[Bug 1893949] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols2 - Qt5 for Windows - QtQuickControls2 component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893949 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manisan...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich --- Sandro, can you please look into this one? It's basically a copy of mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols. I will need it for mingw-mediawriter in future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893949] New: Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols2 - Qt5 for Windows - QtQuickControls2 component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893949 Bug ID: 1893949 Summary: Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols2 - Qt5 for Windows - QtQuickControls2 component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jgrul...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols2/mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols2.spec SRPM URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols2/mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols2.spec Description: This package contains the Qt software toolkit for developing cross-platform applications. This is the Windows version of Qt, for use in conjunction with the Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Fedora Account System Username: jgrulich -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884608] Review Request: dosbox-staging - DOS/x86 emulator focusing on ease of use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884608 Kamil Páral changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(f...@fcami.net) --- Comment #8 from Kamil Páral --- Let's try to poke François... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892366] Review Request: php-symfony-contracts2 - A set of abstractions extracted out of the Symfony, version 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892366 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-296d551a8b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-296d551a8b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-296d551a8b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884235] Review Request: php-ramsey-collection - Library for representing and manipulating collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884235 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1fc90ad058 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-1fc90ad058 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1fc90ad058 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884218] Review Request: php-brick-math - Arbitrary-precision arithmetic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884218 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ae7ffbfa49 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-ae7ffbfa49 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ae7ffbfa49 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1731592] Review Request: python-netpyne - Develop, simulate and analyse biological neuronal networks in NEURON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731592 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-eead172880 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-eead172880 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eead172880 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884235] Review Request: php-ramsey-collection - Library for representing and manipulating collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884235 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1011aac8ba has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-1011aac8ba \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1011aac8ba See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892366] Review Request: php-symfony-contracts2 - A set of abstractions extracted out of the Symfony, version 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892366 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-93e09fef3e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-93e09fef3e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-93e09fef3e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884218] Review Request: php-brick-math - Arbitrary-precision arithmetic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5698925baa has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-5698925baa \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5698925baa See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1731592] Review Request: python-netpyne - Develop, simulate and analyse biological neuronal networks in NEURON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731592 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-febd6e24ac has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-febd6e24ac \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-febd6e24ac See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893207] Review Request: freeipa-fas - Fedora Account System extension for FreeIPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893207 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a94058429d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893207] Review Request: freeipa-fas - Fedora Account System extension for FreeIPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893207 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5ec1f07739 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893207] Review Request: freeipa-fas - Fedora Account System extension for FreeIPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893207 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-11-03 00:32:33 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3f20306084 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1780885] Review Request: cutelyst - C++ Qt-based Web Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780885 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mic...@michel-slm.name Flags||fedora-review? ||needinfo?(raineforest@raine ||forest.me) --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Taking this review. This doesn't currently build as is, could you follow the steps here to adjust for Fedora 33's recent CMake changes? