[Bug 1001452] Review Request: makepp - Compatible but reliable and improved replacement for make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1119947 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001452] Review Request: makepp - Compatible but reliable and improved replacement for make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001452] Review Request: makepp - Compatible but reliable and improved replacement for make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2014-07-06 21:38:58 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng --- Due to ccache bug[1], I can't build this package. Closing now. If someone is interested at this package, feel free to open a new ticket. [1]---https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8424 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001452] Review Request: makepp - Compatible but reliable and improved replacement for make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to Björn Persson from comment #1) > The source URL is invalid. There is no version 2.0.98.3.1 on the server. > Please fix this so I can know which version I'm reviewing. That was a development version. Updated. > To match what LICENSE says, the License field should be "GPLv2+ or Artistic". Done. > If I understand correctly, "touch .test_done" ignores any and all failures > in the whole test suite. That makes the %check section rather pointless. Why > run the tests at all if you're going to ignore the result? If the > "makeppreplay" test is known to fail, wouldn't it be better to disable only > that one test? Enabled again. > Anyway, I don't believe that test case has anything to do with Ccache. I > can't see that anything in Makepp invokes Ccache, and it fails with the same > error message whether I have Ccache installed or not. Not it invokes that, but the gcc actually maybe(haven't checked again) I will provide new links later as something unexpected happened. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001452] Review Request: makepp - Compatible but reliable and improved replacement for make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452 Björn Persson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #1 from Björn Persson --- The source URL is invalid. There is no version 2.0.98.3.1 on the server. Please fix this so I can know which version I'm reviewing. To match what LICENSE says, the License field should be "GPLv2+ or Artistic". If I understand correctly, "touch .test_done" ignores any and all failures in the whole test suite. That makes the %check section rather pointless. Why run the tests at all if you're going to ignore the result? If the "makeppreplay" test is known to fail, wouldn't it be better to disable only that one test? Anyway, I don't believe that test case has anything to do with Ccache. I can't see that anything in Makepp invokes Ccache, and it fails with the same error message whether I have Ccache installed or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001452] Review Request: makepp - Compatible but reliable and improved replacement for make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452 Björn Persson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001452] Review Request: makepp - Compatible but reliable and improved replacement for make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452 Björn Persson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
