comment above the License block with this link:
> https://github.com/qorelanguage/qore/blob/develop/README-LICENSE
>   to make it clear that depending on the license choice, different modules
> are enabled or disabled. `licensecheck` complains a great deal,
> unfortunately.
> - The Group: tag is obsolete and should be removed.
> - "/usr/bin/env" is a part of the coreutils package, but since it's a part
> of the base system, this Requires can probably be removed.
> - Check which of the BuildRequires for -devel package can be replaced with
> pkgconfig(foo). Relevant section of the Packaging Guidelines:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> PkgConfigBuildRequires/

done - thank you for the info and references - I missed those (among others)

> The main package should probably contain Requires like these to make sure
> all of the subpackages are correctly linked to the main package:
> Requires: %{name}-libqore%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires: %{name}-stdlib%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> etc.
> 
> > %package -n libqore
> > Summary: The libraries for the qore runtime and qore clients
> > Group: System Environment/Libraries
> > Provides: qore-module(abi)%{?_isa} = 0.23
> > Provides: qore-module(abi)%{?_isa} = 0.22

done

> - The Group tag is obsolete and should be removed.
> - rpmlint complains about the abi provides: libqore.x86_64: E:
> useless-provides qore-module(abi)(x86-64)
>   I couldn't find anything explicit in the Packaging Guidelines, but perhaps
> you can remove these?
> 
> > Provides: libqore6 = %{version}
> > Obsoletes: libqore6 < %{version}
> 
> I'm wondering about these lines. Neither qore, nor any version of libqore is
> in the repositories so I don't think these are needed.

They were only for existing systems installed with non-official RPMs, but
anyway I removed them

> > %files -n libqore
> > %{_libdir}/libqore.so.6.2.0
> > %{_libdir}/libqore.so.6
> > %doc COPYING.LGPL COPYING.GPL COPYING.MIT README.md README-LICENSE 
> > README-MODULES RELEASE-NOTES AUTHORS ABOUT
> 
> The COPYING.* files are license files and they should be tagged with the
> %license macro.

done

> > %post -n libqore -p /sbin/ldconfig
> 
> > %postun -n libqore -p /sbin/ldconfig
> 
> Running ldconfig is no longer needed and these lines should be removed.

done

> > %package stdlib
> > Summary: Standard library modules
> > Group: System Environment/Libraries
> > Requires: libqore = %{version}-%{release}
> > Requires: qore-module(abi)%{?_isa} = 0.23
> 
> - Group tags are obsolete and should be removed.
> - Use a fully qualified version Requires like so:
>   Requires: %{name}-libqore%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> - The abi requirement can probably be removed.

done

> > %files stdlib
> > %{user_module_dir}
> > %{module_dir}
> > %doc COPYING.MIT README-LICENSE
> 
> - The %{module_dir}

[Bug 1861216] Review Request: aml - Another Main Loop

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861216

Aleksei Bavshin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||alebast...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|alebast...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Aleksei Bavshin  ---
Approved.
Please, address following before import:

> License: ISC
There's a BSD-licensed include/sys/queue.h in the source tree. Thus, `ISC and
BSD` (and the usual comment on licensing breakdown).

> %description
Would be nice to format lists better. You can just copy lists from upstream
markdown source[1]. FreeBSD maintainer used similar formatting[2].

[1] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/any1/aml/master/README.md
[2] https://www.freshports.org/devel/aml/



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requi

[Bug 1865739] New: Review Request: R-profmem - Simple Memory Profiling for R

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1865739

Bug ID: 1865739
   Summary: Review Request: R-profmem - Simple Memory Profiling
for R
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-profmem/R-profmem.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-profmem/R-profmem-0.5.0-1.fc31.src.rpm

Description:
A simple and light-weight API for memory profiling of R expressions.  The
profiling is built on top of R's built-in memory profiler
('utils::Rprofmem()'), which records every memory allocation done by R (also
native code).


Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48580951


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1850262] Review Request: kissat - Keep It Simple SAT solver

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850262

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||kissat-0-0.1.20200704gitbae
   ||f460.fc33
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2020-08-04 03:15:37



--- Comment #10 from Jerry James  ---
Built in Rawhide.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862705] Review Request: rgbds - A development package for the Game Boy, including an assembler

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862705

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-b16a6d4fee has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-b16a6d4fee \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b16a6d4fee

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1859207] Review Request: sane-airscan - SANE backend for eSCL and WSD protocols

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859207

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-841f4ce8df has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-841f4ce8df`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-841f4ce8df

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862861] Review Request: golang-github-shulhan-bindata - A small utility which generates Go code from any file

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862861

Robert-André Mauchin 🐧  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧  ---
 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376511] Review Request: nexus - NeXus scientific data file format

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511



--- Comment #20 from Stuart Campbell  ---
Spec URL: https://sic.fedorapeople.org/nexus/nexus.spec
SRPM URL: https://sic.fedorapeople.org/nexus/nexus-4.4.3-6.fc32.src.rpm
Description: NeXus is a common data format for neutron, x-ray, and muon
science. This
package provides tools and libraries for accessing these files.  The on disk
representation is based upon either HDF4, HDF5 or XML
Fedora Account System Username: sic


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376511] Review Request: nexus - NeXus scientific data file format

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511



--- Comment #19 from Stuart Campbell  ---
Awesome, thank you - I will look into the fsf issue upstream.  I've added the
COPYING file into the devel package.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862861] Review Request: golang-github-shulhan-bindata - A small utility which generates Go code from any file

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862861



--- Comment #4 from Brandon Perkins  ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/aliyun/master/SPECS/golang-github-shulhan-bindata.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5513/4813/golang-github-shulhan-bindata-3.6.0-2.fc33.src.rpm

Successful Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48555464

Requested changes made.  Renamed binary and man page to go-bindata.shulhan so
it does not conflict with go-bindata.  I chose a suffix as I think it makes
tab-completion easier :)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862861] Review Request: golang-github-shulhan-bindata - A small utility which generates Go code from any file

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862861



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧  ---
In practice, I would remove:

# The upstream repository of the "go-bindata" package
# (github.com/jteeuwen/go-bindata) has been archived
# by the owner and is now read-only.  The upstream
# repository of this "golang-github-shulhan-bindata"
# package (github.com/shuLhan/go-bindata) has become
# the de-facto source for the "go-bindata" command.
Obsoletes:  go-bindata < 3.1.0
Provides:   go-bindata = %{version}


and rename with a prefix or suffix the binary and the man page here:

%gobuild -o %{gobuilddir}/bin/go-bindata %{goipath}/cmd/go-bindata
mkdir -p %{gobuilddir}/share/man/man1
help2man --no-discard-stderr -n "%{summary}" -s 1 -o
%{gobuilddir}/share/man/man1/go-bindata.1 -N --version-string="%{version}"
%{gobuilddir}/bin/go-bindata

[…]

%files
%license LICENSE
%doc AUTHORS CHANGELOG CONTRIBUTING.md README.md
%{_mandir}/man1/go-bindata.1*
%{_bindir}/*


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862861] Review Request: golang-github-shulhan-bindata - A small utility which generates Go code from any file

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862861

Robert-André Mauchin 🐧  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zebo...@gmail.com



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧  ---
To document what I said by mail:

> You did take care of all seven packages that I had.  However, I found
> out yesterday in testing that even though the cli package built, it was
> not functional.  The go-bindata part of prep failed silently and didn't
> build the code needed for the cli to actually function properly.  After
> a bit of research I found out that the go-bindata that we ship in F33
> and earlier has a dead upstream and a fork of the last state became the
> new upstream.  Looking at the old package, it doesn't come close to how
> the other go packages are created, so I decided to create a new review
> request for the new upstream:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862861
> 
> I did add the obsoletes and provides as I *think* it should be.  If you
> do approve this approach and the package, I guess I'll need to reach out
> to the four maintainers of the package:
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-bindata

I do not approve. The go-bindata repo is still maintained and active:
https://github.com/go-bindata/go-bindata/commits/master
Last release was in February, which very recent compared to most Go packages.
The Fedora package was not updated, its maintainers are not active anymore with
Go stuff for Fedora as far as I know.

This other fork has the same basis, the Jim Teeuwen go-bindata repo. Jim
Teeuwen has apparently disappeared and thus the project go-bindata/go-bindata
was created. Now both forks have strongly diverged, so one is no more valid or
the successor of the other, they are two projects sharing the same name from a
common ancestor.

> 
> and ask them to retire it?
> 

No, and you shouldn't Provides/Obsoletes the current go-bindata. Instead I
suggest that you prefix or postfix the conflicting binary (with shulhan or any
suffix you find appropriate).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376511] Review Request: nexus - NeXus scientific data file format

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511



--- Comment #18 from Andy Mender  ---
> For the COPYING file, I wasn't sure if the file had to be 'installed' (hence 
> the patch was to add that to CMake), but it looks like the %license macro 
> picks it up from the source/build.

