[Bug 1963417] Review Request: golang-helm-3 - The Kubernetes Package Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963417 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca --- About the two "deprecations" tests: looks like https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-k8s-apiserver/pull-request/1 was enough to get Helm to build, but not enough to make that feature actually work. I tried backporting some more commits, but it gets invasive enough that it's probably not worth it. Given that this is a fairly minor feature for Helm (a linter), I'm inclined to just turn off the tests for now and leave it broken. This will fix itself once the k8s packages are updated to 1.20 or later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963410] Review Request: golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate - SQL schema migration tool for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963410 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1963417 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963417 [Bug 1963417] Review Request: golang-helm-3 - The Kubernetes Package Manager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963417] Review Request: golang-helm-3 - The Kubernetes Package Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963417 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1963410 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963410 [Bug 1963410] Review Request: golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate - SQL schema migration tool for Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963417] New: Review Request: golang-helm-3 - The Kubernetes Package Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963417 Bug ID: 1963417 Summary: Review Request: golang-helm-3 - The Kubernetes Package Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcava...@fb.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-helm-3/golang-helm-3.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-helm-3/golang-helm-3-3.5.4-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Helm is a tool for managing Charts. Charts are packages of pre-configured Kubernetes resources. Use Helm to: - Find and use popular software packaged as Helm Charts to run in Kubernetes - Share your own applications as Helm Charts - Create reproducible builds of your Kubernetes applications - Intelligently manage your Kubernetes manifest files - Manage releases of Helm packages Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963409] Review Request: golang-github-gorp-1 - Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963409 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1963410 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963410 [Bug 1963410] Review Request: golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate - SQL schema migration tool for Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963410] Review Request: golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate - SQL schema migration tool for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963410 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1963409 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963409 [Bug 1963409] Review Request: golang-github-gorp-1 - Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963410] New: Review Request: golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate - SQL schema migration tool for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963410 Bug ID: 1963410 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate - SQL schema migration tool for Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcava...@fb.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate/golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate/golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate-0-0.1.20210517gita32ed26.fc35.src.rpm Description: sql-migrate is a SQL Schema migration tool for Go, based on gorp and goose. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963409] Review Request: golang-github-gorp-1 - Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963409 --- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=68510354 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963409] New: Review Request: golang-github-gorp-1 - Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963409 Bug ID: 1963409 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-gorp-1 - Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcava...@fb.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-gorp-1/golang-github-gorp-1.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-gorp-1/golang-github-gorp-1-1.7.2-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946033] Review Request: python-protego - Pure-Python robots.txt parser with support for modern conventions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946033 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4c100f26e2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4c100f26e2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946033] Review Request: python-protego - Pure-Python robots.txt parser with support for modern conventions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946033 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-41513f962c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-41513f962c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946041] Review Request: python-itemloaders - Library that helps you collect data from HTML and XML sources.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946041 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-36c6548dee has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-36c6548dee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961355] Review Request: python-markdown-include - Syntax for Python-Markdown to include other Markdown documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961355 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-957e831abf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-957e831abf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946041] Review Request: python-itemloaders - Library that helps you collect data from HTML and XML sources.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946041 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a762513ae2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a762513ae2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961355] Review Request: python-markdown-include - Syntax for Python-Markdown to include other Markdown documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961355 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2ba5ea9da6 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-2ba5ea9da6 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2ba5ea9da6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946030] Review Request: python-itemadapter - a wrapper for data container objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946030 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d6787c75a3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d6787c75a3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961355] Review Request: python-markdown-include - Syntax for Python-Markdown to include other Markdown documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961355 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4de8c3cd6e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4de8c3cd6e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4de8c3cd6e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959754] Review Request: rust-cranelift-entity - Data structures using entity references as mapping keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959754 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-432f4980b4 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-432f4980b4` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-432f4980b4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959780] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen-shared - For code shared between cranelift-codegen-meta and cranelift-codegen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959780 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8c6b037eb1 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-8c6b037eb1` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8c6b037eb1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946030] Review Request: python-itemadapter - a wrapper for data container objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946030 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ce13418d5b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ce13418d5b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944422] Review Request: rust-systemd - A rust interface to libsystemd/libelogind provided APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944422 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-23 01:03:38 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-dd116f8411 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941896] Review Request: rust-rudo - rudo is a small equivalent of sudo writen in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896 Bug 1941896 depends on bug 1944422, which changed state. Bug 1944422 Summary: Review Request: rust-systemd - A rust interface to libsystemd/libelogind provided APIs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944422 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1954259] Review Request: python-databases - Async database support for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954259 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-05-23 01:03:30 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e7fabd81fb has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1246719] Review Request: lua-luaprompt - A Lua command prompt with pretty-printing and autocompletion
