[Bug 1942132] Review Request: intel-media-driver-free - The Intel Media Driver for VAAPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 --- Comment #36 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- I don't get why there is a libigfxcmrt sub-package out of this project. Is this used by some other component ? My understanding is that library is a fork of this project: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2114125 Now if intel-media-driver is the only user of the library, I don't get the problem to have it bundled at all. It will avoid the need of any ABI computation. Also it will ease the swap between the full featured and Until a solution is found WRT alternative version (https://github.com/intel/libva/issues/639 ), I would be okay to have a downstream patch with the iHD-free driver name added into libva. Please rename as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173677] Review Request: regextester - Regex Tester for elementary OS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173677
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #20 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or
later", "GNU Library General Public License v2 or later". 419 files
have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/vascom/2173677-regextester/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/mo,
/usr/share/locale/mo/LC_MESSAGES
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/locale/mo/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/mo
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile an
[Bug 2165381] Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-3b4f9763b0 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-3b4f9763b0 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3b4f9763b0 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0a7acf6022 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0a7acf6022 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b87f25b5cf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b87f25b5cf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2168112] Review Request: phpunit10 - The PHP Unit Testing framework version 10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112 Benson Muite changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|benson_mu...@emailplus.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165381] Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-3f467146e3 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-3f467146e3 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3f467146e3 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176934] Review Request: x86-simd-sort - C++ header file library for high performance SIMD based sorting algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934 Benson Muite changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|benson_mu...@emailplus.org Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6065fdb4ac has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6065fdb4ac See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-509bbdf58d has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-509bbdf58d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165381] Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-2bf1e6c40c has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2bf1e6c40c See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2172068] Review Request: python-tcx2gpx - Convert Garmin TPX to GPX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172068 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-0f4dd26676 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0f4dd26676 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172068 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1942132] Review Request: intel-media-driver-free - The Intel Media Driver for VAAPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 --- Comment #34 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949453 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949453&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5227768 to 5620209 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1942132] Review Request: intel-media-driver-free - The Intel Media Driver for VAAPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/intel/me ||dia-driver --- Comment #35 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5620209 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-1942132-intel-media-driver-free/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05620209-intel-media-driver-free/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1942132] Review Request: intel-media-driver-free - The Intel Media Driver for VAAPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #33 from František Zatloukal ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/intel-media-driver-free/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05620176-intel-media-driver-free/intel-media-driver-free.spec
SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/intel-media-driver-free/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05620176-intel-media-driver-free/intel-media-driver-free-23.1.3-1.fc39.src.rpm
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #32)
> > %{_libdir}/libigfxcmrt.so*
>
> Why isn't the regular shared library split out into a subpackage rather than
> being in the devel subpackage? It doesn't belong in the main driver package,
> sure, but it also doesn't belong in the devel subpackage either.
Should be addressed, package bumped to the latest upstream tag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wslay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa --- Looks great now! PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot --- Thanks Neal ! Request for unretirement: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11329 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 --- Comment #8 from Rémi Verschelde --- [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Thanks, both fixed! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License". 43 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/ngompa/2176889-wslay/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in wslay-
devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packag
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0a7acf6022 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0a7acf6022 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-3f467146e3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3f467146e3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6065fdb4ac has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6065fdb4ac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-509bbdf58d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-509bbdf58d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b87f25b5cf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b87f25b5cf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Rémi Verschelde from comment #5)
> Indeed. I've added gcc-c++ (seems like Fedora's CMake macro requires g++
> even though the library is C only) and make.
>
This is actually because the CMakeLists doesn't declare it as a C-only project.
By default CMake assumes C++ projects unless you say otherwise.
Feel free to fix this if you want.
> I also had to dehardcode "build" in the "%check" section:
> ```
> %check
> %{_vpath_builddir}/tests/wslay_tests
> ```
>
> It's now building fine using mock's rawhide config on Mageia. (Updated spec
> and SRPM at the same location.)
Excellent!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 Salman Butt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-03-09 21:13:19 --- Comment #23 from Salman Butt --- Build Success Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2167744 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889
--- Comment #5 from Rémi Verschelde ---
Indeed. I've added gcc-c++ (seems like Fedora's CMake macro requires g++ even
though the library is C only) and make.
