[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20 |ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20, ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20, ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20, ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20, ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, alex-3.0.5-36.fc20, cabal-install-1.16.0.2-34.fc20, ghc-parallel-3.2.0.3-34.fc20, ghc-regex-compat-0.95.1-34.fc20, ghc-syb-0.4.0-35.fc20, happy-1.18.10-34.fc20, haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-36.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20, ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20, ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20, ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20, ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20, ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20, ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20, ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20, ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20, ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20, haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-33.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-async-2.0.1.4-30.fc20,ghc-html-1.0.1.2-28.fc20,ghc-HTTP-4000.2.8-32.fc20,ghc-HUnit-1.2.5.2-31.fc20,ghc-network-2.4.1.2-31.fc20,ghc-parsec-3.1.3-30.fc20,ghc-QuickCheck-2.6-32.fc20,ghc-regex-base-0.93.2-28.fc20,ghc-regex-posix-0.95.2-29.fc20,ghc-transformers-0.3.0.0-33.fc20,haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-33.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-02-23 22:34:31 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen --- CLosing - I plan to backport later to F20 together with more HP packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen --- Built for F21 rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1059942 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942 [Bug 1059942] Review Request: ghc-network - Low-level networking interface -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|Ready | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|POST Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen --- Thank you for reviewing the package. Package Change Request == Package Name: ghc-parsec New Branches: f20 f19 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 26 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in 1038087-ghc-parsec/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|unspecified |medium Severity|unspecified |medium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||shakthim...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shakthim...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||ghc-parsec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen --- *** Bug 1038352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap ||roject.org Whiteboard||Ready --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- Package review to move parsec out of the haskell-platform bundle. Original review is bug 550105. Parsec has over 550 reverse dependencies on Hackage: http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/parsec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6255523 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
