[Bug 1908922] Review Request: libopenaptx - Open Source implementation of Audio Processing Technology codec (aptX)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922 --- Comment #6 from Aleksei Bavshin --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5) > This is a weird pattern. Usually the main package includes the utilities and > a -libs subpackage includes the libraries. This can be observed even in the > RPM package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/blob/master/f/rpm.spec Seems common for codecs and other library packages: opus (library), opus-tools (encoder/decoder) libavif (library), libavif-tools (encoder/decoder) libpng, libpng-tools libwebp, libwebp-tools ... The main content here is a library and binaries are just an additional content that is unlikely to be installed by a regular user. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1908922] Review Request: libopenaptx - Open Source implementation of Audio Processing Technology codec (aptX)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa --- > %packageutils > Summary:%{name} encoder and decoder utilities > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} This is a weird pattern. Usually the main package includes the utilities and a -libs subpackage includes the libraries. This can be observed even in the RPM package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/blob/master/f/rpm.spec Can you please restructure this accordingly? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493 --- Comment #14 from Clark Williams --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #12) > I was very happy that rhbzquery got a mention in the latest Fedora Magazine > Copr projects round-up! > > https://fedoramagazine.org/4-cool-new-projects-to-try-in-copr-from-december/ I saw that! They'd better hurry if they want to try it in copr :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493 --- Comment #13 from Clark Williams --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #11) > (In reply to Clark Williams from comment #9) > > BTW, I'm impressed with Haskell. Probably won't make me stop using LISP, but > > impressive nonetheless :). > > Cool that's nice to hear :-) > > Which Lisp do you use btw? Mostly Emacs Lisp :). I have fooled with Steel Bay Common Lisp (sbcl) and more Scheme's than I can count (starting back in the R3RS days). But really, I'm a C programmer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888167] Review Request: golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 - Golang implementation of nanomsg's "Scalablilty Protocols"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888167 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen --- I was very happy that rhbzquery got a mention in the latest Fedora Magazine Copr projects round-up! https://fedoramagazine.org/4-cool-new-projects-to-try-in-copr-from-december/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rhbzquery-0.4.1-1.fc34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen --- (In reply to Clark Williams from comment #9) > BTW, I'm impressed with Haskell. Probably won't make me stop using LISP, but > impressive nonetheless :). Cool that's nice to hear :-) Which Lisp do you use btw? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1901747] Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to display output in real time while still capturing it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747 c...@musicinmybrain.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net --- Comment #3 from c...@musicinmybrain.net --- By saying “there is no justification of the patches,” I believe the reviewer is not claiming they are not required. Instead, they are trying to say that each patch should have a comment in the spec file either linking to an upstream bug report or explaining what the patch does, why it is required, and whether it will be offered upstream; see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PatchUpstreamStatus/. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904172] Review Request: endlessh - SSH tarpit that slowly sends an endless banner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904172 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ddeb1f2063 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904172] Review Request: endlessh - SSH tarpit that slowly sends an endless banner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904172 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-078d93890e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470842] Review Request: bazel - A fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470842 Scott K Logan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||log...@cottsay.net --- Comment #6 from Scott K Logan --- I know this is a long-closed ticket, but for those who want Bazel in Fedora and stumble upon this, I thought I'd share some findings. I did a quick-and-dirty survey to see what it would take to bootstrap Bazel for Fedora 32, and I couldn't find the following JARs: - auto-service-annotations.jar - auto-value-annotations.jar - checker-qual.jar - com.android.tools.common.jar - com.android.tools.layoutlib.layoutlib-api.jar - com.android.tools.repository.jar - commons-collections3.jar - commons-pool2.jar - error-prone-annotations.jar - error-prone-type-annotations.jar - escapevelocity.jar - flogger.jar - flogger-system-backend.jar - geronimo-annotation-1.3-spec.jar - google-api-client-jackson2.jar - google-api-client.jar - google-auth-library-credentials.jar - google-auth-library-oauth2-http.jar - google-extensions.jar - google-http-client-jackson2.jar - google-http-client.jar - grpc-api.jar - grpc-auth.jar - grpc-context.jar - grpc-core.jar - grpc-netty.jar - grpc-protobuf.jar - grpc-protobuf-lite.jar - grpc-stub.jar - java-allocation-instrumenter.jar - java-diff-utils.jar - jsr305.jar - netty-transport-native-epoll.jar - netty-transport-native-kqueue.jar - netty-transport-native-unix-common.jar - netty-transport-sctp.jar - opencensus-api.jar - opencensus-contrib-grpc-metrics.jar - perfmark-api.jar - protobuf-util.jar - tomcat9-annotations-api.jar On top of those missing, there are 17 packages currently in Fedora which provide some of the required JARs. Getting all of the missing JARs packaged would be a lot of work, and this package would end up with a pretty hefty number of dependencies. Given the number of dependencies and the rate at which Bazel is tagging releases, I don't think that this would be a trivial package to maintain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-793a800731 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-793a800731 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1901747] Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to display output in real time while still capturing it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747 --- Comment #2 from chedi toueiti --- @dan first, thanks for taking the time to review this package. I updated the srpm to be the same as the spec file. as for the points you mentioned: 1- Unfortunately I can't use the latest version as it requires a newer version of python-rich (9.5.1) that is not currently available in fedora (latest in rawhide is 9.3.0), and a new package python-enrich (that I'll be submitting for review as soon as possible). so for the time being I'll stick to v 0.1.5 2- The patches as necessary for the version python-pytest < 6.1. (the current version in f33 is 6.0) not having them causes the tests to fail. 3- I updated the spec file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1901747] Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to display output in real time while still capturing it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747 --- Comment #1 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com --- - Please consider upgrading your spec to version 0.2.0 (got released two days ago). - there is no justification of the patches - consider replacing everything under %prep with: %autosetup -p1 -n %{srcname}-%{version} - the spec file that you linked is different to the one in the srpm (the one not in the srpm has an additional commented out BuildRequires). Besides that, looks good to me. This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "*No copyright* Expat License". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dan/fedora-scm/1901747-python-subprocess- tee/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [?]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with
[Bug 1901747] Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to display output in real time while still capturing it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747 dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. ||com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. ||com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-muesli-crunchy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks a lot for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1909767] Review Request: kata-containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909767 Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dinec...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1909767] New: Review Request: kata-containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909767 Bug ID: 1909767 Summary: Review Request: kata-containers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: el...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://etrunko.fedorapeople.org/kata-containers.spec SRPM URL: https://etrunko.fedorapeople.org/kata-containers-2.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: etrunko Description: Kata Containers is an open source project and community working to build a standard implementation of lightweight Virtual Machines (VMs) that feel and perform like containers, but provide the workload isolation and security advantages of VMs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1908922] Review Request: libopenaptx - Open Source implementation of Audio Processing Technology codec (aptX)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922 Ben Cotton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bcot...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Ben Cotton --- Ack on the legal review. I'll get the patent status verified and then update this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1886700] Review Request: golang-github-saintfish-chardet - Charset detector library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886700 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-saintfish-chardet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1906493] Review Request: rhbzquery - Bugzilla query tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906493 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rhbzquery -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1907976] Review Request: megapixels - A GTK3 camera application that knows how to deal with the media request api
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907976 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/megapixels -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Olivier Lemasle --- - Spec & changelog ok - License ok - Guidelines ok - rpmlint ok - builds in mock - latest version packaged Package accepted -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888167] Review Request: golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 - Golang implementation of nanomsg's "Scalablilty Protocols"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888167 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter --- Again, sorry. Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-muesli-crunchy.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-muesli-crunchy-0.4.0-2.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for reviewing this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1886700] Review Request: golang-github-saintfish-chardet - Charset detector library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886700 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org