If it's in the root of the source dir, using %license for license files and
%doc for documentation files will add these to the correct directories :).

> Wasn't sure how bad the first one is, but the second one is a false warning, 
> as muon is spelt correctly.

I think the first one is bogus as well. Don't worry about it.

Last things reported by rpmlint:

Rpmlint
---
[...]
nexus.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/nexus/COPYING
nexus-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
nexus-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/nexus/napi.h
nexus-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/nexus/napiu.h
[...]
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 8 warnings.

A rather minor item, but I would add the COPYING file to the -devel package as
well:
%files devel
%license COPYING

As for the "incorrect-fsf-address" errors, the guidelines recommend contacting
upstream:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address
I've personally never seen this before, but it's not a blocking issue either
way.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811182] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-ossutil - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Object Storage Service (OSS) CLI

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811182

Brandon Perkins  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-08-03 20:45:08



--- Comment #7 from Brandon Perkins  ---
CLOSED. In Rawhide (f33).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811179] Review Request: golang-github-alyu-configparser - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) INI configuration file parser for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811179

Brandon Perkins  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-08-03 20:44:57



--- Comment #6 from Brandon Perkins  ---
CLOSED. In Rawhide (f33).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811182] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-ossutil - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Object Storage Service (OSS) CLI

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811182
Bug 1811182 depends on bug 1811179, which changed state.

Bug 1811179 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alyu-configparser - Alibaba 
Cloud (Aliyun) INI configuration file parser for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811179

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811177] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-credentials - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Credentials for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811177

Brandon Perkins  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-08-03 20:44:46



--- Comment #7 from Brandon Perkins  ---
CLOSED. In Rawhide (f33).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811183] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-cli - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) CLI

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811183
Bug 1811183 depends on bug 1811179, which changed state.

Bug 1811179 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alyu-configparser - Alibaba 
Cloud (Aliyun) INI configuration file parser for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811179

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811183] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-cli - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) CLI

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811183
Bug 1811183 depends on bug 1811177, which changed state.

Bug 1811177 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-credentials - Alibaba 
Cloud (Aliyun) Credentials for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811177

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811182] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-ossutil - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Object Storage Service (OSS) CLI

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811182
Bug 1811182 depends on bug 1811180, which changed state.

Bug 1811180 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-droundy-goopt - Getopt-like 
flags package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811180

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811183] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-cli - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) CLI

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811183
Bug 1811183 depends on bug 1811180, which changed state.

Bug 1811180 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-droundy-goopt - Getopt-like 
flags package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811180

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811177] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-credentials - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Credentials for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811177
Bug 1811177 depends on bug 1811173, which changed state.

Bug 1811173 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alibabacloud-debug - Alibaba 
Cloud (Aliyun) Debug function for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811173

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811180] Review Request: golang-github-droundy-goopt - Getopt-like flags package for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811180

Brandon Perkins  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-08-03 20:44:35



--- Comment #6 from Brandon Perkins  ---
CLOSED. In Rawhide (f33).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811174] Review Request: golang-github-alibabacloud-tea - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) support for TEA OpenAPI DSL

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811174

Brandon Perkins  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-08-03 20:44:25



--- Comment #6 from Brandon Perkins  ---
CLOSED. In Rawhide (f33).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811177] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-credentials - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Credentials for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811177
Bug 1811177 depends on bug 1811174, which changed state.

Bug 1811174 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alibabacloud-tea - Alibaba 
Cloud (Aliyun) support for TEA OpenAPI DSL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811174

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811173] Review Request: golang-github-alibabacloud-debug - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Debug function for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811173

Brandon Perkins  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-08-03 20:43:47



--- Comment #7 from Brandon Perkins  ---
CLOSED. In Rawhide (f33).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811174] Review Request: golang-github-alibabacloud-tea - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) support for TEA OpenAPI DSL

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811174
Bug 1811174 depends on bug 1811173, which changed state.

