[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||python-atomicwrites-0.1.4-5 ||.fc22 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-atomicwrites-0.1.4-5.fc22, vdirsyncer-0.4.3-5.fc22, khal-0.4.0-10.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-atomicwrites Short Description: Python POSIX Atomic file writes Upstream URL: https://github.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites Owners: mbaldessari Branches: f22 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-atomicwrites-0.1.4-5.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-atomicwrites-0.1.4-5.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-03-02 14:58:37 --- Comment #5 from Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org --- Thanks everyone! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sso...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346
Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sso...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/simo/tmp/1197346-python-
atomicwrites/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]:
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1197436 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197436 [Bug 1197436] Review Request: vdirsyncer - Synchronize calendars and contacts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197346] Review Request: python-atomicwrites - Python Atomic file writes on POSIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197346 Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com --- fedora-review passes spec file looks good LGTM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
