[Bug 1876737] Review Request: ghc-git-lfs - Git-lfs protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876737 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830424 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830424 [Bug 1830424] git-annex-8.20200810 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876737] Review Request: ghc-git-lfs - Git-lfs protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876737 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50983756 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876736] Review Request: ghc-http-client-restricted - Restricting the servers that http-client will use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876736 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830424 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830424 [Bug 1830424] git-annex-8.20200810 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876736] Review Request: ghc-http-client-restricted - Restricting the servers that http-client will use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876736 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50983925 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876737] New: Review Request: ghc-git-lfs - Git-lfs protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876737 Bug ID: 1876737 Summary: Review Request: ghc-git-lfs - Git-lfs protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-git-lfs.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-git-lfs-1.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: An implementation of the git-lfs protocol. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876736] New: Review Request: ghc-http-client-restricted - Restricting the servers that http-client will use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876736 Bug ID: 1876736 Summary: Review Request: ghc-http-client-restricted - Restricting the servers that http-client will use Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-http-client-restricted.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-http-client-restricted-0.0.3-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Addition to the http-client and http-client-tls libraries, that restricts the HTTP servers that can be used. This is useful when a security policy needs to eg, prevent connections to HTTP servers on localhost or a local network, or only allow connections to a specific HTTP server. It handles restricting redirects as well as the initial HTTP connection, and it also guards against DNS poisoning attacks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876726] Review Request: R-downlit - Syntax Highlighting and Automatic Linking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876726 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1876595 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876595 [Bug 1876595] R-pkgdown-1.6.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1873302] Review Request: IP2Location - IP2location library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873302 --- Comment #7 from Peter Bieringer --- executed: fedpkg request-repo IP2Location 1873302 will now wait for approval -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856005] Review Request: dmtcp - Checkpoint/Restart functionality for Linux processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856005 --- Comment #15 from Paul Grosu --- Hi Dave, Sorry for the delay in responding. Where it is failing it tends to be for rarely used cases, or for cases where the tests take long or may time out. Primarily we are interested in having DMTCP 2.6 accepted as a package, and then soon after updating to DMTCP 3.0. Would it be better if we skipped the tests for now? Our larger goal is to move our package to DMTCP 3.0, but we would like to see a 2.6 package first as a confidence-building measure. Best regards, - Gene and Paul -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876726] Review Request: R-downlit - Syntax Highlighting and Automatic Linking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876726 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1876720 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876720 [Bug 1876720] Review Request: R-brio - Basic R Input Output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876720] Review Request: R-brio - Basic R Input Output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876720 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1876726 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876726 [Bug 1876726] Review Request: R-downlit - Syntax Highlighting and Automatic Linking -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876726] New: Review Request: R-downlit - Syntax Highlighting and Automatic Linking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876726 Bug ID: 1876726 Summary: Review Request: R-downlit - Syntax Highlighting and Automatic Linking Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-downlit.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-downlit-0.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Syntax highlighting of R code, specifically designed for the needs of RMarkdown packages like pkgdown, hugodown, and bookdown. It includes linking of function calls to their documentation on the web, and automatic translation of ANSI escapes in output to the equivalent HTML. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876720] Review Request: R-brio - Basic R Input Output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876720 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- The correct scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50979291 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876720] New: Review Request: R-brio - Basic R Input Output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876720 Bug ID: 1876720 Summary: Review Request: R-brio - Basic R Input Output Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-brio/R-brio.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-brio/R-brio-1.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Functions to handle basic input output, these functions always read and write UTF-8 (8-bit Unicode Transformation Format) files and provide more explicit control over line endings. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50962920 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1739133] Review Request: opensbi - RISC-V Open Source Supervisor Binary Interface (OpenSBI)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739133 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br Resolution|NOTABUG |--- Flags||needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com ||) Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto --- lets finish this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1739133] Review Request: opensbi - RISC-V Open Source Supervisor Binary Interface (OpenSBI)
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Richard W.M. Jones 's needinfo: Bug 1739133: Review Request: opensbi - RISC-V Open Source Supervisor Binary Interface (OpenSBI) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739133 --- Comment #6 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1871269] Review Request: python-jsonpath-ng - Implementation of JSONPath for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871269 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > - Add the link to your PR above License field: > > # https://github.com/h2non/jsonpath-ng/pull/45 > License:ASL 2.0 > > - One file is licensed under WTFPL: > > Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License, Version 2 > -- > jsonpath-ng-1.5.1/jsonpath_ng/bin/jsonpath.py > > Add it to the License field and add a comment explaining the licenses > breakdown. > > # Main library: ASL 2.0 > # jsonpath_ng/bin/jsonpath.py: WTFPL > License:ASL 2.0 and WTFPL Thanks for the feedback. Added %changelog * Mon Sep 07 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.5.1-2 - Clarify licensing (rhbz#1871269) Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-jsonpath-ng.spec SRPM URL: hhttps://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-jsonpath-ng-1.5.1-2.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796401] Review Request: python-requre - REQuest REcording your python code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796401 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(jsco...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter --- This package was never build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1871414] Review Request: python-linkheader - Parse and format link headers according to RFC 5988
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871414 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-linkheader.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-linkheader-0.4.3-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Parse and format link headers according to RFC 5988 "Web Linking". Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49946942 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-linkheader-0.4.3-1.fc32.src.rpm python-linkheader.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://bitbucket.org/asplake/link_header HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-linkheader-0.4.3-1.fc32.noarch.rpm python3-linkheader.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://bitbucket.org/asplake/link_header HTTP Error 404: Not Found python3-linkheader.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1871414] Review Request: python-linkheader - Parse and format link headers according to RFC 5988
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871414 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875937] Review Request: python-aioguardian - Python library for Elexa Guardian devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875937 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876672] New: Review Request: python-afsapi - Python wrapper for the Frontier Silicon API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876672 Bug ID: 1876672 Summary: Review Request: python-afsapi - Python wrapper for the Frontier Silicon API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-afsapi.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-afsapi-0.0.4-1.fc34.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/zhelev/python-afsapi Description: Asynchronous Python implementation of the Frontier Silicon API. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50963803 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-afsapi-0.0.4-1.fc34.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-afsapi-0.0.4-1.fc34.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876670] New: Review Request: python-accuweather - Python wrapper for getting data from AccuWeather servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876670 Bug ID: 1876670 Summary: Review Request: python-accuweather - Python wrapper for getting data from AccuWeather servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-accuweather.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-accuweather-0.0.10-1.fc34.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/bieniu/accuweather Description: Python wrapper for getting weather data from AccuWeather servers for Limited Trial package. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50963479 rpmlint output: rpmlint python-accuweather-0.0.10-1.fc34.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-accuweather-0.0.10-1.fc34.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876660] New: Review Request: flang - Flang is a Fortran language front-end designed for integration with LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876660 Bug ID: 1876660 Summary: Review Request: flang - Flang is a Fortran language front-end designed for integration with LLVM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sguel...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/flang.spec SRPM URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/flang-11.0.0-0.1.rc2.fc31.src.rpm Description: Flang is a ground-up implementation of a Fortran front end written in modern C++. Fedora Account System Username: sergesanspaille -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876578] Review Request: python-kismet-rest - Python API for the Kismet REST interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876578 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andy Mender --- > Not, possible as they require a running kismet instance. Upstream is using > containers to do it but this will not work with the build system. I see... I looked at the tests and assumed it's possible to have at least a local instance running for the tests. Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1872373] Review Request: rust-prost-build - Protocol Buffers implementation for the Rust Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872373 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson --- SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-prost-build.spec SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-prost-build-0.6.1-2.fc32.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50959288 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876578] Review Request: python-kismet-rest - Python API for the Kismet REST interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876578 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1) > I see the project has tests: > https://github.com/kismetwireless/python-kismet-rest/tree/master/tests > Can you add them as a %check step if possible? Not, possible as they require a running kismet instance. Upstream is using containers to do it but this will not work with the build system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876578] Review Request: python-kismet-rest - Python API for the Kismet REST interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876578 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1) > I see the project has tests: > https://github.com/kismetwireless/python-kismet-rest/tree/master/tests > Can you add them as a %check step if possible? Not, possible as they require a running kismet instance. Upstream is using containers to do it but this will not work with the build system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875996] Review Request: python-typish - Python library for additional control over types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875996 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876578] Review Request: python-kismet-rest - Python API for the Kismet REST interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876578
--- Comment #1 from Andy Mender ---
I see the project has tests:
https://github.com/kismetwireless/python-kismet-rest/tree/master/tests
Can you add them as a %check step if possible?
