[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc |ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc |21 |20 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc |ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.el |20 |7 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc |ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc |22 |21 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc ||22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-03-13 13:25:22 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-STMonadTrans-0.3.2-1.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||maths...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maths...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 204800 bytes in 20 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-STMonadTrans Short Description: Monad transformer version of the ST monad Upstream URL: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/STMonadTrans Owners: petersen Branches: f22 f21 f20 epel7 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9117496 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197639] Review Request: ghc-STMonadTrans - A monad transformer version of the ST monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197639 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1197640 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197640 [Bug 1197640] Review Request: ghc-equivalence - Maintaining an equivalence relation implemented as union-find using STT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
