[Bug 1906287] Review Request: python-xeddsa - Python implementation of the XEdDSA signature scheme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906287 Matthieu Saulnier changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Matthieu Saulnier --- scratch build: rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57109059 f33: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57109063 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906287] New: Review Request: python-xeddsa - Python implementation of the XEdDSA signature scheme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906287 Bug ID: 1906287 Summary: Review Request: python-xeddsa - Python implementation of the XEdDSA signature scheme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cas...@casperlefantom.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fantom.fedorapeople.org/python-xeddsa.spec SRPM URL: https://fantom.fedorapeople.org/python-xeddsa-0.6.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: This python library offers an open implementation of the XEdDSA signature scheme. Fedora Account System Username: fantom -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904833] Review Request: python-django-jsonfield-backport - Backport of the cross-DB JSONField model and form fields from Django 3.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-12-10 01:33:28 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904832] Review Request: python-pep562 - Backport of PEP 562
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904832 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-12-10 01:33:26 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1900147] Review Request: fb303 - Base Thrift service and a common set of functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900147 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-53c640d73d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1900147] Review Request: fb303 - Base Thrift service and a common set of functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900147 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-12-10 01:14:27 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5921980912 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1901740] Review Request: lua-readline - Lua interface to the readline and history libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901740 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-12-10 01:14:46 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-55ecb451a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1872427] Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation for Amazon ec2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 David Duncan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #20 from David Duncan --- bumping to highlight that there are new updates https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/ec2-hibinit-agent.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1894605] Review Request: realtime-tests - Suite of realtime tests including cyclictest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894605 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- John you are sponsored now. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1894605] Review Request: realtime-tests - Suite of realtime tests including cyclictest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894605
--- Comment #15 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
John I will sponsor you. Few things I noted, please fix them:
- The following lines are not needed, the implicit deps generator is quite
good:
%{?__python3:Requires: %{__python3}}
...
Requires: bash
- The following line is not needed, please drop it:
rm -rf %{buildroot}
- Please escape macros in the changelog, i.e.
in the changelog change %description to %%description, and also probably change
%s to %%s and %ld to %%ld
Another thing I am just curious about:
- Isn't better (and safer) to just state that only root could run it instead of
giving it caps?
%caps(cap_sys_rawio+ep) /usr/bin/cyclictest
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905270] Review Request: bpfmon - Traffic monitor for BPF expression/iptables rule
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905270 --- Comment #4 from Andy Mender --- Awesome! Thanks for the heads-up! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904833] Review Request: python-django-jsonfield-backport - Backport of the cross-DB JSONField model and form fields from Django 3.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904832] Review Request: python-pep562 - Backport of PEP 562
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904832 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785982] Review Request: python-qdarkstyle - A dark stylesheet for Python and Qt applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785982 Timothy Redaelli changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1906117 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906117 [Bug 1906117] python3-qdarkstyle should not requires stuff only used as build dependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856005] Review Request: dmtcp - Checkpoint/Restart functionality for Linux processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856005
--- Comment #17 from Paul Grosu ---
Hi Orion,
Hope you are doing well. Any updates on our submission? We just got the
following email today regarding the old version (2.3), which this package
(2.6.1) should address positively:
-- Forwarded message -
From: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:39 PM
Subject: Processed: found 868928 in 2.3.1-5, found 776640 in 2.3.1-5, found
789292 in 2.3.1-5, found 791940 in 2.3.1-5
To: Andreas Beckmann
Cc:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # 2.3.1-6 went missing from the changelog
> found 868928 2.3.1-5
Bug #868928 [src:dmtcp] dmtcp: FTBFS: pidwrappers.h:191:20: error:
'__WAIT_STATUS' was not declared in this scope
Marked as found in versions dmtcp/2.3.1-5.
> found 776640 2.3.1-5
Bug #776640 [dmtcp] dmtcp: Please include plugins from the source package
Marked as found in versions dmtcp/2.3.1-5.
> found 789292 2.3.1-5
Bug #789292 [src:dmtcp] dmtcp: FTBFS with glibc-2.21 and gcc-5
Bug #808644 [src:dmtcp] dmtcp: FTBFS: error: conflicting types for
‘_real_sigvec’
Marked as found in versions dmtcp/2.3.1-5.
Marked as found in versions dmtcp/2.3.1-5.
