[Bug 2165381] Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165381] Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165381] Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-2bf1e6c40c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2bf1e6c40c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165381] Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 Charles R. Anderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-03-09 04:42:58 --- Comment #12 from Charles R. Anderson --- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6a39297686 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176241] Review Request: golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo - Sysinfo is a Go library providing Linux OS / kernel / hardware system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949195 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949195&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5603636 to 5617056 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176241] Review Request: golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo - Sysinfo is a Go library providing Linux OS / kernel / hardware system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 --- Comment #4 from Link Dupont --- Spec URL: https://linkdupont.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo.spec SRPM URL: https://linkdupont.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo-0.9.5-2.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174487] Review Request: esmi_ib_library - E-SMI: EPYC™ System management Interface In-band Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174487 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-b4b332a3ce has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b4b332a3ce See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174487 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173123] Review Request: python-postorius - Web UI for GNU Mailman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173123 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-64d3cc740b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-64d3cc740b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173123 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173743] Review Request: python-hyperkitty - A web interface to access GNU Mailman v3 archives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173743 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-64d3cc740b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-64d3cc740b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173743 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949167 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949167&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5615159 to 5616498 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5616498 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2174438-painless-password-rotation/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05616498-painless-password-rotation/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #10 from Salman Butt --- Due to a technical issue and error on my part, i had to re-create the upstream repo. I hope this does not cause any confusion. Verison tag is back to 0.1 Will follow proper versioning and best practice form this point onwards. Updates: Spec URL: https://cn137.fedorapeople.org/painless-password-rotation.spec SRPM URL: https://cn137.fedorapeople.org/painless-password-rotation-0.1-1.fc39.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98463393 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176200] Review Request: rust-blowfish - Blowfish block cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176200 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-03-08 23:02:48 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176200 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176200] Review Request: rust-blowfish - Blowfish block cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176200 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-blowfish -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176200 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176670] Review Request: fedora-iot-config - ostree configuration file for Fedora IoT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176670 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://fedoraproject.org/ --- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5616167 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2176670-fedora-iot-config/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05616167-fedora-iot-config/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176670 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176670] New: Review Request: fedora-iot-config - ostree configuration file for Fedora IoT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176670 Bug ID: 2176670 Summary: Review Request: fedora-iot-config - ostree configuration file for Fedora IoT Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pwha...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SPEC: https://pwhalen.fedorapeople.org/packages/fedora-iot-config/fedora-iot-config.spec SRPM: https://pwhalen.fedorapeople.org/packages/fedora-iot-config/fedora-iot-config-0.0-1.fc37.src.rpm Description: Fedora IoT configuration file for ostree repositories. FAS: pwhalen Scratch: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98466256 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176670 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176241] Review Request: golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo - Sysinfo is a Go library providing Linux OS / kernel / hardware system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 --- Comment #3 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga --- Please, upload an updated srpm created with the new spec. > golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo.x86_64: E: summary-too-long Sysinfo is a Go > library providing Linux OS / kernel / hardware system information Reduce the Summary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2161739] Review Request: rust-pyo3-log - Logging bridge from pyo3 native extension to python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161739 --- Comment #18 from Fabio Valentini --- I've checked, and the latest matrix-synapse release also started depending on v0.8.1. Since nothing in Fedora currently depends on pyo3-log, I've gone ahead and submitted updates for the package. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161739 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176200] Review Request: rust-blowfish - Blowfish block cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176200 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC||decatho...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. - package builds and installs without errors on rawhide - test suite is run and all unit tests pass - latest version of the crate is packaged - license matches upstream specification (MIT OR Apache-2.0) and is acceptable for Fedora - license files are included with %license in %files - package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional) - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - track package in koschei for all built branches === I think this is your first Rust package? Just a general word of advice: Due to peculiarities of how Rust packaging works, it is necessary to re-generate spec files with rust2rpm for every new version of a crate. For example, the list of "+feature-devel" subpackages needs to be kept in sync with "features" from upstream metadata in Cargo.toml. rpmautospec helps with this (because you don't need to take care to preserve changelog etc.). As soon as the repository for rust-pbkdf2_0.9 is ready, I will build v0.10 and v0.9, and review the other two packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176200 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2162851] Review Request: symcrypt - Cryptographic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851 --- Comment #9 from Benson Muite --- Thanks for updated patch. May need to explicitly link glibc: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/SymCrypt/fedora-rawhide-aarch64/05615546-SymCrypt/fedora-review/review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175893] Review Request: autorestic - Config driven, easy backup cli for restic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175893 Bug 2175893 depends on bug 2175886, which changed state. Bug 2175886 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-buger-goterm - Advanced terminal output in Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175893 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175886] Review Request: golang-github-buger-goterm - Advanced terminal output in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 Major Hayden 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-03-08 18:08:36 --- Comment #4 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Done! https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-33fa27a583 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949132 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949132&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5615144 to 5615532 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5615532 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2176394-xine-ui/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05615532-xine-ui/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #8 from Xavier Bachelot --- Fixed skins URLs. Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/xine-ui.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/xine-ui-0.99.14-3.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5615441 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2175818-input-leap/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05615441-input-leap/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173751] Review Request: mod_auth_cas - unretire package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173751 --- Comment #20 from Scott Williams --- Patches submitted to Tim's repo: https://github.com/thansen11/mod_auth_cas_rpm/pull/3/files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173751 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949127 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949127&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5603815 to 5615441 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176131] Review Request: fim - Lightweight universal image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176131 Lukas Javorsky changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ado...@redhat.com ||) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176131 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176131] Review Request: fim - Lightweight universal image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176131
--- Comment #2 from Lukas Javorsky ---
My notes:
- Change the license name to the commonly used GPLv2 and GPLv3 (look at files
config.guess and config.sub)
- Add version-release to the changelog entry
- Take a look at the checksum error for the key
- Resolve "Bad spec filename" error
- Check all failures from Fedora review tool
Output from the Fedora review tool from comment#1:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Note: Check did not completechecksum differs and there are problems
running diff. Please verify manually.
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[-]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
2", "FSF All Permissive License", "*No copyright* GNU General Public
License", "[generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or
later", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU General
Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public
License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License
v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "X11 License
[generated file]", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version
2", "GNU Library General Public License v2 or later". 154 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-
rpmbuild/results/fim/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 696320 bytes in 16 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Spec f
[Bug 2175886] Review Request: golang-github-buger-goterm - Advanced terminal output in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 --- Comment #3 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Thank you, Link! Repo requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51833 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175886] Review Request: golang-github-buger-goterm - Advanced terminal output in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-buger-goterm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #18 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu --- SPEC Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05615430-input-leap/input-leap.spec SRPM Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05615430-input-leap/input-leap-2.4.0%5E20230306gite71fbbfe-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173751] Review Request: mod_auth_cas - unretire package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173751 --- Comment #19 from Scott Williams --- "We don't necessarily need to wait for upstream to merge that and the pcre2 change. We can include them in the package as patch files, with comments linking to their upstream PRs. In fact I recommend doing that." The m4 one should be trivially easy. The pcre2 PR was submitted against HEAD, so I might create a branch against current release tag and see if I can cherry-pick the commits into it to make the patch. It's been over a decade since I've rolled a significant custom .patch and last time I used regular old diff, so this'll give me a chance to try out using `git format-patch`. Tim, how about I create the patches and you can plug them into the spec with the other change? I'll submit the patch files in a PR against your repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173751 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173940] Review Request: golang-github-quic-qpack - A minimal QPACK RFC9204 implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173940
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Link Dupont ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT
License". 26 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/link/2173940-golang-github-quic-
qpack/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 163840 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint
[Bug 2165381] Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ancient -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173940] Review Request: golang-github-quic-qpack - A minimal QPACK RFC9204 implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173940 Link Dupont changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@sub-pop.net Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@sub-pop.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173940 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175886] Review Request: golang-github-buger-goterm - Advanced terminal output in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Link Dupont ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "MIT License", "Unknown or
generated". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/link/2175886-golang-github-buger-
goterm/licensecheck.txt
[-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlin
[Bug 2175886] Review Request: golang-github-buger-goterm - Advanced terminal output in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 Link Dupont changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@sub-pop.net Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@sub-pop.net Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175886 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176342] Review Request: yggdrasil-worker-package-manager - Package manager worker for yggdrasil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176342 --- Comment #1 from Link Dupont --- Spec URL: https://linkdupont.fedorapeople.org/yggdrasil-worker-package-manager.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/linkdupont/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05604871-yggdrasil-worker-package-manager/yggdrasil-worker-package-manager-0.2.0-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176342 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5615144 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2176394-xine-ui/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05615144-xine-ui/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949075 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949075&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5613863 to 5615144 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949074 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949074&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5603067 to 5615159 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5615159 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2174438-painless-password-rotation/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05615159-painless-password-rotation/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949060 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949060&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5528322 to 5615128 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5615128 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2168538-minidlna/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05615128-minidlna/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #7 from Salman Butt --- Summary of Changes: * Added preserve timestamp * Updated BuildRequires (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_systemd) In regards to file: painless-password-rotation.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/vault-rotate 600 This is intentionally set to 0600 since it is meant to store a token that the API uses to communicate with the Vault Server The token should only be accessed by the root user to avoid misuse and potential sealing of the server; brute force attempts. Spec URL: https://cn137.fedorapeople.org/painless-password-rotation.spec SRPM URL: https://cn137.fedorapeople.org/painless-password-rotation-0.3-2.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot --- Thanks Neal, all (and more) fixed: - Use SPDX License: tag - Drop useless conditionals - Drop useless comments - Add EL7 cond for %%post/%%postun - Escape unescaped %% in %%changelog - Drop very old Obsoletes:/Provides: for xine/xine-skins Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/xine-ui.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/xine-ui-0.99.14-2.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #17 from Brian J. Murrell --- Heh, yes. I tend to forget that synergy is dead to me, but not everyone. So I agree that probably only Obsoletes+Provides for barrier is appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175159] Review Request: jurand - A tool for manipulating Java symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175159 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-03-08 14:22:58 --- Comment #10 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Package has been built for rawhide. Bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d30349c2f7 This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi. Closing review as resolved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175159 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2158825] Review Request: python-hid-parser - Parse HID report descriptors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158825 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/FFY00/py ||thon-hid-parser --- Comment #4 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5614988 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2158825-python-hid-parser/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05614988-python-hid-parser/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158825 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5614984 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2176391-vcdimager/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05614984-vcdimager/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949047 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949047&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5614851 to 5614984 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2158825] Review Request: python-hid-parser - Parse HID report descriptors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158825 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dominik@greysecto | |r.net) | --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Thanks for the review, Troy. I was on vacation, sorry for delayed response. (In reply to Troy Curtis from comment #2) > Issues > == > - This project can use the build dependency generator instead of manually > specifying them (other than python3-devel of course): > > %generate_buildrequires > %pyproject_buildrequires -x test > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/ > #Automatically-generated-dependencies Done. Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/python-hid-parser/python-hid-parser.spec SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/python-hid-parser/python-hid-parser-0.0.3-2.fc37.src.rpm * Wed Mar 08 2023 Dominik Mierzejewski - 0.0.3-2 - use automatic BuildRequires generation - conditionalize running tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158825 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #16 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu --- Ok, we can obsolete barrier (primary developers moved to inputleap) but not sure about synergy. https://github.com/symless/synergy-core/commits/master https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/synergy/commits/rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 --- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot --- Fixed License: to use SPDX and manpages to use a glob instead of fixed .gz. Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/vcdimager.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/vcdimager-2.0.1-16.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
needinfo canceled: [Bug 2042375] Review Request: gpu-trace - Simple script to collect GPU traces
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Dorinda has canceled Package Review 's request for Dorinda 's needinfo: Bug 2042375: Review Request: gpu-trace - Simple script to collect GPU traces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042375 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2042375] Review Request: gpu-trace - Simple script to collect GPU traces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042375 Dorinda changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dbas...@redhat.co | |m) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042375 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #15 from Brian J. Murrell --- Ahh. Good catch on replacing synergy as well Neal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5614851 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2176391-vcdimager/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05614851-vcdimager/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949028 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949028&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5613857 to 5614851 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #14 from Neal Gompa --- That means we need "Obsoletes+Provides" stanza for barrier (and potentially synergy too...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #13 from Neal Gompa --- No, the package replacement needs to be part of this package review, since it is intended to replace barrier and synergy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #12 from Brian J. Murrell --- Hi Ali. It seems like adding Obsoletes: would be part of the package approval process (it's going to modify the specfile after all) and discussing it afterward would be like discussing how to get the toothpaste out of the tube after it's already all been squeezed out. Or am I misunderstanding something? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
> It also contains the %{!?_without_caca:color ascii art and} framebuffer
> version%{!?_without_caca:s}.
One more of the conditional goop that can be dropped too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Initial spec review:
> %{!?_without_caca:BuildRequires: libcaca-devel}
> %{!?_without_lirc:BuildRequires: lirc-devel}
We can drop the conditional goop here since it's available everywhere xine-lib
is (EPEL9 and Fedora)
> %if 0%{!?_without_lirc}
> export LIRC_CFLAGS="-llirc_client"
> export LIRC_LIBS="-llirc_client"
> %endif
Ditto for here too.
> %if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} < 8
> %post
> # Mime type
> update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :
> update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || :
> # Icon cache
> touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
>
> %postun
> # Mime type
> update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :
> update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || :
> # Icon cache
> if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
> touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null
> gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
> fi
>
> %posttrans
> gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
> %endif
We can drop all this since this package can't be built on anything older than
EPEL 9.
> %{!?_without_caca:%{_bindir}/cacaxine}
We can drop the conditional goop here since it's available everywhere xine-lib
is (EPEL9 and Fedora)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot --- Thanks Neal. All fixed in : Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/vcdimager.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/vcdimager-2.0.1-15.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
> %{_mandir}/man1/cdxa2mpeg.1.gz
> %{_mandir}/man1/vcd-info.1.gz
> %{_mandir}/man1/vcdimager.1.gz
> %{_mandir}/man1/vcdxbuild.1.gz
> %{_mandir}/man1/vcdxgen.1.gz
> %{_mandir}/man1/vcdxminfo.1.gz
> %{_mandir}/man1/vcdxrip.1.gz
Please use "1*" here, because we don't guarantee gzipped man pages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa --- Oh I missed one... > License: GPLv2+ This needs to be "GPL-2.0-or-later" now. Cf. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_valid_license_short_names -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2162851] Review Request: symcrypt - Cryptographic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851 --- Comment #8 from Petr Menšík --- Created attachment 1949025 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949025&action=edit Include all headers patch Additional change on top of previous. Make devel require pkgconfig to own %_libdir/pkgconfig directory. And include also static headers from source dir into headers, making them hopefully usable. Because there are quite a lot required local files, move headers into %_includedir/SymCrypt subdirectory. Should provide working pkg-config including those paths. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Initial spec review:
> Requires(post): info
> Requires(preun): info
This is only needed for EL7. EL8 and newer have file triggers so this should be
dropped for them.
> find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} ';'
This should be %{buildroot} for consistency
> %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig
> %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig
This is only needed for EL7. If you want to have EL7 compatibility, please
switch to "%ldconfig_scriptlets libs" instead, so it becomes a no-op on EL8+
and Fedora.
> %post
> for infofile in vcdxrip.info vcdimager.info vcd-info.info; do
> /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/${infofile} %{_infodir}/dir 2>/dev/null || :
> done
>
> %preun
> if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then
> for infofile in vcdxrip.info vcdimager.info vcd-info.info; do
> /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/${infofile} %{_infodir}/dir \
> 2>/dev/null || :
> done
> fi
This is only needed for EL7. EL8 and newer have file triggers so this should be
dropped for them.
> %{_bindir}/*
> %{_mandir}/man1/*
This kind of globbing is not explicit/specific enough, there's no way to tell
if the package may add conflicting binaries.
Cf. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_explicit_lists
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2162851] Review Request: symcrypt - Cryptographic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851 Petr Menšík changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Petr Menšík --- Oh, found created SymCrypt-devel package is not usable. It is missing main symcrypt.h header and its dependencies. It seems those headers should go into subdirectory, because they need a lot of files with names unrelated to the package. Tried to use it for building SymCrypt-OpenSSL, but found there are missing headers in it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176241] Review Request: golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo - Sysinfo is a Go library providing Linux OS / kernel / hardware system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 --- Comment #2 from Link Dupont --- Wow, I didn't notice that the spec produced by a build does not contain the autochangelog bits. I did use autochangelog. Here's the spec I used to produce the srpm. https://linkdupont.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2162851] Review Request: symcrypt - Cryptographic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851
--- Comment #6 from Benson Muite ---
Thanks. Made most of the updates. Getting following from fedora-review on
AArch64, see
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/SymCrypt/build/5612997/
SymCrypt.aarch64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103.1.0 __aarch64_ldset4_relax
(/usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103.1.0)
SymCrypt.aarch64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103.1.0 __aarch64_ldadd8_relax
(/usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103.1.0)
SymCrypt-devel.aarch64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so
SymCrypt-devel.aarch64: W: no-documentation
SymCrypt-devel.aarch64: W: library-not-linked-against-libc
/usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so
SymCrypt.aarch64: W: library-not-linked-against-libc
/usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103.1.0
SymCrypt-debuginfo.aarch64: E: files-duplicated-waste 1445656
SymCrypt-devel.aarch64: E: double-slash-in-pkgconfig-path
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/symcrypt.pc includedir=${prefix}//usr/include/symcrypt
Once have resolved, will upload to the repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://www.xine-project.org ||/ --- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5613863 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2176394-xine-ui/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05613863-xine-ui/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176171] Review Request: R-httr2 - Perform HTTP Requests and Process the Responses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176171 --- Comment #3 from Iñaki Ucar --- A test and a vignette seem to require Internet access, and the checks fail. Again, I would remove that test and check without rebuilding vignettes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176171 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://www.gnu.org/software ||/vcdimager/ --- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5613857 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2176391-vcdimager/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05613857-vcdimager/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176171] Review Request: R-httr2 - Perform HTTP Requests and Process the Responses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176171 Iñaki Ucar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i.uca...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176171 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC||ngomp...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] New: Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 Bug ID: 2176394 Summary: Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/xine-ui.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/xine-ui-0.99.14-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: xine-ui is the traditional, skinned GUI for xine-lib Fedora Account System Username: xavierb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176171] Review Request: R-httr2 - Perform HTTP Requests and Process the Responses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176171 Iñaki Ucar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.uca...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Iñaki Ucar --- I would just remove the particular test file that uses docopt instead of packaging it... Packages should work fine without Suggests, including tests (except of course for the test suite), so this kind of thing is a bug really. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176171 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC||ngomp...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] New: Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 Bug ID: 2176391 Summary: Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/vcdimager.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/vcdimager-2.0.1-14.fc39.src.rpm Description: VCDImager allows you to create VideoCD BIN/CUE CD images from MPEG files. These can be burned with cdrdao or any other program capable of burning BIN/CUE files. Also included is VCDRip which does the reverse operation, that is to rip MPEG streams from images or burned VideoCDs and to show information about a VideoCD. Fedora Account System Username: xavierb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176241] Review Request: golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo - Sysinfo is a Go library providing Linux OS / kernel / hardware system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mi...@olasagasti.info
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
CC||mi...@olasagasti.info
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga ---
> ## START: Set by rpmautospec
> ## (rpmautospec version 0.3.5)
> ## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog
> %define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua:
> release_number = 1;
> base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}"));
> print(release_number + base_release_number - 1);
> }%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}}
> ## END: Set by rpmautospec
Is this block required nowadays?
> %global golicenses LICENSE
You're missing cpuid/LICENSE, you can try with something like:
%global golicenses LICENSE cpuid-LICENSE
(...)
%install
%gopkginstall
mv cpuid/LICENSE cpuid-LICENSE
(...)
%license LICENSE cpuid-LICENSE
> %changelog
> * Tue Mar 07 2023 Link Dupont - 0.9.5-1
> - Intitial package
I suggest to use %autochangelog to make it easier to maintain the spec in the
future, but not a hard requirement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176170] Review Request: R-docopt - Command-Line Interface Specification Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176170
Iñaki Ucar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i.uca...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Status|NEW |POST
CC||i.uca...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Iñaki Ucar ---
All ok (copying the review below for reference). Package approved.
Just please use the URL field as specified in the package guidelines upon
package import:
URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=%{packname}
Source: %{url}&version=%{packver}#/%{packname}_%{packver}.tar.gz
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION, NEWS
- Package requires R-core.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* MIT License", "Unknown or generated", "MIT
License". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-
rpmbuild/results/R-docopt/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep
[Bug 2172050] Review Request: build-helper-maven-plugin - Build Helper Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172050 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-03-08 09:53:16 --- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Renamed package was pushed to rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4cf91103db Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172050 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2172052] Review Request: maven-bundle-plugin - Maven Bundle Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172052 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-03-08 09:53:11 --- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Renamed package was pushed to rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-663517ef98 Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172052 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176131] Review Request: fim - Lightweight universal image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176131 Lukas Javorsky changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ljavo...@redhat.com CC||ljavo...@redhat.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flags||fedora-review? Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176131 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 Lukas Javorsky changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2176131 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176131 [Bug 2176131] Review Request: fim - Lightweight universal image viewer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2172050] Review Request: build-helper-maven-plugin - Build Helper Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172050 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172050 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2172052] Review Request: maven-bundle-plugin - Maven Bundle Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172052 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172052 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2172052] Review Request: maven-bundle-plugin - Maven Bundle Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172052 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maven-bundle-plugin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172052 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2172050] Review Request: build-helper-maven-plugin - Build Helper Maven Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172050 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/build-helper-maven-plugin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172050 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
