[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a17f963ef3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a17f963ef3 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6acb7e859a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-6acb7e859a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6acb7e859a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1990685] Review Request: cpp-httplib - A C++11 single-file header-only cross platform HTTP/HTTPS library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990685 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a9bbf37e6d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-a9bbf37e6d \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a9bbf37e6d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982286] Review Request: golang-github-path-network-mmproxy - Golang implementation of MMProxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982286 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4aba8cab9b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4aba8cab9b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4aba8cab9b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1517451] Review Request: gnome-internet-radio-locator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517451 --- Comment #29 from o...@gnome.org --- Spec URL: http://people.gnome.org/~ole/fedora/SPECS/gnome-internet-radio-locator.spec SRPM URL: http://people.gnome.org/~ole/fedora/SRPMS/gnome-internet-radio-locator-12.0.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Locate and stream Internet Radio stations from graphical, zoomable map Fedora Account System Username: oka I have built RPM packages for fc34 x86_64: http://people.gnome.org/~ole/fedora/RPMS/x86_64/gnome-internet-radio-locator-12.0.1-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm http://people.gnome.org/~ole/fedora/SRPMS/gnome-internet-radio-locator-12.0.1-1.fc34.src.rpm I have not yet released 12.1.0 upstream, but I plan to release it as soon as I get feedback on the RPMS. gnome-radio 0.1.0 is in fc35, while gnome-internet-radio-locator 12.0.1 is not part of rawhide and fc35. See http://www.gnomeradio.org/~ole/GUADEC2021.pdf for the latest information about GNOME Radio. Best, Ole -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6f1cdf34bf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6f1cdf34bf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c1924562c9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c1924562c9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994501] Review Request: libstrophe - An XMPP library for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994501
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pemen...@redhat.com
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
Note: /sbin/ldconfig called in libstrophe
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets
Replace with %{?ldconfig_scriptlets}, which would expand to nothing for
recent releases.
- doc package should ensure proper version of library is installed.
Required for license file. Requires: %{name} >= %{version}-%{release} might
be used,
but equal would be the best.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "[generated file]", "*No
copyright* MIT License", "FSF Unlimited License (with Retention) GNU
General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General
Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public
License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "MIT
License [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later",
"FSF Unlimited License (with Retention) GNU General Public License,
Version 2", "FSF Unlimited License (with Retention)", "*No copyright*
Public domain". 22 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/1994501-libstrophe/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package
[Bug 1996892] Review Request: biglybt - Source for BiglyBT, a feature filled, open source, ad-free, bittorrent client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996892 Sergio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2021-08-23 22:25:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981982] Review Request: biglybt - Source for BiglyBT, a feature filled, open source, ad-free, bittorrent client.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981982 --- Comment #7 from Sergio Basto --- - There is no javadoc generation. I added javadoc generation - Removes these comments removed Spec URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/biglybt/biglybt.spec SRPM URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/biglybt/biglybt-2.8.0.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: BiglyBT is forked from Vuze/Azureus and is being maintained by two of the original developers as well as members of the community. Fedora Account System Username: sergiomb https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74417946 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996892] New: Review Request: biglybt - Source for BiglyBT, a feature filled, open source, ad-free, bittorrent client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996892 Bug ID: 1996892 Summary: Review Request: biglybt - Source for BiglyBT, a feature filled, open source, ad-free, bittorrent client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ser...@serjux.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/biglybt/biglybt.spec SRPM URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/biglybt/biglybt-2.8.0.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: BiglyBT is forked from Vuze/Azureus and is being maintained by two of the original developers as well as members of the community. Fedora Account System Username: sergiomb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981982] Review Request: biglybt - Source for BiglyBT, a feature filled, open source, ad-free, bittorrent client.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981982
--- Comment #6 from Sergio Basto ---
- You should not mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
done
- I add bundles I don't know the versions
- I can't unbundle apache-commons-lang , because fedora have version 3 when
biglybt use 2,
- bouncycastle biglybt use a very old package I tried to migrate but give me
some problems so I postpone the unbundle.
- json_simple at have to test maybe we can unbundle easily (is a very little
package).
- Using unowned directory: /usr/share/application-registry
rpm -qf /usr/share/application-registry/
gnome-mime-data-2.18.0-24.fc33.noarch
I think spec is correct the directoy is owned by gnome-mime-data
- Simply remove the trailing period from the summary field.
I believe it is all done
- You should split your description, where each line does not exceed 80
characters.
