[Bug 1973950] Review Request: ghc-GLURaw - A raw binding for the OpenGL graphics system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973950 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- Thank you for the review, Robert-André https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35355 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971411] Review Request: rust-matrixcompare-mock - Internal mock data structures for testing of matrixcompare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971411 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-65b7ae2266 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-65b7ae2266 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971428] Review Request: rust-genmesh - A package for generating 3D meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971428 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4efd861c50 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4efd861c50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971415] Review Request: rust-sapp-kms - Part of miniquad rendering library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971415 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-28 01:31:09 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e02d9d5642 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1966385] Review Request: rust-oxipng - Oxipng is a multithreaded lossless PNG compression optimizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966385 Bug 1966385 depends on bug 1966386, which changed state. Bug 1966386 Summary: Review Request: rust-cloudflare-zlib - Safe wrapper for Cloudflare's optimized zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966386 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1966386] Review Request: rust-cloudflare-zlib - Safe wrapper for Cloudflare's optimized zlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966386 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-28 01:31:06 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-78725a08e6 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971428] Review Request: rust-genmesh - A package for generating 3D meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971428 Bug 1971428 depends on bug 1971418, which changed state. Bug 1971418 Summary: Review Request: rust-cgmath - linear algebra and mathematics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971418 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971418] Review Request: rust-cgmath - linear algebra and mathematics library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-28 01:30:57 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6677cddc4b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971424] Review Request: rust-clipboard - a library for getting and setting the contents of the clipboard.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971424 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-28 01:30:52 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-7e4c90c212 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1928694] Review Request: python-cffsubr - Standalone CFF subroutinizer based on the AFDKO tx tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928694 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-090ded929a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-090ded929a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-090ded929a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1972445] Review Request: servus - Zeroconf discovery in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972445
--- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
> > > %{_libdir}/*.so.*
> >
> > Globbing all shared objects like this SHOULD NOT be done. At least the major
> > version number should be fixed, so that ABI breaks are noticed on updates.
> > So do %{_libdir}/libSerevus.so.6* etc. instead.
> >
> > Reference:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> > #_listing_shared_library_files
> >
> I tried to fix it, but I noticed the upstream project has broken versioning,
> i.e.:
> libServus.so.1.6.0
> libServus.so.6
>
> I.e. its SONAME is libServus.so.6, ABI version 6, but library version is
> 1.6.0. It's strange, I will report upstream. I think we shouldn't package it
> until clarified what's the correct version is.
>
Upstream ticket: https://github.com/HBPVIS/Servus/issues/105
I think I could rename it to the libServus.6.0.0 (according to the SONAME).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1972445] Review Request: servus - Zeroconf discovery in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972445 --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/servus/servus.spec SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/servus/servus-1.5.2-2.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1972445] Review Request: servus - Zeroconf discovery in C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972445
--- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Otto Urpelainen from comment #1)
Guys, thanks for review.
> > For the bundling probably FESCO exception will be needed.
>
> Not anymore, nowadays the packager can decide to leave bundled dependencies
> in if upstream does not support using system libraries instead.
>
> ---
>
> I would have taken this if Rafael did not beat me to it. Anyhow, I did a
> complete review, here are my findings:
>
> > License: LGPLv3 and RSA
>
> Since this is a multiple licensing situation, the specfile must contain a
> comment explaining the license breakdown.
>
> Reference:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> LicensingGuidelines/#_multiple_licensing_scenarios
>
Hopefully fixed.
> > Provides: bundled(eyescale-cmake-common)
>
> This is a build time only dependency, right? I wonder if the policy for
> bundled dependencies applies as-is to such case. Certainly the objective of
> flagging the bundling is achieved, I just wonder if it would be useful to
> also flag that it is a build time thing. Should we ask in the devel list
> about this? Reference:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling
>
I understand it as it is used to easily find packages which are affected by
security bug in the bundled code. It's unlikely the cmake macros could
introduce some runtime security bug, but I think it should be noted there. I am
trying to convince upstream to allow building with the system cmake macros. In
such case I will package the macros to standalone package.
> > %package doc
>
> Is the doc subpackage needed? Currently, there are no %files entry for it,
> and it seems that (probably because of that) there is no rpm for the
> subpackage either. And all the docs go to the main package — which is fine,
> since there is not a lot of them. You could just remove the doc subpackage
> from the specfile.