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds Also bump the version packaged, since 2.13 is now out. Agreed with previous commenters that: - %find_lang will find the translation files - try starting with only either two packages for now (cutelyst and cutelyst-devel), or three (if the binaries are not needed by running apps and can be packaged separately). Those will be easier to maintain - see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_requiring_base_package for having cutelyst-devel requires the right architecture for cutelyst (what Michael Schwendt was referring to) You enabled building tests, but they were never run. Add %check %ctest after the %install section, this should run them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892101] Review Request: fbthrift - Facebook's branch of Apache Thrift, including a new C++ server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892101 --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #14) > I'm still seeing lots of "undefined-non-weak-symbol" warnings... Are you > sure that's RPATH related? ah, they only show up if rpmlint is run on an installed package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1886354] Review Request: libliftoff - Lightweight KMS plane library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886354 Filipe Brandenburger changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Filipe Brandenburger --- > Set the "fedora-review" flag to "+". Done! Thanks Neal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893901] New: Review Request: ansible-base - A radically simple IT automation system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893901 Bug ID: 1893901 Summary: Review Request: ansible-base - A radically simple IT automation system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ke...@scrye.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/ansible-base-review/ansible-base.spec SRPM URL: https://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/ansible-base-review/ansible-base-2.10.2-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Ansible is a radically simple model-driven configuration management, multi-node deployment, and remote task execution system. Ansible works over SSH and does not require any software or daemons to be installed on remote nodes. Extension modules can be written in any language and are transferred to managed machines automatically. This is the base part of ansible (the engine). Fedora Account System Username: kevin See: https://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2020/11/02/ansible-2-10-x-and-fedora-epel/ for background on the ansible-2.10 changes and why this is a new package. Right now, we don't build the full web docs (the rst docs for ansible-doc are included), as those need a number of new packages + a new release of python-pydandic to land in rawhide (it has a python 3.9 bug that breaks things). I will be submitting those as time permits soon and once everything is in will enable docs building in rawhide at least. rpmlint says: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 84 errors, 18 warnings. ansible-base.src: W: strange-permission ansible-generator 755 all the other generators are that I think... ansible-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ansible-test ansible-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ansible-connection No man pages for those, but they aren't much used. These are harmless I think: ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/network/.travis.yml ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/network/templates/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/network/files/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/role/.travis.yml ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/role/templates/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/role/files/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/collection/roles/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/collection/docs/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/container/.travis.yml ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/container/templates/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/container/files/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/apb/.travis.yml ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/apb/templates/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/apb/files/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible_test/_data/coveragerc ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible_test/_data/ansible.cfg ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/network/templates/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/network/files/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/role/templates/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/role/files/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/collection/roles/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/default/collection/docs/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ansible/galaxy/data/container/templates/.git_keep ansible-base.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
[Bug 1892101] Review Request: fbthrift - Facebook's branch of Apache Thrift, including a new C++ server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892101 --- Comment #14 from Neal Gompa --- I'm still seeing lots of "undefined-non-weak-symbol" warnings... Are you sure that's RPATH related? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892101] Review Request: fbthrift - Facebook's branch of Apache Thrift, including a new C++ server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892101 --- Comment #13 from Neal Gompa --- Rpmlint (installed packages) fbthrift-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/facebook/fbthrift fbthrift-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/facebook/fbthrift fbthrift-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/facebook/fbthrift fbthrift.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/facebook/fbthrift fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolException::throwBoolValueOutOfRange(unsigned char) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolException::throwExceededSizeLimit() fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolException::throwUnionMissingStop() fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::CompactProtocolReader::throwBadType(unsigned char) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolException::throwNegativeSize() fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolException::throwInvalidSkipType(apache::thrift::protocol::TType) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolException::throwTruncatedData() fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::CompactProtocolReader::readFieldBeginWithStateMediumSlow(apache::thrift::CompactProtocolReader::StructReadState&, short) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolException::throwInvalidSkipType(apache::thrift::protocol::TType) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libasync.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolException::throwInvalidSkipType(apache::thrift::protocol::TType) fbthrift.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcompiler_base.so.2020.10.26.