> found 791940 2.3.1-5
Bug #791940 {Done: Paul Grosu } [dmtcp] Please support ARM64
(done upstream; will be in 2.4.0)
Marked as found in versions dmtcp/2.3.1-5.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
776640: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776640
789292: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789292
791940: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791940
808644: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808644
868928: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868928
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Thanks,
Paul and Gene
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý --- Err sorry, that was the test version. Correct one: SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/msuchy/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01822670-python-templated-dictionary/python-templated-dictionary.spec SRC.RPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/msuchy/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01822670-python-templated-dictionary/python-templated-dictionary-1.1-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881169] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881169
--- Comment #17 from Alex Macdonald ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #16)
> (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #14)
> > > Hey Alex, I think the cpptasks replacements needs some more tweaking. The
> > > artifact produced is now noarch, but really is for linux amd64 (x86_64).
> > > We
> > > (jmc) still want the other 64-bit arches: aarch64, ppc64le, and s390x.
> >
> > I'd think one reason for this is that the spec claims its 'BuildArch:
> > noarch' which it really isn't:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/almac/rpms/lz4-java/blob/master/f/lz4-
> > java.spec#_46
> >
> > Remove this line from the spec and try again.
> >
> > > Here's an old build of lz4-java for comparison:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1557740
> >
> > This is a build of lz4, not lz4-java, unless I'm missing something :)
>
> Ah shoot, sorry. This should be an lz4-java one...
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1441537
Ah, thanks for catching that. I had put the BuildArch in there a while ago
trying to cleanup rpmlint errors ("no-binary" in particular).
I've removed it, and a new copr build can be found at:
COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/almac/lz4-java/build/1822635/
SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/almac/lz4-java/fedora-33-x86_64/01822635-lz4-java/lz4-java-1.7.1-10.fc33.x86_64.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý --- Updated. SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/msuchy/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01822663-python-templated-dictionary/python-templated-dictionary.spec SRC.RPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/msuchy/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01822663-python-templated-dictionary/python-templated-dictionary-1.1-1.git.0.919f74b.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881169] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881169 --- Comment #16 from Jie Kang --- (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #15) > (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #14) > > Hey Alex, I think the cpptasks replacements needs some more tweaking. The > > artifact produced is now noarch, but really is for linux amd64 (x86_64). We > > (jmc) still want the other 64-bit arches: aarch64, ppc64le, and s390x. > > I'd think one reason for this is that the spec claims its 'BuildArch: > noarch' which it really isn't: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/almac/rpms/lz4-java/blob/master/f/lz4- > java.spec#_46 > > Remove this line from the spec and try again. > > > Here's an old build of lz4-java for comparison: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1557740 > > This is a build of lz4, not lz4-java, unless I'm missing something :) Ah shoot, sorry. This should be an lz4-java one... https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1441537 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905273] Review Request: cjson - Ultralightweight JSON parser in ANSI C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905273 --- Comment #3 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cjson -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881169] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881169 --- Comment #15 from Severin Gehwolf --- (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #14) > Hey Alex, I think the cpptasks replacements needs some more tweaking. The > artifact produced is now noarch, but really is for linux amd64 (x86_64). We > (jmc) still want the other 64-bit arches: aarch64, ppc64le, and s390x. I'd think one reason for this is that the spec claims its 'BuildArch: noarch' which it really isn't: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/almac/rpms/lz4-java/blob/master/f/lz4-java.spec#_46 Remove this line from the spec and try again. > Here's an old build of lz4-java for comparison: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1557740 This is a build of lz4, not lz4-java, unless I'm missing something :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881167] Review Request: mvel - MVFLEX Expression Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881167 --- Comment #13 from Severin Gehwolf --- Thanks, Alex, for going the extra mile and packaging latest mvel! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905273] Review Request: cjson - Ultralightweight JSON parser in ANSI C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905273 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1834731] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer to Peer Cryptographic Currency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #42 from Simone Caronni --- Anyone up for review? And maybe help with the SELinux policy as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905835] Review Request: containers-common - Common configuration and documentation for containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905835 Jindrich Novy changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905835] New: Review Request: containers-common - Common configuration and documentation for containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905835 Bug ID: 1905835 Summary: Review Request: containers-common - Common configuration and documentation for containers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jn...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/containers-common.spec SRPM URL: https://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/containers-common-1-0.1.fc32.noarch.rpm Description: This package contains common configuration files and documentation for container tools ecosystem, such as podman, buildah, skopeo. It is required because the most of configuration files and docs come from projects which are vendored into podman, buildah, skopeo, etc. but they are not packaged separately. Fedora Account System Username: jnovy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
