[Bug 1883732] Review Request: rubygem-sassc-rails - Integrate SassC-Ruby into Rails

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883732

Pavel Valena  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1871622





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871622
[Bug 1871622] F34FailsToInstall: rubygem-sass-rails
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883732] Review Request: rubygem-sassc-rails - Integrate SassC-Ruby into Rails

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883732



--- Comment #1 from Pavel Valena  ---
Note that te test suite is troublesome at this moment. I didn't manage to make
the tests work, due to paths (assets not found, or even SassC). And CSS
'compressor' doesn't seem to work. I will try to resolve those issues upstream.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883732] New: Review Request: rubygem-sassc-rails - Integrate SassC-Ruby into Rails

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883732

Bug ID: 1883732
   Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sassc-rails - Integrate
SassC-Ruby into Rails
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: pval...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pvalena/rubygems/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01689521-rubygem-sassc-rails/rubygem-sassc-rails.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pvalena/rubygems/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01689521-rubygem-sassc-rails/rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-1.fc34.src.rpm
Description: Integrate SassC-Ruby into Rails.
Fedora Account System Username: pvalena

Automated test: https://git.io/JUMd4
Fedora-review: https://git.io/JUMdv

This is a successor of rubygem-sass-rails:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-sass-rails/pull-request/1


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882909] Review Request: python-rak811 - Interface for RAK811 LoRa module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882909

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-40256b3e21 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-40256b3e21 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-40256b3e21

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882458] Review Request: python-upnpy - Lightweight UPnP client library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882458

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-4f9ab86600 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-4f9ab86600 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4f9ab86600

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882650] Review Request: mqtt-randompub - Tool for generating MQTT messages on various topics

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882650

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9ea5d1f0ee has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-9ea5d1f0ee \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9ea5d1f0ee

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883447] Review Request: R-flexiblas - FlexiBLAS API Interface for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883447

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-a555e29c76 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-a555e29c76 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a555e29c76

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1877811] Review Request: python-pyarlo - Python library to interact with Netgear Arlo cameras

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877811

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1877931] Review Request: ocaml-csexp - Parsing and printing of S-expressions in canonical form

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877931

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-09-30 00:15:43



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-897116b774 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1871123] Review Request: toot - CLI and TUI tool for interacting with Mastodon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871123

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-09-30 00:15:56



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-a92d09315b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1829334] Review Request: 3mux - Terminal multiplexer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829334

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-09-30 00:15:42



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9751d52706 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1877784] Review Request: python-pyopenuv - Python API data from openuv.io

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877784

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-09-30 00:15:31



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c6425976d9 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1876597] Review Request: python-smbprotocol - Interact with a server using the SMB 2/3 Protocol

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876597

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-09-30 00:15:37



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-bd29e34833 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997
Bug 1875997 depends on bug 1875996, which changed state.

Bug 1875996 Summary: Review Request: python-typish - Python library for 
additional control over types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875996

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1875996] Review Request: python-typish - Python library for additional control over types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875996

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-09-30 00:15:28



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-e1f3bbcb42 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1877359] Review Request: python-thingserver - HTTP Web Thing implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877359

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-09-30 00:15:39



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-f38dfbe72b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1880663] Review Request: python-pyduofern - Library for controlling Rademacher DuoFern actors

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880663

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-09-30 00:15:34



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9b3eb02586 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1878903] Review Request: jmol - Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903



--- Comment #5 from Jerry James  ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #3)
> The unretiring guideline
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
> says: "Restore the contents in GIT and prepare a new build and update (if
> necessary)"
> 
> which means that the changelog shouldn't be purged, as for any other update.

I missed that.  Thanks for pointing it out.  I have restored the entire
changelog.

(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #4)
> A couple of new versions were recently released, newest being 14.31.8:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/jmol/files/Jmol/Version%2014.31/Jmol%2014.
> 31.8/

Upstream seems to release frequently.  I'm sure that will make maintaining this
package ... interesting. :-)

I have updated to version 14.31.8.

> The Java Packaging Guidelines mention also that a Requires on
> javapackages-filesystem and java-headless should be added as well:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Java/

I have added javapackages-filesystem.  However, java-headless is not good
enough.  This package uses Java's GUI features, so the dependency has to be on
java.  This is covered by
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Java/#_buildrequires_and_requires.

> If jsmol is an independent package, it needs to provide its own license file
> with the %license macro. If it's not independent, it needs to explicitly
> Requires the main jmol package:
> > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

I have added the license files to jsmol.