>
> Reference:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation
>
Ups, sorry, I was trying to build some doxygen docs, scratched the idea later,
but forgot to remove the subpackage :)
> > #%%license COPYING
>
> This must be fixed. LGPLv3 requires distributing the full license text with
> each copy, so it must be included in the rpm.
> Licensing guidelines allow you to add it, if you have contacted upstream,
> which you have done. So either wait for upstream response, or add the
> correct license files. According to gnu.org, the standard way would be to
> add COPYING and COPYING.LESSER with GPLv3 and LGPLv3 texts:
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
>
> Reference:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
>
Hopefully fixed.
> > %{_libdir}/*.so.*
>
> Globbing all shared objects like this SHOULD NOT be done. At least the major
> version number should be fixed, so that ABI breaks are noticed on updates.
> So do %{_libdir}/libSerevus.so.6* etc. instead.
>
> Reference:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> #_listing_shared_library_files
>
I tried to fix it, but I noticed the upstream project has broken versioning,
i.e.:
libServus.so.1.6.0
libServus.so.6
I.e. its SONAME is libServus.so.6, ABI version 6, but library version is 1.6.0.
It's strange, I will report upstream. I think we shouldn't package it until
clarified what's the correct version is.
> > servusBrowser
>
> This is a gui application, so it needs to have a desktop file.
>
> Reference:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_desktop_files
>
> Strangely, the review guidelines also allow to put a comment in specfile
> explaining why a desktop file is not needed. I cannot find any basis for
> that from the Packaging Guidelines.
I tried to fix it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976483] Review Request: python-build - A simple, correct PEP517 package builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976483
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Please fix 1-2-3 above and consider the package pre-APPROVED.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Expat License".
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines (except %python_provide)
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python: SHOULD NOT use
%python_provide
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and
[Bug 1976483] Review Request: python-build - A simple, correct PEP517 package builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976483 --- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok --- I was checking what happened that your copr build passed and my mock build did not. Apparently, I had some extra packages installed in mock from the jupyter-packaging revew, Fedora-Review did not clean that mock and it made the build fail like this :( Weird as it is, it passed now when I cleaned my mock, sorry for the noise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976483] Review Request: python-build - A simple, correct PEP517 package builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976483
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
I've got a test failures when building via mock:
+ /usr/bin/pytest --ignore
/builddir/build/BUILD/build-0.5.1/.pyproject-builddir -k 'not
test_build_package and not test_build_package_via_sdist'
= test session starts
==
platform linux -- Python 3.10.0b3, pytest-6.2.4, py-1.10.0, pluggy-0.13.1
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/build-0.5.1, configfile: setup.cfg
plugins: virtualenv-1.7.0, cov-2.11.1, shutil-1.7.0, mock-3.5.1, forked-1.3.0,
xdist-2.3.0, rerunfailures-9.1.1
collected 122 items / 4 deselected / 118 selected
tests/test_env.py ..sF. [ 14%]
tests/test_main.py [ 31%]
tests/test_module.py . [ 32%]
tests/test_projectbuilder.py ... [ 68%]
.. [ 73%]
tests/test_integration.py sss[100%]
=== FAILURES
===
test_executable_missing_post_creation
_
mocker =
@pytest.mark.skipif(IS_PY2, reason='venv module used on Python 3 only')
@pytest.mark.skipif(IS_PYPY3, reason='PyPy3 uses get path to create and
provision venv')
def test_executable_missing_post_creation(mocker):
mocker.patch.object(build.env, 'virtualenv', None)
original_get_paths = sysconfig.get_paths
def _get_paths(vars): # noqa
shutil.rmtree(vars['base'])
return original_get_paths(vars=vars)
get_paths = mocker.patch('sysconfig.get_paths', side_effect=_get_paths)
with pytest.raises(RuntimeError, match='Virtual environment creation
failed, executable .* missing'):
> with build.env.IsolatedEnvBuilder():
tests/test_env.py:77:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
../../BUILDROOT/python-build-0.5.1-1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/build/env.py:90:
in __enter__
executable, scripts_dir = _create_isolated_env_virtualenv(self._path)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
path = '/tmp/build-env-nrfb_6k7'
def _create_isolated_env_virtualenv(path): # type: (str) -> Tuple[str,
str]
"""
On Python 2 we use the virtualenv package to provision a virtual
environment.