Bug 1811173 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alibabacloud-debug - Alibaba 
Cloud (Aliyun) Debug function for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811173

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862460] Review Request: python-cachelib - A collection of cache libraries with a common API

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862460

Andy Mender  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862460] Review Request: python-cachelib - A collection of cache libraries with a common API

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862460

Andy Mender  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #3 from Andy Mender  ---
Looks good, package approved!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1850262] Review Request: kissat - Keep It Simple SAT solver

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850262



--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kissat


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862305] Review Request: liblcf - Library for handling RPG Maker 2000/2003 game data

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862305

Andy Mender  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1860668] Review Request: golang-gopkg-jdkato-prose-1 - A Golang library for text processing

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860668



--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This is backwards though. The import path for v2.0.0, according to go.mod, is
github.com/jdkato/prose/v2. That translates to a package name of
golang-github-jdkato-prose-2, so _it_ is the one that should have the new
package request.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1860668] Review Request: golang-gopkg-jdkato-prose-1 - A Golang library for text processing

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860668

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1863862





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863862
[Bug 1863862] hugo: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862616] Review Request: e-antic - Real Embedded Algebraic Number Theory In C

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862616
Bug 1862616 depends on bug 1862615, which changed state.

Bug 1862615 Summary: Review Request: antic - Algebraic Number Theory In C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862615

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862615] Review Request: antic - Algebraic Number Theory In C

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862615

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2020-08-03 17:00:50



--- Comment #4 from Jerry James  ---
Built in Rawhide.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862306] Review Request: easyrpg-player - Game interpreter for RPG Maker 2000/2003 and EasyRPG games

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862306



--- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki  ---
I took a better look at the sources and noticed some bundled libraries - added
patches to un-bundle those.
Since liblcf has been approved recently, I also submitted a koji build. 

spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/easyrpg-player-0.6.2.1-2/easyrpg-player.spec
srpm:
https://svgames.pl/fedora/easyrpg-player-0.6.2.1-2/easyrpg-player-0.6.2.1-2.fc32.src.rpm
koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48526046


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1795461] Review Request: practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795461



--- Comment #10 from Jiri Hladky  ---
Hi Ankur,

the upstream version (which includes the changes necessary to make it a rpm
package) is delayed, but it should be released really soon:

===
Cerian Knight - 2020-07-26
I am nearing the final milestone for release 
===

Please bear with us! 

Thanks
Jirka


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1863042] New: Review Request: mingw-libgamerzilla - Library for games to support trophy system

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863042

Bug ID: 1863042
   Summary: Review Request: mingw-libgamerzilla - Library for
games to support trophy system
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: du...@identicalsoftware.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec
URL:https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dulsi/libgamerzilla/master/mingw-libgamerzilla.spec
SRPM URL:
http://identicalsoftware.com/gamerzilla/mingw-libgamerzilla-0.0.5-1.fc32.src.rpm
Description: LibGamerzilla allows games to easily integrate with the Gamerzilla
trophy/achievement system for Hubzilla.
Fedora Account System Username: dulsi


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862705] Review Request: rgbds - A development package for the Game Boy, including an assembler

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862705

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-b16a6d4fee has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b16a6d4fee


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1850262] Review Request: kissat - Keep It Simple SAT solver

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850262

dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com ---
Sorry for the long radio silence, package is approved!

= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 433 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dan/fedora-
 scm/1850262-kissat/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[?]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in kissat-
 libs , kissat-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes sig

[Bug 1857199] Review Request: mozjs78 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857199



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mozjs78


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811183] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-cli - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) CLI

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811183



--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-aliyun-cli


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811177] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-credentials - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Credentials for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811177



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-aliyun-credentials


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811182] Review Request: golang-github-aliyun-ossutil - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Object Storage Service (OSS) CLI

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811182



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-aliyun-ossutil


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811180] Review Request: golang-github-droundy-goopt - Getopt-like flags package for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811180



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-droundy-goopt


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811179] Review Request: golang-github-alyu-configparser - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) INI configuration file parser for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811179



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-alyu-configparser


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811174] Review Request: golang-github-alibabacloud-tea - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) support for TEA OpenAPI DSL

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811174



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-alibabacloud-tea


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1811173] Review Request: golang-github-alibabacloud-debug - Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Debug function for Go

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811173



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-alibabacloud-debug


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862305] Review Request: liblcf - Library for handling RPG Maker 2000/2003 game data

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862305



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/liblcf


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862615] Review Request: antic - Algebraic Number Theory In C

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862615



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/antic


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1856005] Review Request: DMTCP - (Distributed MultiThreaded Checkpointing)

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856005



--- Comment #5 from Dave Love  ---
The current version still doesn't run the tests because it doesn't find
"python" -- see build.log.  I'd suggest modifying the script(s) to call python3
explicitly.  (I haven't looked at the source.)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1809405] Review Request: python-sumatra - Tool for managing and tracking projects based on numerical simulation and/or analysis, with the aim of supporting reproducible research

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809405

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(nisharma@redhat.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Hi Ntish,

Any updates here please?

