[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Niels de Vos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nde...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
Niels de Vos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lpa...@redhat.com
Flags||needinfo?(lpa...@redhat.com
||)
--- Comment #1 from Niels de Vos ---
After improving your package with the hints and suggestions given below, please
run your new packages and spec file through rpmlint to verify the changes.
Include the output from rpmlint in your comment when you inform me of an
updated src.rpm and spec file.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Needs clarification
-> = suggested action to take
Q: = question you need to answer
Issues:
===
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages
-> Put the libcmockery2.so file in the -devel subpackage.
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: gcc make
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
-> gcc and make are always installed in the buildroot, please remove them
from the BuildRequires.
- ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in cmockery2
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries
-> Your package caries lib*.so* files, you need to execute ldconfig in %post
and %postun.
- Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
Note: cmockery2-devel : /usr/lib/libcmockery.la
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries
-> Please prevent building the .la file, or delete the file after
compilation. If this really is needed (I don't think it is) for static
compilation, include it in the -static package.
- The Source0 url is invalid.
-> use
https://github.com/lpabon/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- The summary text for the package description should no end in a '.'.
-> Remove the . at the end of the Summary lines.
- There is no version on the last entry in the %changelog.
-> Please add a - in the changelog.
- The %clean section is only needed for EPEL-5 packages.
Q: Are you planning to provide this package in EPEL-5?
- Invalid BuildRoot is used.
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
-> If you want to provide the package in EPEL-5, set the BuildRoot to one of
the variants from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#BuildRoot_tag
- Subpackages -devel and -static are missing a versioned dependency on the
main package.
-> Add "Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}" in
cmockery2-devel and cmockery2-static.
- The package contains obsolete autotools m4 macros.
See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools
Q: Can be dropped, or are they required for EPEL-5?
- -devel contains unneeded files.
-> NEWS is empty, and INSTALL does not contain any useful information. These
files should not get installed.
Accepted warnings:
==
- Spelling errors for 'Cmockery' and 'executables'.
- exit() call in libcmockery.so in cmockery.c:exit_test().
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or
generated". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
in /srv/devel/fedora-
pkgs/cmockery2.bz1076863/1076863-cmockery2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[?]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Luis Pabon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(lpa...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #2 from Luis Pabon --- Yes, the spec file will also be used for EL5. If this causes an issue, then I can have a spec file for EL6+/Fedora and one for EL5. Here is the output of rpmlint: cmockery2-1.3.4-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm - cmockery2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Cmockery -> Mockery, C mockery, Crockery cmockery2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cmockery -> mockery, crockery, c mockery cmockery2.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcmockery.so.0.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. cmockery2-debuginfo-1.3.4-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm - cmockery2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/cmockery2-1.3.4/src/cmockery.c cmockery2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/cmockery2-1.3.4/src/cmockery/cmockery.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. cmockery2-devel-1.3.4-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm - cmockery2-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Cmockery -> Mockery, C mockery, Crockery cmockery2-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. cmockery2-static-1.3.4-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm - cmockery2-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Cmockery -> Mockery, C mockery, Crockery cmockery2-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. SRPM and specfile update here: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lpabon/fedora/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/lpabon/fedora/raw/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2-1.3.4-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
%{_prefix}/share/doc --》 %{_docdir}
Reason for keeping static libraries?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
--- Comment #4 from Luis Pabon ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
> %{_prefix}/share/doc --》 %{_docdir}
>
> Reason for keeping static libraries?