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 typeinfo for apache::thrift::compiler::validator fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::validator::visit(apache::thrift::compiler::t_program*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit(apache::thrift::compiler::t_service*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit(apache::thrift::compiler::t_enum*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit(apache::thrift::compiler::t_field*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit(apache::thrift::compiler::t_const*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit_and_recurse(apache::thrift::compiler::t_program*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit_and_recurse(apache::thrift::compiler::t_service*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit_and_recurse(apache::thrift::compiler::t_enum*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit_and_recurse(apache::thrift::compiler::t_struct*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit_and_recurse(apache::thrift::compiler::t_field*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit_and_recurse(apache::thrift::compiler::t_const*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::visitor::visit(apache::thrift::compiler::t_struct*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 virtual thunk to apache::thrift::compiler::validator::visit(apache::thrift::compiler::t_program*) fbthrift.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcompiler_generators.so.2020.10.26.0 apache::thrift::compiler::validator::add_error(boost::optional, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) fbthrift.x86_64: W: unde
[Bug 1892101] Review Request: fbthrift - Facebook's branch of Apache Thrift, including a new C++ server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892101 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/devel/fbthrift.spec SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/devel/fbthrift-2020.10.26.00-3.fc33.src.rpm fbthrift-devel now conflicts with thrift-devel, and addressed the RPATH issue. Note: there's a new version of fbthrift out today, but I'm not rebasing yet in case it wouldn't work with the folly/fizz/wangle builds from last week. I'll rebase them all after this is approved. specs on master [!?] ❯ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-fbthrift/result/fbthrift-2020.10.26.00-3.fc34.x86_64.rpm fbthrift.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcompiler_base.so.2020.10.26.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 fbthrift.x86_64: W: no-documentation fbthrift.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary thrift1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11) > Review notes: > > > [!]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. > > Note: See rpmlint output > > There's some cleanup that needs to be done here, the rpath settings are > completely superfluous and could cause issues in some circumstances. > Fixed > > [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/include/thrift(thrift- > > devel) > > This requires a "Conflicts: thrift-devel" on the devel subpackage. > > > [!]: Package does not generate any conflict. > > See above. Fixed > > > [...] undefined-non-weak-symbol [...] > > I don't know what's going on here, but something is obviously wrong with how > this is getting built... Turns out to be related to the first RPATH problem. CMakeLists.txt specifies an incorrect RPATH so /usr//usr/lib64 ended up embedded in the shared libraries, which is obviously wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892096] Review Request: perl-Test-Some - CPAN distribution to run a subset of the tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892096 --- Comment #5 from Shlomi Fish --- Jitka: thanks for the review and comments. I'll try to fix them in my copy soon. (I just didn't want to leave you hanging.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810293] Review Request: seqan3 - The modern C++ library for sequence analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810293 --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Looks pretty good: - Please add comments about the upstream patches, with their URLs (without them, it's hard for a reader to see where these come from or what they do). - Please remove the License tag from the doc sub-package, - Please remove the /usr/include/sdsl/.gitignore file You cannot include the sdsl-lite bits in this package and provide it in the -devel subpackage, each srpm/package should only provide one software, no? sdsl-lite needs to be either: - packaged separately and included as a BR, - or bundled, but then it should not provide the publicly usable headers in this package, Cheers! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887470] Review Request: libtraceevent - library to parse raw trace event formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887470
--- Comment #4 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jiri Olsa from comment #2)
> > > [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> > > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
> > > /usr/include/traceevent(trace-cmd-devel), /usr/lib64/traceevent(perf,
> > > trace-cmd-libs), /usr/lib64/traceevent/plugins(perf, trace-cmd-libs)
> > >
> > > This is intended. The aim of the upstream traceevent is to make this a
> > > shared library to be consumed by perf, trace-cmd and others. I'm also the
> > > trace-cmd packager and working on solving the dependency after this
> > > library
> > > is in Fedora. The perf part will be ready when it's done in upstream
> > > kernel
> > > repo.
> >
> > so what's the plan in here?
> > start with libtracevent and perf as conflict packages
> > and then remove those plugins from perf rpm?
> >
> > if that's the plan maybe we could ake this conflict
> > explicit, I think there's 'Conflicts:' for that
> >
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
> Do you happen to know the plan of perf consuming libtraceevent upstream? If
> there is a clear plan I think it worth mark a conflict with version
> requirement. Otherwise I can add a general "Conflicts: perf" in the spec
> file.
I think general conflict is ok for now,
once there's rpm we can add perf's support to dynamically
link libtraceevent and use libtraceevent's plugins
and remove the Conflict then
>
> >
> > other note:
> >
> > - package version and the library version do not match,
> >%{_libdir}/libtraceevent.so.1.1.0
> > vs
> >Version: 0
> >Release: 0.1.%{commitdate}git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}
> >
> >might be good to put version values to variables,
> >so you'll update only one place during the rpm update
> >
>
> Ok, sure. While I think this is from the SRPM in comment 0. The version
> should be in-sync in the version in comment 1 already.
>
> I've updated both in-place without bump the release.
>
> SPEC URL:
> https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/libtraceevent/libtraceevent.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/libtraceevent/libtraceevent-1.1.0-1.
