[Bug 2066841] Review Request: ghc-double-conversion - Fast conversion between double precision floating point and text

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066841



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-6684f5640a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066841
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2028702] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-docker - Ansible modules and plugins for working with Docker

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028702



--- Comment #7 from Maxwell G  ---
I have updated this to the latest version. Ben, are you able to finish up the
review?

Spec URL:
https://git.sr.ht/~gotmax23/ansible-collection-community-docker/blob/78ce6ede52c7d08e16d209fe879378f500f2cec8/ansible-collection-community-docker.spec
SRPM
URL:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gotmax23/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/03938474-ansible-collection-community-docker/ansible-collection-community-docker-2.3.0-1.fc37.src.rpm
Diff:
https://git.sr.ht/~gotmax23/ansible-collection-community-docker/commit/78ce6ede52c7d08e16d209fe879378f500f2cec8
Fedora Review URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gotmax23/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/03938474-ansible-collection-community-docker/fedora-review/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028702
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2070881] Review Request: golang-github-mock - gomock is a mocking framework for the Go programming language

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070881



--- Comment #3 from Fabio Alessandro Locati  ---
Please remove the manual changelog entries:

* Fri Apr 01 2022 laiot  - 1.6.0-1
- Initial package

Since you are already using %autochangelog that auto-creates those lines.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070881
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2070860] Review Request: golang-bitbucket-creachadair-stringset - A lightweight set-of-strings implementation based on the Go built-in map type

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070860

Fabio Alessandro Locati  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Fabio Alessandro Locati  ---
go2rpm package, fedora-review is correct:

- The specfile is sane.
- License is correct
- Builds successfully in mock
- No rpmlint errors
- %check section passes
- The latest version is packaged
- The package complies with the Packaging Guidelines.

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- Add package to release-monitoring.org
- Add package to Koschei.
- Give go-sig privileges on package
- Close the review bug by referencing it in the rpm changelog and/or the Bodhi
ticket.

Thanks!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070860
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1834731] Review Request: bitcoin-core - Peer to Peer Cryptographic Currency

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731



--- Comment #151 from Neal Gompa  ---
Also, please add metainfo files for the GUI software subpackage. :)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1834731] Review Request: bitcoin-core - Peer to Peer Cryptographic Currency

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com



--- Comment #150 from Neal Gompa  ---
Oh geez, this is nuts.

I'm going to go ahead and fix this...


PACKAGE APPROVED!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - LemonLDAP-NG WebSSO

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682



--- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Sorry, I clean forgot about this review.

Everything in the last spec looks ok, with three exceptions:

a) I really don't think "LemonLDAP-NG WebSSO" makes a good summary for Fedora
users. Something like "Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management" would
work much better.
b) At one point, you make vim the default editor. Why do you do this?
c) Building the package in mock and running rpmlint on the resulting binairies
gives quite a lot of errors (mostly "files-duplicate" warnings in
lemonldap-ng-doc.noarch). Please consider fixing this.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2057302] Review Request: proxmark3 - The Swiss Army Knife of RFID Research

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057302



--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Sorry for the delay here... ;( 

I'm ok with everything except I am not a fan of the debuginfo being turned off.
Perhaps we can use one of the other find-debuginfo options... 

Perhaps we could use -p?

"The -p argument is an grep -E -style regexp matching the a file name,and must
not use anchors (^ or $)."

If there's a regex that could be all the non firmware names. I'll try and play
around with it...


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057302
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1917073] Review Request: cLaTeXMath - A dynamic and cross-platform LaTeX rendering library

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073



--- Comment #27 from Ben Beasley  ---
(In reply to Lyes Saadi from comment #26)
> I guess I should also orphan it, since I'm still shown as the admin?

You may, if you like, or you can just wait for the F34–F36 branches to reach
end-of-life. I think it doesn’t matter much since the package was never
imported.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1917073] Review Request: cLaTeXMath - A dynamic and cross-platform LaTeX rendering library

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073



--- Comment #26 from Lyes Saadi  ---
I guess I should also orphan it, since I'm still shown as the admin?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1917073] Review Request: cLaTeXMath - A dynamic and cross-platform LaTeX rendering library

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073



--- Comment #25 from Lyes Saadi  ---
Thank you, and sorry for the inconvenience!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1917073] Review Request: cLaTeXMath - A dynamic and cross-platform LaTeX rendering library

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073



--- Comment #24 from Ben Beasley  ---
(In reply to Lyes Saadi from comment #23)
> Hello,
> 
> Yes, I am still interested in packaging this, but, the reason why it wasn't
> imported is because we had legal issues which we were able to resolve, but
> in a less than ideal way. I decided after my last message to wait instead
> for the new version of the library, which would get rid of all the issues
> once and for all (and which is coming soon-ish). But, that new version also
> comes with a change of name (MicroTeX), so, I don't see a reason for keeping
> the repository (Should I open an issue with releng for this?). And I guess
> I'll just open a new review request when time comes.
> 
> Thank you for reminding me of this review request.