The rest looks good. Full review below:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License". 44
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-kismet-rest/python-kismet-
rest/licensecheck.txt
Review: LICENSE file picked up as LGPL, but it's actually GPLv2.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes
[Bug 1872373] Review Request: rust-prost-build - Protocol Buffers implementation for the Rust Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872373 Bug 1872373 depends on bug 1872372, which changed state. Bug 1872372 Summary: Review Request: rust-prost-types - Protocol Buffers implementation for the Rust Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872372 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1872372] Review Request: rust-prost-types - Protocol Buffers implementation for the Rust Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872372 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-09-07 18:09:21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876578] Review Request: python-kismet-rest - Python API for the Kismet REST interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876578 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|andymenderu...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876006] Review Request: metrics2mqtt - Publish system performance metrics to a MQTT broker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876006 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andy Mender --- > It's a run-time dependency and not a a requirement for the build (as there > are no tests). The dependency generator is picking-up jsons and the other > modules which are required to run: > > > python3-metrics2mqtt (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > > python(abi) > > python3.9dist(jsons) > > python3.9dist(numpy) > > python3.9dist(paho-mqtt) > > python3.9dist(psutil) > > python3.9dist(setuptools) > > Yes, you are completely right, apologies! Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1871813] Review Request: python-aioesphomeapi - Library to interact with devices flashed with esphome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871813 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875996] Review Request: python-typish - Python library for additional control over types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875996 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andy Mender --- Approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876601] Review Request: python-requests-credssp - HTTPS CredSSP authentication with the requests library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876601 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mohamed El Morabity --- Hello, the package already exists: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-requests-credssp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1861020] Review Request: x-tile - A GTK application to tile windows in different ways
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861020 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-09-07 17:14:04 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1eec26d4f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1871997] Review Request: menulibre - MenuLibre is an advanced FreeDesktop.org compliant menu editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871997 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-09-07 17:13:54 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1b8a9123e7 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1867423] Review Request: R-ragg - Graphic Devices Based on AGG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867423 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-09-07 17:12:57 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-aff200a91c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876588] Review Request: python-spnego - Windows Negotiate Authentication Client and Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876588 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pikachu.2...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876601] Review Request: python-requests-credssp - HTTPS CredSSP authentication with the requests library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876601 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1876588 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-requests-credssp.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-requests-credssp-1.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/jborean93/requests-credssp Description: This package allows for HTTPS CredSSP authentication using the requests library. CredSSP is a Microsoft authentication that allows your credentials to be delegated to a server giving you double hop authentication. Koji scratch build: fails due to missing dependency rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python3-requests-credssp-1.2.0-1.fc32.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python-requests-credssp-1.