:param path: The path where to create the isolated build environment
:return: The Python executable and script folder
"""
cmd = [str(path), '--no-setuptools', '--no-wheel', '--activators', '']
> result = virtualenv.cli_run(cmd, setup_logging=False)
E AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'cli_run'
../../BUILDROOT/python-build-0.5.1-1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/build/env.py:182:
AttributeError
___ test_pip_needs_upgrade_mac_os_11[x86_64-20.2.0]
mocker =
pip_version = '20.2.0', arch = 'x86_64'
@pytest.mark.isolated
@pytest.mark.parametrize('pip_version', ['20.2.0', '20.3.0', '21.0.0',
'21.0.1'])
@pytest.mark.parametrize('arch', ['x86_64', 'arm64'])
@pytest.mark.skipif(IS_PY35, reason="Python 3.5 does not run on macOS 11,
and pip can't upgrade to 21 there")
@pytest.mark.skipif(IS_PY2, reason='venv module used on Python 3 only')
def test_pip_needs_upgrade_mac_os_11(mocker, pip_version, arch):
SimpleNamespace = collections.namedtuple('SimpleNamespace', 'version')
check_call = mocker.patch('subprocess.check_call')
mocker.patch('platform.system', return_value='Darwin')
mocker.patch('platform.machine', return_value=arch)
mocker.patch('platform.mac_ver', return_value=('11.0', ('', '', ''),
''))
mocker.patch('build.env.metadata.distributions',
return_value=(SimpleNamespace(version=pip_version),))
mocker.patch.object(build.env, 'virtualenv', None) # hide virtualenv
min_version = Version('20.3' if arch == 'x86_64' else '21.0.1')
> with build.env.IsolatedEnvBuilder():
tests/test_env.py:131:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
../../BUILDROOT/python-build-0.5.1-1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/build/env.py:90:
in __enter__
executable, scripts_dir = _create_isolated_env_virtualenv(self._path)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
path = '/tmp/build-env-ksdtb14z'
def _create_isolated_env_virtualenv(path): # type: (str) -> Tuple[str,
str]
"""
On Python 2 we use the virtualenv package to provision a virtual
environment.
:param path: The path where to create the isolated build environment
:return: The Python executable and
[Bug 1976483] Review Request: python-build - A simple, correct PEP517 package builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976483 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok --- Oh, one more thing. 3) Please move %generate_buildrequires after %prep, when it happens. It makes the reader flow follow to the execution flow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976483] Review Request: python-build - A simple, correct PEP517 package builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976483
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec sanity:
1) Consider using and URL that contains name:
Source0:%{url}/archive/%{version}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.tar.gz
It plays much nicer with other tarballs when %_sourcedir is a common location
on packager's machine.
2) %{?python_provide:...} is deprecated and SHOULD NOT be used, see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_the_py_provides_macro
Other than that, looks sane.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976645] Review Request: rust-field-offset - Safe pointer-to-member implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976645 Rémi Lauzier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||remilauz...@protonmail.com Blocks||1974996 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974996 [Bug 1974996] rust-gtk-0.14.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976645] New: Review Request: rust-field-offset - Safe pointer-to-member implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976645 Bug ID: 1976645 Summary: Review Request: rust-field-offset - Safe pointer-to-member implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: remilauz...@protonmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/remilauzier/gtk/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02305656-rust-field-offset/rust-field-offset.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/remilauzier/gtk/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02305656-rust-field-offset/rust-field-offset-0.3.4-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Safe pointer-to-member implementation Fedora Account System Username: remilauzier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976640] Review Request: python-lfpykit - Electrostatic models for multicompartment neuron models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976640 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1950305, 1276941 ||(fedora-neuro) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950305 [Bug 1950305] python-lfpy: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976640] New: Review Request: python-lfpykit - Electrostatic models for multicompartment neuron models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976640 Bug ID: 1976640 Summary: Review Request: python-lfpykit - Electrostatic models for multicompartment neuron models Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-lfpykit/python-lfpykit.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-lfpykit/python-lfpykit-0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: This Python module contain freestanding implementations of electrostatic forward models incorporated in LFPy (https://github.com/LFPy/LFPy, https://LFPy.readthedocs.io). The aim of the LFPykit module is to provide electrostatic models in a manner that facilitates forward-model predictions of extracellular potentials and related measures from multicompartment neuron models, but without explicit dependencies on neural simulation software such as NEURON (https://neuron.yale.edu, https://github.com/neuronsimulator/nrn), Arbor (https://arbor.readthedocs.io, https://github.com/arbor-sim/arbor), or even LFPy. The LFPykit module can then be more easily incorporated with these simulators, or in various projects that utilize them such as LFPy (https://LFPy.rtfd.io, https://github.com/LFPy/LFPy). BMTK (https://alleninstitute.github.io/bmtk/, https://github.com/AllenInstitute/bmtk), etc. Its main functionality is providing class methods that return two-dimensional linear transformation matrices M between transmembrane currents I of multicompartment neuron models and some measurement Y given by Y=MI. The presently incorporated volume conductor models have been incorporated in LFPy (https://LFPy.rtfd.io, https://github.com/LFPy/LFPy), as described in various papers and books: - Linden H, Hagen E, Leski S, Norheim ES, Pettersen KH, Einevoll GT (2014) LFPy: a tool for biophysical simulation of extracellular potentials generated by detailed model neurons. Front. Neuroinform. 7:41. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00041 - Hagen E, Næss S, Ness TV and Einevoll GT (2018) Multimodal Modeling of Neural Network Activity: Computing LFP, ECoG, EEG, and MEG Signals With LFPy 2.0. Front. Neuroinform. 12:92. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00092 - Ness, T. V., Chintaluri, C., Potworowski, J., Leski, S., Glabska, H., Wójcik, D. K., et al. (2015). Modelling and analysis of electrical potentials recorded in microelectrode arrays (MEAs). Neuroinformatics 13:403–426. doi: 10.1007/s12021-015-9265-6 - Nunez and Srinivasan, Oxford University Press, 2006 - Næss S, Chintaluri C, Ness TV, Dale AM, Einevoll GT and Wójcik DK (2017). Corrected Four-sphere Head Model for EEG Signals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:490. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00490 Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973974] Review Request: golang-github-hexdigest-gowrap - GoWrap is a command line tool for generating decorators for Go interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973974 --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-hexdigest-gowrap 1973974 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35352 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973975] Review Request: golang-github-gojuno-minimock - Powerful mock generation tool for Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973975 --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-gojuno-minimock 1973975 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35351 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973975] Review Request: golang-github-gojuno-minimock - Powerful mock generation tool for Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973975 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Bump to 3.0.9 - License ok - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973974] Review Request: golang-github-hexdigest-gowrap - GoWrap is a command line tool for generating decorators for Go interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973974 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973969] Review Request: golang-github-ziutek-telnet - Package to handle a telnet connection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973969 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-ziutek-telnet 1973969 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35350 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973971] Review Request: golang-github-twitchtv-twirp - A simple RPC framework with protobuf service definitions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973971 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-twitchtv-twirp 1973971 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35349 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973971] Review Request: golang-github-twitchtv-twirp - A simple RPC framework with protobuf service definitions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973971 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1187030] Review Request: giza - scientific plotting library for C/Fortran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed|2015-10-26 09:48:41 |2021-06-27 16:29:28 --- Comment #24 from Mattia Verga --- Very well, so I'm going to close this ticket. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973969] Review Request: golang-github-ziutek-telnet - Package to handle a telnet connection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973969 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973950] Review Request: ghc-GLURaw - A raw binding for the OpenGL graphics system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973950
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-GLURaw/review-ghc-
GLURaw/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file
[Bug 1973929] Review Request: golang-pack-tftp - Go TFTP library with full standards support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973929 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-pack-tftp 1973929 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35347 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973929] Review Request: golang-pack-tftp - Go TFTP library with full standards support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973929 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973928] Review Request: golang-github-rck-unit - Golang unit package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973928 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-rck-unit 1973928 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35346 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973927] Review Request: golang-github-rekby-gpt - Library for direct work with GPT table
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973927 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-rekby-gpt 1973927 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35345 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973926] Review Request: golang-github-intel-cpuid - Intel CPUID library for Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973926 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-intel-cpuid 1973926 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35344 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973924] Review Request: golang-github-u-root-iscsinl - Go iSCSI initiator netlink library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973924 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-u-root-iscsinl 1973924 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35343 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973922] Review Request: golang-github-facebookincubator-dhcplb - Facebook's implementation of a load balancer for DHCP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973922 --- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-facebookincubator-dhcplb 1973922 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35342 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973928] Review Request: golang-github-rck-unit - Golang unit package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973928 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973927] Review Request: golang-github-rekby-gpt - Library for direct work with GPT table
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973927 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1956580] Review Request: alchemyquest - Reflection game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956580 --- Comment #5 from Dennis Payne --- Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/dulsi/alchemyquest/-/raw/master/alchemyquest.spec SRPM URL: http://identicalsoftware.com/alchemyquest/alchemyquest-0.5.2-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973926] Review Request: golang-github-intel-cpuid - Intel CPUID library for Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973926 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973924] Review Request: golang-github-u-root-iscsinl - Go iSCSI initiator netlink library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973924 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973922] Review Request: golang-github-facebookincubator-dhcplb - Facebook's implementation of a load balancer for DHCP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973922 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973921] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-ensure - Ensure the given conditions are met and Fatal if they aren't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973921 --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-facebookgo-ensure 1973921 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35341 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973921] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-ensure - Ensure the given conditions are met and Fatal if they aren't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973921 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Fix this typo: golang-github-facebookgo-ensure.