I believe it is all done
- JAR files must not include class-path entry inside META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
done in %prep
- biglybt.src: W: strange-permission biglybt.desktop 775
fixed
Another problem eclise-swt has been removed for F35 and rawhide ..., so for now
it just build in f34 and f33 buildroot
fedora-review -b 1981982 -m fedora-34-x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996873] New: Review Request: google-cloud-functions - Python Client for Google Cloud Functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996873 Bug ID: 1996873 Summary: Review Request: google-cloud-functions - Python Client for Google Cloud Functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhay...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578641-python-google-cloud-functions/python-google-cloud-functions.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578641-python-google-cloud-functions/python-google-cloud-functions-1.0.3-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: Manages lightweight user-provided functions executed in response to events via the Google Cloud Functions API. Fedora Account System Username: mhayden fedora-review from COPR: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578641-python-google-cloud-functions/fedora-review/review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996872] New: Review Request: google-cloud-kms - Python Client for Google Cloud Key Management Service (KMS) API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996872 Bug ID: 1996872 Summary: Review Request: google-cloud-kms - Python Client for Google Cloud Key Management Service (KMS) API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhay...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578644-python-google-cloud-kms/python-google-cloud-kms.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578644-python-google-cloud-kms/python-google-cloud-kms-2.5.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: Manages keys and performs cryptographic operations in a central cloud service, for direct use by other cloud resources and applications via the Google Cloud Key Management Service (KMS) API. Fedora Account System Username: mhayden fedora-review from COPR: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578644-python-google-cloud-kms/fedora-review/review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996871] New: Review Request: google-cloud-redis - Python Client for Google Cloud Memorystore for Redis API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996871 Bug ID: 1996871 Summary: Review Request: google-cloud-redis - Python Client for Google Cloud Memorystore for Redis API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhay...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578628-python-google-cloud-redis/python-google-cloud-redis.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578628-python-google-cloud-redis/python-google-cloud-redis-2.2.2-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: The Google Cloud Memorystore for Redis API is used for creating and managing Redis instances on the Google Cloud Platform. Fedora Account System Username: mhayden fedora-review from COPR: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578628-python-google-cloud-redis/fedora-review/review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996870] New: Review Request: grpc-google-iam-v1 - GRPC library for the google-iam-v1 service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996870 Bug ID: 1996870 Summary: Review Request: grpc-google-iam-v1 - GRPC library for the google-iam-v1 service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhay...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578621-python-grpc-google-iam-v1/python-grpc-google-iam-v1.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578621-python-grpc-google-iam-v1/python-grpc-google-iam-v1-0.12.3-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: The IDL-derived library for the google-iam (v1) service in Google Cloud. Fedora Account System Username: mhayden fedora-review from COPR: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578621-python-grpc-google-iam-v1/fedora-review/review.txt Required for python-google-cloud-kms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996868] New: Review Request: python-pem - Easy PEM file parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996868 Bug ID: 1996868 Summary: Review Request: python-pem - Easy PEM file parsing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhay...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578645-python-pem/python-pem.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578645-python-pem/python-pem-21.2.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: pem is an MIT-licensed Python module for parsing and splitting of PEM files, i.e. Base64-encoded DER keys and certificates. Fedora Account System Username: mhayden fedora-review from COPR: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mhayden/python-google-cloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02578645-python-pem/fedora-review/review.txt Required for packaging python-google-cloud-kms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1990685] Review Request: cpp-httplib - A C++11 single-file header-only cross platform HTTP/HTTPS library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990685 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a9bbf37e6d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a9bbf37e6d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996866] Review Request: python3-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996866 Sam P changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dagofthed...@gmail.com, ||d...@djc.id.au Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981997] Review Request: python-pydata-sphinx-theme - Bootstrap-based Sphinx theme from the PyData community
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James --- The fontawesome5-fonts package is now available in F35 and Rawhide. New URLs for this package to take advantage of that: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-pydata-sphinx-theme/python-pydata-sphinx-theme.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-pydata-sphinx-theme/python-pydata-sphinx-theme-0.6.3-2.fc36.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996866] New: Review Request: python3-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996866 Bug ID: 1996866 Summary: Review Request: python3-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dagofthed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/survient/python3-configobj/python3-configobj.git/plain/python3-configobj.spec?id=5e9b6d212c9accf86527d34df2d037a25e21b81b SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/survient/python3-configobj/srpm-builds/02579607/python3-configobj-5.0.6-26.el7.src.rpm Description: ConfigObj is a simple but powerful configuration file reader and writer: an ini\ file round tripper. Its main feature is that it is very easy to use, with a\ straightforward programmers interface and a simple syntax for config files. Fedora Account System Username: survient This is a separate build of python-configobj specifically for python 3 on EPEL7. I am trying to build an EPEL7 release of holland that has been ported to python3 and has python-configobj as a dependency. Any guidance or advice would be appreciated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981997] Review Request: python-pydata-sphinx-theme - Bootstrap-based Sphinx theme from the PyData community