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876588 [Bug 1876588] Review Request: python-spnego - Windows Negotiate Authentication Client and Server -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876588] Review Request: python-spnego - Windows Negotiate Authentication Client and Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876588 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1876601 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876601 [Bug 1876601] Review Request: python-requests-credssp - HTTPS CredSSP authentication with the requests library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876601] New: Review Request: python-requests-credssp - HTTPS CredSSP authentication with the requests library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876601 Bug ID: 1876601 Summary: Review Request: python-requests-credssp - HTTPS CredSSP authentication with the requests library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876588] Review Request: python-spnego - Windows Negotiate Authentication Client and Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876588 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1876597 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876597 [Bug 1876597] Review Request: python-smbprotocol - Interact with a server using the SMB 2/3 Protocol -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876597] Review Request: python-smbprotocol - Interact with a server using the SMB 2/3 Protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876597 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1876588 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-smbprotocol.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-smbprotocol-1.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/jborean93/smbprotocol Description: SMB is a network file sharing protocol and has numerous iterations over the years. This library implements the SMBv2 and SMBv3 protocol based on the MS-SMB2 document. Koji scratch build: fails due to missing dependency rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python3-smbprotocol-1.1.0-1.fc32.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python-smbprotocol-1.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876588 [Bug 1876588] Review Request: python-spnego - Windows Negotiate Authentication Client and Server -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876597] New: Review Request: python-smbprotocol - Interact with a server using the SMB 2/3 Protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876597 Bug ID: 1876597 Summary: Review Request: python-smbprotocol - Interact with a server using the SMB 2/3 Protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1869433] Review Request: php-opis-closure - A library that can be used to serialize closures and arbitrary objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869433 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b006932aa7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856904] Review Request: pwncat - TCP/UDP communication suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856904 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d464fe632d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876588] New: Review Request: python-spnego - Windows Negotiate Authentication Client and Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876588 Bug ID: 1876588 Summary: Review Request: python-spnego - Windows Negotiate Authentication Client and Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-spnego.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-spnego-0.1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/jborean93/pyspnego Description: Python SPNEGO Library to handle SPNEGO (Negotiate, NTLM, Kerberos) authentication. Also includes a packet parser that can be used to decode raw NTLM/SPNEGO/Kerberos tokens into a human readable format. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50950584 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-spnego-0.1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-spnego-0.1.1-1.fc32.noarch.rpm python3-spnego.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pyspnego-parse 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875860] Review Request: python-ciso8601 - Fast ISO8601 date time parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875860 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1873199] Review Request: malcontent - Parental controls implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember ---
Nice, thanks for the fixes! I'll let Andy do the final pass but looking good to
me :)
Just a few more remarks below:
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #8)
> (In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #7)
> > I don't think there's any requirement for shipping a docs within all
> > subpackages. It's just dumb rpmlint warning about not having docs and that
> > warning is fine to ignore. rpmlint output doesn't 100% match our packaging
> > guidelines and best practices.
> >
> > What stand-alone subpackages need to have is a license file specified with
> > %license (which they already have).
> >
> >
> > I do have some other random comments here I noticed while going through the
> > spec file:
> >
> >
> > > Requires: gnome-user-docs
> >
> > Why is this hard dep necessary? It seems wrong from minimization point of
> > view to drag in an unrelated docs package if one just wants to install the
> > library.
>
> It was so that the /usr/share/help sub-directories were created. I've tried
> to fix that up
> in the latest version. Let me know if you wanted it done some other way, I
> couldn't actually find examples in the checked out packages.
Ahh, that's usually done with '%find_lang --with_gnome' which then picks up all
the individual directories under /usr/share/help and adds the correct %files
lang() attributes etc and writes it out to malcontent.lang, which you then
include with %files -f malcontent.lang. I think the only missing part is adding
--with-gnome to %find_lang and then you can drop the gnome-user-docs requires
and all of the %{_datadir}/help references from %files.
> > > %check
> > > desktop-file-validate
> > > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/org.freedesktop.MalcontentControl.desktop
> >
> > It should also have appdata validation here.