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US satisified -> satisfied, sissified, satiated - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973916] Review Request: golang-github-insomniacslk-dhcp - DHCPv6 and DHCPv4 packet library, client and server written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973916 --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-insomniacslk-dhcp 1973916 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35340 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973922] Review Request: golang-github-facebookincubator-dhcplb - Facebook's implementation of a load balancer for DHCP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973922 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Wrong tab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973916] Review Request: golang-github-insomniacslk-dhcp - DHCPv6 and DHCPv4 packet library, client and server written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973916 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973922] Review Request: golang-github-facebookincubator-dhcplb - Facebook's implementation of a load balancer for DHCP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973922 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973918] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-stack - Utilities to capture and pass around stack traces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973918 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-facebookgo-stack 1973918 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35339 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973920] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-subset - A library to check if a value is a subset of another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973920 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-facebookgo-subset 1973920 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35338 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973914] Review Request: golang-github-u-root-uio - Golang package for breaking up circular dependencies in u-root
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973914 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-u-root-uio 1973914 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35337 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973915] Review Request: golang-github-fanliao-promise - A library to implement future and promise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973915 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-fanliao-promise 1973915 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35336 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973918] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-stack - Utilities to capture and pass around stack traces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973918 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973920] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-subset - A library to check if a value is a subset of another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973920 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973914] Review Request: golang-github-u-root-uio - Golang package for breaking up circular dependencies in u-root
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973914 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973915] Review Request: golang-github-fanliao-promise - A library to implement future and promise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973915 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973844] Review Request: rust-ambient-authority - Ambient Authority
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973844 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973801] Review Request: rust-boxfnonce - Safe FnOnce boxing for rust stable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973801 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo rust-boxfnonce 1973801 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35335 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973794] Review Request: rust-counted-array - Macro for declaring fixed-size arrays without counting elements by hand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973794 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo rust-counted-array 1973794 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35334 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973801] Review Request: rust-boxfnonce - Safe FnOnce boxing for rust stable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973801 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973711] Review Request: golang-github-facebookincubator-ptp - Facebook's PTP libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973711 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-facebookincubator-ptp 1973711 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35333 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973794] Review Request: rust-counted-array - Macro for declaring fixed-size arrays without counting elements by hand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973794 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- # Bump lazy_static to 1.4.0 - Send a PR upstream for this and link it in the SPEC - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973711] Review Request: golang-github-facebookincubator-ptp - Facebook's PTP libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973711 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - If you want to ship these files, you must rename them in %prep in order to not overwrite the main README.md: ptp4u/README.md simpleclient/README.md - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1187030] Review Request: giza - scientific plotting library for C/Fortran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030 Joachim Frieben changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jfrieben@hotmail. | |com)| --- Comment #23 from Joachim Frieben --- (In reply to Mattia Verga from comment #22) I am currently providing a package via the COPR repository which I do keep up-to-date with respect to upstream. Thus, Fedora users interested in using giza can just download it from that place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974151] Review Request: golang-github-facebookincubator-contest - Run continuous and on-demand system testing for real and virtual hardware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974151 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-facebookincubator-contest 1974151 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35332 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974148] Review Request: golang-github-xaionaro-metrics - An implementation of fast metrics for high-load-ed services on Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974148 --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-xaionaro-metrics 1974148 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35331 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973778] Review Request: golang-github-trafficstars-metrics - An implementation of fast metrics for high-load-ed services on Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973778 --- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-trafficstars-metrics 1973778 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35330 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973762] Review Request: golang-github-xaionaro-atomicmap - High performance thread-safe implementation of hash map for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973762 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-xaionaro-atomicmap 1973762 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35329 