You can retire the package in Rawhide yourself with:

> $ fedpkg co cLaTeXMath
> $ cd cLaTeXMath
> $ fedpkg retire --notes 'Please replace this text with a brief summary of why 
> the package was retired.'

That should be all you need to do.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1917075] Review Request: notekit - Hierarchical markdown notetaking application with tablet support

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917075
Bug 1917075 depends on bug 1917073, which changed state.

Bug 1917073 Summary: Review Request: cLaTeXMath - A dynamic and cross-platform 
LaTeX rendering library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917075
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1917073] Review Request: cLaTeXMath - A dynamic and cross-platform LaTeX rendering library

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073

Lyes Saadi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
 Status|POST|CLOSED
  Flags|needinfo?(fed...@lyes.eu)   |
Last Closed||2022-04-03 15:49:41



--- Comment #23 from Lyes Saadi  ---
Hello,

Yes, I am still interested in packaging this, but, the reason why it wasn't
imported is because we had legal issues which we were able to resolve, but in a
less than ideal way. I decided after my last message to wait instead for the
new version of the library, which would get rid of all the issues once and for
all (and which is coming soon-ish). But, that new version also comes with a
change of name (MicroTeX), so, I don't see a reason for keeping the repository
(Should I open an issue with releng for this?). And I guess I'll just open a
new review request when time comes.

Thank you for reminding me of this review request.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1917073] Review Request: cLaTeXMath - A dynamic and cross-platform LaTeX rendering library

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(fed...@lyes.eu)



--- Comment #22 from Mattia Verga  ---
The package was never imported, are you still interested in finalizing this?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 1752158] Review Request: termbox - Legacy-free alternative to ncurses

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752158

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(a...@php.net)



--- Comment #9 from Mattia Verga  ---
The package was never imported, are you still interested in finalizing this?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752158
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2069453] Review Request: SDL2_sound - An abstract soundfile decoder library

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453



--- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede  ---
> Ok, I'll prepare updated SDL_sound packages for F35+ dropping the play_sound 
> util.

Done.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2071369] Review Request: loudgain - ReplayGain 2.0 audio loudness normalizer

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071369

Peter Oliver  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Peter Oliver  ---
This package is now eligible for Fedora since we now have ffpmeg.

Previous review: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5801


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071369
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2071369] New: Review Request: loudgain - ReplayGain 2.0 audio loudness normalizer

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071369

Bug ID: 2071369
   Summary: Review Request: loudgain - ReplayGain 2.0 audio
loudness normalizer
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ma...@mavit.org.uk
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/loudgain.git/plain/loudgain.spec
SRPM URL:
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/7205/537205/loudgain-0.6.8-6.fc37.src.rpm
Description: ReplayGain 2.0 audio loudness normalizer
Fedora Account System Username: mavit


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071369
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2070881] Review Request: golang-github-mock - gomock is a mocking framework for the Go programming language

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070881



--- Comment #2 from Carmelo Sarta  ---
Thank Fale for your help.
I pushed the fixed files in the same repo.

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Laiot/golang-github-mock-rpm/master/golang-github-mock.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/Laiot/golang-github-mock-rpm/raw/7ae36f1cac7dad54a958079b640d0ab9a96ec38e/golang-github-mock-1.6.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
Description: gomock is a mocking framework for the Go programming language. It
integrates well with Go's built-in testing package, but can be used in other
contexts too.
Fedora Account System Username: laiot


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070881
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[Bug 2070860] Review Request: golang-bitbucket-creachadair-stringset - A lightweight set-of-strings implementation based on the Go built-in map type

2022-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070860



--- Comment #2 from Carmelo Sarta  ---
Thank you Fale for your comment.
I followed your instructions and pushed the modified .spec and srpm files in
the same repo.

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Laiot/golang-bitbucket-creachadair-stringset-rpm/master/golang-bitbucket-creachadair-stringset.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/Laiot/golang-bitbucket-creachadair-stringset-rpm/blob/master/golang-bitbucket-creachadair-stringset-0.0.10-1.20220331git1f9a78a.fc36.src.rpm
Description: A lightweight set-of-strings implementation based on the Go
built-in map type.
Fedora Account System Username: laiot


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070860
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure