[Bug 2235068] Review Request: python-jsonstreams - Python library for writing JSON documents as streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235068 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý --- 1) now the build is failing because of missing BR python3-pytest 2) > This seems only true < F39 (starting Sphinx 6). If I package for F38, I will > add the bundled Provides. I see something else. $ rpm -qlpf /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/python-jsonstreams-doc-0.6.0-1.fc40.noarch.rpm /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_sources /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_sources/api.rst.txt /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_sources/changes.rst.txt /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_sources/description.rst.txt /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_sources/examples.rst.txt /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_sources/index.rst.txt /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/basic.css /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/css /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/css/badge_only.css /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/css/theme.css /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/doctools.js /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/documentation_options.js /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/file.png /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/js /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/js/badge_only.js /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/js/theme.js /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/language_data.js /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/minus.png /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/plus.png /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/pygments.css /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/searchtools.js /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/_static/sphinx_highlight.js /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/api.html /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/changes.html /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/description.html /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/examples.html /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/genindex.html /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/index.html /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/objects.inv /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/search.html /usr/share/doc/python-jsonstreams-doc/html/searchindex.js /usr/share/licenses/python-jsonstreams-doc /usr/share/licenses/python-jsonstreams-doc/LICENSE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235068 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235068%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2215421] Review Request: x2gokdrive - KDrive graphical server backend for X2GoServer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215421 --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski --- Spec URL: https://orion.fedorapeople.org/x2gokdrive.spec SRPM URL: https://orion.fedorapeople.org/x2gokdrive-0.0.0.2-2fc40.src.rpm - Fix License tag and add upstream copyright file - Add %%check -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215421 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202215421%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235056] Review Request: python-banal - Commons of stupid, simple Python micro functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-9345310384 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-9345310384 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9345310384 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235056%23c15 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235056] Review Request: python-banal - Commons of stupid, simple Python micro functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-003f5ce545 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-003f5ce545 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-003f5ce545 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235056%23c14 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235056] Review Request: python-banal - Commons of stupid, simple Python micro functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e1a37678da has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-e1a37678da \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e1a37678da See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235056%23c13 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2237666] Review Request: golang-github-google-s2a - Secure Session Agent Client Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237666 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2023-10-16 00:43:10 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-c53b9e83de has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237666 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237666%23c8 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2242984] Review Request: futuresql - Non-blocking database framework for Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-10-16 00:43:13 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-514a1b7906 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242984 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202242984%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2242971] Review Request: python-torch - PyTorch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242971 --- Comment #13 from Tom Rix --- Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/python-torch.spec SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/python-torch-2.1.0-4.fc40.src.rpm This brings in the the gloo and xnnpack packages that were recently packaged A --with pyproject option added to make testing the pyproject_ macros easier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242971 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202242971%23c13 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244307] Review Request: python-colorthief - Grabs the dominant color or a representative color palette from an image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Gitlab ||fedora/legal/fedora-license ||-data/-/issues/382 Depends On||182235 (FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Artem --- https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/382 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244307%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244307] Review Request: python-colorthief - Grabs the dominant color or a representative color palette from an image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added CC||farch...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #3 from Steve Cossette --- First thing will be to get the license approved by Fedora Legal: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-review-process/ Might be difficult for this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244307%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235071] Review Request: python-packageurl-python - Python implementation of the package url spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235071 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-packageurl-python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235071 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235071%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235071] Review Request: python-packageurl-python - Python implementation of the package url spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235071 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thank you for the review, Miroslav https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/57244 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235071 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235071%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235066] Review Request: python-gemfileparser2 - Library to parse Rubygem gemspec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235066 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý --- APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235066 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235066%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235065] Review Request: python-ftfy - Fixes mojibake and other glitches in Unicode text, after the fact
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235065 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý --- APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235065 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235065%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244318] New: Review Request: python-ssh-audit - a SSH server & client security auditing tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244318 Bug ID: 2244318 Summary: Review Request: python-ssh-audit - a SSH server & client security auditing tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: n...@shrug.pw QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://neil.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-ssh-audit.spec SRPM URL: https://neil.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-ssh-audit-3.0.0-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: ssh-audit is an SSH server & client security auditing (banner, key exchange, encryption, mac, compression, compatibility, security, etc) Fedora Account System Username: neil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244318 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244318%23c0 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243093] Review Request: mat2 - Metadata removal tool, supporting a wide range of commonly used file formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243093 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Review Service --- Created attachment 1994097 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1994097&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 6524040 to 6528348 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243093 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243093%23c11 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235070] Review Request: python-normality - Tiny library for Python text normalisation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235070 Fedora Review Service changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/pudo/nor ||mality --- Comment #2 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528364 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235070-python-normality/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528364-python-normality/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235070 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235070%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235070] Review Request: python-normality - Tiny library for Python text normalisation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235070 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-normality.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-normality-2.5.0-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235070 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235070%23c1 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243093] Review Request: mat2 - Metadata removal tool, supporting a wide range of commonly used file formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243093
--- Comment #10 from Artem ---
a) Package install correctly for me on f39 x86_64. Maybe f40 aarch64 bug?