I also had to dehardcode "build" in the "%check" section:
```
%check
%{_vpath_builddir}/tests/wslay_tests
```
It's now building fine using mock's rawhide config on Mageia. (Updated spec and
SRPM at the same location.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2127961] Review Request: kpipewire - Set of convenient classes to use PipeWire in Qt projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127961 marcd...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |COMPLETED Last Closed||2023-03-09 20:44:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127961 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Neal Gompa --- Okay, fine with me. Everything else looks good here. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #12 from Xavier Bachelot --- Sure, but xine-lib still lives in RPM Fusion for EL7 and EL8, so I'd like to keep the conditionals to be able to keep the spec synch'ed across branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vcdimager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #22 from Salman Butt --- Branch Request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51868 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51869 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51870 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51871 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51872 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51873 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa --- The build fails due to missing "BuildRequires: gcc" and missing "BuildRequires: make". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/painless-password-rotation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5619428 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2175818-input-leap/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619428-input-leap/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949414 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949414&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5615441 to 5619428 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 Robby Callicotte changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438
--- Comment #20 from Robby Callicotte ---
Official Review:
This package is approved. See fedora-review output below.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT License", "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/packer/fedora-
review/2174438-painless-password-rotation/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
Note: Systemd service file(s) in painless-password-rotation
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 --- Comment #22 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu --- I've missed that. SPEC Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619358-input-leap/input-leap.spec SRPM Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619358-input-leap/input-leap-2.4.0%5E20230306gite71fbbfe-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176934] Review Request: x86-simd-sort - C++ header file library for high performance SIMD based sorting algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/intel/x8 ||6-simd-sort --- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5619356 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2176934-x86-simd-sort/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619356-x86-simd-sort/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176934] New: Review Request: x86-simd-sort - C++ header file library for high performance SIMD based sorting algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934 Bug ID: 2176934 Summary: Review Request: x86-simd-sort - C++ header file library for high performance SIMD based sorting algorithms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: aekoro...@linux.intel.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SPEC Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619345-x86-simd-sort/x86-simd-sort.spec SRPM Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619345-x86-simd-sort/x86-simd-sort-1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: C++ header file library for SIMD based 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit data type sorting on x86 processors. Source header files are available in src directory. We currently only have AVX-512 based implementation of quicksort. This repository also includes a test suite which can be built and run to test the sorting algorithms for correctness. It also has benchmarking code to compare its performance relative to std::sort. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2049689] Review Request: python-awscrt - Python bindings for the AWS Common Runtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049689 --- Comment #3 from Nikola Forró --- I've reworked the first patch to (hopefully) make it upstreamable. I'm still not sure I fully understand Fedora crypto policy and if it is really necessary, either way, linking with OpenSSL seems like a better idea than statically linking with AWS-LC. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/python-awscrt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619333-python-awscrt/python-awscrt.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/python-awscrt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619333-python-awscrt/python-awscrt-0.16.10-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049689 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2175818] Review Request: input-leap - Share mouse and keyboard between multiple computers over the network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818
--- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa ---
> %if %{with_snapshot}
> Version: 2.4.0%{?with_snapshot:^%{gitdate}git%{shortcommit}}
> %else
> Version: 2.4.0
> %endif
You can drop the %if conditional. it's redundant.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176394] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 --- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa --- It probably makes sense to drop all the EL7 specific stuff, since we don't have xine-lib in EPEL7 (or even EPEL8). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176394 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176933] New: Review Request: python-accessible-pygments - Accessible pygments themes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176933 Bug ID: 2176933 Summary: Review Request: python-accessible-pygments - Accessible pygments themes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganje...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-accessible-pygments/python-accessible-pygments.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-accessible-pygments/python-accessible-pygments-0.0.3-1.fc37.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: This package includes a collection of accessible themes for pygments based on different sources. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176933 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949413 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949413&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5619223 to 5619338 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5619338 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2174438-painless-password-rotation/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619338-painless-password-rotation/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #17 from Salman Butt --- Summary of Changes: * Updated manpage Spec URL: https://cn137.fedorapeople.org/painless-password-rotation.spec SRPM URL: https://cn137.fedorapeople.org/painless-password-rotation-0.3-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176391] Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa --- This looks great now. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5619223 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2174438-painless-password-rotation/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05619223-painless-password-rotation/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949408 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949408&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5616498 to 5619223 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 --- Comment #14 from Salman Butt --- Summary of Changes: * Corrected script name to match man page; resolving: no-manual-page-for-binary rotate-linux-password.sh Spec URL: https://cn137.fedorapeople.org/painless-password-rotation.spec SRPM URL: https://cn137.fedorapeople.org/painless-password-rotation-0.2-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 --- Comment #3 from Rémi Verschelde --- Thanks, that looks much better. I updated the Spec and SRPM linked in the OP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Created attachment 1949405 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949405&action=edit mgarepo output with full author name logs I pulled the log from the Mageia SVN for a fuller RPM log matching Fedora changelog conventions. Can you update this package to use that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: wslay - Lightweight WebSocket library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: -|library in C -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] Review Request: -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2174438] Review Request: painless-password-rotation - Automates password rotation using HashiCorp Vault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438
--- Comment #13 from Robby Callicotte ---
Salman,
The latest update shows discrepancies in your spec file:
> painless-password-rotation.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> painless-password-rotation.noarch: E: non-readable
> /etc/sysconfig/vault-rotate 600
> painless-password-rotation.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
> rotate-linux-password.sh
> painless-password-rotation.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3-1
> ['0.1-1.fc39', '0.1-1']
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings, 1 badness; has
> taken 0.0 s
> Name: painless-password-rotation
> Version: 0.1
> Release: 1%{?dist}
> %changelog
> * Mon Mar 06 2023 Salman Butt - 0.3-1
> - Initial build
Your changelog entry needs to match the V-R entries listed in the preamble.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174438
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176837] Review Request: godot3 - Godot 3.x compatibility package, adapted from godot package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/godot3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176837] Review Request: godot3 - Godot 3.x compatibility package, adapted from godot package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 --- Comment #4 from Rémi Verschelde --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3) > I did notice that you have a note about bundling wslay because it's not > packaged. Can you put up a package review for that so we can unbundle it? Yes I can :) Here we go: bug 2176889. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176889] New: Review Request: -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 Bug ID: 2176889 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rversche...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://akien.fedorapeople.org/srpms/wslay.spec SRPM URL: https://akien.fedorapeople.org/srpms/wslay-1.1.1-1.mga9.src.rpm Description: Lightweight WebSocket library in C Fedora Account System Username: akien wslay is a lightweight WebSocket library, used notably by Godot Engine which is packaged in Fedora as `godot` (and soon `godot3` too following bug 2176837). The godot package in Fedora currently builds wslay from source, but it can be built easily as a system library, like I did for the Mageia package. So I'm proposing to include that package in Fedora too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176889 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2049689] Review Request: python-awscrt - Python bindings for the AWS Common Runtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049689 --- Comment #2 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Sweet. I'll get a look today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049689 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176837] Review Request: godot3 - Godot 3.x compatibility package, adapted from godot package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- I did notice that you have a note about bundling wslay because it's not packaged. Can you put up a package review for that so we can unbundle it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176837] Review Request: godot3 - Godot 3.x compatibility package, adapted from godot package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- This package is effectively a rename, and the diff is concentrated to that. The package data is comprehensive, follows our guidelines, builds and installs, and otherwise looks good. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176241] Review Request: golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo - Sysinfo is a Go library providing Linux OS / kernel / hardware system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949381 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949381&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5617056 to 5618866 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176241] Review Request: golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo - Sysinfo is a Go library providing Linux OS / kernel / hardware system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 --- Comment #6 from Link Dupont --- Spec URL: https://linkdupont.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo.spec SRPM URL: https://linkdupont.