[Bug 1893729] Review Request: perl-Gtk3-ImageView - Image viewer widget for GTK 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893729 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ca032f0519 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-ca032f0519` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ca032f0519 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a17f963ef3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988168] Review Request: rust-signal-hook-mio - MIO support for signal-hook
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988168 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-38bd079c55 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-38bd079c55 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-38bd079c55 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996791] Review Request: wineglass - GUI for Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996791 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d9ca09d40d has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1997277] Review Request: lexertl14 - C++14 version of lexertl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997277 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-585e926060 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6acb7e859a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1997277] Review Request: lexertl14 - C++14 version of lexertl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997277 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b93d8f9c57 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4aba8cab9b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1997277] Review Request: lexertl14 - C++14 version of lexertl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997277 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-02 23:07:48 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e99f15d214 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-02 23:07:28 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6f1cdf34bf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1991202] Review Request: xpp3 - XML Pull Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-02 23:07:31 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5721ee3601 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996325] Review Request: uvw - Header-only easy to use libuv C++ wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996325
Dan Čermák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dan.cermak@cgc-instruments.
||com
CC||dan.cermak@cgc-instruments.
||com
--- Comment #2 from Dan Čermák ---
I have taken a look and there are a few minor issues:
- The package mentions only the MIT license, but according to github
"Documentation released under CC BY 4.0. Logo released under CC BY-SA 4.0."
- %ldconfig_scriptlets are no longer required
- upstream is already at 2.10.0
- please mention https://github.com/skypjack/uvw/pull/253 next to your patch
- why is there a `echo "%{_docdir}"` in the spec?
- The changelog of the rpm looks odd (wrong date format, first entry is bogus):
* So srp 21 2021 Petr Menšík 2.9.0-2
- Ignore failing test, comment it out
* So srp 21 2021 Petr Menšík 2.9.0-1
- Move bigger doc part into noarch package
* So srp 21 2021 Petr Menšík Packaging variables read or
set by %forgemeta-1
- Initial fedora package spec
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- Dist tag is present.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License". 101 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dan/fedora-
scm/1996325-uvw/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is
[Bug 2000219] Review Request: llvm-libunwind - LLVM libunwind implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000219 Dan Čermák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dan.cermak@cgc-instruments. ||com --- Comment #1 from Dan Čermák --- The build fails in Rawhide: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:202 (include): include could not find requested file: HandleOutOfTreeLLVM [...] CMake Error at test/CMakeLists.txt:1 (include): include could not find requested file: AddLLVM CMake Error at test/CMakeLists.txt:27 (configure_lit_site_cfg): Unknown CMake command "configure_lit_site_cfg". -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! See also "/builddir/build/BUILD/libunwind-12.0.0.src/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log". See also "/builddir/build/BUILD/libunwind-12.0.0.src/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log". RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.U6yxSg (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.U6yxSg (%build) Child return code was: 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000763] Review Request: wike - Wikipedia Reader for the GNOME Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000763 Gustavo Costa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000763] New: Review Request: wike - Wikipedia Reader for the GNOME Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000763 Bug ID: 2000763 Summary: Review Request: wike - Wikipedia Reader for the GNOME Desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: xfgu...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://xfgusta.fedorapeople.org/packages/wike/wike.spec SRPM URL: https://xfgusta.fedorapeople.org/packages/wike/wike-1.5.4-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Wike is a Wikipedia reader for the GNOME Desktop. Provides access to all the content of this online encyclopedia in a native application, with a simpler and distraction-free view of articles. Fedora Account System Username: xfgusta Scratch build (rawhide): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75012251 Hi. I'm looking for a sponsor, as this is my first package here. I have been learning more about Fedora packaging by reading some other package submissions, doing some preliminary reviews [1][2][3][4], and opening some pull requests [5][6][7][8]. Furthermore, I have a Copr [9] of this package that was published in the Fedora Magazine [10], although both spec files are quite different. 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986844#c1 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980117#c2 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989943#c1 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994095#c1 5. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dialect/pull-request/1 6. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/apostrophe/pull-request/1 7. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghex/pull-request/1 8. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnote/pull-request/2 9. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/xfgusta/wike/ 10. https://fedoramagazine.org/4-cool-new-projects-to-try-in-copr-for-july-2021/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1991138] Review Request: python-pytest-postgresql - pytest plugin that allows to test code that relies on a running PostgreSQL database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991138 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-09-02 19:58:15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000555] Review Request: perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch - Monkey patching with test mocking in mind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000555 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000732] New: Review Request: stargz-snapshotter - Fast container image distribution plugin with lazy pulling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000732 Bug ID: 2000732 Summary: Review Request: stargz-snapshotter - Fast container image distribution plugin with lazy pulling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: ASSIGNED Component: Package Review Assignee: jn...@redhat.com Reporter: l...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: dwa...@redhat.com, ktokunaga.m...@gmail.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pagure.io/stargz-snapshotter/raw/main/f/stargz-snapshotter.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/stargz-snapshotter/raw/main/f/SRPMS/stargz-snapshotter-0.8.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Fast container image distribution plugin with lazy pulling Fedora Account System Username: lsm5 Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75012094 $ rpmlint stargz-snapshotter.spec SRPMS/stargz-snapshotter-0.8.0-1.fc34.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/* stargz-snapshotter.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: v0.8.0-vendor.tar.gz stargz-snapshotter.src: W: invalid-url Source0: v0.8.0-vendor.tar.gz stargz-snapshotter.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary containerd-stargz-grpc stargz-snapshotter.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ctr-remote stargz-snapshotter.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary stargz-store 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Using vendored tarball and no manpages from what I can see so far, hence the rpmlint warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000555] Review Request: perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch - Monkey patching with test mocking in mind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000555 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1): > > TODO: I recommend adding (or replacing with) the second paragraph from the > POD to a description. I think it characterizes the package better than a > general definition of mocking. Indeed. Done. > TODO: Remove Group tag. It's not used in Fedora. > TODO: Constrain 'perl(Module::Build::Tiny)' build-dependency with '>= 0.034' > (Build.PL:3). > TODO: Build-require 'perl(:VERSION) >= 5.6' (Build.PL:2). All done. > Resolution: Package APPROVED. Thank you for the review, Petr. I've requested the repo (https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36661) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1993535] Review Request: auditwheel - Cross-distribution Linux wheels auditing and relabeling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993535 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ad2893566d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ad2893566d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1998886] Review Request: python3-liblarch - A Python library to easily handle complex data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998886 Miguel changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/python-liblarch/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02679962-python-liblarch/python-liblarch.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/python-liblarch/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02679962-python-liblarch/python-liblarch-3.1.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: Liblarch is a python library built to easily handle data structure such are lists, trees and acyclic graphs (tree where nodes can have multiple parents). There's also a liblarch_gtk binding that will allow you to use your data structure into a Gtk.Treeview. Liblarch support multiple views of one data structure and complex filtering. That way, you have a clear separation between your data themselves (Model) and how they are displayed (View). Fedora Account System Username: miguel7ra This package was retired 3 years ago but is active again, I need to un-retire it to be able to un-retire Getting Things Gnome! (gtg) that also returned to activity. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1998886] Review Request: python3-liblarch - A Python library to easily handle complex data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998886 Miguel changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/python-liblarch/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02679962-python-liblarch/python-liblarch.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/python-liblarch/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02679962-python-liblarch/python-liblarch-3.1.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: Liblarch is a python library built to easily handle data structure such are lists, trees and acyclic graphs (tree where nodes can have multiple parents). There's also a liblarch-gtk binding that will allow you to use your data structure into a Gtk.Treeview. Liblarch support multiple views of one data structure and complex filtering. That way, you have a clear separation between your data themselves (Model) and how they are displayed (View). Fedora Account System Username: miguel7ra -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1993498] Review Request: rust-statrs - Statistical computing library for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993498 --- Comment #8 from Davide Cavalca --- Updated to address feedback. Changelog: - generate clean tarball without non-redistributable data files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988168] Review Request: rust-signal-hook-mio - MIO support for signal-hook