b) Main package depend on:
Requires: python3-%{modname} = %{version}-%{release}
python3-%{modname} (python3-libmat2) contain license file. Maybe this is
linter bug?
I removed %license LICENSE as you recommended since license file installed
automatically with python module:
❯ rpm -qL python3-libmat2-0.13.4-3.fc39.noarch.rpm
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/mat-0.13.4.dist-info/LICENSE
d) This TODO/HELP WANTED for future area for me.
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-39-x86_64/06528338-mat2/mat2.spec
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-39-x86_64/06528338-mat2/mat2-0.13.4-3.fc39.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243093
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243093%23c10
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2238840] Review Request: jellyfin - The Free Software Media System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238840 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2170536 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170536 [Bug 2170536] Packaging macro and/or runtime ID update in upstream list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238840 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244312] Review Request: itinerary - Itinerary and boarding pass management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-10-15 19:16:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235068] Review Request: python-jsonstreams - Python library for writing JSON documents as streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235068 Fedora Review Service changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/dcbaker/ ||jsonstreams --- Comment #4 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528323 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235068-python-jsonstreams/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528323-python-jsonstreams/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235068 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235068%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244312] Review Request: itinerary - Itinerary and boarding pass management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/itinerary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244312%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244312] Review Request: itinerary - Itinerary and boarding pass management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 --- Comment #2 from Steve Cossette --- Thank you for the review, Neal https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/57239 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244312%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235068] Review Request: python-jsonstreams - Python library for writing JSON documents as streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235068 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Sphinx will generate a number of javascript files for html documentation. Some of these should be indicated as bundled, for example js-jquery. May consider also generating man pages. This seems only true < F39 (starting Sphinx 6). If I package for F38, I will add the bundled Provides. Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-jsonstreams.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-jsonstreams-0.6.0-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235068 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235068%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235067] Review Request: python-intbitset - Python C-based extension implementing fast integer bit sets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235067 Fedora Review Service changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/invenios ||oftware-contrib/intbitset --- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528289 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235067-python-intbitset/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528289-python-intbitset/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235067 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235067%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244312] Review Request: itinerary - Itinerary and boarding pass management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: * Package follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines * Package builds and installs * Package licensing is correctly handled * No serious issues from rpmlint PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244312%23c1 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244312] Review Request: itinerary - Itinerary and boarding pass management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/itinerary/itinerary.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/itinerary/itinerary-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: Itinerary and boarding pass management application. Fedora Account System Username: farchord -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235067] Review Request: python-intbitset - Python C-based extension implementing fast integer bit sets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235067 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(benson_muite@emai ||lplus.org) --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- > e) Doc package has bundled js-jquery and js-underscore. Please indicate this > in the spec file. Can´t find that at all. Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-intbitset-3.0.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235067 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235067%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244312] New: Review Request: itinerary - Itinerary and boarding pass management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 Bug ID: 2244312 Summary: Review Request: itinerary - Itinerary and boarding pass management application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: farch...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/itinerary/itinerary.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/itinerary/itinerary-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: Itinerary and boarding pass management application. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244312 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244312%23c0 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235066] Review Request: python-gemfileparser2 - Library to parse Rubygem gemspec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235066 Fedora Review Service changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/nexB/gem ||fileparser2 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528276 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235066-python-gemfileparser2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528276-python-gemfileparser2/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235066 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235066%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235066] Review Request: python-gemfileparser2 - Library to parse Rubygem gemspec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235066 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thanks for the review! Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-gemfileparser2.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-gemfileparser2-0.9.3-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235066 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235066%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235065] Review Request: python-ftfy - Fixes mojibake and other glitches in Unicode text, after the fact
