[Bug 1908922] Review Request: libopenaptx - Open Source implementation of Audio Processing Technology codec (aptX)

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922



--- Comment #6 from Aleksei Bavshin  ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
> This is a weird pattern. Usually the main package includes the utilities and
> a -libs subpackage includes the libraries. This can be observed even in the
> RPM package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/blob/master/f/rpm.spec

Seems common for codecs and other library packages:
opus (library), opus-tools (encoder/decoder)
libavif (library), libavif-tools (encoder/decoder)
libpng, libpng-tools
libwebp, libwebp-tools
...

The main content here is a library and binaries are just an additional content
that is unlikely to be installed by a regular user.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1908922] Review Request: libopenaptx - Open Source implementation of Audio Processing Technology codec (aptX)

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com



--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa  ---
> %packageutils
> Summary:%{name} encoder and decoder utilities
> Requires:   %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

This is a weird pattern. Usually the main package includes the utilities and a
-libs subpackage includes the libraries. This can be observed even in the RPM
package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/blob/master/f/rpm.spec

Can you please restructure this accordingly?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493



--- Comment #14 from Clark Williams  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #12)
> I was very happy that rhbzquery got a mention in the latest Fedora Magazine
> Copr projects round-up!
> 
> https://fedoramagazine.org/4-cool-new-projects-to-try-in-copr-from-december/

I saw that! They'd better hurry if they want to try it in copr :)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493



--- Comment #13 from Clark Williams  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #11)
> (In reply to Clark Williams from comment #9)
> > BTW, I'm impressed with Haskell. Probably won't make me stop using LISP, but
> > impressive nonetheless :).
> 
> Cool that's nice to hear :-)
> 
> Which Lisp do you use btw?

Mostly Emacs Lisp :). I have fooled with Steel Bay Common Lisp (sbcl) and 
more Scheme's than I can count (starting back in the R3RS days).

But really, I'm a C programmer.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1888167] Review Request: golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 - Golang implementation of nanomsg's "Scalablilty Protocols"

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888167

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493



--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen  ---
I was very happy that rhbzquery got a mention in the latest Fedora Magazine
Copr projects round-up!

https://fedoramagazine.org/4-cool-new-projects-to-try-in-copr-from-december/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||rhbzquery-0.4.1-1.fc34




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493



--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Clark Williams from comment #9)
> BTW, I'm impressed with Haskell. Probably won't make me stop using LISP, but
> impressive nonetheless :).

Cool that's nice to hear :-)

Which Lisp do you use btw?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1901747] Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to display output in real time while still capturing it

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747

c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net



--- Comment #3 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
By saying “there is no justification of the patches,” I believe the reviewer is
not claiming they are not required. Instead, they are trying to say that each
patch should have a comment in the spec file either linking to an upstream bug
report or explaining what the patch does, why it is required, and whether it
will be offered upstream; see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PatchUpstreamStatus/.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1904172] Review Request: endlessh - SSH tarpit that slowly sends an endless banner

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904172



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ddeb1f2063 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1904172] Review Request: endlessh - SSH tarpit that slowly sends an endless banner

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904172



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-078d93890e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1470842] Review Request: bazel - A fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470842

Scott K Logan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||log...@cottsay.net



--- Comment #6 from Scott K Logan  ---
I know this is a long-closed ticket, but for those who want Bazel in Fedora and
stumble upon this, I thought I'd share some findings.

I did a quick-and-dirty survey to see what it would take to bootstrap Bazel for
Fedora 32, and I couldn't find the following JARs:
- auto-service-annotations.jar
- auto-value-annotations.jar
- checker-qual.jar
- com.android.tools.common.jar
- com.android.tools.layoutlib.layoutlib-api.jar
- com.android.tools.repository.jar
- commons-collections3.jar
- commons-pool2.jar
- error-prone-annotations.jar
- error-prone-type-annotations.jar
- escapevelocity.jar
- flogger.jar
- flogger-system-backend.jar
- geronimo-annotation-1.3-spec.jar
- google-api-client-jackson2.jar
- google-api-client.jar
- google-auth-library-credentials.jar
- google-auth-library-oauth2-http.jar
- google-extensions.jar
- google-http-client-jackson2.jar
- google-http-client.jar
- grpc-api.jar
- grpc-auth.jar
- grpc-context.jar
- grpc-core.jar
- grpc-netty.jar
- grpc-protobuf.jar
- grpc-protobuf-lite.jar
- grpc-stub.jar
- java-allocation-instrumenter.jar
- java-diff-utils.jar
- jsr305.jar
- netty-transport-native-epoll.jar
- netty-transport-native-kqueue.jar
- netty-transport-native-unix-common.jar
- netty-transport-sctp.jar
- opencensus-api.jar
- opencensus-contrib-grpc-metrics.jar
- perfmark-api.jar
- protobuf-util.jar
- tomcat9-annotations-api.jar