> > # Icons from Nuvola are included, but at different sizes than Fedora 
> > provides
> > Provides:   bundled(nuvola-icon-theme)
> 
> Is the license on this icon set compatible with the other licenses?

Good catch.  The icons are GPLv2, so I have added that license to the License
field.

New URLs:
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jmol/jmol.spec
SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jmol/jmol-14.31.8-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902



--- Comment #6 from Jerry James  ---
Thank you Andy.  That build failure on armhfp is a segfault in a futex call
inside libpthread.  That can't possibly be the fault of naga, which contains no
native code.  I'll cross my fingers and hope that doesn't happen on koji.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882458] Review Request: python-upnpy - Lightweight UPnP client library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882458

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-4f9ab86600 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4f9ab86600


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882909] Review Request: python-rak811 - Interface for RAK811 LoRa module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882909

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-40256b3e21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-40256b3e21


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882650] Review Request: mqtt-randompub - Tool for generating MQTT messages on various topics

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882650

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-9ea5d1f0ee has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9ea5d1f0ee


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883154] Review Request: python-click-spinner - Spinner for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883154

Andy Mender  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Andy Mender  ---
Thanks for bringing this in, I was planning to do it for a while :).

There is a fork of click-spinner called blindspin in the repos, but the
upstream project hasn't been updated in a long while and it doesn't seem like
anything depends on python-blindspin. Could you make it so python-click-spinner
Obsoletes python-blindspin so that I can orphan it?

The Fedora repo is here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-blindspin
The upstream project is here: https://github.com/kennethreitz/blindspin
The differences in versioning are because the authors of the fork changed the
versioning scheme, not because it's already at version 2.x.

Other than that, looks good. Package approved.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
  Note: python3-pytest4 is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/deprecating-packages/


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
 Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 14 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-click-
 spinner/python-click-spinner/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
 Review: mentioned in an earlier comment.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned 

[Bug 1883154] Review Request: python-click-spinner - Spinner for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883154

Andy Mender  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|andymenderu...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882703] Review Request: python-inject - Dependency injection, the Python way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882703

Andy Mender  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Andy Mender  ---
Looks good. Package approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902

Andy Mender  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Andy Mender  ---
Alright, looks good.

I trigged some builds just in case:
COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymenderunix/jmol/build/1689006/
(fails on armhfp for whatever reason)
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52471969 (clean)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1878101] Review Request: cozy - Modern audiobook player

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878101

Andy Mender  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Andy Mender  ---
> I don't think it does, because if it did, then RPM would complain about stuff 
> present in the buildroot, but not listed in the %files section.

Fair point!

Looks good. Package approved!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883585] Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585



--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-click-repl


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581



--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-click-didyoumean


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883585] Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok  ---
APPROVED.

Optional: Please align the BuildeRequires to the rest of the tags (column 16
instead of 15).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883585] Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585



--- Comment #6 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688975-python-click-repl/python-click-repl.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688975-python-click-repl/python-click-repl-0.1.6-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok  ---
APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581



--- Comment #7 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688976-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688976-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean-0.0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883585] Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mhron...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

Issues:
---
- Please justify the patches by short comment in the spec file


OCD:

- Please align the BuildeRequires to the rest of the tags (column 16 instead of
15).


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "*No copyright* Expat
 License".
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Patches link to 

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581



--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok  ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5)
> [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
>  license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
>  license(s) for the package is included in %license.

Sorry this was supposed to be [!] and listed in the issues:

- Please include the LICENSE file as %license.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mhron...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

Issues:
---

- Please drop the manual requires
- Please justify the patches by short comment in the spec file

OCD:


- Please align the BuildeRequires to the rest of the tags (column 16 instead of
15).

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 8 files have unknown
 license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from 

[Bug 1883585] Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585



--- Comment #4 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688954-python-click-repl/python-click-repl.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688954-python-click-repl/python-click-repl-0.1.6-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581



--- Comment #4 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688955-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688955-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean-0.0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1803302] Review Request: github-cli - The GitHub CLI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803302



--- Comment #7 from Rich Megginson  ---
Note - this is a replacement for the `hub` command which is being deprecated


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883585] Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585



--- Comment #3 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688942-python-click-repl/python-click-repl.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688942-python-click-repl/python-click-repl-0.1.6-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581



--- Comment #3 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688943-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688943-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean-0.0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883585] Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585



--- Comment #2 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688913-python-click-repl/python-click-repl.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688913-python-click-repl/python-click-repl-0.1.6-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581



--- Comment #2 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688937-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688937-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean-0.0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883585] Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585



