[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2015-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0- |nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-
   |2.fc20  |2.el7



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2015-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0- |nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-
   |2.el7   |2.el6



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2015-01-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-
   ||2.fc21
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2015-01-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0- |nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-
   |2.fc21  |2.fc20



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231



--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2014-12-22 04:12:26



--- Comment #5 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Built in rawhide therefore closing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||piotr1...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com ---
builds and installs fine. APPROVED

suggestion:
You could download and include tests from upstream.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 Unknown or generated. 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/piotr/rpmbuild/nodejs-object-
 assign/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a 

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|piotr1...@gmail.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #2 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for your suggestion. Added test from upstream now.

Spec URL:
https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/nodejs-object-assign.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/nodejs-object-assign-2.0.0-2.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231



--- Comment #3 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for this review.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: nodejs-object-assign
Short Description: ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill
Upstream URL: https://github.com/sindresorhus/object-assign
Owners: pnemade
Branches: f19 f20 f21 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171231] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill

2014-12-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171231

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1171236




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171236
[Bug 1171236] Review Request: nodejs-got - Simplified HTTP/HTTPS requests
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review