> fc34.src.rpm
ok, looks good
jirka
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893539] Review Request: calceph - Astronomical library to access planetary ephemeris files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893539 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NOTREADY --- Comment #1 from Mattia Verga --- Koji's scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54787400 Tests are failing under s390x, I will try to contact upstream to check if the package can work on that architecture. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893729] Review Request: perl-Gtk3-ImageView - Image viewer widget for GTK 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893729 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Gtk3-ImageView-4-1.fc34.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(base) 1 perl(Cairo) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(feature) 1 perl(Glib) >= 1.21 1 perl(Glib::Object::Subclass) 1 perl(Gtk3) 1 perl(Gtk3::ImageView::Tool) 1 perl(Gtk3::ImageView::Tool::Dragger) 1 perl(Gtk3::ImageView::Tool::Selector) 1 perl(if) 1 perl(List::Util) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.32.0) 1 perl(POSIX) 1 perl(Readonly) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Gtk3-ImageView-4-1.fc34.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Gtk3::ImageView) = 4 1 perl-Gtk3-ImageView = 4-1.fc34 1 perl(Gtk3::ImageView::Tool) = 4 1 perl(Gtk3::ImageView::Tool::Dragger) = 4 1 perl(Gtk3::ImageView::Tool::Selector) = 4 1 perl(Gtk3::ImageView::Tool::SelectorDragger) = 4 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Gtk3-ImageView* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines. Resolution: Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1886354] Review Request: libliftoff - Lightweight KMS plane library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886354 --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa --- Set the "fedora-review" flag to "+". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1886354] Review Request: libliftoff - Lightweight KMS plane library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886354 --- Comment #4 from Filipe Brandenburger --- Looks good. What's the next step? Should I mark this bug CLOSED or otherwise? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893661] Review Request: koji-osbuild - Koji integration for osbuild composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661 --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa --- I just edited the original comment to use the spec file that was actually uploaded by copr from the SRPM build for package reviews. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893661] Review Request: koji-osbuild - Koji integration for osbuild composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gicmo/koji-osbuild/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01741573-koji-osbuild/koji-osbuild.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gicmo/koji-osbuild/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01741573-koji-osbuild/koji-osbuild-1-0.fc34.src.rpm Description: This project provides osbuild integration with Koji. It makes it possible to build images and other OS artifacts via osbuild-composer through koji, This is done via three plugins: Koji hub plugin: Provides a new XMLRPC API endpoint that clients can use to create new osbuildImage Koji tasks. Koji builder plugin: Handles osbuildImage Koji tasks and will talk to osbuild-composer to create new composes via composer's Koji API. Koji cli plugin: Adds a new osbuild-image to the existing koji command line client. This will then use the new XMLRPC API to request a new compose. Fedora Account System Username: gicmo Upstream git: https://github.com/osbuild/koji-osbuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884255] Review Request: python-patiencediff - Contains the implementation of the patiencediff algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255 --- Comment #14 from Miro Hrončok --- Three recommended actions after adding the package: 1) enable koschei tracking once available: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/python-patiencediff?collection=f34 2) add @python-sig group to: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-patiencediff/addgroup 3) add/edit the upstream package to/at https://release-monitoring.org/ and pair it with Fedora's python-patiencediff package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884255] Review Request: python-patiencediff - Contains the implementation of the patiencediff algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255 --- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-patiencediff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893729] Review Request: perl-Gtk3-ImageView - Image viewer widget for GTK 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893729 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892096] Review Request: perl-Test-Some - CPAN distribution to run a subset of the tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892096
--- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
Source file is ok
Summary is ok
License is ok
FIX: Move file LICENSE from %doc to %license
%license LICENSE
Description is almost ok
FIX: Please remove 'E.g.,' from end of description
URL and Source0 are ok
All tests passed
BuildRequires
FIX: Please add following build-requires.
coreutils - needs for macro %{_fixperms}
make - needs for macros %{make_*}
FIX: Use 'perl(:VERSION) >= 5.10.0' instead of 'perl >= 5.01' because
the package has an epoch.
$ rpm -qp --requires perl-Test-Some-0.2.1-1.fc34.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c |
grep -v rpmlib
1 perl >= 5.01
1 perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
1 perl(File::Spec)
1 perl-interpreter
1 perl(IO::Handle)
1 perl(IPC::Open3)
1 perl(List::MoreUtils)
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.32.0)
1 perl(Package::Stash)
1 perl(Scalar::Util)
1 perl(strict)
1 perl(Test::More)
1 perl(warnings)
FIX: Add build-requires 'perl-generators' to get correct list of run-time
requires and provides. Then you can remove all 'Requires:' except
MODULE_COMPAT.
Lots of listed dependencies are used only for tests during the build.
$ rpm -qp --provides perl-Test-Some-0.2.1-1.fc34.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
1 perl-Test-Some = 0.2.1-1.fc34
FIX: 'perl(Test::Some) = 0.2.1' is missing. Using of perl-generators solve it.