>
> Done, but disabled for now:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pwithnall/malcontent/-/issues/23
It should be validate-relax which should make it pass. appstream-util uses a
bit weird naming there, but the idea was for 'validate' to mean "validate stuff
that flathub wants" and 'validate-relax' to be "validate stuff that
package-based distros want".
> %files ui-libs
> %license COPYING
> %doc README.md
> %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0/MalcontentUi-0.typelib
This should have '%dir %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0' to own the directory as
well.
> %files libs
> %license COPYING
> %doc README.md
> %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0/Malcontent-0.typelib
... and same here, '%dir %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0', which would then allow
dropping 'Requires: gobject-introspection' from above.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1873199] Review Request: malcontent - Parental controls implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #7)
> I don't think there's any requirement for shipping a docs within all
> subpackages. It's just dumb rpmlint warning about not having docs and that
> warning is fine to ignore. rpmlint output doesn't 100% match our packaging
> guidelines and best practices.
>
> What stand-alone subpackages need to have is a license file specified with
> %license (which they already have).
>
>
> I do have some other random comments here I noticed while going through the
> spec file:
>
>
> > Requires: gnome-user-docs
>
> Why is this hard dep necessary? It seems wrong from minimization point of
> view to drag in an unrelated docs package if one just wants to install the
> library.
It was so that the /usr/share/help sub-directories were created. I've tried to
fix that up
in the latest version. Let me know if you wanted it done some other way, I
couldn't actually find examples in the checked out packages.
> > %package ui-devel
> > Summary:Development files for libmalcontent-ui
> > License:LGPLv2+
> > Requires: %{name}-ui-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> > Requires: pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
>
> I don't think you need to manually specify 'Requires: pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)'
> as it's normally automatically generated based on the .pc file. If that
> doesn't happen, it's probably a bug in the .pc file.
OK, removed.
>
> > Requires: gobject-introspection-devel
>
> Instead of this, please just use multiple directory ownership for the gir
> directories as we do in other gnome packages instead of hard-depending on
> gobject-introspection-devel.
Done.
>
> > %package ui-libs
> > Summary:Libraries for %{name}
> > License:LGPLv2+
> > Requires: gobject-introspection
>
> Same thing here, please just use multiple directory ownership for the gir
> directories.
>
>
> I see that you are specifying "License: LGPLv2+" in all subpackages. This is
> fine, but unnecessary: it's enough to just specify it for the main package
> and then all subpackages inheriy the license tag of the main packages.
OK.
> > %check
> > desktop-file-validate
> > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/org.freedesktop.MalcontentControl.desktop
>
> It should also have appdata validation here.
Done, but disabled for now:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pwithnall/malcontent/-/issues/23
> > %ldconfig_scriptlets libs
> > %ldconfig_scriptlets ui-libs
>
> These are not needed in current Fedora versions and can just go (they
> evaluate to nothing). We have ldconfig triggers in place that automatically
> rebuild the ldconfig cache.
Done.
> > %{_mandir}/man8/malcontent-client.8.gz
>
> Can you use malcontent-client.8* glob here? This works better for flatpak
> builds that don't currently have man page compression applied.
Sure.
Scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50946663
-4 version copied to the same URL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876578] Review Request: python-kismet-rest - Python API for the Kismet REST interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876578 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-kismet-rest.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-kismet-rest-2019.5.2-1.fc32.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/kismetwireless/python-kismet-rest Description: Python API wrapper for Kismet RESTful API interface. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50946494 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-kismet-rest-2019.5.2-1.fc32.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-kismet-rest-2019.5.2-1.fc32.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876578] New: Review Request: python-kismet-rest - Python API for the Kismet REST interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876578 Bug ID: 1876578 Summary: Review Request: python-kismet-rest - Python API for the Kismet REST interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816301] Review Request: openfoam - computational fluid dynamics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301 --- Comment #18 from mark.ole...@esi-group.com --- Anything still missing for this to go ahead? The most current set of srpm and specs are listed under https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/openfoam/openfoam/fedora-33-x86_64/01646651-openfoam2006/openfoam2006-200727-200904.fc33.src.rpm https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/openfoam/openfoam/fedora-33-x86_64/01646651-openfoam2006/openfoam2006.spec /mark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875726] Review Request: golang-github-openprinting-ipp-usb - HTTP reverse proxy, backed by IPP-over-USB connection to device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875726 --- Comment #3 from Zdenek Dohnal --- And the fixed spec and srpm (without two issue mentioned above) are uploaded and ready for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875868] Review Request: python-aioflo - Python library for Flo by Moen Smart Water Detectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875868 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875996] Review Request: python-typish - Python library for additional control over types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875996 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > See https://github.com/ramonhagenaars/typish/issues/18 > > Consider disabling them for now? Disabled %changelog * Mon Sep 07 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.7.0-2 - Disable failing tests (rhbz#1875996) Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-typish.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-typish-1.7.0-2.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 an.d.yk.i.ngso.lomo.nt...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||an.d.yk.i.ngso.lomo.ntm.p@g ||mail.com --- Comment #174 from an.d.yk.i.ngso.lomo.nt...@gmail.com --- Propacity is a prop-tech company, simplifying digitisation for real estate channel partners is a prop-tech company, simplifying digitisation for real estate channel partners. They pair industry’s top talent & technology to provide seamless & intelligent business consulting to CPs of top developers like DLF, Godrej, Hero, Shapoorji, Lodha, Hines, Emaar, AIPL, Piramal etc in Delhi, Noida, Gurgaon, Bangalore, Pune & Mumbai https://propacity.in/ https://propacity.in/blog/real-estate-marketing/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876508] Review Request: jpcre2 - C++ wrapper for PCRE2 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876508 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- rpmlint output clean: 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876508] New: Review Request: jpcre2 - C++ wrapper for PCRE2 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876508 Bug ID: 1876508 Summary: Review Request: jpcre2 - C++ wrapper for PCRE2 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: domi...@greysector.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/jpcre2/jpcre2.spec SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/jpcre2/jpcre2-10.32.01-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: PCRE2 is the name used for a revised API for the PCRE library, which is a set of functions, written in C, that implement regular expression pattern matching using the same syntax and semantics as Perl, with just a few differences. Some features that appeared in Python and the original PCRE before they appeared in Perl are also available using the Python syntax. This provides some C++ wrapper classes/functions to perform regex operations such as regex match and regex replace. Fedora Account System Username: rathann -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875860] Review Request: python-ciso8601 - Fast ISO8601 date time parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875860
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Package APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[-]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: Package
[Bug 1875370] Review Request: hadolint - Dockerfile linter, validate inline bash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875370 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anton.koch...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen --- *** Bug 1845034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875860] Review Request: python-ciso8601 - Fast ISO8601 date time parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875860 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Mohamed El Morabity from comment #1) > Why did you disable debug packages? Was empty at some point during the creation of the package. Enabled now. Thanks for the feedback. %changelog * Mon Sep 07 2020 Fabian Affolter - 2.1.3-2 - Enable debug output Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ciso8601.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ciso8601-2.1.3-2.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1873199] Review Request: malcontent - Parental controls implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember ---
I don't think there's any requirement for shipping a docs within all
subpackages. It's just dumb rpmlint warning about not having docs and that
warning is fine to ignore. rpmlint output doesn't 100% match our packaging
guidelines and best practices.
What stand-alone subpackages need to have is a license file specified with
%license (which they already have).
I do have some other random comments here I noticed while going through the
spec file:
> Requires: gnome-user-docs
Why is this hard dep necessary? It seems wrong from minimization point of view
to drag in an unrelated docs package if one just wants to install the library.
> %package ui-devel
> Summary:Development files for libmalcontent-ui
> License:LGPLv2+
> Requires: %{name}-ui-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires: pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
I don't think you need to manually specify 'Requires: pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)' as
it's normally automatically generated based on the .pc file. If that doesn't
happen, it's probably a bug in the .pc file.