Cheers,
Ankur


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1795461] Review Request: practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795461



--- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Hi Jiri,

Any updates here?


Cheers,
Ankur


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1857199] Review Request: mozjs78 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857199



--- Comment #4 from František Zatloukal  ---
Thanks for review, one last update addressing your feedback.

SPEC: https://gist.github.com/frantisekz/52551d4f22f4e6a127aa5d2d4411a401
SRPM:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5695/48495695/mozjs78-78.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm

Scratch: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48495691


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862460] Review Request: python-cachelib - A collection of cache libraries with a common API

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862460



--- Comment #2 from Matej Grabovsky  ---
Thanks for the review, Andy. See below for links to updated spec file and SRPM.

(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1)
> Is both a %modname and a %srcname required? I've seen only %srcname in
> Python package SPECs.

I've removed %modname and kept %srcname only.

> You can probably use the %{expand:} macro like so:
> %global _description %{expand:
> A collection of cache libraries with a common API.
> Extracted from Werkzeug.}
> 
> That way you don't have to add backslashes.

I found the description to be short enough to bear two backslashes previously,
but now I've rewritten it with the macro.

> Does the package have any tests worth adding to the %check phase?

Unfortunately, it does not. There were some tests in the original Werkzeug, but
they were not migrated with the rest of the code.

Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mgrabovs/cachelib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01591433-python-cachelib/python-cachelib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mgrabovs/cachelib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01591433-python-cachelib/python-cachelib-0.1.1-1.fc33.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862965] Review Request: rust-tpm2-policy - Specify and send TPM2 policies to satisfy object authorization

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862965

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1859994 (PARSEC)
  Alias||rust-tpm2-policy
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859994
[Bug 1859994] Support PARSEC
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862965] New: Review Request: rust-tpm2-policy - Specify and send TPM2 policies to satisfy object authorization

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862965

Bug ID: 1862965
   Summary: Review Request: rust-tpm2-policy - Specify and send
TPM2 policies to satisfy object authorization
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: pbrobin...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-tpm2-policy.spec
SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-tpm2-policy-0.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description:
Specify and send TPM2 policies to satisfy object authorization

FAS: pbrobinson
koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48499798


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862950] New: Review Request: rust-zbus - API for D-Bus communication

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862950

Bug ID: 1862950
   Summary: Review Request: rust-zbus - API for D-Bus
communication
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: marcandre.lur...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-zbus.spec
SRPM URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-zbus-1.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description: API for D-Bus communication
Fedora Account System Username: elmarco


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862949] New: Review Request: rust-zbus_macros - Proc-macros for zbus

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862949

Bug ID: 1862949
   Summary: Review Request: rust-zbus_macros - Proc-macros for
zbus
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: marcandre.lur...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-zbus_macros.spec
SRPM URL:
https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-zbus_macros-1.0.1-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description: Proc-macros for zbus
Fedora Account System Username: elmarco


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862947] New: Review Request: rust-zvariant - API for D-Bus wire format encoding & decoding

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862947

Bug ID: 1862947
   Summary: Review Request: rust-zvariant - API for D-Bus wire
format encoding & decoding
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: marcandre.lur...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-zvariant.spec
SRPM URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-zvariant-2.0.1-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description: API for D-Bus wire format encoding & decoding
Fedora Account System Username: elmarco


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862946] New: Review Request: rust-zvariant_derive - API for D-Bus wire format encoding & decoding

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862946

Bug ID: 1862946
   Summary: Review Request: rust-zvariant_derive - API for D-Bus
wire format encoding & decoding
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: marcandre.lur...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-zvariant_derive.spec
SRPM URL:
https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-zvariant_derive-2.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description: API for D-Bus wire format encoding & decoding
Fedora Account System Username: elmarco


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862945] New: Review Request: rust-fastrand - Simple random number generator

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862945

Bug ID: 1862945
   Summary: Review Request: rust-fastrand - Simple random number
generator
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: marcandre.lur...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-fastrand.spec
SRPM URL:
https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-fastrand-1.3.3-1.fc33.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm
Description: Simple random number generator
Fedora Account System Username: elmarco


