[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/highway.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/highway-0-0.1.20201212git8205c2c.fc34.src.rpm Description: Highway is a C++ library for SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data), i.e. applying the same operation to 'lanes'. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/highway.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/highway-0-0.1.20201212git8205c2c.fc34.src.rpm Description: Highway is a C++ library for SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data), i.e. applying the same operation to 'lanes'. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906980] New: Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 Bug ID: 1906980 Summary: Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/highway.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/highway-0-0.1.20201212git8205c2c.fc34.src.rpm Description: Highway is a C++ library for SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data), i.e. applying the same operation to 'lanes'. Highway is a C++ library for SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data), i.e. applying the same operation to 'lanes'. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904739] Review Request: python-xbout - reading and analysing BOUT++ simulations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904739 --- Comment #4 from david08...@gmail.com --- Thanks for both quick reviews :-) I have addressed the comments raise. Let me know if you need something reviewed in return. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1889619] Review Request: python-adext - Python module to extend AlarmDecoder module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889619 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-12-12 01:04:18 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9eb3e24fdd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1901851] Review Request: python-stdiomask - Python module for masking passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901851 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-12-12 01:04:16 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f64becbf7f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1885495] Review Request: qatengine - Intel(R) QuickAssist Technology (QAT) OpenSSL Engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885495
Vladis Dronov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vdro...@redhat.com
--- Comment #30 from Vladis Dronov ---
(In reply to Carl George 🤠 from comment #24)
> Once the license breakdown comment is fixed, I think this package will be
> ready to be approved.
I double-checked that the license breakdown comment is fixed in the .spec file
from #c28.
I've run a fedora-revew, the results are below. They are good, I would approve
the package,
but I don't wan to get into Carl's way.
Dinesh, Yogaraj, please, note, after review you'll need to open bugzillas for
each of those
in ExcludeArch, mark them as blocking the tracker bugs listed in the guidelines
[0], and
include links to each of them in spec file comments. Please, see bz1885430#c12
and
bz1897661 as a guidance.
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures
==
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated, [ ] = Manual
review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "BSD 4-clause
"Original" or "Old" License Apache License 1.0", "Unknown or
generated", "OpenSSL License", "OpenSSL License BSD 3-clause "New" or
"Revised" License", "GNU Lesser General Public License", "GPL (v2)",
"BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License GPL (v2)". 9 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/root/qatengine/review-qatengine/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 81920 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
wo
[Bug 1903650] Review Request: python-pypck - Python LCN-PCK library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1903650 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pypck -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1903650] Review Request: python-pypck - Python LCN-PCK library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1903650 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888121] Review Request: commit-stream - Github event API consumer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888121 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/commit-stream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888167] Review Request: golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 - Golang implementation of nanomsg's "Scalablilty Protocols"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888167 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888117] Review Request: golang-github-gdamore-optopia - Yet another getopt implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888117 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-gdamore-optopia -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888976] Review Request: snowcrash - Polyglot payload generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888976 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-12-11 22:16:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888121] Review Request: commit-stream - Github event API consumer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888121 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1889606] Review Request: python-pygrocy - Python API client for grocy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889606 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-12-11 22:13:16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888167] Review Request: golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 - Golang implementation of nanomsg's "Scalablilty Protocols"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888167 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888117] Review Request: golang-github-gdamore-optopia - Yet another getopt implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888117 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1889625] Review Request: python-respx - Utility for mocking out the HTTPX and HTTP Core libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889625 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-12-11 22:00:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1886700] Review Request: golang-github-saintfish-chardet - Charset detector library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886700 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Olivier Lemasle from comment #1) > I think "icu-license.html" should be added in golicenses. It contains the > ICU license and it is referenced at the end of "LICENSE". Added %changelog * Fri Dec 11 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0-0.2.20201009git3af4cd4 - Add missing license file (#1887671) Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-saintfish-chardet.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-saintfish-chardet-0-0.2.20201009git3af4cd4.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Olivier Lemasle from comment #1)
> Please remove these lines:
> for cmd in cmd/* ; do
> %gobuild -o %{gobuilddir}/bin/$(basename $cmd) %{goipath}/$cmd
> done
>
> It produces the following unexpected binaries:
> /usr/bin/fuzz
> /usr/bin/list
> /usr/bin/show
> /usr/bin/test
>
> The only binary should be /usr/bin/monsoon.
Changed.
> Also, a new version (0.6.0) was released this week.
Updated
%changelog
* Fri Dec 11 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0.6.0-1
- Remove binaries
- Update to latest upstream release 0.6.0 (#1887671)
Updated files:
Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon-0.6.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Olivier Lemasle from comment #1)
> Please remove these lines:
> for cmd in cmd/* ; do
> %gobuild -o %{gobuilddir}/bin/$(basename $cmd) %{goipath}/$cmd
> done
>
> It produces the following unexpected binaries:
> /usr/bin/fuzz
> /usr/bin/list
> /usr/bin/show
> /usr/bin/test
>
> The only binary should be /usr/bin/monsoon.
Changed.
> Also, a new version (0.6.0) was released this week.