On top of those missing, there are 17 packages currently in Fedora which
provide some of the required JARs.

Getting all of the missing JARs packaged would be a lot of work, and this
package would end up with a pretty hefty number of dependencies. Given the
number of dependencies and the rate at which Bazel is tagging releases, I don't
think that this would be a trivial package to maintain.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-793a800731 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-793a800731


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1901747] Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to display output in real time while still capturing it

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747



--- Comment #2 from chedi toueiti  ---
@dan

first, thanks for taking the time to review this package. I updated the srpm to
be the same as the spec file.

as for the points you mentioned:

1- Unfortunately I can't use the latest version as it requires a newer version
of python-rich (9.5.1) that is not 
currently available in fedora (latest in rawhide is 9.3.0), and a new package
python-enrich (that I'll be submitting 
for review as soon as possible). so for the time being I'll stick to v 0.1.5

2- The patches as necessary for the version python-pytest < 6.1. (the current
version in f33 is 6.0) not having them 
causes the tests to fail.

3- I updated the spec file


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1901747] Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to display output in real time while still capturing it

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747



--- Comment #1 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com ---
- Please consider upgrading your spec to version 0.2.0 (got released two days
ago).
- there is no justification of the patches
- consider replacing everything under %prep with: %autosetup -p1 -n
%{srcname}-%{version}
- the spec file that you linked is different to the one in the srpm (the one
not in the srpm has an additional commented out BuildRequires).

Besides that, looks good to me.


This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
  a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
  listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
  case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
  in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
  ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "*No copyright* Expat
 License". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/dan/fedora-scm/1901747-python-subprocess-
 tee/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with 

[Bug 1901747] Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to display output in real time while still capturing it

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747

dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dan.cermak@cgc-instruments.
   ||com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dan.cermak@cgc-instruments.
   ||com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562



--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-muesli-crunchy


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562



--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks a lot for the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1909767] Review Request: kata-containers

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909767

Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dinec...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1909767] New: Review Request: kata-containers

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909767

Bug ID: 1909767
   Summary: Review Request: kata-containers
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: el...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://etrunko.fedorapeople.org/kata-containers.spec
SRPM URL: https://etrunko.fedorapeople.org/kata-containers-2.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: etrunko
Description: Kata Containers is an open source project and community working to
build a standard implementation of lightweight Virtual Machines (VMs) that feel
and perform like containers, but provide the workload isolation and security
advantages of VMs.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1908922] Review Request: libopenaptx - Open Source implementation of Audio Processing Technology codec (aptX)

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922

Ben Cotton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bcot...@redhat.com



--- Comment #4 from Ben Cotton  ---
Ack on the legal review. I'll get the patent status verified and then update
this bug.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1886700] Review Request: golang-github-saintfish-chardet - Charset detector library

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886700



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-saintfish-chardet


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493



--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rhbzquery


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1907976] Review Request: megapixels - A GTK3 camera application that knows how to deal with the media request api

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907976



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/megapixels


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562

Olivier Lemasle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Olivier Lemasle  ---
- Spec & changelog ok
- License ok
- Guidelines ok
- rpmlint ok
- builds in mock
- latest version packaged

Package accepted


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1888167] Review Request: golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 - Golang implementation of nanomsg's "Scalablilty Protocols"

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888167

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562



--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Again, sorry.

Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-muesli-crunchy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-muesli-crunchy-0.4.0-2.fc33.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671



--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks for reviewing this.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1886700] Review Request: golang-github-saintfish-chardet - Charset detector library

2020-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886700



--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Thanks for the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org