[Bug 1942104] Review Request: ghc-hosc - Haskell Open Sound Control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942104 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1271ec83fd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1271ec83fd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942104] Review Request: ghc-hosc - Haskell Open Sound Control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942104 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-cae035cf47 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cae035cf47 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942104] Review Request: ghc-hosc - Haskell Open Sound Control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942104 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||ghc-hosc-0.18.1-1.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944117] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-no-overview - GNOME Shell extension for no overview at startup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944117 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Can you update this package as upstream commented now? Include LICENSE file as Source1: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fthx/no-overview/main/LICENSE and install it as %license LICENSE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943965] Review Request: crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943965 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-628e1122f2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-628e1122f2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2b5818a979 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2b5818a979 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-42ad0ca3df has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-42ad0ca3df See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1909390] Review Request: gn - Meta-build system that generates build files for Ninja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909390 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d72bcdda41 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d72bcdda41 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943965] Review Request: crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943965 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-baee58e653 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-baee58e653 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-baee58e653 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-775a94312f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-775a94312f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-775a94312f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6361409a91 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-6361409a91 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6361409a91 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941294] Review Request: python-typer - Typer, build great CLIs. Easy to code. Based on Python type hints
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941294 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Hi Chandan, Can you provide updated SRPM and SPEC for further review here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1932734] Review Request: mkfontscale - Tool to generate legacy X11 font system index files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932734 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-03-31 01:27:05 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) --- I think this bug should have been closed automatically. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1932736] Review Request: bdftopcf - Font compiler for the X server and font server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932736 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-03-31 01:26:30 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) --- I think this bug should have been closed automatically. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1932737] Review Request: fonttosfnt - Tool to wrap bdf or pcf bitmap fonts in an sfnt wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932737 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-03-31 01:25:06 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943965] Review Request: crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943965 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8697c76c0f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-8697c76c0f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8697c76c0f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0f99a033c1 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0f99a033c1 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0f99a033c1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4684784589 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4684784589 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4684784589 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3871a41131 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-3871a41131 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3871a41131 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943965] Review Request: crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943965 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-aa94798023 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-aa94798023 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-aa94798023 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e1e8d7169e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-e1e8d7169e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e1e8d7169e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938471] Review Request: disk-utilities - Collection of utilities for ripping, dumping, analysing, and modifying disk images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938471 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-48e39bade3 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941994] Review Request: cockpit-machines - Cockpit component for managing virtual machines (split out from existing cockpit package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941994 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - You need to add MIT to the list of licenses too: License:LGPLv2+ and MIT Package approved, please fix the aforementioned issue before import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942114] Review Request: guestfs-tools - Tools to access and modify virtual machine disk images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942114 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-31 00:16:53 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a24c53741b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942845] Review Request: mcrouter - memcached protocol router for scaling memcached deployments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942845 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-31 00:16:47 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fe0a6d05c2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1937455] Review Request: ocaml-caml-mode - Emacs mode for editing OCaml source code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937455 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-03-31 00:16:17 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-376a797e94 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941896] Review Request: rust-rudo - rudo is a small equivalent of sudo writen in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896 --- Comment #6 from Rémi Lauzier --- Hi! I manage to put review for all dependency of rudo and to compile them in my copr. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/remilauzier/rudo/ For now i manage to compile rudo but the config file appear to install as directory even if it is a file in the final rpm. Thanks for your time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944912] New: Review Request: python-hypothesmith - Hypothesis strategies for generating Python programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944912 Bug ID: 1944912 Summary: Review Request: python-hypothesmith - Hypothesis strategies for generating Python programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcava...@fb.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/python-hypothesmith/python-hypothesmith.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/python-hypothesmith/python-hypothesmith-0.1.8-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Hypothesis strategies for generating Python programs, something like CSmith. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944912] Review Request: python-hypothesmith - Hypothesis strategies for generating Python programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944912 --- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64882125 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942392] Review Request: rust-vmm-sys-util - Helpers and utilities used by multiple rust-vmm components and VMMs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942392
--- Comment #7 from Connor Kuehl ---
(In reply to Fabiano Fidêncio from comment #6)
> [..]
> [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
> Sergio, license is only being installed as part of the
> rust-vmm-sys-util-devel package.
I think the root `rust-vmm-sys-util-devel` is required by the other subfeature
versions, so running `dnf install rust-vmm-sys-util+serde-devel` should result
in rust-vmm-sys-util-devel being installed with the license. Is that
sufficient?
> [..]