> Requires: gobject-introspection-devel
Instead of this, please just use multiple directory ownership for the gir
directories as we do in other gnome packages instead of hard-depending on
gobject-introspection-devel.
> %package ui-libs
> Summary:Libraries for %{name}
> License:LGPLv2+
> Requires: gobject-introspection
Same thing here, please just use multiple directory ownership for the gir
directories.
I see that you are specifying "License: LGPLv2+" in all subpackages. This is
fine, but unnecessary: it's enough to just specify it for the main package and
then all subpackages inheriy the license tag of the main packages.
> %check
> desktop-file-validate
> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/org.freedesktop.MalcontentControl.desktop
It should also have appdata validation here.
> %ldconfig_scriptlets libs
> %ldconfig_scriptlets ui-libs
These are not needed in current Fedora versions and can just go (they evaluate
to nothing). We have ldconfig triggers in place that automatically rebuild the
ldconfig cache.
> %{_mandir}/man8/malcontent-client.8.gz
Can you use malcontent-client.8* glob here? This works better for flatpak
builds that don't currently have man page compression applied.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875906] Review Request: python-pyiqvia - Python API for IQVIA data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875906 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875808] Review Request: python-hikvision - Python interface to interact with a Hikvision camera
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875808 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875795] Review Request: python-edimax - Interface with Edimax Smart Plugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875795 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875726] Review Request: golang-github-openprinting-ipp-usb - HTTP reverse proxy, backed by IPP-over-USB connection to device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875726 Zdenek Dohnal changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Dohnal --- Hi Robert-André, thank you for the review and notes! I would like to ask how should I fix the following warning and error: golang-github-openprinting-ipp-usb-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/OpenPrinting/ipp-usb/.goipath golang-github-openprinting-ipp-usb-debugsource.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug sources for package golang-github-openprinting-ipp-usb. Both of them seem to be generated during building the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854729] Review Request: nispor - API for network state query written in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729 Gris Ge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||nispor-0.5.0-2.fc34 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Flags|needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com | |) | Last Closed||2020-09-07 07:52:19 --- Comment #24 from Gris Ge --- Never mind. I missed the deadline of Fedora 33. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854729] Review Request: nispor - API for network state query written in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729 Bug 1854729 depends on bug 1860792, which changed state. Bug 1860792 Summary: Review Request: rust-rtnetlink - The rtnetlink interface for rust netlink binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860792 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860792] Review Request: rust-rtnetlink - The rtnetlink interface for rust netlink binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860792 Gris Ge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-rtnetlink-0.4.0-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-09-07 07:19:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860784] Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-route - rust binding for netlink route protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860784 Bug 1860784 depends on bug 1860781, which changed state. Bug 1860781 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-core - core package for netlink rust binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860781 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860787] Review Request: rust-netlink-proto - Netlink protocol constants for rust netlink binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860787 Bug 1860787 depends on bug 1860781, which changed state. Bug 1860781 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-core - core package for netlink rust binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860781 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860781] Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-core - core package for netlink rust binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860781 Gris Ge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-netlink-packet-core-0. ||2.0-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-09-07 07:19:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854729] Review Request: nispor - API for network state query written in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729 Bug 1854729 depends on bug 1860781, which changed state. Bug 1860781 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-core - core package for netlink rust binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860781 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854729] Review Request: nispor - API for network state query written in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729 Bug 1854729 depends on bug 1860784, which changed state. Bug 1860784 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-route - rust binding for netlink route protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860784 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860792] Review Request: rust-rtnetlink - The rtnetlink interface for rust netlink binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860792 Bug 1860792 depends on bug 1860784, which changed state. Bug 1860784 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-route - rust binding for netlink route protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860784 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860784] Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-route - rust binding for netlink route protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860784 Gris Ge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-netlink-packet-route-0 ||.4.0-1.fc34 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-09-07 07:18:29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860784] Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-route - rust binding for netlink route protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860784 Bug 1860784 depends on bug 