I am just providing them just in case someone may want them, but I can remove
it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #5 from Luis Pabon --- Updated docdir according to Christopher Meng's comment. New files available here: SRPM and specfile update here: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lpabon/fedora/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/lpabon/fedora/raw/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2-1.3.4-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng --- 1. Fedora discourages using static libraries(although, we can't avoid using it somtimes), I hope you can remove that subpackage, but since you are the upstream, I want to listen to your opinion. Do they really useful for Fedora? 2. Parallel make? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make 3. -devel package: Group: Development/Tools ??? Are you sure ??? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #7 from Luis Pabon --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6) > 1. Fedora discourages using static libraries(although, we can't avoid using > it somtimes), I hope you can remove that subpackage, but since you are the > upstream, I want to listen to your opinion. Do they really useful for Fedora? No problem. I really cannot think of a situation where it is absolutely required. I removed it from the .spec file. > 2. Parallel make? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make Fixed. > > 3. -devel package: > > Group: Development/Tools > > ??? Are you sure ??? This package is very similar to libcmocka, and I based cmockery2's group on what they use which is Development/Tools. It does make sense, since this package is a tool for C developers. New updated packages available: SRPM and specfile update here: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lpabon/fedora/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/lpabon/fedora/raw/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2-1.3.4-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #8 from Luis Pabon --- For some reason, GitHub is not updating the raw version of the Spec file. Here is the normal view to the spec file: https://github.com/lpabon/fedora/blob/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt ---
> %files devel
> %{_includedir}/cmockery*
> %{_libdir}/libcmockery.so
> %exclude %{_libdir}/libcmockery.a
> %exclude %{_libdir}/libcmockery.la
The proper Group tag for such library -devel packages has always been
"Development/Libraries". Don't look at bad/poor examples in the package
collection.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt --- It's "Development/Libraries" here, too: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cmocka.git/plain/cmocka.spec The group of that base package is wrong and should be "System Environment/Libraries". However, the Group tag may also be omitted nowadays. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #11 from Luis Pabon --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #10) > It's "Development/Libraries" here, too: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cmocka.git/plain/cmocka.spec > > The group of that base package is wrong and should be "System > Environment/Libraries". > > However, the Group tag may also be omitted nowadays. Thank you. I have updated the spec file and SRPM: New updated packages available: SRPM and specfile update here: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lpabon/fedora/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/lpabon/fedora/raw/master/cmockery2/1.3.4/cmockery2-1.3.4-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #12 from Luis Pabon --- Hi reviewers, is the package spec file ok now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Niels de Vos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Niels de Vos --- Hi Luis, I've just checked the current .spec again, and it looks good to me. You have addressed all the comments we mentioned. From my point of view, there is nothing that prevents your current proposal to be included in the Fedora Package Collection. With this note, I'll APPROVE the package, please continue with step 8 from the review process: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
--- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt ---
What is the purpose of this section?
| %if ( 0%{_for_fedora_koji_builds} )
| Source0:
https://github.com/lpabon/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
| %else
| Source0:%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
| %endif
Those two Source0 tags are equivalent (because the tarball name is the same),
except that the former is preferred because it also contains the full download
location.
> %check
> make check
>
> %install
The %check section is executed _after_ %install, so it ought to be placed after
%install in the spec file. Btw, there are scenarios where a custom %check
section needs to operate on buildroot contents, and the buildroot is empty
before %install.
> [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
Not true.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). ndevos is not a valid FAS account, add later in pkgdb when it is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Luis Pabon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Luis Pabon --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: cmockery2 Short Description: Lightweight C unit testing framework Owners: lpabon Branches: f19 f20 el5 el6 epel7 InitialCC: ndevos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
--- Comment #17 from Luis Pabon ---
Hi Michael, thank you for taking a look at the spec file again.
> What is the purpose of this section?
>
> | %if ( 0%{_for_fedora_koji_builds} )
> | Source0:
> https://github.com/lpabon/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.
> gz
> | %else
> | Source0:%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> | %endif
>
> Those two Source0 tags are equivalent (because the tarball name is the
> same), except that the former is preferred because it also contains the full
> download location.
-- Fixed
>
>
> > %check
> > make check
> >
> > %install
>
> The %check section is executed _after_ %install, so it ought to be placed
> after %install in the spec file. Btw, there are scenarios where a custom
> %check section needs to operate on buildroot contents, and the buildroot is
> empty before %install.
-- Fixed
>
>
> > [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
>
> Not true.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags
-- Fixed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.6-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cmockery2-1.3.6-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.6-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cmockery2-1.3.6-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cmockery2-1.3.6-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.6-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cmockery2-1.3.6-1.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-04-04 05:41:22 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc20 |cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc19 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- cmockery2-1.3.7-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
