[Bug 1949058] Review Request: pcm - Processor Counter Monitor

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949058

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-06-05 01:14:25



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-317a06a3a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1961588] Review Request: rust-directories-next - a rust library for retrieving and storing configuration, cache and other data directories

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961588

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-06-05 01:04:02



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-290371673c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bruno.cor...@hpe.com
  Flags|needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c |
   |om) |



--- Comment #31 from Bruno Cornec  ---
Indeed I intend to adapt the specfile so it matches Fedora's requirements, and
will work on it. However, don't expect a quick return as I'm also working on
upstream modifications as well.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774



--- Comment #4 from Major Hayden  ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-fabric.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-fabric-2.6.0-1.fc34.src.rpm

I generated a man page with help2man via a virtualenv and added it to the
package. An auto-generated man page would be nice, but this project isn't
moving terribly quickly lately. 😞


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1968072] New: Review Request: golang-github-vtolstov-ioctl - Golang ioctl wrapper library

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968072

Bug ID: 1968072
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-vtolstov-ioctl - Golang
ioctl wrapper library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: dcava...@fb.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-vtolstov-ioctl/golang-github-vtolstov-ioctl.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-vtolstov-ioctl/golang-github-vtolstov-ioctl-0-0.1.20210604git6be9cce.fc35.src.rpm

Description:

Golang ioctl wrapper library

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774



--- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley  ---
Hmm
 the help2man command works for me. Probably a typo somewhere. If you can’t
get it working, I can offer a spec-file patch or PR after the review is done.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774

Major Hayden  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(mhay...@redhat.co |
   |m)  |



--- Comment #2 from Major Hayden  ---
I'm working on the fixes now, but I couldn't get that help2man/fab stuff to
work.

+ cat
+ chmod +x fab
+ PYTHONPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/fabric-2.6.0
+ help2man --no-info --output fab.1 ./fab
help2man: can't get `--help' info from ./fab
Try `--no-discard-stderr' if option outputs to stderr
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xn69P6 (%build)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967805] Review Request: nodejs-web-ext - This is a command line tool to help build, run, and test WebExtensions.

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967805

Ben Beasley  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Ben Beasley  ---
I see two high-level issues here.

First, this primarily provides the web-ext tool, so per
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Node.js/#_naming_guidelines
this should be called web-ext rather than nodejs-web-ext. This is easily
remedied by changing the name and opening a new review request.

The second problem is more serious: the BR on coffee-script. That package is
orphaned (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coffee-script) and at risk of
retirement. You could adopt it yourself, and I even looked at doing so when it
was first orphaned.

The problem is that CoffeeScript is self-hosting—it is written in
CoffeeScript—so the existing RPM uses the pre-compiled JavaScript
implementation in the source tarball to re-compile CoffeeScript. This kind of
bootstrapping is not generally permissible when it uses a pre-compiled binary,
requiring explicit approval from FPC, and I don’t see why bootstrapping from
pre-compiled JavaScript would be any different. As far as I can tell, no
exception was ever requested or obtained for coffee-script. So—in my
opinion—anyone who adopts the coffee-script package should be prepared to go to
the FPC, explain the situation, and try to get an exception. See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping and
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_general_exception_policy.

It seems like it doesn’t make sense to package this unless the situation with
coffee-script is resolved, since web-ext would very quickly be FTI.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967774] Review Request: python-fabric - High level SSH command execution

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967774

Ben Beasley  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(mhay...@redhat.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #1 from Ben Beasley  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

= Issues =

- This is a patch, so it should be sent upstream, or an issue filed if the
  downstream patch is not upstreamable:

# Pathlib is included in python3, so there's no need to bring in pathlib2,
which
# is currently a dead project.
sed -i 's/, "pathlib2"//' setup.py

  I sent a PR upstream, patching it a little differently so that it still
  worked with Python 2.7. Consider using my PR as a patch, instead, and linking
  it:

# https://github.com/fabric/fabric/pull/2167
Patch0: fabric-2.6.0-conditional-pathlib2.patch

  At least link the PR in a comment above your sed command.

