[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *rubygem-ice_nine.noarch: I: checking
rubygem-ice_nine.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/dkubb/ice_nine
(timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-ice_nine.src: I: checking
rubygem-ice_nine.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/dkubb/ice_nine
(timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-ice_nine.src: I: checking-url
https://rubygems.org/gems/ice_nine-0.10.0.gem (timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-ice_nine-doc.noarch: I: checking
rubygem-ice_nine-doc.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/dkubb/ice_nine
(timeout 10 seconds)
rubygem-ice_nine.spec: I: checking-url
https://rubygems.org/gems/ice_nine-0.10.0.gem (timeout 10 seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint is silent.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
MIT
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
108f7538b32819623db949583895a962f5934dcfd183e7fff8b7e6d70db04c42
ice_nine-0.10.0.gem
108f7538b32819623db949583895a962f5934dcfd183e7fff8b7e6d70db04c42
ice_nine-0.10.0.gem.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 Ken Dreyer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-ice_nine Short Description: Deep Freeze Ruby Objects Owners: ktdreyer Branches: f19 f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.f ||c20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-10 02:59:51 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025928] Review Request: rubygem-ice_nine - Deep Freeze Ruby Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.f |rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.f |c20 |c19 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-ice_nine-0.10.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
