[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: qca Short Description: Qt Cryptographic Architecture Upstream URL: http://delta.affinix.com/qca Owners: rdieter slankes Branches: f21 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: qca Short Description: Qt Cryptographic Architecture Upstream URL: http://delta.affinix.com/qca Owners: rdieter, slankes Branches: f21,f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #19 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Forgot, the package exists, but is retired and just needs some new branches. Package Change Request == Package Name: qca New Branches: f21 f20 Owners: rdieter slankes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-12-01 10:54:19 --- Comment #21 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Imported, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dr...@land.ru) --- Comment #22 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Boo, Qt5 build uses the same library soname and pkgconfig file names, so not parallel-installable with Qt4 versions. Ivan, would you accept a patch to rename those to include a -qt5 suffix (when building against Qt5)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- And cmake files too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|he...@kde.org --- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Looks like I might be able to set QCA_SUFFIX=qt5 for this purpose, but I'd argue this should be set automatically in a standard way, else we risk API/ABI-incompatible implementations for different distros choosing different values for QCA_SUFFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #25 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- cmake files didn't use QCA_SUFFIX (yet), here's the patch I'm using currently, http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qca.git/tree/qca-2.1.0-cmake_QCA_SUFFIX.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dr...@land.ru)| --- Comment #26 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- but I'd argue this should be set automatically in a standard way You are not alone :( https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121168/ In really you must use two patches for Qt5 coinstalled version. http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=qca.gita=commith=9a9c16dfd1affc92962acd92e4a5246830ccbc04 http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=qca.gita=commith=66447d0454591f4c1deb5f4c988c6027194b1335 Anyway this all out of scope. Please make separate bugreport if you need/want. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Helio Chissini de Castro he...@kde.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||he...@kde.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Helio Chissini de Castro he...@kde.org --- Package is fine. About time to normalize names. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #11 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- $ rpm -qpl /home/taurus/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.R.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/mozcerts /usr/bin/qcatool /usr/lib64/libqca.so.2 /usr/lib64/libqca.so.2.1.0 It is bad idea to mix library and executable files. In this case I can't install on my system both qca.x86_64 and qca.i686 pacakges. Also mozcerts and qcatool not need for regular users. So this files should be moved to separate subpackes qca-tools for example or something like. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #12 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- I wonder is it OK that package doesn't provide libqca-2.1.so ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Re: comment #11 binaries should be ok, rpm uses binary coloring to prefer native binaries in this context. Not sure what you mean by comment #12 , the library soname is libqca.so.2 (not libqca-2-1.so) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #14 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- [root@lix lib64]# ll libQtCore.so.* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Nov 14 02:14 libQtCore.so.4 - libQtCore.so.4.8.6 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Nov 14 02:14 libQtCore.so.4.8 - libQtCore.so.4.8.6 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3108864 Jul 24 00:32 libQtCore.so.4.8.6 [root@lix lib64]# ll libqca.so.* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Nov 14 02:15 libqca.so.2 - libqca.so.2.0.3 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Nov 14 02:15 libqca.so.2.0 - libqca.so.2.0.3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1154456 Aug 4 2013 libqca.so.2.0.3 In new qca no libqca.so.2.1 . There are only libqca.so.2 and libqca.so.2.1.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #15 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #13) Re: comment #11 binaries should be ok, rpm uses binary coloring to prefer native binaries in this context. Yes. I checked it. No any problems. I installed both qca.i686 and qca.x86_64 # rpm -qa | grep qca qca-devel-2.1.0-2.fc20.i686 qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64 qca-ossl-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64 qca-devel-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64 qca-gnupg-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64 qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.i686 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dr...@land.ru --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- *** Bug 1161767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||qca --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- This is a update and rename of existing qca2 package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||512000 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512000 [Bug 512000] rename qca2 - qca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Fyi, qca can now support Qt5 too, but I chose to not include that yet, in order to keep the review simpler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|928937 (qt-reviews) | --- Comment #4 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- Please add documentation and botan plugins subpackages. Use make doc to build documentation. Seems I didn't do install target for docs. So I must be copied to installation folder. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qca/qca.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qca/qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Nov 14 2014 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 2.1.0-2 - -botan, -doc subpkgs, and READMEs to plugin subpkgs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #6 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- #The following tests FAILED: # 8 - FileWatch (Failed) How I can reproduce this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348
--- Comment #7 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru ---
Maybe should use %{_docdir} instead of %{_qt4_docdir}? Or there are reasons to
use %{_qt4_docdir}?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Considering we will likely be adding qt5 support in the near future, using a Qt agnostic dir makes sense. I'll switch that in the next pkg iteration (but won't update the review *just* for that. As far as the failed test, good question, maybe the mock/koji environment is different somehow. You should be able to reproduce it in mock yourself, then run 'mock shell' to entire into the buildroot for more investigation if needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #9 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- Need to gnupg to BR. It is used in tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #10 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- I rebuild qca for F21 x68_64 in mock. But can't reproduce FileWatcher failing unittest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