  It looks like upstream is far from active at the moment, and PR’s and issues
  are mostly languishing.

- Same here:

# Upstream is supporting Python 2 + 3 at this time, so they rely on mock.
sed -i 's/from mock/from unittest.mock/' tests/*.py fabric/testing/*.py

  And again, I sent a backwards-compatible PR upstream:

# https://github.com/fabric/fabric/pull/2168
Patch1: fabric-2.6.0-conditional-mock.patch

- Please add

%license LICENSE

  to the %files section.

- The License field says “MIT”, but it should be “BSD”.

- Since you are not using %pyproject_buildrequires, you must add

BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-setuptools

  See
 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GCPGM34ZGEOVUHSBGZTRYR5XKHTIJ3T7/
  and
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reduce_dependencies_on_python3-setuptools.

- You should attempt to run the tests. (It turns out that’s not going to be
  possible right now, but the attempt to do so helped me to find the missing
  dependencies mentioned in the next issue.) Please add:

# Enable if https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949502 /
# https://github.com/bitprophet/pytest-relaxed/issues/12 is # resolved:
%bcond_with tests

%if %{with tests}
# Runtime dependencies, needed for testing
BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-invoke
BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-paramiko
# Extra “pytest” (a superset of extra “testing”)
BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-pytest
# Missing from setup.py (only in requirements-dev.txt), but still needed
for
# testing:
BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-pytest-relaxed
%endif

  and

%check
%if %{with tests}
%pytest
%endif

- Upstream defaults to using copies of six, lexicon, and decorator that are
  vendored by invoke as invoke.vendor.*. Since Fedora correctly removes the
  vendored copies from the python-invoke package, you must support the
  standalone packages in python-fabric.

  First, you must add BR’s (for testing) and (since the standalone dependencies
  are not in setup.py) also explicit Requires for the extra dependencies:

%if %{with tests}
# Runtime dependencies upstream assumed would be vendored with invoke, but
# which we must use standalone
BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-decorator
BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-lexicon
BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-six
%endif

# Runtime dependencies upstream assumed would be vendored with invoke, but
# which we must use standalone
Requires:   python%{python3_pkgversion}-decorator
Requires:   python%{python3_pkgversion}-lexicon
Requires:   python%{python3_pkgversion}-six

  Next, while upstream attempted to support using standalone dependencies (see
  the following changelog entry and also
  https://github.com/fabric/fabric/pull/1745)

- :support:`1745 backported` Wrap any imports of ``invoke.vendor.*`` with
  ``try``/``except`` such that downstream packages which have removed
  ``invoke.vendor`` are still able to function by using stand-alone
  dependencies. Patch courtesy of Othmane Madjoudj.

  the unconditional imports of vendored packages slipped back in. So:

# https://github.com/fabric/fabric/pull/2169
Patch2: fabric-2.6.0-wrap-invoke-vendor.patch

- It would be great if you could build and install the documentation in a -doc
  subpackage. I tried to, and I could get mostly-acceptable-looking
  documentation if I added

# Patch out dependency on “releases” extension
# (https://github.com/bitprophet/releases), which is not currently packaged
sed -r -i '/extensions.append\("releases"\)/d' sites/www/conf.py

  in %prep, but there were still a bunch of broken intersphinx inve

[Bug 990544] Review Request: mangler - VOIP client capable of connecting to Ventrilo 3.x servers

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990544

Palle Ravn  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2021-06-04 19:27:23




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 990544] Review Request: mangler - VOIP client capable of connecting to Ventrilo 3.x servers

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990544

Palle Ravn  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(ravn...@gmail.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #14 from Palle Ravn  ---
(In reply to Otto Urpelainen from comment #13)
> This review request is very old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so,
> I can review, unless Christoper is still interested. If not, please either
> close the issue, or do nothing, in which case automation will close it
> automatically in one month.