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973706] Review Request: golang-github-pressly-goose - Goose database migration tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973706 --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-pressly-goose 1973706 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35328 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973702] Review Request: golang-github-clickhouse - Golang driver for ClickHouse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973702 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-clickhouse 1973702 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35327 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974151] Review Request: golang-github-facebookincubator-contest - Run continuous and on-demand system testing for real and virtual hardware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974151 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973695] Review Request: golang-github-datadog-golz4 - Golang interface to LZ4 compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973695 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-datadog-golz4 1973695 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35326 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973520] Review Request: golang-github-chappjc-logrus-prefix - Logrus Prefixed Log Formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973520 --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-chappjc-logrus-prefix 1973520 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35325 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973519] Review Request: golang-github-x-cray-logrus-prefixed-formatter - Logrus Prefixed Log Formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973519 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-x-cray-logrus-prefixed-formatter 1973519 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35324 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974148] Review Request: golang-github-xaionaro-metrics - An implementation of fast metrics for high-load-ed services on Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974148 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973778] Review Request: golang-github-trafficstars-metrics - An implementation of fast metrics for high-load-ed services on Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973778 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973762] Review Request: golang-github-xaionaro-atomicmap - High performance thread-safe implementation of hash map for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973762 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973706] Review Request: golang-github-pressly-goose - Goose database migration tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973706 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Remove the precompiled goose binary in examples/go-migrations/ in %prep - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973702] Review Request: golang-github-clickhouse - Golang driver for ClickHouse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973702 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- > Also include BSD in the License: list and add a comment explaining the > license breakdown. Sorry you've already done that, just add the license breakdown in a comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973702] Review Request: golang-github-clickhouse - Golang driver for ClickHouse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973702 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - lib/lz4/LICENSE is overwritting LICENSE, you should rename it to LICENSE-lz4 in %prep. Also include BSD in the License: list and add a comment explaining the license breakdown. lib/protocol/README.md is overwriting README.md just the same. Don't include it as it is mostly empty. %global golicenses LICENSE lib/lz4/LICENSE %global godocs examples CONTRIBUTING.md README.md\\\ lib/protocol/README.md - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973695] Review Request: golang-github-datadog-golz4 - Golang interface to LZ4 compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973695
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- You also need to Requires the lz4-devel:
%global godevelheader %{expand:
Requires: lz4-devel
}
otherwise dependent packages won't be able to be built.
- License ok
- Latest version packaged
- Builds in mock
- No rpmlint errors
- Conforms to Packaging Guidelines
Package approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973520] Review Request: golang-github-chappjc-logrus-prefix - Logrus Prefixed Log Formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973520 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973519] Review Request: golang-github-x-cray-logrus-prefixed-formatter - Logrus Prefixed Log Formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973519 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953340] Review Request: dovecot-fts-xapian - Xapian plugin for Dovecot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Sorry I seem to have missed this bug in my mail. Don't hesitate to use Needinfo in this casd. The package is approved. However you still nedd to find a sponsor to be aloozed into the packager group, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1846749] Review Request: rubygem-rotp - A Ruby library for generating and verifying one time passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846749 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flags|needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com |needinfo?(patilsuraj767@gma |) |il.com) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1846749] Review Request: rubygem-rotp - A Ruby library for generating and verifying one time passwords
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Robert-André Mauchin has canceled Package Review 's request for Robert-André Mauchin 's needinfo: Bug 1846749: Review Request: rubygem-rotp - A Ruby library for generating and verifying one time passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846749 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1910392] Review Request: python-build - Simple, correct PEP517 package builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910392 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed|2021-02-27 00:45:28 |2021-06-27 09:44:16 --- Comment #13 from Lumír Balhar --- Thanks, Miro! My review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976483 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1976483 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976483] Review Request: python-build - A simple, correct PEP517 package builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976483 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1893382, 1905174 CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch --- Comment #1 from Lumír Balhar --- *** Bug 1910392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893382 [Bug 1893382] python-check-manifest-0.46 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905174 [Bug 1905174] F34FailsToInstall: python3-check-manifest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1928694] Review Request: python-cffsubr - Standalone CFF subroutinizer based on the AFDKO tx tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928694 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-090ded929a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-090ded929a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
