[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-grunt-util-options-0 |nodejs-grunt-util-options-0 |.0.2-2.fc22 |.0.2-2.el7 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-grunt-util-options-0 |nodejs-grunt-util-options-0 |.0.2-2.fc21 |.0.2-2.fc22 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||nodejs-grunt-util-options-0 ||.0.2-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-07-23 04:56:00 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com --- Thanks New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-grunt-util-options Short Description: Grunt util for getting options Upstream URL: https://github.com/mikaelkaron/grunt-util-options Owners: piotrp Branches: f21 f22 el6 epel7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 --- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com --- thank you for review and excuse me for the long delay. Added license: Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-options.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-2.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- Great. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Bug 1194902 depends on bug 1194897, which changed state. Bug 1194897 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-property - Grunt util for getting and setting properties https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194897 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||t...@compton.nu Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@compton.nu Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 --- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- Only problem is that you need to add the license text locally until upstream does so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 --- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: Unknown or generated. 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/tom/1194902-nodejs-grunt-util- options/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. = EXTRA items = Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint --- Checking: nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1194897 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194897 [Bug 1194897] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-propery - Grunt util for getting and setting properties -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review