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Jeff Backus 's needinfo: Bug 1246719: Review Request: lua-luaprompt - A Lua command prompt with pretty-printing and autocompletion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246719 --- Comment #9 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
needinfo canceled: [Bug 982302] Review Request: mod_xslt - Dynamic xsl transformations for apache
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Christopher Meng 's needinfo: Bug 982302: Review Request: mod_xslt - Dynamic xsl transformations for apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982302 --- Comment #7 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961309] Review Request: xcfun - A library of approximate exchange-correlation functionals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961309 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Ok. Still use cmake3 for EPEL7, even if you don,t choose to use the new macros. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961309] Review Request: xcfun - A library of approximate exchange-correlation functionals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961309 --- Comment #5 from Susi Lehtola --- The difference is that pytest just runs the tests, and doesn't install anything per se. Note also that no bytecode gets installed by CMake; it is rpm itself which compiles the bytecode for all the Python libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961309] Review Request: xcfun - A library of approximate exchange-correlation functionals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961309
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #2)
> Yes, I know that the newest Fedoras have dedicated cmake macros. However,
> they are not available on older distros and EPEL. There is nothing wrong in
> using %make_build and %make_install; the spec also correctly uses an
> out-of-root build directory.
>
The new macros works even on EPEL7, you just have to use
%undefine __cmake3_in_source_build
to force out-of-tree builds.
And if you target EPEL7, you should use cmake3 instead of cmake:
BuildRequires: cmake3
[…]
%build
%cmake3 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo -DLIB=%{_lib}
-DXCFUN_PYTHON_INTERFACE=ON -DPYMOD_INSTALL_LIBDIR=../../%{python3_sitearch}
%cmake3_build
%install
%cmake3_install
(it's compatible in Fedora)
> I've added the missing BRs; the package now builds in mock. I have fixed the
> installed tests' permissions.
>
Ok
> > In any case the python bytecode for tests must not be shipped
>
> Please point me to the section of
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/ that
> states that Python bytecode must not be shipped.
I don't know about the guidelines but that's what we do in the macros:
rpm --eval %pytest
\
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-${RPM_LD_FLAGS}}"\
PATH="/home/bob/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.x86_64/usr/bin:$PATH"\
PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH:-/home/bob/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages:/home/bob/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages}"\
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1\
/usr/bin/pytest
I won't block your package for any of this, but please consider it first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961309] Review Request: xcfun - A library of approximate exchange-correlation functionals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961309 --- Comment #3 from Susi Lehtola --- https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/xcfun.spec https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/xcfun-2.1.1-2.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961309] Review Request: xcfun - A library of approximate exchange-correlation functionals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961309 --- Comment #2 from Susi Lehtola --- Yes, I know that the newest Fedoras have dedicated cmake macros. However, they are not available on older distros and EPEL. There is nothing wrong in using %make_build and %make_install; the spec also correctly uses an out-of-root build directory. I've added the missing BRs; the package now builds in mock. I have fixed the installed tests' permissions. > In any case the python bytecode for tests must not be shipped Please point me to the section of https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/ that states that Python bytecode must not be shipped. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963063] Review Request: rust-tokio-rustls - Asynchronous TLS/SSL streams for Tokio using Rustls
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963063 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks! https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34207 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34208 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962626] Review Request: imath - C++ and python library of 2D and 3D vector, matrix, and math operations for computer graphics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962626 --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley --- While I changed my mind about reviewing this (thanks, Robert-André, for picking it up!), I did want to note that adding > %check > %ctest worked for me, so unless there are any platform-dependent issues it’s probably trivially easy to run the tests too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963341] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 --- Comment #2 from Olivier Lemasle --- Thank you for all these reviews Robert-André! https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34203 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962887] Review Request: rust-unsafe-io - Non-owning unsafe I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962887 --- Comment #3 from Olivier Lemasle --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34202 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963063] Review Request: rust-tokio-rustls - Asynchronous TLS/SSL streams for Tokio using Rustls
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963063 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962887] Review Request: rust-unsafe-io - Non-owning unsafe I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962887 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963341] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963340] Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962622] Review Request: rust-cranelift-frontend - Cranelift IR builder helper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962622 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 --- Comment #3 from Olivier Lemasle --- Thanks for the review Robert-André! https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34197 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961355] Review Request: python-markdown-include - Syntax for Python-Markdown to include other Markdown documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961355 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-957e831abf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-957e831abf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963340] Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1963341 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 [Bug 1963341] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1963341 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 [Bug 1963341] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963341] Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1962583, 1963340 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 [Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 [Bug 1963340] Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963341] New: Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963341 Bug ID: 1963341 Summary: Review Request: rust-wasmtime-environ - Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: o.lema...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-wasmtime-environ.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-wasmtime-environ-0.27.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Standalone environment support for WebAsssembly code in Cranelift. Fedora Account System Username: olem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962622] Review Request: rust-cranelift-frontend - Cranelift IR builder helper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962622 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1963340 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 [Bug 1963340] Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963340] Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1962622 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962622 [Bug 1962622] Review Request: rust-cranelift-frontend - Cranelift IR builder helper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963340] New: Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963340 Bug ID: 1963340 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-wasm - Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: o.lema...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-wasm.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-wasm-0.74.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Translator from WebAssembly to Cranelift IR. Fedora Account System Username: olem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961749] Review Request: geompp - Basic geometrical utilities for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961749
--- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley ---
Thanks!