I'm sorry, I don't intent to complete this.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1923678] Review Request: openresolv - DNS management framework

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923678

Petr MenĆĄĂ­k  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2021-06-04 15:57:36



--- Comment #12 from Petr MenĆĄĂ­k  ---
Built into rawhide, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openresolv


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1963409] Review Request: golang-gopkg-gorp-1 - Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963409

Davide Cavalca  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
   ||)



--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca  ---
Let me know if I should fix anything else to move this forward. Thanks!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967954] Review Request: ansible-collection-microsoft-sql - The Ansible role to manage Microsoft SQL Server

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967954



--- Comment #5 from Sergei Petrosian  ---
I think reviewers can comment and suggest changes right on the PR linked in
comment#2 instead of doing it here for convenience.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967954] Review Request: ansible-collection-microsoft-sql - The Ansible role to manage Microsoft SQL Server

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967954

Sergei Petrosian  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||nho...@redhat.com,
   ||pcah...@redhat.com,
   ||rmeg...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(pcah...@redhat.co
   ||m)
   ||needinfo?(rmeg...@redhat.co
   ||m)
   ||needinfo?(nho...@redhat.com
   ||)



--- Comment #4 from Sergei Petrosian  ---
Hi Rich, Noriko, Pavel,

Please review the spec file I created for the RPM that will provide the mssql
role. I used the linux-system-roles.spec as a base, I removed most unused code
from it and only kept what is relevant to mssql. In comment#2, you can find a
link to the PR that you can use to view what has been changed in comparison to
linux-system-roles.spec.

Thank you


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967954] Review Request: ansible-collection-microsoft-sql - The Ansible role to manage Microsoft SQL Server

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967954



--- Comment #3 from Sergei Petrosian  ---
The PR that compares this spec file to the linux-system-roles spec file. The PR
is in my personal Git repo, I use it for convenience to track changes made.
https://github.com/spetrosi/sql/pull/2/files


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967954] Review Request: ansible-collection-microsoft-sql - The Ansible role to manage Microsoft SQL Server

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967954



--- Comment #2 from Sergei Petrosian  ---
Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=69301461 

rpmlint output:

[spetrosi@spetrosi ansible-collection-microsoft-sql]$ fedpkg --release f34 lint
Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl
/home/spetrosi/Documents/work/sql/ansible-collection-microsoft-sql/ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.spec:51:
W: macro-in-comment %{archiveurlN}
/home/spetrosi/Documents/work/sql/ansible-collection-microsoft-sql/ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.spec:267:
W: macro-in-comment %files
/home/spetrosi/Documents/work/sql/ansible-collection-microsoft-sql/ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.spec:270:
W: macro-in-comment %dir
/home/spetrosi/Documents/work/sql/ansible-collection-microsoft-sql/ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.spec:287:
W: macro-in-comment %doc
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.src:51: W: macro-in-comment %{archiveurlN}
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.src:267: W: macro-in-comment %files
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.src:270: W: macro-in-comment %dir
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.src:287: W: macro-in-comment %doc
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/microsoft/sql/tests/server/.fmf
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/microsoft/sql/tests/server/.fmf
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/microsoft/sql-server/tests/.fmf
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/microsoft/sql-server/tests/.fmf
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql-collection-artifact.noarch: W: spelling-error
%description -l en_US gz -> g, z, gs
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql-collection-artifact.noarch: E:
description-line-too-long C Collection artifact for
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql. This package contains
microsoft-sql-0.0.1.tar.gz
ansible-collection-microsoft-sql-collection-artifact.noarch: W:
no-documentation
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 14 warnings.
Could not execute lint: Failed to execute command.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967954] Review Request: ansible-collection-microsoft-sql - The Ansible role to manage Microsoft SQL Server

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967954

Sergei Petrosian  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Comment|0   |updated



--- Comment #0 has been edited ---

Created attachment 1788988
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1788988&action=edit
spec file

Created attachment 1788988 [details]
spec file

Spec URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1788988
SRPM URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1788989
Description: The package that provides the Ansible role for Microsoft SQL
Server management in the collection format within the microsoft.sql collection
and in the legacy format in `microsoft/sql-server`.
Fedora Account System Username: spetros

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967954] Review Request: ansible-collection-microsoft-sql - The Ansible role to manage Microsoft SQL Server

