[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 Ingvar Hagelundchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2015-09-17 02:47:28 --- Comment #13 from Ingvar Hagelund --- Opening a new request #1263941, and closing this as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1263941 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 Ingvar Hagelundchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #11 from Ingvar Hagelund --- New src.rpm here: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/tayga/tayga-0.9.2-1.fc22.src.rpm Spec here: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/tayga/tayga.spec I wrote this from scratch, so it resembles William's package only by coincidence :-) It seems like the selinux policy is now included upstream, so while making this package, I skipped selinux. I also skipped the automatic adding of network stuff. The binary itself sets up its own interface. Adding skeleton config for routing seems over-engineering to me. Ingvar Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 Christopher Mengchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@cicku.me --- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng --- Please open a new bug and mark this one as DUPLICATE. Do not reuse existing bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 --- Comment #10 from William Brown--- I'm not interested in this any more. You may take it over, and I'm happy to advise however via email. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 Ingvar Hagelundchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ing...@linpro.no --- Comment #9 from Ingvar Hagelund --- Is this review request for tayga dead? William, are you still willing to wrap tayga? If not, I could have a look at it. br, Ingvar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|m...@zarb.org |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|needinfo? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 --- Comment #8 from William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au --- Updated with reviewed SELinux policy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 --- Comment #6 from William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au --- Rewritten, rewrote selinux policy and tested on my system. Both URLs have been updated. Please review. I will have the SELinux policy reviewed on the SELinux mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 --- Comment #7 from William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au --- https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/firstyear/tayga/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 --- Comment #5 from William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au --- I will take into account all these suggestions. Thinking about it, openvpn does something similar with @.service, so I will rewrite my scripts for this and will resubmit for review soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to William Brown from comment #3) Sorry about the delay getting back to you. Initially, the policy should be in this package, and once it's stable I'll send to to selinux-policy. You should open a new bug under selinux-policy and tell the maintainer that a new package will need some works. If they deny to adopt, then it's time ship it in this package. How do you suggest to integrate with systemd? I'm not sure that it supports network interfaces ... unless you mean to suggest that we run nat64 as a service over a network interface? (Given this doesn't create an interface with an IP that is certainly an option to make services such as tayga@.service). It should support it well. %{_mandir}/man5/%{name}.conf.5.gz %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8.gz -- %{_mandir}/man5/%{name}.conf.5* %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* Remove %defattr(-,root,root,0755) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 --- Comment #3 from William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au --- Sorry about the delay getting back to you. Initially, the policy should be in this package, and once it's stable I'll send to to selinux-policy. What do you mean separate the binary from ifup/ifdown? How do you suggest to integrate with systemd? I'm not sure that it supports network interfaces ... unless you mean to suggest that we run nat64 as a service over a network interface? (Given this doesn't create an interface with an IP that is certainly an option to make services such as tayga@.service). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org --- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- Wouldn't it be better to have the selinux policy sent to selinux-policy package ? I will take a look at the package, as the topic interest me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 --- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- Ok, so looking at the policy, it is just the label of the tayga binary, and the ifup/ifdown stuff are highly depend on the state of initscript, so i think the binary should be separated from theses two part. I think it would maybe be better to have it integrated with systemd somehow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1028206] Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206 William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review