[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2015-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396
Bug 1036396 depends on bug 1036393, which changed state.

Bug 1036393 Summary: Review Request: python3-openid - Python 3 port of the 
python-openid library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036393

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2014-02-23 22:53:00



--- Comment #20 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
No f20 build, no epel6 build, no epel7 build.

RAWHIDE only, anyway.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-02-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #18 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
Well,
it now builds for epel7, but there are some broken dependences:

On x86_64:
python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-requests-oauthlib
python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-oauthlib

On ppc64:
python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-requests-oauthlib
python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-requests
python-social-auth-0.1.19-1.el7.noarch requires python-oauthlib

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-02-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #19 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
There are epel7 branches of python-oauthlib and python-requests-oauthlib.
I have just requested epel7 branch of python-requests.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||echevemas...@gmail.com



--- Comment #17 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
Jakub I'm using this package, thanks for bring this to Fedora :)
I saw that epel7 build fails, you can fix if put this lines above the spec, due
to py3 doesn't exists in epel7, also python2 macro doesn't exists on epel.

# Workaround for epel versions where don't exists python2 macro
%{!?__python2: %global __python2 %{__python}}

%if 0%{?fedora}  12
%global with_python3 1
%else
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print (get_python_lib()))}
%endif

Best Regards, sorry for not open a bug for say this, due to isn't a bug, and
the review is recent

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(jdor...@redhat.co |needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co
   |m)  |m)



--- Comment #13 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
Hi Christopher,
You have asked whether I am going to push it to EPEL.
Are there some additional requirements for the package to be pushed to EPEL?
How can I request epel branches?

Thank You,
QB

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co |
   |m)  |



--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
For EPEL6 these python versioned macros don't exist, you need to add some hack
for epel == 6 with __python macro redefined. 

But EPEL7 doesn't need this modification. 

For requesting new branches instructions, please refer to:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #15 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-social-auth
New Branches: el6 epel7
Owners: jdornak
InitialCC: 

Users requested EPEL 6 and 7 branches.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||puiterw...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(jdor...@redhat.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #12 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
Could we please get EPEL 6 and 7 branches? I would be more than glad to
maintain those, as we need them for Fedora Infrastructure.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1036393




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036393
[Bug 1036393] Review Request: python3-openid - Python 3 port of the
python-openid library
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #9 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-social-auth
Short Description: Social auth made simple
Owners: jdornak
Branches: f20
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #11 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
Anyway, I have to wait until python3-openid review process is finished first.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jakub Dorňák from comment #7)
 ad 1.)
 
 The source from pypi does not contain docs and examples, while the source
 from githup does. Is it really better to use the one from pypi?

No ;-).

But according to the results, this tag has been retagged, you can download
source from URL again and then rebuild again with the sources just downloaded.
And better file an issue on github of including docs into tarballs on pypi.

 ad 2.)
 
 I am not sure how to fix this.

Just BSD, no extra 'License' needed in the field, See: 

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main

 ad 3.)
 
 The dependancies will be solved by other (sub)packages proposed by me.

---
I will set fedora-review + for this package, however please fix above #1 and #2
before SCM, I'm watching. ;D

PACKAGE APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #7 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
ad 1.)

The source from pypi does not contain docs and examples, while the source from
githup does. Is it really better to use the one from pypi?

ad 2.)

I am not sure how to fix this.

ad 3.)

The dependancies will be solved by other (sub)packages proposed by me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(jdor...@redhat.co |
   |m)  |



--- Comment #3 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
I do not plan to push it to EPEL until somebody asks for it.
What would be the implications?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Assume that you are now only interested in Fedora, please improve:

0. Don't create file list by script, write down them in %files.

1. Version the python2 macro: %{__python} -- %{__python2}; %{python_sitelib}
-- %{python2_sitelib}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #5 from Jakub Dorňák jdor...@redhat.com ---
improved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2014-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in
  the spec URL.
  Note: Check did not completechecksum differs and there are problems running
  diff. Please verify manually.
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 Unknown or generated. 400 files have unknown license. Detailed output
 of licensecheck:

Unknown or generated

python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/docs/conf.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/setup.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/__init__.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/actions.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/__init__.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/context_processors.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/default/__init__.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/default/admin.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/default/fields.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/default/models.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/default/tests.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/me/__init__.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/me/models.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/me/tests.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/middleware.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/tests.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/urls.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/utils.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/django_app/views.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/flask_app/fields.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/flask_app/models.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/flask_app/routes.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/flask_app/template_filters.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/flask_app/utils.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/pyramid_app/__init__.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/pyramid_app/fields.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/pyramid_app/models.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/pyramid_app/utils.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/pyramid_app/views.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/tornado_app/fields.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/tornado_app/handlers.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/tornado_app/models.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/tornado_app/routes.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/tornado_app/utils.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/webpy_app/app.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/webpy_app/fields.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/webpy_app/models.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/apps/webpy_app/utils.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/amazon.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/angel.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/aol.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/appsfuel.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/base.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/behance.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/belgiumeid.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/bitbucket.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/box.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/dailymotion.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/disqus.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/douban.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/dropbox.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/email.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/evernote.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/exacttarget.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/facebook.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/fedora.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/fitbit.py
python-social-auth-0.1.17/%{py3dir}/social/backends/flickr.py

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2013-12-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jdor...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(jdor...@redhat.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Please look at comment 1 and answer my question.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2013-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396

Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||cicku...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1036396] Review Request: python-social-auth - Social auth made simple

2013-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396



--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
First, will you push it to EPEL?

Issue need to be fixed first:

Please write down files list explicitly in %files, don't use .files to ease the
work. ;)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review