[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.fc20 |ghc-exceptions-0.6.1-1.el7 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-exceptions-0.6.1-1.el7, ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.el7, ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-exceptions-0.6.1-1.el7, ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.el7, ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3568/ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-2.el7,ghc-exceptions-0.6.1-1.el7,ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-07-30 17:57:36 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.fc20, ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.fc20, ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.fc20, ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.fc20, ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-8435/ghc-ghc-mtl-1.2.1.0-1.fc20,ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- Thank you Ben for reviewing this! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-hint Short Description: Runtime Haskell interpreter Upstream URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hint Owners: petersen Branches: f21 f20 f19 epel7 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216
Ben Boeckel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel ---
Forgot I wasn't on Rawhide on this machine :) .
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 26 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/boeckb/misc/code/fedora/1091216-ghc-
hint/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 808960 bytes in 50 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen --- Well actually F21+ has 1.2.1.0 but I could update F20 too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel --- Looks like this need a version bump: Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: ghc-mtl ==1.2.1.* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|unspecified |low -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maths...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Bug 1091216 depends on bug 1075601, which changed state. Bug 1075601 Summary: Review Request: ghc-exceptions - Extensible optionally-pure exceptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075601 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-hint/ghc-hint.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-hint/ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6861808 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||ghc-hint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091216] Review Request: ghc-hint - Runtime Haskell interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap ||roject.org Depends On||1075601 (ghc-exceptions) Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/hint Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075601 [Bug 1075601] Review Request: ghc-exceptions - Extensible optionally-pure exceptions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