--- Comment #1 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688897-python-click-repl/python-click-repl.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688897-python-click-repl/python-click-repl-0.1.6-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581



--- Comment #1 from František Zatloukal  ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688895-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688895-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean-0.0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883585] New: Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883585

Bug ID: 1883585
   Summary: Review Request: python-click-repl - REPL plugin for
Click
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: fzatl...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688876-python-click-repl/python-click-repl.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01688876-python-click-repl/python-click-repl-0.1.6-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883581] New: Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable git-like did-you-mean feature in click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883581

Bug ID: 1883581
   Summary: Review Request: python-click-didyoumean - Enable
git-like did-you-mean feature in click
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: fzatl...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/0160-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean.spec

SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/celery_up/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/0160-python-click-didyoumean/python-click-didyoumean-0.0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879067] Review Request: openssl1.1 - Compatibility version of the OpenSSL library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067

Tomas Mraz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||openssl1.1-1.1.1g-2.fc34
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-09-29 15:02:08




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883447] Review Request: R-flexiblas - FlexiBLAS API Interface for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883447

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-a555e29c76 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a555e29c76


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879067] Review Request: openssl1.1 - Compatibility version of the OpenSSL library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067

Tomas Mraz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879067] Review Request: openssl1.1 - Compatibility version of the OpenSSL library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067



--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl1.1


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883447] Review Request: R-flexiblas - FlexiBLAS API Interface for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883447



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-flexiblas


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883447] Review Request: R-flexiblas - FlexiBLAS API Interface for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883447



--- Comment #2 from Iñaki Ucar  ---
Many thanks!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882978] Review Request: R-pkgcache - Cache 'CRAN'-Like Metadata and R Packages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882978

José Matos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jama...@fc.up.pt
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from José Matos  ---
Rebuilding the package fails because in the testing stage the build is offline:

...
  Running 'testthat.R'
 ERROR
Running the tests in 'tests/testthat.R' failed.
Last 13 lines of output:
  13. update_or_add, cache is too old (@test-5-cache.R#147) - Reason: offline

  14. update_or_add, cache is current (@test-5-cache.R#179) - Reason: offline

  15. bioconductor$get_repos (@test-metadata-utils.R#5) - Reason: offline

  16. bioconductor$.internal$get_matching_bioc_version
(@test-metadata-utils.R#16) - Reason: offline

  == Failed
==
  -- 1. Failure: download_file, errors (@test-4-async-http.R#62) 

  `ret` inherits from
`async_rejected/async_http_error/simpleError/error/condition` not
`async_http_404`.

  == DONE

  Error: Test failures
  Execution halted
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 ERROR, 3 WARNINGs


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1882970] Review Request: R-presser - Lightweight Web Server for Testing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882970

José Matos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jama...@fc.up.pt
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from José Matos  ---
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file follows the
Fedora package guidelines.

In this cases these are the fedora-review complaints:

Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
  BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
  Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

The first is a bug as DESCRIPTION is not marked as %doc and the others are as
intended.

Another micro-issue is that probably examples and credits (in %files) could be
marked as %doc.
(One could even argue that %doc is becoming obsolete but that is another
issue.) :-)

So the package is approved. 


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883447] Review Request: R-flexiblas - FlexiBLAS API Interface for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883447

José Matos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jama...@fc.up.pt
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from José Matos  ---
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file follows the
Fedora package guidelines.

In this cases these are the fedora-review complaints:

Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
  BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
  Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

The first is a bug as DESCRIPTION is not marked as %doc and the others are as
intended.

So the package is approved. :-)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1883447] New: Review Request: R-flexiblas - FlexiBLAS API Interface for R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883447

Bug ID: 1883447
   Summary: Review Request: R-flexiblas - FlexiBLAS API Interface
for R
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: i.uca...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://iucar.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/R-flexiblas.spec
SRPM URL: https://iucar.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/R-flexiblas-3.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm

koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52440939

Description: Provides functions to switch the BLAS/LAPACK optimized backend and
change the number of threads without leaving the R session, which needs
to be linked against the FlexiBLAS wrapper library
.

Fedora Account System Username: iucar


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1881675] Review Request: yubikey-manager-qt - Cross-platform application for configuring any YubiKey over all USB interfaces

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881675



--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelen  ---
Updated the missing Requires as reported by Patrik through email (as well as
the copr builds):

Spec URL: https://jjelen.fedorapeople.org/yubikey-manager-qt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jjelen.fedorapeople.org/yubikey-manager-qt-1.1.5-2.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1877811] Review Request: python-pyarlo - Python library to interact with Netgear Arlo cameras

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877811

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org