1860785, which changed state. Bug 1860785 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-utils - Utils of rust netlink binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860785 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860785] Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-utils - Utils of rust netlink binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860785 Gris Ge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-netlink-packet-utils-0 ||.2.0-2.fc34 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-09-07 07:15:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854729] Review Request: nispor - API for network state query written in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729 Bug 1854729 depends on bug 1860785, which changed state. Bug 1860785 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-utils - Utils of rust netlink binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860785 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860781] Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-core - core package for netlink rust binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860781 Bug 1860781 depends on bug 1860785, which changed state. Bug 1860785 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-packet-utils - Utils of rust netlink binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860785 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860787] Review Request: rust-netlink-proto - Netlink protocol constants for rust netlink binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860787 Gris Ge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-netlink-proto-0.4.1-1. ||fc34 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-09-07 07:14:50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860787] Review Request: rust-netlink-proto - Netlink protocol constants for rust netlink binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860787 Bug 1860787 depends on bug 1860790, which changed state. Bug 1860790 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-sys - The system tools(sockets, aync, etc) for rust binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860790 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854729] Review Request: nispor - API for network state query written in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729 Bug 1854729 depends on bug 1860787, which changed state. Bug 1860787 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-proto - Netlink protocol constants for rust netlink binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860787 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854729] Review Request: nispor - API for network state query written in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729 Bug 1854729 depends on bug 1860790, which changed state. Bug 1860790 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-sys - The system tools(sockets, aync, etc) for rust binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860790 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860790] Review Request: rust-netlink-sys - The system tools(sockets, aync, etc) for rust binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860790 Gris Ge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rust-netlink-sys-0.4.0-1.fc ||34 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-09-07 07:14:12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1860792] Review Request: rust-rtnetlink - The rtnetlink interface for rust netlink binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860792 Bug 1860792 depends on bug 1860787, which changed state. Bug 1860787 Summary: Review Request: rust-netlink-proto - Netlink protocol constants for rust netlink binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860787 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875930] Review Request: python-asyncio-dgram - Higher level Datagram support for Asyncio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875930 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875834] Review Request: python-brother - Python wrapper for getting data from Brother printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875834 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875982] Review Request: python-regenmaschine - Python API for RainMachine sprinkler controllers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875982 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875744] Review Request: python-schedule - Job scheduling for humans
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875744 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thank you for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875849] Review Request: python-voluptuous-serialize - Convert voluptuous schemas to dictionaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875849 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876006] Review Request: metrics2mqtt - Publish system performance metrics to a MQTT broker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876006 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1) > COPR builds: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymenderunix/metrics2mqtt-and- > dependencies/build/1650400/ > > I see that metrics2mqtt internally requires python3-jsons, but the > requirement is not specified. Won't this lead to a non-functional/broken > package? Since metrics2mqtt has no tests, there is no safeguard against it. > > I think the following should be added to the SPEC file: > BuildRequires: python3dist(jsons) It's a run-time dependency and not a a requirement for the build (as there are no tests). The dependency generator is picking-up jsons and the other modules which are required to run: > python3-metrics2mqtt (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > python(abi) > python3.9dist(jsons) > python3.9dist(numpy) > python3.9dist(paho-mqtt) > python3.9dist(psutil) > python3.9dist(setuptools) > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875994] Review Request: python-nptyping - Type hints for Numpy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875994 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875782] Review Request: python-databay - Python interface for scheduled data transfer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875782 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for your feedback and your support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875766] Review Request: python-sentinels - Various objects to denote special meanings in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875766 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875765] Review Request: python-mongomock - Module for testing MongoDB-dependent code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875765 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