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988168 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-38bd079c55 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-38bd079c55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000347] Review Request: python-mkdocs-redirects - A MkDocs plugin for dynamic page redirects to prevent broken links
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhron...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok --- Spec sanity: 1. There is no %check section. Having a check section is mandatory in new Python guidelines. If upstream has no tests suite, at least run %py3_check_import mkdocs_redirects to assert the module is importable. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#py3_check_import But I see tests in the upstream repo. 2. There seems to be no %license. I suggest asking upstream to tag the 1.0.3 release, so we can use the git tarball and have the tests and the license file as neither is in the sdists on PyPI. If you do talk to upstream, also suggest they add license_files=['LICENSE'] to their setup.py. Other than that, the specfile seems sane. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1893729] Review Request: perl-Gtk3-ImageView - Image viewer widget for GTK 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893729 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ca032f0519 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ca032f0519 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1893729] Review Request: perl-Gtk3-ImageView - Image viewer widget for GTK 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893729 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ca032f0519 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ca032f0519 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988168] Review Request: rust-signal-hook-mio - MIO support for signal-hook
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988168 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-9eb8795676 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9eb8795676 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000555] Review Request: perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch - Monkey patching with test mocking in mind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000555 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Source0 and URL address are Ok. Source0 archive (SHA-512: f6a27754a4cafb9bd99e833d8c15a203bd071ba9dafa3cedf9b952568ffa4a3b050157f402248a4fa1784c8e454035ed8fa46c722839f770d9207a4b525b2b56) is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/Mock/MonkeyPatch.pm. Ok Description verified from lib/Mock/MonkeyPatch.pm. Ok. TODO: I recommend adding (or replacing with) the second paragraph from the POD to a description. I think it characterizes the package better than a general definition of mocking. License verified from lib/Mock/MonkeyPatch.pm, LICENSE, and README. Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. TODO: Remove Group tag. It's not used in Fedora. TODO: Constrain 'perl(Module::Build::Tiny)' build-dependency with '>= 0.034' (Build.PL:3). TODO: Build-require 'perl(:VERSION) >= 5.6' (Build.PL:2). Otherwise build-require are Ok. All tests pass. Ok. rpmlint perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch-1.02-1.fc36.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch-1.02-1.fc36.noarch.rpm (none): W: unable to init enchant, spellchecking disabled. (none): W: unable to init enchant, spellchecking disabled. (none): W: unable to init enchant, spellchecking disabled. (none): W: unable to init enchant, spellchecking disabled. == rpmlint session starts = rpmlint: 2.1.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 3 === 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s == rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch-1.02-1.fc36.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Sep 2 17:41 /usr/share/doc/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch -rw-r--r--1 root root 474 Aug 26 2020 /usr/share/doc/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch/Changes -rw-r--r--1 root root 7633 Aug 26 2020 /usr/share/doc/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch/README drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Sep 2 17:41 /usr/share/licenses/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch -rw-r--r--1 root root18427 Aug 26 2020 /usr/share/licenses/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch/LICENSE -rw-r--r--1 root root 4692 Sep 2 17:41 /usr/share/man/man3/Mock::MonkeyPatch.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Sep 2 17:41 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mock -rw-r--r--1 root root 9216 Aug 26 2020 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mock/MonkeyPatch.pm File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch-1.02-1.fc36.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Sub::Util) >= 1.40 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch-1.02-1.fc36.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(Mock::MonkeyPatch) = 1.02 1 perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch = 1.02-1.fc36 Binary provides are Ok. $ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch-1.02-1.fc36.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies are resolvable. Ok. The package builds in F36 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75005284). Ok. Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Please consider fixing the TODO items before building this package. Resolution: Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1897619] Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor-diagram - Asciidoctor diagramming extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897619 Christopher Brown changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2021-09-02 15:46:55 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Brown --- Abandoning, this is dependency hell and I don't have the time unfortunately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000555] Review Request: perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch - Monkey patching with test mocking in mind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000555 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1980931 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980931 [Bug 1980931] perl-Workflow-1.56 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000555] Review Request: perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch - Monkey patching with test mocking in mind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000555 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000643] Review Request: python-calligrabot - robosignatory driver for the CentOS Stream signing service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000643 Carl George 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@redhat.com CC||c...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000643] New: Review Request: python-calligrabot - robosignatory driver for the CentOS Stream signing service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000643 Bug ID: 2000643 Summary: Review Request: python-calligrabot - robosignatory driver for the CentOS Stream signing service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mmath...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/merlinm/calligrabot/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02679231-python-calligrabot/python-calligrabot.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/merlinm/calligrabot/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02679231-python-calligrabot/python-calligrabot-0.0.1-0.fc36.src.rpm Description: A robosignatory driver for the CentOS Stream signing service. Needed to enable automated package signing for CentOS Stream 9. Fedora Account System Username: merlinm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000598] Review Request: python-pathos - Parallel graph management and execution in heterogeneous computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000598 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro), ||1914344 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914344 [Bug 1914344] python-SALib fails to build with new pyscaffold -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000598] New: Review Request: python-pathos - Parallel graph management and execution in heterogeneous computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000598 Bug ID: 2000598 Summary: Review Request: python-pathos - Parallel graph management and execution in heterogeneous computing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-pathos/python-pathos.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-pathos/python-pathos-0.2.8-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: The pathos package provides a few basic tools to make parallel and distributed computing more accessible to the end user. The goal of pathos is to enable the user to extend their own code to parallel and distributed computing with minimal refactoring. pathos provides methods for configuring, launching, monitoring, and controlling a service on a remote host. One of the most basic features of pathos is the ability to configure and launch a RPC-based service on a remote host. pathos seeds the remote host with the portpicker script, which allows the remote host to inform the localhost of a port that is available for communication. Beyond the ability to establish a RPC service, and then post requests, is the ability to launch code in parallel. Unlike parallel computing performed at the node level (typically with MPI), pathos enables the user to launch jobs in parallel across heterogeneous distributed resources. pathos provides distributed map and pipe algorithms, where a mix of local processors and distributed workers can be selected. pathos also provides a very basic automated load balancing service, as well as the ability for the user to directly select the resources. The high-level pool.map interface, yields a map implementation that hides the RPC internals from the user. With pool.map, the user can launch their code in parallel, and as a distributed service, using standard python and without writing a line of server or parallel batch code. RPC servers and communication in general is known to be insecure. However, instead of attempting to make the RPC communication itself secure, pathos provides the ability to automatically wrap any distributes service or communication in a ssh-tunnel. Ssh is a universally trusted method. Using ssh-tunnels, pathos has launched several distributed calculations on national lab clusters, and to date has performed test calculations that utilize node-to-node communication between several national lab clusters and a users laptop. pathos allows the user to configure and launch at a very atomistic level, through raw access to ssh and scp. pathos is the core of a python framework for heterogeneous computing. pathos is in active development, so any user feedback, bug reports, comments, or suggestions are highly appreciated. A list of issues is located at https://github.com/uqfoundation/pathos/issues, with a legacy list maintained at https://uqfoundation.github.io/project/pathos/query. Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000349] Review Request: python-ghp-import - GitHub Pages Import
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000349 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok --- > Obsolete/provide python3-ghp-import2 python-nikola needs to be adapted to use python3-ghp-import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000348] Review Request: python-pyyaml-env-tag - A custom YAML tag for referencing environment variables in YAML files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000348 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-pyyaml_env_tag - A |python-pyyaml-env-tag - A |custom YAML tag for |custom YAML tag for |referencing environment |referencing environment |variables in YAML files |variables in YAML files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000349] Review Request: python-ghp-import - GitHub Pages Import