You’re right that the Release field should be of the form O.N%{?dist}. I will
adjust it before importing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 890589] Review Request: csprng - Entropy source using the cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890589 Jiri Hladky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(hladky.jiri@gmail | |.com) | Last Closed||2021-05-22 13:10:46 --- Comment #8 from Jiri Hladky --- H Otto, thanks for the reminder. I don't plan to include the package in Fedora anymore. Let me close the ticket. Thanks Jirka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962574] Review Request: rust-regalloc - Modular register allocation algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962574 --- Comment #4 from Olivier Lemasle --- Thank you for the review! https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34191 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpegxl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 Antonio T. sagitter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Antonio T. sagitter --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961355] Review Request: python-markdown-include - Syntax for Python-Markdown to include other Markdown documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961355 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4de8c3cd6e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4de8c3cd6e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962574] Review Request: rust-regalloc - Modular register allocation algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962574 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpegxl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 --- Comment #16 from Robert-André Mauchin --- My bad, thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpegxl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 --- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/jpegxl.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/jpegxl-0.3.7-1.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962375] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen-meta - Metaprogram for cranelift-codegen code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962375 --- Comment #4 from Olivier Lemasle --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34190 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962375] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen-meta - Metaprogram for cranelift-codegen code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962375 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962372] Review Request: rust-cranelift-bforest - Forest of B+-trees
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962372 --- Comment #4 from Olivier Lemasle --- Thank you Robert-André! https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34189 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961355] Review Request: python-markdown-include - Syntax for Python-Markdown to include other Markdown documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961355 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2ba5ea9da6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2ba5ea9da6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962622] Review Request: rust-cranelift-frontend - Cranelift IR builder helper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962622 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- Package updated: Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-frontend.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-frontend-0.74.0-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962583] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen - Low-level code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962583 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- Package updated: Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-codegen.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-codegen-0.74.0-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962372] Review Request: rust-cranelift-bforest - Forest of B+-trees
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962372 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpegxl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638
--- Comment #14 from Antonio T. sagitter ---
-doc and -devel install the same documentation files:
%files doc
%doc doc/*.md
%doc %{_vpath_builddir}/html <
%license LICENSE
%files libs
%license LICENSE
%{_libdir}/libjxl.so.0*
%{_libdir}/libjxl_threads.so.0*
%dir %{_datadir}/thumbnailers
%{_datadir}/thumbnailers/jxl.thumbnailer
%{_datadir}/mime/packages/image-jxl.xml
%files devel
%doc %{_vpath_builddir}/html <
%doc CONTRIBUTING.md
%{_includedir}/jxl/
%{_libdir}/libjxl.so
%{_libdir}/libjxl_threads.so
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libjxl.pc
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libjxl_threads.pc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962299] Review Request: python-sshpubkeys - OpenSSH public key parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962299
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-sshpubkeys/review-
python-sshpubkeys/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
[Bug 1962375] Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen-meta - Metaprogram for cranelift-codegen code generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962375 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Olivier Lemasle --- Package updated: Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-codegen-meta.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-codegen-meta-0.74.0-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1962372] Review Request: rust-cranelift-bforest - Forest of B+-trees
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962372 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Olivier Lemasle --- Package updated: Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-bforest.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-bforest-0.74.0-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961932] Review Request: rust-virtio-bindings - Rust FFI bindings to virtio generated using bindgen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961932 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpegxl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 --- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/jpegxl.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/jpegxl-0.3.7-1.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpegxl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638
--- Comment #12 from Antonio T. sagitter ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 2621440 bytes in 305 files.
