[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc21 |ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.el7 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc22 |ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc21 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc20 |ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc22 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-03-13 13:03:56 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Bug 1194189 depends on bug 1194187, which changed state. Bug 1194187 Summary: Review Request: libuecc - Very small Elliptic Curve Cryptography library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194187 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org --- Added a pull request upstream for the license file: https://github.com/tcatm/ecdsautils/pull/10 Will carry this as a patch as long as it's not contained in a release. Spec URL: https://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/ecdsautils/ecdsautils.spec SRPM URL: https://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/ecdsautils/ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ecdsautils Short Description: Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify) Upstream URL: https://github.com/tcatm/ecdsautils Owners: heffer Branches: f20 f21 f22 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189
Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
Note: Cannot find COPYRIGHT in rpm(s)
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
--- NOT an issue! Package uses %license
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
MIT/X11 (BSD like), BSD (2 clause).
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
--- https://github.com/tcatm/ecdsautils/pull/10
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
--- NOT an issue. Upstream does not provide an license text file.
https://github.com/tcatm/ecdsautils/pull/10
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecdsautils-0.3.2-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||d...@der-flo.net Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net --- hi Felix! Please inform upstream about the missing license text file and mention this in the spec file. In addition, please insert %license COPYRIGHT to the files section. Cheers, Florian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194189] Review Request: ecdsautils - Tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194189 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1194187 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194187 [Bug 1194187] Review Request: libuecc - Very small Elliptic Curve Cryptography library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