Updated
%changelog
* Fri Dec 11 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0.6.0-1
- Remove binaries
- Update to latest upstream release 0.6.0 (#1887671)
Updated files:
Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon-0.6.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1894605] Review Request: realtime-tests - Suite of realtime tests including cyclictest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894605 --- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/realtime-tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309 Silvie Chlupova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309 --- Comment #4 from Silvie Chlupova --- Thanks for the changes, now it looks fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906851] Review Request: python-aiocoap - Python CoAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906851 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1269538 (IoT), 1906624 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538 [Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906624 [Bug 1906624] expliot-0.9.6 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906851] New: Review Request: python-aiocoap - Python CoAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906851 Bug ID: 1906851 Summary: Review Request: python-aiocoap - Python CoAP library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-aiocoap.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-aiocoap-0.4-0.b3.fc33.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/chrysn/aiocoap Description: The aiocoap package is an implementation of CoAP, the Constrained Application Protocol. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57258384 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-aiocoap-0.4-0.b3.fc33.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-aiocoap* python3-aiocoap.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aiocoap-client python3-aiocoap.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aiocoap-fileserver python3-aiocoap.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aiocoap-proxy python3-aiocoap.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aiocoap-rd python3-aiocoap+linkheader.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage python3-aiocoap+linkheader.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) aiocoap -> tapioca python3-aiocoap+linkheader.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) linkheader -> link header, link-header, headliner python3-aiocoap+linkheader.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metapackage -> meta package, meta-package, prepackage python3-aiocoap+linkheader.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US linkheader -> link header, link-header, headliner python3-aiocoap+linkheader.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US aiocoap -> tapioca python3-aiocoap+linkheader.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This is a metapackage bringing in linkheader extras requires for python3-aiocoap. python3-aiocoap+linkheader.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-aiocoap+prettyprint.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage python3-aiocoap+prettyprint.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) aiocoap -> tapioca python3-aiocoap+prettyprint.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) prettyprint -> pretty print, pretty-print, interpret python3-aiocoap+prettyprint.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metapackage -> meta package, meta-package, prepackage python3-aiocoap+prettyprint.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US prettyprint -> pretty print, pretty-print, interpret python3-aiocoap+prettyprint.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US aiocoap -> tapioca python3-aiocoap+prettyprint.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This is a metapackage bringing in prettyprint extras requires for python3-aiocoap. python3-aiocoap+prettyprint.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 18 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab The rpmlint issues are related to the used macros. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906731] Review Request: python-django-auth-ldap - Django LDAP authentication backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906731 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ada6f53e92 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ada6f53e92 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906490] Review Request: python-setuptools-rust - Setuptools Rust extension plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906490 --- Comment #5 from Christian Heimes --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3) > I think you'll need to patch at least some of the setuptools-rust code to > make it work with Rust packages on fedora, primarily the functions that wrap > cargo calls. Otherwise those won't be able to see / use system-installed > rust libraries (including PyO3). That is hard to test without a PyO3 RPM. I would prefer to figure out modifications after python-setuptools-rust and PyO3 crate have been packaged for Fedora. Consumers of python-setuptools-rust may need to use /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.cargo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906490] Review Request: python-setuptools-rust - Setuptools Rust extension plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906490 --- Comment #4 from Christian Heimes --- The updated package builds successfully on F33 and rawhide, https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cheimes/python-cryptography-rust/ Some packages on Fedora 32 are too old to build setuptools-rust correctly. setuptools and setuptools_scm are outdated. That's ok. I'm planning to update and support Fedora 32 any way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906490] Review Request: python-setuptools-rust - Setuptools Rust extension plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906490 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||decatho...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- I think you'll need to patch at least some of the setuptools-rust code to make it work with Rust packages on fedora, primarily the functions that wrap cargo calls. Otherwise those won't be able to see / use system-installed rust libraries (including PyO3). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906490] Review Request: python-setuptools-rust - Setuptools Rust extension plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906490
--- Comment #2 from Christian Heimes ---
I have updated the spec file after getting feedback from Petr Viktorin.
* I have replaced 0001-setupcfg-version.patch with "sed -i '/\[metadata\]/a
version = %{version}' setup.cfg" in %prep section
* Use "%{pypi_source setuptools-rust}" instead of "%{pypi_source}" with
implicit use of "%{pypi_name}"
* Specfile now hard codes "setuptools-rust" instead of using %{pypi_name}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906731] Review Request: python-django-auth-ldap - Django LDAP authentication backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906731 --- Comment #4 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django-auth-ldap -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904874] Review Request: R-parallelly - Enhancing the 'parallel' Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904874 --- Comment #4 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-parallelly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1896303] Review Request: ddcutil - control monitor settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896303 --- Comment #6 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ddcutil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906731] Review Request: python-django-auth-ldap - Django LDAP authentication backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906731 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: * Package follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines * Package follows Python Packaging Guidelines * Package builds and installs * Package licensing is correctly defined and license content is installed * No serious issues with rpmlint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906731] Review Request: python-django-auth-ldap - Django LDAP authentication backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906731 --- Comment #2 from Igor Raits --- New Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-django-auth-ldap.spec New SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-django-auth-ldap-2.2.0-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906731] Review Request: python-django-auth-ldap - Django LDAP authentication backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906731 --- Comment #1 from Igor Raits --- New Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-django-auth-ldap.spec New SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-django-auth-ldap-2.2.0-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906731] New: Review Request: python-django-auth-ldap - Django LDAP authentication backend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906731 Bug ID: 1906731 Summary: Review Request: python-django-auth-ldap - Django LDAP authentication backend Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: igor.ra...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-django-auth-ldap.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-django-auth-ldap-2.2.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Django LDAP authentication backend. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905273] Review Request: cjson - Ultralightweight JSON parser in ANSI C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905273 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7cb0c5c49d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7cb0c5c49d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904874] Review Request: R-parallelly - Enhancing the 'parallel' Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904874 --- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Thank you for the review,José Matos https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/31301 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