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_documentation
- '%{_datadir}/thumbnailers' is not owned
- Bundled libraries have not version
- + /usr/bin/ctest --output-on-failure --force-new-ctest-process -j8
Test project
/builddir/build/BUILD/jpeg-xl-v0.3.7-9e9bce86164dc4d01c39eeeb3404d6aed85137b2/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
No tests were found!!!
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright*
Apache License 2.0", "zlib/libpng license BSD 3-clause "New" or
"Revised" License", "Expat License Apache License 2.0", "zlib/libpng
license Apache License 2.0", "zlib/libpng license", "BSD 3-clause
"New" or "Revised" License". 170 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/sagitter/1922638-jpegxl/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/thumbnailers
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
[Bug 890589] Review Request: csprng - Entropy source using the cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890589 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(hladky.jiri@gmail ||.com) --- Comment #7 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. If you still want to include this package in Fedora, please clear the needinfo tag and explain how you intend to continue. I can review. Otherwise, just leave the tag in place and this request should be automatically closed in a month. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 835617] Review Request: roundcubemail-plugins-kolab - Kolab plugins for Roundcube
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835617 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(vanmeeuwen+fedora ||@kolabsys.com) --- Comment #7 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. If you still want to include this package in Fedora, please clear the needinfo tag and explain how you intend to continue. I can review. Otherwise, just leave the tag in place and this request should be automatically closed in a month. Links are dead, so the first thing would be to provide new, working ones. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961790] Review Request: ghc-wl-pprint-text - A Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer for Text values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961790
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-wl-pprint-text/review-
ghc-wl-pprint-text/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/wl-pprint-text-1.2.0.1(ghc-wl-
pprint-text-doc), /usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/wl-pprint-
text-1.2.0.1/src(ghc-wl-pprint-text-doc)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(callkalpa@gmail.c ||om) --- Comment #17 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. If you still want to include this package in Fedora, please clear the needinfo tag and explain how you intend to continue. I can review. Otherwise, just leave the tag in place and this request should be automatically closed in a month. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c ||om) --- Comment #30 from Otto Urpelainen --- Bruno, If you still want to include this package in Fedora, please clear the needinfo tag and explain how you intend to continue. The first thing to do is to address comments that have been already give. After that, I can review. If you do not intend to continue, just leave the tag in place and this request should be automatically closed in a month. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961749] Review Request: geompp - Basic geometrical utilities for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961749
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Release:2%{?dist}
Since it's a prerelease, I would start Release at 0.1, 0.2...
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or
later". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
in /home/bob/packaging/review/geompp/review-geompp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has
[Bug 1961542] Review Request: rust-shellwords - Manipulate strings according to the word parsing rules of the UNIX Bourne shell.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961542 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com Summary|rust-shellwords: Manipulate |Review Request: |strings according to the|rust-shellwords - |word parsing rules of the |Manipulate strings |UNIX Bourne shell. |according to the word ||parsing rules of the UNIX ||Bourne shell. --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Please respect the format: Review Request: name - description as it is parsed by the repo request script I believe. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961529] Review Request: rust-tabular: plain text tables in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961529 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1961133] Review Request: alligator - Kirigami-based RSS reader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961133 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Onuralp SEZER from comment #2) > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > > How do we know which licenses apply from the provided ones? > > > > > > *No copyright* Creative Commons CC0 Universal 1.0 Public Domain Dedication > > -- > > alligator-21.05/LICENSES/CC0-1.0.txt > > > > *No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 3 > > > > alligator-21.05/LICENSES/LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL.txt > > > > BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License > > - > > alligator-21.05/LICENSES/BSD-2-Clause.txt > > > > GNU General Public License, Version 2 > > - > > alligator-21.05/LICENSES/GPL-2.0-only.txt > > > > > > The Appdata file specifies GPLv2+ > > > > GPL-2.0-or-later > > > > And Flathub says the same: > > > > License > > GPL-2.0-or-later > > > > > > Please correct the license to match this, and clarify with upstream which > > license files do apply. > > > > > > > As I understand all files has ; > > * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only OR > LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL > > > So that means we can use something like this : > > "License: GPLv2 or GPLv3" Ok I,ll let you fix this before import. Package appproved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