$ rpmlint ./perl-Test-Some*
perl-Test-Some.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subtest ->
subtlest, sub test, sub-test
perl-Test-Some.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whitelist ->
white list, white-list, whistle
perl-Test-Some.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subtests -> sub
tests, sub-tests, subtexts
perl-Test-Some.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subtest ->
subtlest, sub test, sub-test
perl-Test-Some.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whitelist -> white
list, white-list, whistle
perl-Test-Some.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subtests -> sub
tests, sub-tests, subtexts
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
Rpmlint is ok
FIX: Please remove the following old code which is not needed for Fedoras
and EPEL 7/8
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
rm -rf %{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';'
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
FIX: Remove options 'INSTALLVENDORLIB=/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl
INSTALLVENDORMAN3DIR=/usr/share/man/man3'
from command 'perl Makefile.PL', they are not needed.
TODO: Use new %make_* macros and remove packlist by ExtUtils::MakeMaker's
variable.
1) Add
NO_PERLLOCAL=1 NO_PACKLIST=1
to command
perl Makefile.PL
and remove
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
2) Replace
make %{?_smp_mflags}
by
%{make_build}
3) Replace
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
by
%{make_install}
Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines.
Please correct all 'FIX' items, consider fixing 'TODO' items and provide a new
spec file.
Resolution:
NOT approved
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884235] Review Request: php-ramsey-collection - Library for representing and manipulating collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884235 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1fc90ad058 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1fc90ad058 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884218] Review Request: php-brick-math - Arbitrary-precision arithmetic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ae7ffbfa49 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ae7ffbfa49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892096] Review Request: perl-Test-Some - CPAN distribution to run a subset of the tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892096 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova --- It is not needed. Only the old code can be removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892366] Review Request: php-symfony-contracts2 - A set of abstractions extracted out of the Symfony, version 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892366 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-296d551a8b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-296d551a8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892096] Review Request: perl-Test-Some - CPAN distribution to run a subset of the tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892096 Shlomi Fish changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(shlomif@shlomifis | |h.org) | --- Comment #2 from Shlomi Fish --- Hi Jitka! (In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1) > Do you want to add the package to EPEL 6/7? I can add it there if it is required by policy/etc. If not, then I don't mind either way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1731592] Review Request: python-netpyne - Develop, simulate and analyse biological neuronal networks in NEURON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731592 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-febd6e24ac has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-febd6e24ac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1731592] Review Request: python-netpyne - Develop, simulate and analyse biological neuronal networks in NEURON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731592 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-febd6e24ac has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-febd6e24ac --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-eead172880 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eead172880 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 --- Comment #2 from Olivier Lemasle --- Reading that paragraph in README: > Your system dictionaries from /usr/share/dict will be indexed. If no > dictionaries were found, > crunchy only relies on the regular sanity checks (ErrEmpty, ErrTooShort, > ErrTooFewChars and > ErrTooSystematic). On Ubuntu it is recommended to install the wordlists > distributed with > cracklib-runtime, on macOS you can install cracklib-words from brew. You > could also install > various other language dictionaries or wordlists, e.g. from skullsecurity.org. I think this package should have: # For tests (if %check) BuildRequires: words # Weak dependency only Recommends: words -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- Tests fail in mock. Actually, I do not understand why tests were not executed in your Koji scratch build... I also launched a scratch build (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54771110); tests were executed and failed. - Test TestRatePassword fail because /usr/share/dict is empty in mock. I suppose this package should depend on package "words", it it expects a dictionary. - Test TestCheckHIBP fail because there's no Internet access in mock. This tests should be disabled. Test failure messages: --- FAIL: TestRatePassword (0.00s) crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password 'password', got 20 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is too common / from a dictionary for password 'password', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password 'intoxicate', got 22 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is too common / from a dictionary for password 'intoxicate', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password 'p@ssw0rd', got 42 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is mangled, but too common / from a dictionary for password 'p@ssw0rd', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password '!pass@word?', got 64 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is mangled, but too common / from a dictionary for password '!pass@word?', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password 'drowssap', got 20 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is mangled, but too common / from a dictionary for password 'drowssap', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password '?drow@ssap!', got 64 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is mangled, but too common / from a dictionary for password '?drow@ssap!', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password '5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99', got 100 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is hashed, but too common / from a dictionary for password '5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password '5baa61e4c9b93f3f0682250b6cf8331b7ee68fd8', got 100 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is hashed, but too common / from a dictionary for password '5baa61e4c9b93f3f0682250b6cf8331b7ee68fd8', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password '5e884898da28047151d0e56f8dc6292773603d0d6aabbdd62a11ef721d1542d8', got 