[Bug 1005785] Review Request: snowball - Libstemmer Java bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005785 Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msima...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com --- i dont need C libraries ... and for now i dont have intentions to package this libs Ok. It is distributed separately by upstream, so it shouldn't be a problem. The description is now ok, but I still insist on changing the name. If someone decided to package the snowball compiler or the C version of the library, there would be problem. snowball-java or libstemmer-java sounds more reasonable. Regarding that POM - why do you add dependency on junit? I don't see any unit test in there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005785] Review Request: snowball - Libstemmer Java bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005785 Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msima...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com --- I think the name is not correct. There is also a C version of this available on the site. Therefore we need to diambiguate the name in case someone wanted to package the C version of algorithms. The summary also doesn't seem right. If those are bindings - then bindings to what? On the site it is summarized as The Java version of the libstemmer library. That also raises a question whether it should be really called snowball. TBH I don't really understand what the package is supposed to do, but it seems to me that sentence You can use the various ANSI C and Java stemmers in programs of your own, without bothering yourself with the Snowball system that generated them. implies that this is not snowball itself, but rather something generated by it. Therefore I think it shouldn't be called snowball, but libstemmer-java Java as indicated by the name of the tarball. The descritption is insufficient, it doesn't say anything about the library itself. Also, where did you get that POM? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005785] Review Request: snowball - Libstemmer Java bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005785 --- Comment #2 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com --- Looking at their documentation and sources I made a different conclusion: You should package http://snowball.tartarus.org/dist/snowball_code.tgz as snowball instead, because that is the compiler that generated it and also the source for the generated code. Thre is a GNUmakefile that can build the compiler and generate the C and Java libraries (it seems like it needs to be patched a little to get the Java version, though), which should become snowball's subpackages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005785] Review Request: snowball - Libstemmer Java bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005785 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- (In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #1) I think the name is not correct. There is also a C version of this available on the site. Therefore we need to diambiguate the name in case someone wanted to package the C version of algorithms. The summary also doesn't seem right. If those are bindings - then bindings to what? On the site it is summarized as The Java version of the libstemmer library. That also raises a question whether it should be really called snowball. TBH I don't really understand what the package is supposed to do, but it seems to me that sentence You can use the various ANSI C and Java stemmers in programs of your own, without bothering yourself with the Snowball system that generated them. implies that this is not snowball itself, but rather something generated by it. Therefore I think it shouldn't be called snowball, but libstemmer-java Java as indicated by the name of the tarball. The descritption is insufficient, it doesn't say anything about the library itself. better ? Snowball is a small string processing language designed for creating stemming algorithms for use in Information Retrieval. This package contains all you need to include the snowball stemming algorithms into a Java project of your own. If you use this, you don't need to use the snowball compiler, or worry about the internals of the stemmers in any way. Also, where did you get that POM? created by me -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005785] Review Request: snowball - Libstemmer Java bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005785 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- (In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #2) Looking at their documentation and sources I made a different conclusion: You should package http://snowball.tartarus.org/dist/snowball_code.tgz as snowball instead, because that is the compiler that generated it and also the source for the generated code. Thre is a GNUmakefile that can build the compiler and generate the C and Java libraries (it seems like it needs to be patched a little to get the Java version, though), which should become snowball's subpackages. i dont need C libraries ... and for now i dont have intentions to package this libs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005785] Review Request: snowball - Libstemmer Java bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005785 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Alias||snowball -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WOmE0yr6gRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005785] Review Request: snowball - Libstemmer Java bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005785 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1005792 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YyEps4oQFSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
