[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aZirxdYtnNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mbHx1OzZtOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MnTL2KJTCta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oNrvmHLIw1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pvlsEc5hgHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ekOspd9WXKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=o69E6hLiH3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351
Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: glite-lbjp-common-db Short Description: Database engine abstraction wrapper Owners: valtri Branches: f18 f19 f20 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2MlEGRoMHDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=43kQ0FMYN1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BxV2rMAGMVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