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997 Bug 1981997 depends on bug 1989300, which changed state. Bug 1989300 Summary: Review Request: fontawesome5-fonts - Iconic font set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989300] Review Request: fontawesome5-fonts - Iconic font set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||fontawesome5-fonts-5.15.4-1 ||.fc36 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-08-23 20:55:20 --- Comment #13 from Jerry James --- Built for Rawhide and F35. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982286] Review Request: golang-github-path-network-mmproxy - Golang implementation of MMProxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982286 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996827] Review Request: golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk - SDK for the Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996827 Sanne Raymaekers changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sraym...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953340] Review Request: dovecot-fts-xapian - Xapian plugin for Dovecot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340 --- Comment #19 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996827] New: Review Request: golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk - SDK for the Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996827 Bug ID: 1996827 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk - SDK for the Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanne.raymaek...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gundersanne/golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02525470-golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk/golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gundersanne/golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02525470-golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk/golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk-0.1.200-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: This SDK simplifies the use of the OCM API on https://api.openshift.com/, and provides several go modules which simplify the development of services for the platform. Fedora Account System Username: gundersanne Intentional duplicate of #1994481 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953340] Review Request: dovecot-fts-xapian - Xapian plugin for Dovecot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340 --- Comment #18 from Joan Moreau --- $ fedpkg request-repo dovecot-fts-xapian 1953340 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36466 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982286] Review Request: golang-github-path-network-mmproxy - Golang implementation of MMProxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982286 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-path-network-mmproxy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982286] Review Request: golang-github-path-network-mmproxy - Golang implementation of MMProxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982286 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-path-network-mmproxy 1982286 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36463 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983181] Review Request: python-google-cloud-storage - Python Client for Google Cloud Storage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983181 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-23 17:30:06 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-44fc830e78 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983177] Review Request: python-google-resumable-media - Utilities for Google media downloads and resumable uploads
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983177 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-08-23 17:30:02 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-44fc830e78 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983181] Review Request: python-google-cloud-storage - Python Client for Google Cloud Storage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983181 Bug 1983181 depends on bug 1983177, which changed state. Bug 1983177 Summary: Review Request: python-google-resumable-media - Utilities for Google media downloads and resumable uploads https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983177 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983176] Review Request: python-google-crc32c - Python wrapper for CRC32C hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983176 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-08-23 17:30:00 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-44fc830e78 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983181] Review Request: python-google-cloud-storage - Python Client for Google Cloud Storage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983181 Bug 1983181 depends on bug 1983176, which changed state. Bug 1983176 Summary: Review Request: python-google-crc32c - Python wrapper for CRC32C hashing algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983176 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983176] Review Request: python-google-crc32c - Python wrapper for CRC32C hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983176 Bug 1983176 depends on bug 1983175, which changed state. Bug 1983175 Summary: Review Request: google-crc32c - CRC32C implementation with support for CPU-specific acceleration instructions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983175 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983181] Review Request: python-google-cloud-storage - Python Client for Google Cloud Storage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983181 Bug 1983181 depends on bug 1983175, which changed state. Bug 1983175 Summary: Review Request: google-crc32c - CRC32C implementation with support for CPU-specific acceleration instructions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983175 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983175] Review Request: google-crc32c - CRC32C implementation with support for CPU-specific acceleration instructions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-23 17:29:56 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-44fc830e78 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996798] New: Review Request: ghc-cached-json-file - Locally cache a json file obtained by http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996798 Bug ID: 1996798 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cached-json-file - Locally cache a json file obtained by http Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-cached-json-file/ghc-cached-json-file.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-cached-json-file/ghc-cached-json-file-0.1.0-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: A small library for caching a slow-changing remote json file in a specified directory (under "~/.cache/"). When the json is requested and the cache file is still fresh enough it is read directly from the local cache, otherwise the cached file is refreshed first. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74401476 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994481] Review Request: golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk - SDK for the Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994481 --- Comment #4 from Sanne Raymaekers --- Thank you for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982286] Review Request: golang-github-path-network-mmproxy - Golang implementation of MMProxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982286
Sanne Raymaekers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Sanne Raymaekers ---
go2rpm package, so nice and easy. approved.