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-zcalusic-sysinfo-0.9.5-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2161739] Review Request: rust-pyo3-log - Logging bridge from pyo3 native extension to python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161739 --- Comment #19 from John Wass --- Thank you, this is very helpful! I had a bz request coming for this, then one of my own bugs skipped line :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161739 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176837] Review Request: godot3 - Godot 3.x compatibility package, adapted from godot package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC||ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176837] New: Review Request: godot3 - Godot 3.x compatibility package, adapted from godot package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 Bug ID: 2176837 Summary: Review Request: godot3 - Godot 3.x compatibility package, adapted from godot package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rversche...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://akien.fedorapeople.org/srpms/godot3.spec SRPM URL: https://akien.fedorapeople.org/srpms/godot3-3.5.2-1.mga9.src.rpm= Description: Multi-platform 2D and 3D game engine with a feature-rich editor (version 3) Fedora Account System Username: akien Existing `godot` package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/godot Diff of changes between godot-3.4.5-4 and godot3-3.5.2-1: https://akien.fedorapeople.org/srpms/godot-to-godot3.diff This follows bug 1552767 where the `godot` package was approved in 2018, and I'm its current maintainer (as well as upstream project maintainer). We just released Godot 4.0 as a major, compatibility breaking update, and we would like to provide both versions in parallel to Fedora users, so they can choose to stay on Godot 3.x for their existing projects, or port their projects to Godot 4.x. So this new package request is basically forking `godot` to `godot3`, with appropriate renames, and updating the package from 3.4.5 to 3.5.2 while at it. The main `godot` package will be upgraded to 4.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176837 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://lemonldap-ng.org --- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5617891 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2050682-lemonldap-ng/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05617891-lemonldap-ng/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2049689] Review Request: python-awscrt - Python bindings for the AWS Common Runtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049689 Nikola Forró changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfo...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Nikola Forró --- Update for the current state of the upstream project. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/python-awscrt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05618049-python-awscrt/python-awscrt.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/python-awscrt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05618049-python-awscrt/python-awscrt-0.16.10-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049689 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #8 from Xavier Bachelot --- COPR build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/xavierb/lemonldap-ng/build/5617980/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176805] Review Request: journal-notify - notifications whenever systemd journal logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176805 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen --- *** Bug 2176806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176805 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176806] Review Request: journal-notify - notifications whenever systemd journal logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176806 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2023-03-09 11:09:31 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2176805 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176806 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176806] New: Review Request: journal-notify - notifications whenever systemd journal logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176806 Bug ID: 2176806 Summary: Review Request: journal-notify - notifications whenever systemd journal logs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: steve.tray...@cern.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/journal-notify/journal-notify.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/journal-notify/journal-notify-0.1.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: Produces notifications whenever systemd journal logs an entry Fedora Account System Username: stevetraylen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176806 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176805] New: Review Request: journal-notify - notifications whenever systemd journal logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176805 Bug ID: 2176805 Summary: Review Request: journal-notify - notifications whenever systemd journal logs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: steve.tray...@cern.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/journal-notify/journal-notify.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/journal-notify/journal-notify-0.1.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: Produces notifications whenever systemd journal logs an entry Fedora Account System Username: stevetraylen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176805 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot --- Hi Emmanuel, Here's an update to latest release. Lasso support has been disabled for F38+ but I guess it could be enabled back after the following PR to lasso has been merged: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lasso/pull-request/8 has been merged. Upstream draft PR for specfile changes for the Fedora review is here : https://gitlab.ow2.org/lemonldap-ng/lemonldap-ng/-/merge_requests/332 Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/lemonldap-ng.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/lemonldap-ng-2.0.16-2.fc39.src.rpm Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2168112] Review Request: phpunit10 - The PHP Unit Testing framework version 10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Created attachment 1949255 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949255&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5585296 to 5617741 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2168112] Review Request: phpunit10 - The PHP Unit Testing framework version 10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5617741 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2168112-phpunit10/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05617741-phpunit10/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2168112] Review Request: phpunit10 - The PHP Unit Testing framework version 10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112 --- Comment #17 from Remi Collet --- Updated to 10.0.15 Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/phpunit10.git/plain/phpunit10.spec?id=61ce2ef0dfaf8766cc637ab9e2335ed7ef44d839 SRPM URL: https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/phpunit10-10.0.15-1.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