> [?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
> vmm-sys-util-devel , rust-vmm-sys-util+default-devel , rust-vmm-sys-
> util+serde-devel , rust-vmm-sys-util+serde_derive-devel , rust-vmm-
> sys-util+with-serde-devel
> Segio, it looks good to me as it is, but I'd like a second check from
> Connor here.
Fabiano, I believe you're correct. This looks good to me.
> [..]
> [?]: Package functions as described.
> Sergio, I haven't tested the package, I'd appreciate if Connor could do.
I have a package that only transiently depends on vmm-sys-util for unit tests,
but a lot of the other required packages aren't packaged for Fedora yet since
they depend on this one. So I think it would be nontrivial for me to position
my other package to test this library. The unit tests that run for this package
are all passing, which is good enough for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943526] Review Request: libuev - Simple event loop for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943526 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943526] Review Request: libuev - Simple event loop for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943526 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|otu...@iki.fi Flags||fedora-review? ||needinfo?(alciregi@posteo.n ||et) --- Comment #3 from Otto Urpelainen --- I will review. This looks simple enough, but is the first time I encounter libtool and pkgconfig, so please be patient if I need a bit of time to understand the build system. Issues found by running fedora-review and inspecting output follow. This is just the first look at the package, so there may still be other issues that automation cannot detect: - Libtool archives (.la) should not be packaged Note: libuev : /usr/lib64/libuev.la See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries - Development (unversioned) .so files should be in the -devel subpackage. Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages - Static library libuev.a should not be included at all, the shared object should be used by all dependencies. If the static library is really required for some reason, it should go to -static subpackage. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries - Rpmlint reveals the following problems: libuev.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.3-1 ['2.3.2-1.fc35', '2.3.2-1'] libuev.src:33: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 33) - Complains about the use of AM_CONFIG_HEADER found in: libuev-2.3.2/configure.ac:7 This is just an extra item, however it would be nice to contact upstream about using its replacement. See: https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/automake-1.7.2/html_chapter/automake_5.html#SEC23 Also I noticed a strange thing: the rpm both Requires and Provides libuev.so.2()(64bit). I need to look deeper into that, how that happened and is that a problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944879] New: Review Request: rust-dbus-tree - Framework for writing D-Bus method handlers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944879 Bug ID: 1944879 Summary: Review Request: rust-dbus-tree - Framework for writing D-Bus method handlers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jbaubl...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jbaublitz/rust-dbus-tree/fedora-34-x86_64/02108784-rust-dbus-tree/rust-dbus-tree.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jbaublitz/rust-dbus-tree/fedora-34-x86_64/02108784-rust-dbus-tree/rust-dbus-tree-0.9.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Framework for writing D-Bus method handlers Fedora Account System Username: jbaublitz Successful koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64875700 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942126] Review Request: rubygem-protobuf - Google Protocol Buffers serialization and RPC implementation for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942126 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Jarek Prokop from comment #4) > Remarks fixed: > > updated srpm: > https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/jackorp/public_git/rubygem-protobuf.git/plain/ > rubygem-protobuf-3.10.3-1.fc35.src.rpm > > updated spec: > https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/jackorp/public_git/rubygem-protobuf.git/plain/ > rubygem-protobuf.spec You need to add a comment explaining the license breakdown in the SPEC: # MIT: main library # BSD: proto/google/protobuf/compiler/plugin.proto # and proto/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto License: MIT and BSD Package approved, please fix the aforementioned issue before import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941994] Review Request: cockpit-machines - Cockpit component for managing virtual machines (split out from existing cockpit package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941994
--- Comment #2 from Katerina Koukiou ---
Robert, I just created release 242 containing the requested fixes.
New spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/%40cockpit/cockpit-preview/fedora-34-x86_64/02108714-cockpit-machines/cockpit-machines.spec
New srpm URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/%40cockpit/cockpit-preview/fedora-34-x86_64/02108714-cockpit-machines/cockpit-machines-242-1.fc34.src.rpm
My understanding is that the '%if 0%{?suse_version}' comment is not a blocking
one. We indeed share this generate for other distros from a sigle template
specfile.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3871a41131 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3871a41131 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943965] Review Request: crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943965 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-aa94798023 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-aa94798023 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0f99a033c1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0f99a033c1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943965] Review Request: crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943965 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-baee58e653 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-baee58e653 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8697c76c0f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8697c76c0f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-775a94312f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-775a94312f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943965] Review Request: crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943965 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-628e1122f2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-628e1122f2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4684784589 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4684784589 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2b5818a979 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2b5818a979 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-42ad0ca3df has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-42ad0ca3df -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6361409a91 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6361409a91 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e1e8d7169e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e1e8d7169e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||decnumber-3.68.0-1.20210321 ||gitda66509.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944764] New: Review Request: SameBoy - Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator written in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944764 Bug ID: 1944764 Summary: Review Request: SameBoy - Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator written in C Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sentrycraft...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pagure.io/sameboy-rpm/blob/63f68beaf2d7f6494caa2a4809e970a58cad25bf/f/sameboy.spec SRPM URL: https://releases.pagure.org/sameboy-rpm/SameBoy-0.14.2-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: SameBoy is an open source Game Boy (DMG) and Game Boy Color (CGB) emulator, written in portable C. It has a native Cocoa front-end for MacOS, an SDL front-end for other operating systems, and a libretro core. It also includes a text-based debugger with expression evaluation. Fedora Account System Username: sentry Some things to note: - SameBoy has implementations of GameBoy BootRoms which are also licensed under MIT https://github.com/LIJI32/SameBoy/tree/master/BootROMs - the COMPILER macro is defined to easily allow for reproducable builds on systems with clang installed https://github.com/LIJI32/SameBoy/blob/master/Makefile#L62 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940937] Review Request: rpi-imager - Graphical user-interface to write disk images and format SD cards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940937 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e6ec396d70 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-e6ec396d70 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e6ec396d70 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941388] Review Request: softfloat - Berkeley IEEE Binary Floating-Point Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2fdb718e64 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-2fdb718e64 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2fdb718e64 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1919701] Review Request: xwm - Tiny XCB floating window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919701 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f5766f5ea9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944554] Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar --- The usage is this one: my $loop = Glib::MainLoop->new (); That does not load Glib module. The test just expects that Glib::MainLoop was imported implicitly somewhere somehow (probably by Glib transitively loaded by "use Glib::IO;" at line #5). It's maybe a deficiency in the test, but the RPM dependency should not be there: [test@fedora-35 Glib-IO-0.001]$ perl -Ilib -e 'Glib::MainLoop->new' Can't locate object method "new" via package "Glib::MainLoop" (perhaps you forgot to load "Glib::MainLoop"?) at -e line 1. [test@fedora-35 Glib-IO-0.001]$ perl -Ilib -e 'use Glib::MainLoop; Glib::MainLoop->new' Can't locate Glib/MainLoop.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Glib::MainLoop module) (@INC contains: lib /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.32 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.32 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at -e line 1. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1. [test@fedora-35 Glib-IO-0.001]$ perl -Ilib -e 'use Glib; Glib::MainLoop->new' [test@fedora-35 Glib-IO-0.001]$ perl -Ilib -e 'use Glib::IO; Glib::MainLoop->new' [test@fedora-35 Glib-IO-0.001]$ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940937] Review Request: rpi-imager - Graphical user-interface to write disk images and format SD cards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940937 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0408c8753e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0408c8753e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0408c8753e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941590] Review Request: python-pyunicorn - Unified complex network and recurrence analysis toolbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941590 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0c5cecd603 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0c5cecd603 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0c5cecd603 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941388] Review Request: softfloat - Berkeley IEEE Binary Floating-Point Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6bc6551e1b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-6bc6551e1b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6bc6551e1b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942114] Review Request: guestfs-tools - Tools to access and modify virtual machine disk images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942114 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a24c53741b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-a24c53741b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a24c53741b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944554] Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554 --- Comment #4 from Michal Josef Spacek --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3) > I cannot see where Glib module is used in the tests (grep -Hnr 'Glib[^:]' > ./t). Do we really need perl(Glib) among BuildRequires? There is usage of Glib::MainLoop in t/file-enumerator.t -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944554] Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- I cannot see where Glib module is used in the tests (grep -Hnr 'Glib[^:]' ./t). Do we really need perl(Glib) among BuildRequires? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1789940] Review Request: Pound - Reverse proxy and load balancer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789940 Breno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2021-03-30 12:52:39 --- Comment #5 from Breno --- This request has been attended a long time ago. Closing the ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936727] Review Request: ignition-common - AV, Graphics, Events, and much more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936727 --- Comment #2 from Rich Mattes --- Thanks for taking a look. You're right that the dependency versions in Fedora are wrong. The entire ignition/gazebo set of packages are version locked and need to be updated at the same time, and this package is required for gazebo-11 and therefore the rest of the ignition packages to be updated. The correct versions are all in the copr I linked, once the new ignition packages are reviewed they'll all be upgraded in rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944658] Review Request: htppu - Hessu's Tampa Ping-Pong conversd URO modified version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944658 Richard Lescak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944658] Review Request: htppu - Hessu's Tampa Ping-Pong conversd URO modified version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944658 Richard Lescak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rles...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rles...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944658] Review Request: htppu - Hessu's Tampa Ping-Pong conversd URO modified version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944658 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Upstream was notified that the license text is missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944658] New: Review Request: htppu - Hessu's Tampa Ping-Pong conversd URO modified version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944658 Bug ID: 1944658 Summary: Review Request: htppu - Hessu's Tampa Ping-Pong conversd URO modified version Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jskar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/htppu/htppu.spec SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/htppu/htppu-1.8-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: The URO modified Ping-Pong conversd, derived from WAMPES' conversd by Dieter Deyke . It is also used in the Internet for ham radio conversation groups. Fedora Account System Username: jskarvad -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1927033] Review Request: eth-tools - Intel Ethernet Fast Fabric Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927033 --- Comment #13 from Jijun Wang --- *** Bug 1943670 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944554] Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Glib-IO-0.001-1.fc35.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(Glib::Object::Introspection) >= 0.014 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.32.1) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Glib-IO-0.001-1.fc35.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Glib::IO) = 0.001 1 perl-Glib-IO = 0.001-1.fc35 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Glib-IO* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines. Resolution: I am not a sponsor of packagers. However for me, the package can be approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942617] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber-messages - cucumber-messages-15.0.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942617 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-cucumber-messages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943583] Review Request: rust-crytpoki-sys - FFI wrapper around the PKCS #11 API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943583 --- Comment #3 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-crytpoki-sys -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942104] Review Request: ghc-hosc - Haskell Open Sound Control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942104 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-hosc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943969] Review Request: sdl-telnet - Simple RFC-compliant TELNET implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943969 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sdl-telnet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943965] Review Request: crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943965 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/crypto -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943968] Review Request: decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943968 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/decnumber -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1350547] Review Request: perl-Net-IP-XS - IPv4/IPv6 address library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350547
--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar ---
The URL and Source0 addresses are usable. Ok.
TODO: Replace URL and Source0 addresses with Metacpan server (See where the
current URL redirects and where the Download link points to).
Source0 archive (SHA-256:
ae9194101adaee050c342475b1ed6674b66cfa1d35fced59d994ae4b34123e78) is original.
Ok.
Summary verified from (lib/Net/IP/XS.pm). Ok.
Description verified from (lib/Net/IP/XS.pm). Ok.
License verified from: n128.h (GPLv2+), inet_pton.h (GPLv2+ and MIT),
functions.c (GPLv2+), LICENSE (GPLv2 text), object.c (GPLv2+), README (GPLv2+),
NetIpXs.xs (GPLv2+), functions.h (GPLv2+), lib/Net/IP/XS.pm (GPLv2+), object.h
(GPLv2+), n128.c (GPLv2+), inet_pton.c (GPLv2+ and MIT).
FIX: Change License tag from "GPLv2" to "GPLv2+ and MIT".
TODO: Remove Group tag. It's obsolete.
TODO: Use "perl" instead of %{__perl} macro. Under-scored macros are not
intended for a public use.
TODO: Add NO_PACKLIST=1 NO_PERLLOCAL=1 arguments to "perl Makefile.PL" command,
constrain perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) with ">= 6.76" version, use %{make_build}
instead of
"make %{?_smp_mflags}", use %{make_install} instead of "make pure_install",
remove all the find commands except of "*.bs" line. See
for an example.
TODO: Remove "rm -rf %{buildroot}" from %install section. It's obsolete.
TODO: Remove %clean section. It's obsolete.
FIX: Package LICENSE file with %license macro.
FIX: Own %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Net/IP directory. I recommend:
%{perl_vendorarch}/Net*
%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/*
FIX: Build-require "gcc" for compiling this XS module.
FIX: Build-require "make" (perl-Net-IP-XS.spec:31).
FIX: Build-require "findutils" (perl-Net-IP-XS.spec:39).
FIX: Build-require "coreutils" (perl-Net-IP-XS.spec:42).
FIX: Build-require all used Perl modules:
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Config) at Makefile.PL:5
perl(strict) at Makefile.PL:1
perl(warnings) at Makefile.PL:2
perl(base) at lib/Net/IP/XS.pm:63
perl(DynaLoader) at lib/Net/IP/XS.pm:63
perl(Exporter) at lib/Net/IP/XS.pm:63
perl(overload) at lib/Net/IP/XS.pm:58
perl(Config) at t/50-rt-102155.t:6
perl(File::Temp) at t/41-serialise.t:9
perl(if) at t/50-rt-102155.t:7
perl(Scalar::Util) at t/40-objects.t:13
perl(Storable) at t/41-serialise.t:8
perl(threads) at t/50-rt-102155.t:7
Run-require perl(IP::Authority) (lib/Net/IP/XS.pm:174).