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235065 Fedora Review Service changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/rspeer/p ||ython-ftfy --- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528271 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235065-python-ftfy/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528271-python-ftfy/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235065 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235065%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244311] Review Request: rust-nucleo-matcher - Plug and play high performance fuzzy matcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244311 --- Comment #1 from blinxen --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107549589 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244311 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244311%23c1 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244311] New: Review Request: rust-nucleo-matcher - Plug and play high performance fuzzy matcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244311 Bug ID: 2244311 Summary: Review Request: rust-nucleo-matcher - Plug and play high performance fuzzy matcher Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: h-k...@hotmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-nucleo-matcher/rust-nucleo-matcher.spec SRPM URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-nucleo-matcher/rust-nucleo-matcher-0.2.0-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: Plug and play high performance fuzzy matcher. Fedora Account System Username: blinxen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244311 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244311%23c0 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235065] Review Request: python-ftfy - Fixes mojibake and other glitches in Unicode text, after the fact
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235065 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thanks for the review: Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-ftfy.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-ftfy-6.1.1-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235065 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235065%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244309] Review Request: rust-unic-normal - UNIC — Unicode Normalization Forms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244309 --- Comment #1 from blinxen --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107548861 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244309 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244309%23c1 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244309] New: Review Request: rust-unic-normal - UNIC — Unicode Normalization Forms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244309 Bug ID: 2244309 Summary: Review Request: rust-unic-normal - UNIC — Unicode Normalization Forms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: h-k...@hotmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-unic-normal/rust-unic-normal.spec SRPM URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-unic-normal/rust-unic-normal-0.9.0-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: UNIC — Unicode Normalization Forms. Fedora Account System Username: blinxen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244309 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244309%23c0 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244307] Review Request: python-colorthief - Grabs the dominant color or a representative color palette from an image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2243755 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243755 [Bug 2243755] komikku-1.27.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244307] Review Request: python-colorthief - Grabs the dominant color or a representative color palette from an image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Fedora Review Service changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/fengsp/c ||olor-thief-py --- Comment #2 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528241 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2244307-python-colorthief/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528241-python-colorthief/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244307%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244307] New: Review Request: python-colorthief - Grabs the dominant color or a representative color palette from an image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Bug ID: 2244307 Summary: Review Request: python-colorthief - Grabs the dominant color or a representative color palette from an image Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/python-colorthief.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/python-colorthief-0.2.1-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: A Python module for grabbing the color palette from an image. Fedora Account System Username: atim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244307%23c0 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244307] Review Request: python-colorthief - Grabs the dominant color or a representative color palette from an image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 --- Comment #1 from Artem --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107548617 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244307 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244307%23c1 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243093] Review Request: mat2 - Metadata removal tool, supporting a wide range of commonly used file formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243093
--- Comment #9 from Benson Muite ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
= MUST items =
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License,
Version 3", "GNU General Public License, Version 3 GNU Lesser General
Public License v3.0 or later", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General
Public License v3.0 or later". 80 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/fedora/temp/review-
mat2/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 23593 bytes in 6 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[ ]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?)
[ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires ar
[Bug 2163338] Review Request: plasma-bigscreen - A big launcher giving you access to any installed apps and skills.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163338 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/plasma-bigscreen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163338 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202163338%23c15 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-10-15 17:19:07 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kosmindoormap -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c8 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 --- Comment #7 from Steve Cossette --- Thank you for the review, Neal https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/57231 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c7 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa --- Looked at it locally... Review notes: * Package follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines * Package builds and installs * Package licensing is correctly handled * No serious issues from rpmlint PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 --- Comment #5 from Steve Cossette --- Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kosmindoormap/kosmindoormap.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kosmindoormap/kosmindoormap-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Updated %files and spacing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 --- Comment #4 from Steve Cossette --- Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kosmindoormap/kosmindoormap.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kosmindoormap/kosmindoormap-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Put some files in the wrong subpackage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528206 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2244302-kosmindoormap/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528206-kosmindoormap/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2244302 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 [Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Depends On||2244247 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- [fedora-review-service-build] Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 [Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c2 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244126] Review Request: ardour8 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244126 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528081 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2244126-ardour8/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528081-ardour8/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244126 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244126%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244126] Review Request: ardour8 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244126 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service --- Created attachment 1994093 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1994093&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 6524392 to 6528081 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244126 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244126%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235059] Review Request: python-debian-inspector - Library to parse Debian deb822-style control and copyright files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235059 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. | |com)| Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #6 from Jerry James --- That looks good. This package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235059 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235059%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235059] Review Request: python-debian-inspector - Library to parse Debian deb822-style control and copyright files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235059 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528167 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235059-python-debian-inspector/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528167-python-debian-inspector/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235059 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235059%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235062] Review Request: python-extractcode-7z - ScanCode Toolkit plugin to use pre-installed 7zip executables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235062 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #5 from Jerry James --- Okay, so the 21.x tags are the right ones, I take it. In that case, I am satisfied. This package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235062 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235062%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235059] Review Request: python-debian-inspector - Library to parse Debian deb822-style control and copyright files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235059 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thank you! Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-debian-inspector.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-debian-inspector-31.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235059 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235059%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235060] Review Request: python-dparse2 - Parser for Python dependency files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235060 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jerry James --- That looks good. This package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235060 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235060%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2163338] Review Request: plasma-bigscreen - A big launcher giving you access to any installed apps and skills.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163338 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #14 from Neal Gompa --- I think we're in good shape now, so... PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163338 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202163338%23c14 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235064] Review Request: python-fingerprints - Compare the names of companies and people by applying strong normalisation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235064 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fingerprints -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235064 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235064%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235061] Review Request: python-extractcode - Mostly universal file extraction library and CLI tool to extract almost any archive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235061 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. | |com)| Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #6 from Jerry James --- That looks good. This package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235061 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235061%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235064] Review Request: python-fingerprints - Compare the names of companies and people by applying strong normalisation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235064 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thank you for the review, Jerry https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/57224 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235064 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235064%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235057] Review Request: python-commoncode - Set of common functions and utilities for handling paths, dates, files and hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235057 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #6 from Jerry James --- Looks good. This package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235057 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235057%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235062] Review Request: python-extractcode-7z - ScanCode Toolkit plugin to use pre-installed 7zip executables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235062 Fedora Review Service changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/nexB/sca ||ncode-plugins --- Comment #4 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528146 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235062-python-extractcode-7z/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528146-python-extractcode-7z/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235062 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235062%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235062] Review Request: python-extractcode-7z - ScanCode Toolkit plugin to use pre-installed 7zip executables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235062 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235062 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235062] Review Request: python-extractcode-7z - ScanCode Toolkit plugin to use pre-installed 7zip executables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235062 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thank for the review! Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-extractcode-7z.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-extractcode-7z-21.5.31-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235062 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235062%23c3 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://invent.kde.org/libr
||aries/%{name}
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528104
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2244302-kosmindoormap/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528104-kosmindoormap/builder-live.log.gz
Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.
- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
are listed in the "Depends On" field
---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c1
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kosmindoormap/kosmindoormap.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kosmindoormap/kosmindoormap-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: A library and QML component for rendering multi-level OSM indoor maps of for example a (large) train station. Fedora Account System Username: farchord -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244302] New: Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Bug ID: 2244302 Summary: Review Request: kosmindoormap - OSM multi-floor indoor map renderer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: farch...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kosmindoormap/kosmindoormap.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kosmindoormap/kosmindoormap-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: A library and QML component for rendering multi-level OSM indoor maps of for example a (large) train station. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244302 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244302%23c0 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235060] Review Request: python-dparse2 - Parser for Python dependency files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235060 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528083 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235060-python-dparse2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528083-python-dparse2/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235060 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235060%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2222844] Review Request: qoi - The “Quite OK Image Format” for fast, lossless image compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528072 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-844-qoi/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528072-qoi/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%20844%23c19 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2222844] Review Request: qoi - The “Quite OK Image Format” for fast, lossless image compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Review Service --- Created attachment 1994089 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1994089&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 6512602 to 6528072 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%20844%23c18 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235061] Review Request: python-extractcode - Mostly universal file extraction library and CLI tool to extract almost any archive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235061 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528086 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235061-python-extractcode/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528086-python-extractcode/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235061 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235061%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235057] Review Request: python-commoncode - Set of common functions and utilities for handling paths, dates, files and hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235057 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6528080 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2235057-python-commoncode/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06528080-python-commoncode/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235057 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235057%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235061] Review Request: python-extractcode - Mostly universal file extraction library and CLI tool to extract almost any archive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235061 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thanks for the review! Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-extractcode.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-extractcode-31.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235061 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235061%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243305] Review Request: python-proton-core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243305
--- Comment #9 from Benson Muite ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Note: package.spec should be python-proton-core.spec
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_spec_file_naming
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[-]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?)