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967954



--- Comment #1 from Sergei Petrosian  ---
Created attachment 1788989
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1788989&action=edit
srpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967954] New: Review Request: ansible-collection-microsoft-sql - The Ansible role to manage Microsoft SQL Server

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967954

Bug ID: 1967954
   Summary: Review Request: ansible-collection-microsoft-sql - The
Ansible role to manage Microsoft SQL Server
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: spetr...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Created attachment 1788988
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1788988&action=edit
spec file

Spec URL: 
SRPM URL: 
Description: The package that provides the Ansible role for Microsoft SQL
Server management in the collection format within the microsoft.sql collection
and in the legacy format in `microsoft/sql-server`.
Fedora Account System Username: spetros


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1966766] Review Request: python-toml-adapt - Adapt toml files

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966766

Iztok Fister Jr.  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(iztok@iztok-jr-fi |
   |ster.eu)|



--- Comment #2 from Iztok Fister Jr.  ---
Dear Ben,

many thanks for your quick review. I have already corrected my initial version.
Revision is Online:

SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/firefly-cpp/rpm-toml-adapt/main/python-toml-adapt.spec

SRPMS:
https://github.com/firefly-cpp/rpm-toml-adapt/raw/main/python-toml-adapt-0.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm

Note:
In fact, I am the upstream of this package too. Currently, software is far to
be completed. My mission is to develop
a simple tool for manipulating toml files, so that I can have it as BR and use
it in SPEC. In order to conduct serious
tests, I need to have it in rawhide.

Therefore, I would be extremely happy to have you as a contributor of a basic
man page. You can submit a PR on my GitHub repo
and I add then man page in package later.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1967876] New: Review Request: perl-Statistics-ChiSquare - How well-distributed is your data?

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967876

Bug ID: 1967876
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Statistics-ChiSquare - How
well-distributed is your data?
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: p...@city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Statistics-ChiSquare/branches/fedora/perl-Statistics-ChiSquare.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Statistics-ChiSquare/perl-Statistics-ChiSquare-1.-1.fc35.src.rpm

Description:
Suppose you flip a coin 100 times, and it turns up heads 70 times. Is the coin
fair? Suppose you roll a die 100 times, and it shows 30 sixes. Is the die
loaded?

In statistics, the chi-square test calculates how well a series of numbers fits
a distribution. In this module, we only test for whether results fit an even
distribution. It doesn't simply say "yes" or "no". Instead, it gives you a
confidence interval, which sets upper and lower bounds on the likelihood that
the variation in your data is due to chance.

Fedora Account System Username: pghmcfc

This is a new test dependency of perl-Crypt-Random.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1951479] Review Request: perl-CLI-Osprey - MooX::Options + MooX::Cmd + Sanity

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951479

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-CLI-Osprey-0.08-1.fc35
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:34:56




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1490670] Review Request: evopop-icon-theme - Icon theme with some inspiration from Google Material Design

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490670

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:29:21



--- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga  ---
Package imported and later retired, closing.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1490455] Review Request: evopop-gtk-theme - Modern Desktop Theme Suite

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490455

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:28:22



--- Comment #5 from Mattia Verga  ---
Package imported and later retired, closing.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1489178] Review Request: moka-icon-theme - Simple and modern icon theme with material design influences

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489178

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:26:58



--- Comment #7 from Mattia Verga  ---
Package imported and in Fedora repos, closing.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1479967] Review Request: fritzing-parts - Parts library for the Fritzing electronic design application

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479967

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:24:46



--- Comment #11 from Mattia Verga  ---
Package imported and later retired, closing.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1470702] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sitemap

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470702

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|NEW
 CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com
   Assignee|zebo...@gmail.com   |nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|fedora-review+  |needinfo?(fzatlouk@redhat.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #5 from Mattia Verga  ---
This package was never imported.
I'm going to reset ticket status as it will need an updated review (releng
script refuses approval flags older than 6 weeks).
I'm also setting NEEDINFO on the submitter, since they probably need to update
the specfile (if they still want to continue the package submission).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1431855] Review Request: python-debrepo - Inspect and compare Debian repositories

