[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-03-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-requests-toolbelt-0. |python-requests-toolbelt-0.
   |3.1-2.fc20  |3.1-2.el7



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-requests-toolbelt-0. |python-requests-toolbelt-0.
   |3.1-2.fc21  |3.1-2.fc20



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||python-requests-toolbelt-0.
   ||3.1-2.fc21
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 Unknown or generated. 22 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3
 -requests-toolbelt
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
   --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8921004
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is 

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #4 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for this review.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-requests-toolbelt
Short Description: A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests
Upstream URL: https://toolbelt.readthedocs.org/
Owners: pnemade
Branches:  f20 f21 f22 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178



--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2015-02-14 01:58:11



--- Comment #9 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Built in rawhide. Closing this review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@der-flo.net
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---
hi Parag!

Please include the license text file in your spec file.

For example by adding to your files section:

  %license LICENSE

Cheers,
 Florian

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

2015-02-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178



--- Comment #2 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Added license file

Spec URL:
https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/python-requests-toolbelt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review