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
Note: Found : Vendor: Proton AG
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_tags_and_sections
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publi
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-10-15 14:40:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2163338] Review Request: plasma-bigscreen - A big launcher giving you access to any installed apps and skills.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163338 marcd...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://marcdeop.fedorapeople.org/plasma-bigscreen.spec SRPM URL: https://marcdeop.fedorapeople.org/plasma-bigscreen-5.27.8-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: A big launcher giving you access to any installed apps and skills. Fedora Account System Username: marcdeop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163338 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kopeninghours -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244247%23c8 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 --- Comment #7 from Steve Cossette --- Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kopeninghours/kopeninghours.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kopeninghours/kopeninghours-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Forgot about Boost, which adds more files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244247%23c7 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235060] Review Request: python-dparse2 - Parser for Python dependency files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235060 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thanks for the review: Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-dparse2.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-dparse2-0.7.0-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235060 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235060%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 marcd...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247
--- Comment #6 from marcd...@fedoraproject.org ---
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sources not installed
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde,
/usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 marcd...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|marcd...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 marcd...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marcd...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 --- Comment #5 from Steve Cossette --- Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kopeninghours/kopeninghours.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kopeninghours/kopeninghours-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Fixed an inconsistency with the BuildRequires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244247%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244126] Review Request: ardour8 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244126 --- Comment #4 from Nils Philippsen --- Spec URL: https://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/ardour8/2/ardour8.spec SRPM URL: https://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/ardour8/2/ardour8-8.0.0-1.fc40.src.rpm This updates the specifies the license in SPDX format. Also, the spec file uses rpmautospec and the original spec file (above) was the processed version of it, tripping a couple of warnings in fedora-review/rpmlint, oops. This one is the unprocessed version (the spec file contains the processed one because that’s what `fedpkg srpm` does). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244126 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244126%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235056] Review Request: python-banal - Commons of stupid, simple Python micro functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e1a37678da has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e1a37678da -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235056%23c12 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244285] New: Review Request: hyprland-protocols - Wayland protocol extensions for Hyprland
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244285 Bug ID: 2244285 Summary: Review Request: hyprland-protocols - Wayland protocol extensions for Hyprland Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: daron...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/reviews/hyprland-protocols/hyprland-protocols.spec SRPM URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/reviews/hyprland-protocols/hyprland-protocols-0.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: Wayland protocol extensions for Hyprland. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107535750 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244285 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244285%23c0 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235056] Review Request: python-banal - Commons of stupid, simple Python micro functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-9345310384 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9345310384 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235056%23c11 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235056] Review Request: python-banal - Commons of stupid, simple Python micro functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-003f5ce545 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-003f5ce545 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235056 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235056%23c10 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2243305] Review Request: python-proton-core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243305 --- Comment #8 from Benson Muite --- Spec URL: https://calexandru2018.fedorapeople.org/package.spec SRPM URL: https://calexandru2018.fedorapeople.org/python-proton-core-0.1.11-1.fc38.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243305 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243305%23c8 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2121585] Review Request: janus - An open source general purpose WebRTC server.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121585 --- Comment #83 from Benson Muite --- Pull request to use newer versions of jquery and other external assets: https://github.com/meetecho/janus-gateway/pull/3279 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121585 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202121585%23c83 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2244247] Review Request: kopeninghours - Library for parsing and evaluating OSM opening hours expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 --- Comment #4 from Steve Cossette --- Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kopeninghours/kopeninghours.spec SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kopeninghours/kopeninghours-23.08.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Simplified autosetup macro -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244247 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244247%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235058] Review Request: python-container-inspector - Suite of analysis utilities and command line tools for Docker container images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235058 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-container-inspector -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235058 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235058%23c6 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235058] Review Request: python-container-inspector - Suite of analysis utilities and command line tools for Docker container images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235058 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thank you for the review, Jerry https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/57215 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235058 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235058%23c5 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2235058] Review Request: python-container-inspector - Suite of analysis utilities and command line tools for Docker container images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235058 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Updated Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-container-inspector.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-container-inspector-32.0.1-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235058 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235058%23c4 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