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862943] New: Review Request: rust-derivative - Set of alternative `derive` attributes for Rust

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862943

Bug ID: 1862943
   Summary: Review Request: rust-derivative - Set of alternative
`derive` attributes for Rust
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: marcandre.lur...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-derivative.spec
SRPM URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-derivative-2.1.1-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description: Set of alternative `derive` attributes for Rust
Fedora Account System Username: elmarco


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1859207] Review Request: sane-airscan - SANE backend for eSCL and WSD protocols

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859207

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-841f4ce8df has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-841f4ce8df


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862919] Review Request: R-isoband - Generate Isolines and Isobands from Regularly Spaced Elevation Grids

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862919

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1810676





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810676
[Bug 1810676] R-ggplot2-3.3.2 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862919] Review Request: R-isoband - Generate Isolines and Isobands from Regularly Spaced Elevation Grids

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862919

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
I accidentally skipped the scratch build; this may not pass:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48493633


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862919] New: Review Request: R-isoband - Generate Isolines and Isobands from Regularly Spaced Elevation Grids

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862919

Bug ID: 1862919
   Summary: Review Request: R-isoband - Generate Isolines and
Isobands from Regularly Spaced Elevation Grids
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-isoband/R-isoband.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-isoband/R-isoband-0.2.2-1.fc31~bootstrap.src.rpm

Description:
A fast C++ implementation to generate contour lines (isolines) and contour
polygons (isobands) from regularly spaced grids containing elevation data.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862909] New: Review Request: wayland-utils - Wayland utilities

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862909

Bug ID: 1862909
   Summary: Review Request: wayland-utils - Wayland utilities
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ofour...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://ofourdan.fedorapeople.org/wayland-utils/wayland-utils.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ofourdan.fedorapeople.org/wayland-utils/wayland-utils-1.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
Description:
wayland-utils contains wayland-info, a standalone version of weston-info,
a utility for displaying information about the Wayland protocols supported
by the Wayland compositor.
wayland-info also provides additional information for a subset of Wayland
protocols it knows about, namely Linux DMABUF, presentation time, tablet and
XDG output protocols.
Fedora Account System Username: ofourdan


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862895] Review Request: R-magick - Advanced Graphics and Image-Processing in R

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862895

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1862902
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862902
[Bug 1862902] Review Request: R-tesseract - Open Source OCR Engine
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862902] Review Request: R-tesseract - Open Source OCR Engine

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862902

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1862895





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862895
[Bug 1862895] Review Request: R-magick - Advanced Graphics and Image-Processing
in R
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862902] New: Review Request: R-tesseract - Open Source OCR Engine

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862902

Bug ID: 1862902
   Summary: Review Request: R-tesseract - Open Source OCR Engine
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-tesseract/R-tesseract.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-tesseract/R-tesseract-4.1-1.fc31.src.rpm

Description:
Bindings to 'Tesseract' :
a powerful optical character recognition (OCR) engine that supports over
100 languages. The engine is highly configurable in order to tune the
detection algorithms and obtain the best possible results.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862895] Review Request: R-magick - Advanced Graphics and Image-Processing in R

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862895



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-magick/R-magick.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-magick/R-magick-2.4.0-1.fc31~bootstrap.src.rpm

Move R-pdftools into bootstrap, since it depends on tesseract too.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1862895] New: Review Request: R-magick - Advanced Graphics and Image-Processing in R

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862895

Bug ID: 1862895
   Summary: Review Request: R-magick - Advanced Graphics and
Image-Processing in R
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-magick/R-magick.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-magick/R-magick-2.4.0-1.fc31~bootstrap.src.rpm

Description:
Bindings to 'ImageMagick': the most comprehensive open-source image processing
library available. Supports many common formats (png, jpeg, tiff, pdf, etc) and
manipulations (rotate, scale, crop, trim, flip, blur, etc). All operations are
vectorized via the Magick++ STL meaning they operate either on a single frame
or a series of frames for working with layers, collages, or animation. In
RStudio images are automatically previewed when printed to the console,
resulting in an interactive editing environment. The latest version of the
package includes a native graphics device for creating in-memory graphics or
drawing onto images using pixel coordinates.


Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48490866


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1859710] Review Request: rust-wasm-bindgen-test - Internal testing crate for wasm-bindgen

2020-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859710

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2020-08-03 07:14:47




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org