[NOTE] Lots of other packages own /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com, so while
fedora-review marked it as fail it's fine. Can't be fixed here anyway.
[NOTE] "Dist tag is present." Was listed as an issue, but since you're using
rpmautospec %autorelease, it's a pass.
[NOTE] rpmlint errors on golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-debugsource.x86_64
can be ignored. Not something that can be fixed here.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/admin/fedora-
review/1982286-golang-github-path-network-mmproxy/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by other packages:
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in go-
mmproxy , golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license te
[Bug 1996791] Review Request: wineglass - GUI for Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996791 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Artem --- Fedora-review: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/for-review/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02572111-wineglass/fedora-review/review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996791] New: Review Request: wineglass - GUI for Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996791 Bug ID: 1996791 Summary: Review Request: wineglass - GUI for Wine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/wineglass.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/wineglass-1.2.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Wineglass is a small application that allows the user to manage their wineprefixes easily and install windows programs without the need of the terminal. It can: * Easily create and remove wineprefixes * Install supported windows apps on their corresponding wineprefix * Make installed apps available normally through the applications menu. * Provide an easy way to add windows libraries to wineprefixes through "winetricks". * Configure wine * run winprefix-specific system apps This app is useful for running windows apps and games easily without hustle. Fedora Account System Username: atim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a17f963ef3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a17f963ef3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994481] Review Request: golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk - SDK for the Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994481 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- go2pm package, simplifying review considerably: - license is correct and acceptable - dependencies are all packaged - no notable rpmlint warnings - package builds and installs without issues APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982286] Review Request: golang-github-path-network-mmproxy - Golang implementation of MMProxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982286 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Yeah sure -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994481] Review Request: golang-github-openshift-online-ocm-sdk - SDK for the Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994481 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dcava...@fb.com CC||dcava...@fb.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Taking this review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6f1cdf34bf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6f1cdf34bf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7b9152ada8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7b9152ada8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6acb7e859a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6acb7e859a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994912] Review Request: rust-aliasable - Basic aliasable (non unique pointer) types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994912 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-aliasable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4aba8cab9b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4aba8cab9b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994912] Review Request: rust-aliasable - Basic aliasable (non unique pointer) types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994912 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-08-23 15:11:52 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-89c90fca3b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1992931] Review Request: rubygem-image_size - Measure image size using pure Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992931 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-image_size -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994912] Review Request: rust-aliasable - Basic aliasable (non unique pointer) types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994912 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-73cf2ac5f4 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989300] Review Request: fontawesome5-fonts - Iconic font set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300 --- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontawesome5-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994946] Review Request: rust-pyo3-build-config - Build configuration for the PyO3 ecosystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994946 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-pyo3-build-config -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983181] Review Request: python-google-cloud-storage - Python Client for Google Cloud Storage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983181 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-google-cloud-storage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983177] Review Request: python-google-resumable-media - Utilities for Google media downloads and resumable uploads
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983177 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-google-resumable-media -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983176] Review Request: python-google-crc32c - Python wrapper for CRC32C hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983176 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-google-crc32c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983175] Review Request: google-crc32c - CRC32C implementation with support for CPU-specific acceleration instructions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983175 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-crc32c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982286] Review Request: golang-github-path-network-mmproxy - Golang implementation of MMProxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982286 Sanne Raymaekers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanne.raymaek...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Sanne Raymaekers --- Hey, Do you want to do a review swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994481 ? Since they're both golang packages it seems apt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978515] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978515 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mikel@olasagasti. | |info) | Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-23 12:57:27 --- Comment #25 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga --- Yes Hangbin, closing it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978515] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978515 Alasdair Kergon changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|1 |updated --- Comment #1 has been edited --- Oh, BTW, this will be the first package I own in Fedora. So looks like I need a sponsor (what this used for?) based on the wiki[1]. In RedHat I maintain packet libndp[2] and wireguard-tools[3]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor [2] bug 1933041 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948893 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1985620] Review Request: python-django3-auth-saml2 - Django3 auth SAML2 integration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985620 --- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa --- > as long as the issue has been reported upstream or a patch has been submitted > to add it. I know Tom does this quite a lot for packages that have missing > license texts. As soon as upstream accepts the patch, he can ship it > downstream in Fedora. Note that this can also be done for BSD/MIT ones. Suggesting a license text and having them accept it is "good enough" in most cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1985620] Review Request: python-django3-auth-saml2 - Django3 auth SAML2 integration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985620 --- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #5) > (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #2) > > As I understand it under > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text, you will have to wait for upstream to > > add license text in response to > > https://github.com/jeremyschulman/django3-auth-saml2/issues/10, or add what > > you believe to be the correct license text yourself. It doesn’t seem like > > packaging without license text is an option. > > As far as I know, this is not correct. It's not up the packager to just > "guess" which license text is applicable. > So it's better to just specify which license upstream intended, file an > issue with upstream that the license file is missing, and link that issue > from the .spec file. fedora-review even has a checkbox for "does not include > license files separate from those supplied by upstream". When it comes to "standard" licenses, there is no guessing involved, so it's fine. The problem comes when something is BSD/MIT licensed. We *can't* ship anything that is supposedly BSD or MIT licensed without the original license text from the software because those can be anything. There's hundreds of license variants in that category. The Apache, GNU, and Mozilla licenses, on the other hand, are standardized and well-known, so it's not as much of an issue that the license text isn't in the repo, as long as the issue has been reported upstream or a patch has been submitted to add it. I know Tom does this quite a lot for packages that have missing license texts. As soon as upstream accepts the patch, he can ship it downstream in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1985620] Review Request: python-django3-auth-saml2 - Django3 auth SAML2 integration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985620 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994912] Review Request: rust-aliasable - Basic aliasable (non unique pointer) types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994912 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini --- Yup, can confirm this works now. Final review: The package was generated with rust2rpm, which simplifies the review. - latest version is packaged - package builds and installs correctly in rawhide - specified license matches upstream - license text is included and marked as %license - test suite is run and all tests pass - unavailable optional features / dependencies are disabled Package APPROVED. When importing this package to src.fedoraproject.org, please also include and commit the accompanying .rust2rpm.conf file such that future updates will inherit the dropped features / optional dependencies automatically. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994912] Review Request: rust-aliasable - Basic aliasable (non unique pointer) types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994912 --- Comment #5 from Christian Heimes --- I' have now dropped all traits related features from the spec file and uploaded the files again. $ cat .rust2rpm.conf [DEFAULT] unwanted-features = stable_deref_trait aliasable_deref_trait traits $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --rebuild rust-aliasable-0.1.3-1.fc36.src.rpm --postinstall ... Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Preparing: 1/1 Installing : rust-aliasable-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch 1/3 Installing : rust-aliasable+alloc-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch 2/3 Installing : rust-aliasable+default-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch 3/3 Verifying: rust-aliasable-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch 1/3 Verifying: rust-aliasable+alloc-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch 2/3 Verifying: rust-aliasable+default-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch 3/3 Installed: rust-aliasable+alloc-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch rust-aliasable+default-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch rust-aliasable-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch Complete! INFO: Finish: run -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994912] Review Request: rust-aliasable - Basic aliasable (non unique pointer) types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994912 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- This didn't work: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(aliasable_deref_trait/default) >= 0.2.0 with crate(aliasable_deref_trait/default) < 0.3.0~) needed by rust-aliasable+traits-devel-0.1.3-1.fc36.noarch The "traits" feature depends on the optional "aliasable_deref_trait". You'll need to disable that feature as well. I looked at the ouroboros code, and it looks like it doesn't use the "traits" feature of "aliasable", so that *should* be OK, but please confirm this yourself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1995127] Review Request: restool - A tool to create and manage the DPAA2 Management Complex (MC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995127 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson --- Mine came from the supported NXP repo for the SoC revisions we support in Fedora. No copr. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1995127] Review Request: restool - A tool to create and manage the DPAA2 Management Complex (MC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995127 --- Comment #3 from John Boero --- Nothing needed. Just trying to help. My builds came from the WindRiver-Labs repo though. 20.04 is the NXP SDK version apparently. It sounds like a different codebase. If you are experimenting with a COPR I'm happy to test it out, or are you planning to put this straight in the Fedora repos soon? Cheers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1995127] Review Request: restool - A tool to create and manage the DPAA2 Management Complex (MC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995127 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(pbrobinson@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson --- What info do you need? Why are you needinfo for a statement? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1995127] Review Request: restool - A tool to create and manage the DPAA2 Management Complex (MC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995127 John Boero changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(pbrobinson@gmail. ||com) CC||boero...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from John Boero --- Hi @pbrobin...@gmail.com I've had this published on COPR for a while now. Happy to compare notes. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/boeroboy/honeycomb/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953340] Review Request: dovecot-fts-xapian - Xapian plugin for Dovecot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340 --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Great. You're in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/grosjo you can now proceed with requesting the SCM repository for your package and so on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