100 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is hashed, but too common / from a dictionary for password '5e884898da28047151d0e56f8dc6292773603d0d6aabbdd62a11ef721d1542d8', got crunchy_test.go:97: Expected rating 0 for password 'b109f3bbbc244eb82441917ed06d618b9008dd09b3befd1b5e07394c706a8bb980b1d7785e5976ec049b46df5f1326af5a2ea6d103fd07c95385ffab0cacbc86', got 100 crunchy_test.go:100: Expected Password is hashed, but too common / from a dictionary for password 'b109f3bbbc244eb82441917ed06d618b9008dd09b3befd1b5e07394c706a8bb980b1d7785e5976ec049b46df5f1326af5a2ea6d103fd07c95385ffab0cacbc86', got --- FAIL: TestCheckHIBP (0.00s) crunchy_test.go:117: Expected Password has been found inside haveibeenpwned.com database for password 'Qwertyuiop', got Get "https://api.pwnedpasswords.com/range/21052": dial tcp: lookup api.pwnedpasswords.com: Temporary failure in name resolution -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892366] Review Request: php-symfony-contracts2 - A set of abstractions extracted out of the Symfony, version 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892366 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-symfony-contracts2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884235] Review Request: php-ramsey-collection - Library for representing and manipulating collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884235 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-ramsey-collection -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884218] Review Request: php-brick-math - Arbitrary-precision arithmetic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884218 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-brick-math -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1731592] Review Request: python-netpyne - Develop, simulate and analyse biological neuronal networks in NEURON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731592 --- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-netpyne -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893741] New: Review Request: python-noggin-messages - Fedora Messaging message schemas for Noggin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893741 Bug ID: 1893741 Summary: Review Request: python-noggin-messages - Fedora Messaging message schemas for Noggin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ngomp...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ngompa/fedora-aaa/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01576196-python-noggin-messages/python-noggin-messages.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ngompa/fedora-aaa/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01576196-python-noggin-messages/python-noggin-messages-0.0.1-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: This package contains the fedora-messaging message schemas for Noggin. Fedora Account System Username: ngompa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893732] Review Request: python-poetry-core - Poetry PEP 517 Build Backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893732 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1818456 Depends On||1824133 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818456 [Bug 1818456] poetry-1.1.4 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824133 [Bug 1824133] python-tomlkit-0.7.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893732] New: Review Request: python-poetry-core - Poetry PEP 517 Build Backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893732 Bug ID: 1893732 Summary: Review Request: python-poetry-core - Poetry PEP 517 Build Backend Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-poetry-core.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-poetry-core-1.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: A PEP 517 build backend implementation developed for Poetry. This project is intended to be a light weight, fully compliant, self-contained package allowing PEP 517 compatible build frontends to build Poetry managed projects. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard Blocked on: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tomlkit/pull-request/6 (cannot be merged before poetry is updated) https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-lark-parser/pull-request/5 (can be merged) Copr repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/poetry-1.1/builds/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||o.lema...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|o.lema...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893729] Review Request: perl-Gtk3-ImageView - Image viewer widget for GTK 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893729 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1893477 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893477 [Bug 1893477] gscan2pdf-2.10.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893729] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk3-ImageView - Image viewer widget for GTK 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893729 Bug ID: 1893729 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk3-ImageView - Image viewer widget for GTK 3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk3-ImageView/perl-Gtk3-ImageView.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk3-ImageView/perl-Gtk3-ImageView-4-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: The Gtk3::ImageView widget allows the user to zoom, pan and select the specified image and provides hooks to allow additional tools, e.g. painter, to be created and used. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810293] Review Request: seqan3 - The modern C++ library for sequence analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810293 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Sorry, missed the ping, will complete review later today -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892096] Review Request: perl-Test-Some - CPAN distribution to run a subset of the tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892096 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||needinfo?(shlomif@shlomifis ||h.org) --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Do you want to add the package to EPEL 6/7? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893661] Review Request: koji-osbuild - Koji integration for osbuild composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661 --- Comment #3 from Christian Kellner --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > Please use a URL that resolves to the direct spec file (that is, not a > GitHub URL that returns HTML and doesn't match the spec in the SRPM). Ah, good point, sorry. I am sure you figured it out by now, but for the record: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gicmo/spec/master/koji-osbuild/koji-osbuild.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810293] Review Request: seqan3 - The modern C++ library for sequence analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810293 Antonio T. sagitter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai ||l.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893661] Review Request: koji-osbuild - Koji integration for osbuild composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Please use a URL that resolves to the direct spec file (that is, not a GitHub URL that returns HTML and doesn't match the spec in the SRPM). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893661] Review Request: koji-osbuild - Koji integration for osbuild composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893711] Review request: mamba - virtual midi keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893711 Vasiliy Glazov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vasc...@gmail.com Summary|Add mamba virtual midi |Review request: mamba - |keyboard|virtual midi keyboard Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags|needinfo?(vasc...@gmail.com |fedora-review? needinfo+ |) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893711] Add mamba virtual midi keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893711 ycollet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vasc...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(vasc...@gmail.com ||) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893711] New: Add mamba virtual midi keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893711 Bug ID: 1893711 Summary: Add mamba virtual midi keyboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ycollette.nos...@free.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I packaged a new package for Mamba. Mamba is a vrtual midi keyboard compatible with ALSAL and Jack Audio. You can read more informations related to mamba on the github repository: https://github.com/brummer10/Mamba The specfile: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ycollet/fedora-spec/master/guitarix/mamba.spec The SRPMS file: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ycollet/linuxmao/fedora-33-x86_64/01741589-mamba/mamba-1.7.0-2.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825592] Review Request: python-aiosecretsdump - Secrets dumper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825592 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|BuildFails | --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #1) > This doesn't build as it has no dependency on python3-devel. Thanks. Added * Mon Nov 02 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0.0.1-2 - Add missing BRs (#1825592) Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-aiosecretsdump.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-aiosecretsdump-0.0.1-2.fc33.src.rpm Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54763997 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893680] Review Request: golang-github-tonistiigi-rosetta - Go utility to detect Rosetta environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893680 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54759173 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893680] New: Review Request: golang-github-tonistiigi-rosetta - Go utility to detect Rosetta environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893680 Bug ID: 1893680 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-tonistiigi-rosetta - Go utility to detect Rosetta environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: o.lema...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews//golang-github-tonistiigi-rosetta.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews//golang-github-tonistiigi-rosetta-0-0.1.20201102gitf795985.fc33.src.rpm Description: Go utility to detect Rosetta environment go-rosetta provides utilities to detect if an application is running as a Rosetta translated binary, and to determine the native architecture. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756 --- Comment #1 from Germano Massullo --- (In reply to Steve Traylen from comment #0) > No license file is present however I have submitted > https://gitlab.com/htgoebel/managesieve/-/issues/4 > to request it. According to pacakge guidelines, let's wait for a response from upstream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893661] New: Review Request: koji-osbuild - Koji integration for osbuild composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661 Bug ID: 1893661 Summary: Review Request: koji-osbuild - Koji integration for osbuild composer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ckell...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/gicmo/spec/blob/master/koji-osbuild/koji-osbuild.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gicmo/koji-osbuild/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01741573-koji-osbuild/koji-osbuild-1-0.fc34.src.rpm Description: This project provides osbuild integration with Koji. It makes it possible to build images and other OS artifacts via osbuild-composer through koji, This is done via three plugins: Koji hub plugin: Provides a new XMLRPC API endpoint that clients can use to create new osbuildImage Koji tasks. Koji builder plugin: Handles osbuildImage Koji tasks and will talk to osbuild-composer to create new composes via composer's Koji API. Koji cli plugin: Adds a new osbuild-image to the existing koji command line client. This will then use the new XMLRPC API to request a new compose. Fedora Account System Username: gicmo Upstream git: https://github.com/osbuild/koji-osbuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840632] Review Request: python-pymc3 - Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632 Sergio Pascual changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-11-02 10:17:28 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892756] Review Request: python-managesieve - Accessing a Sieve-Server for managing Sieve scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|germano.massu...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1892366] Review Request: php-symfony-contracts2 - A set of abstractions extracted out of the Symfony, version 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892366 --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet --- Thanks again SCM requests https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30208 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30209 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30210 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884235] Review Request: php-ramsey-collection - Library for representing and manipulating collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884235 --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet --- Thanks!! SCM requests https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30205 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30206 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30207 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1884218] Review Request: php-brick-math - Arbitrary-precision arithmetic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884218 --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet --- Thanks for the review SCM requests https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30202 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30203 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30204 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825592] Review Request: python-aiosecretsdump - Secrets dumper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825592 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||BuildFails -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825592] Review Request: python-aiosecretsdump - Secrets dumper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825592 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This doesn't build as it has no dependency on python3-devel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