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000349 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jma...@math.ist.utl.pt Flags||needinfo?(jma...@math.ist.u ||tl.pt) --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani --- Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ghp-import.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ghp-import-2.0.1-2.fc36.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 02 2021 Sandro Mani - 2.0.1-2 - Port to new Python guidelines - Obsolete/provide python3-ghp-import2 CC @jama...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000555] New: Review Request: perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch - Monkey patching with test mocking in mind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000555 Bug ID: 2000555 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch - Monkey patching with test mocking in mind Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch.spec SRPM URL: https://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch/perl-Mock-MonkeyPatch-1.02-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Mocking is a common tool, especially for testing. By strategically replacing a subroutine, one can isolate segments (units) of code to test individually. When this is done it is important to know that the mocked sub was actually called and with what arguments it was called. Fedora Account System Username: eseyman Rpmlint Output: 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1999328] Review Request: perl-Devel-MAT-Dumper - Write a heap dump file for later analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999328 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-MAT-Dumper-0.42- ||2.fc36 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-09-02 11:42:38 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1826810 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1999332] Review Request: perl-Object-Pad - Simple syntax for lexical slot-based object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999332 Bug 1999332 depends on bug 1999328, which changed state. Bug 1999328 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-MAT-Dumper - Write a heap dump file for later analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999328 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000350] Review Request: python-mergedeep - A deep merge function for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000350 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani --- Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-mergedeep.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-mergedeep-1.3.4-2.fc36.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 02 2021 Sandro Mani - 1.3.4-2 - Port to new Python guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000347] Review Request: python-mkdocs-redirects - A MkDocs plugin for dynamic page redirects to prevent broken links
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani --- Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-mkdocs-redirects.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-mkdocs-redirects-1.0.3-2.fc36.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 02 2021 Sandro Mani - 1.0.3-2 - Port to new Python guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000348] Review Request: python-pyyaml_env_tag - A custom YAML tag for referencing environment variables in YAML files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000348 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani --- Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-pyyaml-env-tag.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-pyyaml-env-tag-0.1-2.fc36.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 02 2021 Sandro Mani - 0.1-2 - Port to new Python guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1997378] Review Request: pg_auto_failover - Postgres extension and service for automated failover and high-availability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997378 --- Comment #8 from mku...@redhat.com --- Linter RC file: Updated SPEC: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/mkulik-rh/0899b8f07bb6fabeee0c7a94e7b8d340/raw/2a4bb6d96f11265fcfb622869b128594f374142c/pg_auto_failover.spec rpmlintrc: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/mkulik-rh/ff1be946ae9060b440be1c99cf9b84a4/raw/30819eaf183cd7b8d137115f5d77ee7f6ab623d0/pg_auto_failover.rpmlintrc - Add linter exceptions for docs and llvmjit subrpms. - Cleanup spec file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1804353] Review Request: golang-github-majek-slirpnetstack - Slirp4netns implementation using gvisor/netstack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804353 Marc-Andre Lureau changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-02 08:32:59 --- Comment #2 from Marc-Andre Lureau --- I have abandoned this, due to lack of upstream cooperation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953340] Review Request: dovecot-fts-xapian - Xapian plugin for Dovecot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340 --- Comment #35 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Take a look at `fedpkg update --help`. Without any arguments, it should open up a text editor for you to fill in the template interactively. It may look at your $EDITOR environment variable to figure out what editor to use. Worth checking if that is set. You can also use the bodhi web-interface to push updates. I prefer this for new packages because you can add all the new builds there and it'll split it into different updates for each Fedora release itself. Using `fedpkg update`, you'll have to run it for each branch manually. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1977987] Review Request: anarch - minimalist first person shooter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977987 --- Comment #10 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki --- Fixed the linker flags and also added a CSFML (rhbz#1988952) build of the game. spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/anarch-1.02d-2.20210616gitf6a6a68a/anarch.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/anarch-1.02d-2.20210616gitf6a6a68a/anarch-1.02d-2.20210616gitf6a6a68a.fc34.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74980719 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