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431855

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:14:30



--- Comment #8 from Mattia Verga  ---
Closing, since the package was imported and it's in Fedora repos.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 673096] Review Request: bamf-qt - Qt bindings and QML plugin for Bamf DBus server

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673096

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||bamf-qt-0.2.3-1.fc17
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
  Flags|needinfo?(jrez...@redhat.co |
   |m)  |
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:11:20




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1346249] Review Request: resultsdb - Results store for automated tasks

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346249

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||resultsdb-2.0.2-1.fc24
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:09:26




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1082660] Review Request: mahout-collections - Primitive-type collections based on CERN's Colt Java API

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082660
Bug 1082660 depends on bug 1082552, which changed state.

Bug 1082552 Summary: Review Request: mahout-collection-codegen-plugin - Maven 
Mojo to generate code for Mahout Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082552

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1000416] Review Request: mahout-collections - Primitive-type collections based on CERN's Colt Java API

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000416
Bug 1000416 depends on bug 1082552, which changed state.

Bug 1082552 Summary: Review Request: mahout-collection-codegen-plugin - Maven 
Mojo to generate code for Mahout Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082552

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1082552] Review Request: mahout-collection-codegen-plugin - Maven Mojo to generate code for Mahout Collections

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082552

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||mahout-collection-codegen-p
   ||lugin-1.0-1.fc21
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2021-06-04 08:07:36




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1965111] Review Request: SFCGAL - C++ wrapper library around CGAL for PostGIS

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965111



--- Comment #18 from Laurent Rineau  ---
Indeed: I had planned to do that review, but then Robert-André took over with
such an efficiency!

Paul, I can still be co-maintainer if you wish. SFCGAL has been a concern for
the CGAL project for a while, because its code has been using undocumented code
from CGAL, that kept changing (because CGAL project does not try to ensure any
backward-compatibility for undocumented code). See the long list of issues
related to CGAL:
https://gitlab.com/Oslandia/SFCGAL/-/issues?scope=all&utf8=%E2%9C%93&state=all&search=%22CGAL%22


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1441399] Review Request: js-jquery2 - JavaScript DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX library

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441399

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-06-04 07:27:09



--- Comment #7 from Mattia Verga  ---
Closing ticket, since the package was imported (and later retired).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
   Assignee|and...@topdog.za.net|nob...@fedoraproject.org
 Whiteboard||FE-DEADREVIEW
  Flags|fedora-review+  |
Last Closed||2021-06-04 07:17:50



--- Comment #10 from Mattia Verga  ---
Package was never imported.
Since the original submitter cleared the NEEDINFO flag without reply several
years ago, I'm going to close the ticket as DEADREVIEW.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1055500] Review Request: libgssh - Friendly GIO wrapper for libssh

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055500

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
  Flags|needinfo?(puiterwijk@redhat |
   |.com)   |
Last Closed|2016-07-20 15:31:10 |2021-06-04 07:12:50



--- Comment #13 from Mattia Verga  ---
This ticket was never closed. Package was imported and later retired, so I'm
going to close this.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1200672] Review Request: python-keystoneclient-kerberos - Kerberos authentication for the OpenStack clients

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200672

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ayo...@redhat.com



--- Comment #12 from Mattia Verga  ---
*** Bug 1148175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1148175] Review Request: python-keystoneclient-kerberos - Kerberos plugin for the Openstack Keystone client

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148175

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
  Flags|needinfo?(ayo...@redhat.com |
   |)   |
Last Closed||2021-06-04 07:06:56



--- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga  ---
Closing as dupe of 1200672

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1200672 ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


needinfo canceled: [Bug 1148175] Review Request: python-keystoneclient-kerberos - Kerberos plugin for the Openstack Keystone client

2021-06-04 Thread bugzilla


Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review

Mattia Verga  has canceled Package Review
's request for Adam Young
's needinfo:
Bug 1148175: Review Request: python-keystoneclient-kerberos - Kerberos plugin
for the Openstack Keystone client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148175



--- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga  ---
Closing as dupe of 1200672

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1200672 ***
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure