date:20230704

[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538

Benson Muite  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai |
   |lplus.org)  |



--- Comment #21 from Benson Muite  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
 2", "FSF All Permissive License", "BSD 3-Clause License", "*No
 copyright* GNU Library General Public License v2 or later [obsolete
 FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "GNU Library General Public
 License v2 or later [generated file, obsolete FSF postal address
 (Temple Place)]", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention)
 [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later
 [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "FSF
 Unlimited License (with License Retention)", "FSF Unlimited License
 [generated file]", "X11 License [generated file]", "BSD 2-Clause
 License", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "BSD 3-Clause
 License GNU General Public License, Version 2", "[generated file]",
 "*No copyright* [generated file]", "FSF Unlimited License (with
 License Retention) GNU Lesser General Public License GNU General
 Public License". 45 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in
 /home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/minidlna/2168538-minidlna/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /etc/logrotate.d(bes, samba-
 common, psad, sssd-common, wpa_supplicant, below, macromilter,
 lightdm, yast2-filesystem, ppp, cepces, copr-dist-git, gerbera, kdm-
 settings, proftpd, logrotate, retrace-server, ntpsec, openqa)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summ

[Bug 2193288] Review Request: f3d - Fast and minimalist 3D viewer.

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193288



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6142575
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2193288-f3d/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06142575-f3d/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193288

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202193288%23c11
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2193288] Review Request: f3d - Fast and minimalist 3D viewer.

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193288



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Created attachment 1974058
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1974058&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5897230 to 6142575


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193288

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202193288%23c10
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2193288] Review Request: f3d - Fast and minimalist 3D viewer.

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193288



--- Comment #9 from Felix Wang  ---
update to 2.1.0

SPEC URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/f3d.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/f3d-2.1.0-1.fc39.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193288

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202193288%23c9
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219683] New: Review Request: rust-maybe-async - Procedure macro to unify SYNC and ASYNC implementation

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219683

Bug ID: 2219683
   Summary: Review Request: rust-maybe-async - Procedure macro to
unify SYNC and ASYNC implementation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: h-k...@hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-maybe-async/rust-maybe-async.spec
SRPM URL:
https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-maybe-async/rust-maybe-async-0.2.7-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
A procedure macro to unify SYNC and ASYNC implementation.

Fedora Account System Username: blinxen


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219683

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219683%23c0
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219655] New: Review Request: rust-gix-command - Handle gitoxide internal git command execution

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219655

Bug ID: 2219655
   Summary: Review Request: rust-gix-command - Handle gitoxide
internal git command execution
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: h-k...@hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-gix-command/rust-gix-command.spec
SRPM URL:
https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-gix-command/rust-gix-command-0.2.6-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
A WIP crate of the gitoxide project handling internal git command
execution.

Fedora Account System Username: blinxen


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219655%23c0
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646

Didik Supriadi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
 Whiteboard||Unretirement





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219177] Review Request: jheaps - Library that provides various heap implementations in Java

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219177

Didik Supriadi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2219646





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646
[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data
structures and algorithms
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219177
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219495] Review Request: jgraphx - Java Swing diagramming (graph visualisation) library

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219495

Didik Supriadi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2219646





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646
[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data
structures and algorithms
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219495
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219473] Review Request: fastutil - Fast & compact type-specific collections for Java

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219473

Didik Supriadi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2219646





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646
[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data
structures and algorithms
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219473
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219137] Review Request: apfloat - High performance arbitrary precision arithmetic library

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219137

Didik Supriadi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2219646





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646
[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data
structures and algorithms
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219137
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646

Didik Supriadi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2219137, 2219177, 2219473,
   ||2219495
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219137
[Bug 2219137] Review Request: apfloat - High performance arbitrary precision
arithmetic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219177
[Bug 2219177] Review Request: jheaps - Library that provides various heap
implementations in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219473
[Bug 2219473] Review Request: fastutil - Fast & compact type-specific
collections for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219495
[Bug 2219495] Review Request: jgraphx - Java Swing diagramming (graph
visualisation) library
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646

Fedora Review Service  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||https://jgrapht.org/



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service  
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6141367
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2219646-jgrapht/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06141367-jgrapht/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219646%23c1
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219646] New: Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646

Bug ID: 2219646
   Summary: Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph
theory data structures and algorithms
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: didiksupriad...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://didiksupriadi41.fedorapeople.org/jgrapht.spec
SRPM URL: https://didiksupriadi41.fedorapeople.org/jgrapht-1.5.2-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
JGraphT is a free Java class library that provides mathematical graph-theory
objects and algorithms.

Fedora Account System Username: didiksupriadi41


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219646

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219646%23c0
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #30 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6141267
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-1877006-smf-spf/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06141267-smf-spf/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c30
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #29 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Created attachment 1974030
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1974030&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6141151 to 6141267


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c29
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #28 from Jordi Sanfeliu  ---
Oh!, I forgot to update adding the smfs user and group with an sysusers
approach.
Let's see how it goes now.

- Please, find the latest .spec and SRPM versions here
Spec URL: https://ftp.fibranet.cat/smf-spf/smf-spf.spec
SRPM URL: https://ftp.fibranet.cat/smf-spf/smf-spf-2.5.1.061e937-1.fc38.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c28
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #27 from Jordi Sanfeliu  ---
I'm unable to find out where it failed in the logs, I see some Warnings but
they seem harmless.

Can you help me please?
Thanks.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c27
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Created attachment 1974025
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1974025&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6141088 to 6141151


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c25
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6141151
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-1877006-smf-spf/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06141151-smf-spf/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c26
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #24 from Jordi Sanfeliu  ---
It looks like the build failed because it was unable to download the source
file:

WARNING: Cannot download url:
https://github.com/jcbf/smf-spf/archive/v2.5.1.061e937/smf-spf-2.5.1.061e937.tar.gz

The upstream did not provide a release/package for the latest commit 061e937,
and using a GitHub URL directly
to that commit doesn't work because the directory created does not match with
the tags %{name}-%{version}.

So, I've changed the value of the Source0 tag so it will use the tar.gz file
generated by me manually.

- Please, find the latest .spec and SRPM versions here
Spec URL: https://ftp.fibranet.cat/smf-spf/smf-spf.spec
SRPM URL: https://ftp.fibranet.cat/smf-spf/smf-spf-2.5.1.061e937-1.fc38.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c24
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Created attachment 1974021
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1974021&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5383892 to 6141088


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c22
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6141088
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-1877006-smf-spf/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06141088-smf-spf/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c23
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #21 from Jordi Sanfeliu  ---
Of course I am, and thank you very much for your assistance.

I've changed the string "GPLv2+" by "GPL-2.0-or-later" so I hope this will be
enough.

- Please, find the latest .spec and SRPM versions here
Spec URL: https://ftp.fibranet.cat/smf-spf/smf-spf.spec
SRPM URL: https://ftp.fibranet.cat/smf-spf/smf-spf-2.5.1.061e937-1.fc38.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c21
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006



--- Comment #20 from Petr Pisar  ---
If you are still interested in this package, could you please update License
tag to use an SPDX format
 and update
adding the smfs user and group with an sysusers approach
?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877006

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201877006%23c20
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219161] Review Request: python-multiecho - Combine multi-echoes from a multi-echo fMRI acquisition

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219161



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service  
---
Created attachment 1974016
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1974016&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6134132 to 6140983


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219161

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219161%23c3
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219161] Review Request: python-multiecho - Combine multi-echoes from a multi-echo fMRI acquisition

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219161



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Review Service  
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6140983
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2219161-python-multiecho/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06140983-python-multiecho/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219161

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219161%23c4
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219161] Review Request: python-multiecho - Combine multi-echoes from a multi-echo fMRI acquisition

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219161



--- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley  ---
Upstream has responded to several PR’s and issues. Rather than carrying a pile
of patches, I elected to package a post-release snapshot until a 0.29 release
appears.

Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20230704/python-multiecho.spec
SRPM URL:
https://music.fedorapeople.org/20230704/python-multiecho-0.28^20230704gitb4078f0-1.fc38.src.rpm

Koji scratch builds:

F39: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102916914
F38: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102916916
F37: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102916918


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219161

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219161%23c2
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2219443] Review Request: hipcub - A ROCm port of CUB

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219443

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219443
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2218461] Review Request: lomt-junction-fonts - A humanist sans-serif typeface

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218461

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218461
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2215513] Review Request: golang-github-facette-natsort - Natural strings sorting in Go

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215513



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 
 ---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-facette-natsort


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215513

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202215513%23c2
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Created attachment 1973966
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1973966&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5726093 to 6140215


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202168538%23c19
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Review Service 
 ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6140215
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2168538-minidlna/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06140215-minidlna/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202168538%23c20
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538



--- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/minidlna/minidlna.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/minidlna/minidlna-1.3.3-1.fc39.src.rpm

* Tue Jul 04 2023 Dominik Mierzejewski  - 1.3.3-1
- update to 1.3.3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202168538%23c18
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2213078] Review Request: goldendict-ng - The Next Generation GoldenDict

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213078



--- Comment #10 from Felix Wang  ---
updated:
SPEC URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/goldendict-ng.spec
SRPM URL:
https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/goldendict-ng-23.06.01-1.fc39.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213078

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213078%23c10
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2213078] Review Request: goldendict-ng - The Next Generation GoldenDict

2023-07-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213078

Felix Wang  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(topazus@outlook.c |
   |om) |



--- Comment #9 from Felix Wang  ---
> - Please resolve the Conflicts by renaming the binaries

The upstream maintainer said that:
> Not changing binary name & resource name has a few benefits :)

https://github.com/xiaoyifang/goldendict-ng/issues/729#issuecomment-1609192553
https://github.com/xiaoyifang/goldendict-ng/issues/690

> - Introduce the pkgconfig requires for the remaining libraries.

Done.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213078

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202213078%23c9
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

[Bug 2193288] Review Request: f3d - Fast and minimalist 3D viewer.

[Bug 2193288] Review Request: f3d - Fast and minimalist 3D viewer.

[Bug 2193288] Review Request: f3d - Fast and minimalist 3D viewer.

[Bug 2219683] New: Review Request: rust-maybe-async - Procedure macro to unify SYNC and ASYNC implementation

[Bug 2219655] New: Review Request: rust-gix-command - Handle gitoxide internal git command execution

[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms

[Bug 2219177] Review Request: jheaps - Library that provides various heap implementations in Java

[Bug 2219495] Review Request: jgraphx - Java Swing diagramming (graph visualisation) library

[Bug 2219473] Review Request: fastutil - Fast & compact type-specific collections for Java

[Bug 2219137] Review Request: apfloat - High performance arbitrary precision arithmetic library

[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms

[Bug 2219646] Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms

[Bug 2219646] New: Review Request: jgrapht - a Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 1877006] Review Request: smf-spf - Mail filter for Sender Policy Framework verification

[Bug 2219161] Review Request: python-multiecho - Combine multi-echoes from a multi-echo fMRI acquisition

[Bug 2219161] Review Request: python-multiecho - Combine multi-echoes from a multi-echo fMRI acquisition

[Bug 2219161] Review Request: python-multiecho - Combine multi-echoes from a multi-echo fMRI acquisition

[Bug 2219443] Review Request: hipcub - A ROCm port of CUB

[Bug 2218461] Review Request: lomt-junction-fonts - A humanist sans-serif typeface

[Bug 2215513] Review Request: golang-github-facette-natsort - Natural strings sorting in Go

[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

[Bug 2168538] Review Request: minidlna - Lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

[Bug 2213078] Review Request: goldendict-ng - The Next Generation GoldenDict

[Bug 2213078] Review Request: goldendict-ng - The Next Generation GoldenDict

36 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information