[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-02-10 05:41:37 --- Comment #8 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr --- Built for rawhide and mashed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #5) Ack, everything fixed. Approving. Thanks, Petr. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Palm Short Description: Palm OS utility functions Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Palm/ Owners: eseyman Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #4) (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) This is not a simple rename. The distribution got split into two, at least -- this one and Palm::PDB. The latter needs to be packaged before this one as it's your (and lbdb's) dependency. Yup, perl-Palm-PDB was reviewed in bug #1187873 and hit rawhide on 2015-02-02. I see. Totally missed that. Wrong lettercase on the Obsoletes line. Mark the LICENSE file with %license; this is now mandatory. Missing BR: perl The minimum required version of EU::MM should be 6.76. That's when support for NO_PACKLIST was introduced. You can substitute PERL_INSTALL_ROOT with DESTDIR. The URL still points to p5-Palm. All fixed. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Palm/perl-Palm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Palm/perl-Palm-1.014-2.fc21. src.rpm Ack, everything fixed. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 --- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #2) (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1) The standalone spec differs from the one included in the SRPM. Wow, I'm off to a great start on this one. Source RPM rebuilt. Indeed. This is not a simple rename. The distribution got split into two, at least -- this one and Palm::PDB. The latter needs to be packaged before this one as it's your (and lbdb's) dependency. Wrong lettercase on the Obsoletes line. Mark the LICENSE file with %license; this is now mandatory. Missing BR: perl The minimum required version of EU::MM should be 6.76. That's when support for NO_PACKLIST was introduced. You can substitute PERL_INSTALL_ROOT with DESTDIR. The URL still points to p5-Palm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) This is not a simple rename. The distribution got split into two, at least -- this one and Palm::PDB. The latter needs to be packaged before this one as it's your (and lbdb's) dependency. Yup, perl-Palm-PDB was reviewed in bug #1187873 and hit rawhide on 2015-02-02. Wrong lettercase on the Obsoletes line. Mark the LICENSE file with %license; this is now mandatory. Missing BR: perl The minimum required version of EU::MM should be 6.76. That's when support for NO_PACKLIST was introduced. You can substitute PERL_INSTALL_ROOT with DESTDIR. The URL still points to p5-Palm. All fixed. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Palm/perl-Palm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Palm/perl-Palm-1.014-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1) The standalone spec differs from the one included in the SRPM. Wow, I'm off to a great start on this one. Source RPM rebuilt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188648] Review Request: perl-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188648 --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- The standalone spec differs from the one included in the SRPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