FIX: This package fails to build because perl(IP::Authority) is not available
in Fedora 35.
Please correct all FIX issues, consider fixing TODO items, and provide a new
spec file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1943591] Review Request: mod_markdown - Markdown filter for Apache web-server.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943591 --- Comment #2 from Eugene A. Pivnev --- Spec URL: https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mod_markdown/mod_markdown.spec SRPM URL: https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mod_markdown/mod_markdown-1.0.4-2.20200616git933aa25.fc33.src.rpm Koji builds: F32: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64843452 F33: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64843796 F34: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64844226 F35: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64844526 EL8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64844846 Note: I'm not created new upstream bug report, just updated existent one: https://github.com/hamano/apache-mod-markdown/issues/36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1350547] Review Request: perl-Net-IP-XS - IPv4/IPv6 address library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350547 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) | Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942392] Review Request: rust-vmm-sys-util - Helpers and utilities used by multiple rust-vmm components and VMMs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942392
Fabiano Fidêncio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fiden...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Fabiano Fidêncio ---
Sergio, there are a few comments below based on the fedora-review tool.
Please, take a look on the "[!]" and "[?]" parts of the review.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
"BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License". 43 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fidencio/review-
rust-vmm-sys-util/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
Sergio, license is only being installed as part of the
rust-vmm-sys-util-devel package.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[?]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
Sergio, maybe worth using the Requires / Provides pointed out as part of
the fedora-review tool?
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
vmm-sys-util-devel , rust-vmm-sys-util+default-devel , rust-vmm-sys-
util+serde-devel , rust-vmm-sys-util+serde_derive-devel , rust-vmm-
sys-util+with-serde-devel
Segio, it looks good to me as it is, but I'd like a second check from
Connor here.
[?]: Package functions as described.
Sergio, I haven't
[Bug 1910392] Review Request: python-build - Simple, correct PEP517 package builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910392 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhron...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok --- %generate_buildrequires %pyproject_buildrequires -x test %build %py3_build %install %py3_install Note that mixing %pyproject_buildrequires with %py3_build/%py3_install is generally not a supported way of building Python packages. Please, either use the "old" macros, or the "new", described in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1935255] Review Request: python-jaraco-path - cross platform hidden file detection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935255 Petr Viktorin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||pvikt...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-03-30 09:20:50 --- Comment #15 from Petr Viktorin --- The package is built. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944554] Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek --- BTW: This package is my first package in Fedora :-) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942392] Review Request: rust-vmm-sys-util - Helpers and utilities used by multiple rust-vmm components and VMMs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942392 --- Comment #5 from Sergio Lopez --- Updated Spec and SRPM: Spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/slp/rust-vmm-sys-util/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02108127-rust-vmm-sys-util/rust-vmm-sys-util.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/slp/rust-vmm-sys-util/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02108127-rust-vmm-sys-util/rust-vmm-sys-util-0.8.0-1.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942617] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber-messages - cucumber-messages-15.0.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942617 --- Comment #3 from Jarek Prokop --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942126] Review Request: rubygem-protobuf - Google Protocol Buffers serialization and RPC implementation for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942126 --- Comment #4 from Jarek Prokop --- Remarks fixed: updated srpm: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/jackorp/public_git/rubygem-protobuf.git/plain/rubygem-protobuf-3.10.3-1.fc35.src.rpm updated spec: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/jackorp/public_git/rubygem-protobuf.git/plain/rubygem-protobuf.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944554] New: Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554 Bug ID: 1944554 Summary: Review Request: perl-Glib-IO - Perl binding to the GIO library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mspa...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://skim.cz/tmp/perl-Glib-IO.spec SRPM URL: https://skim.cz/tmp/perl-Glib-IO-0.001-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: The Glib::IO module allows a Perl developer to access the GIO library, the high level I/O and platform library of the GNOME development platform. Fedora Account System Username: mspacek Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64834907 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933950] Review Request: clipman - A simple clipboard manager for Wayland
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933950 --- Comment #7 from Bob Hepple --- clipman-1.5.2 is in bohdi as of 2 weeks ago - using the name 'clipman' throughout. I think this can be closed now??? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
