[Bug 1200889] Review Request: lpod-python - a python library implementing the OpenDocument Format standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200889 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Last Closed||2019-09-17 15:37:33 --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Let's close this. Feel free to restart the process at any time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1200889] Review Request: lpod-python - a python library implementing the OpenDocument Format standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200889 --- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Any plans to continue with this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1200889] Review Request: lpod-python - a python library implementing the OpenDocument Format standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200889 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- I'd find it a gratuitous source of confusion to have python-lpod built from lpod-python. lpod-python would normally be used for a python subpackage built off a main package. You are right that the guidelines do not explicitly specify that either version is correct. So it's your choice. >> What about python3 support? > Possibly. Oh, I looked at the sources now. They don't seem python3 compatible at all. So the point is moot for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1200889] Review Request: lpod-python - a python library implementing the OpenDocument Format standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200889
David Tardon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtar...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from David Tardon ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> Name should be python-lpod according to the guidelines
> [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.
> 28python_modules.29].
On the other side, the guidelines for python3 only require that "all python3
modules MUST have python3 in their name." Are the rules stricter for python2?
Also note that this is only the source name. The rpms it builds are named
python-*.
> Add Provides: python2-lpod = %{version}-%{release}
Okay.
> Use %license macro for the license files.
Okay.
> What about python3 support?
Possibly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1200889] Review Request: lpod-python - a python library implementing the OpenDocument Format standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200889
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Name should be python-lpod according to the guidelines
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29].
Add Provides: python2-lpod = %{version}-%{release}
Use %license macro for the license files.
What about python3 support?
Looks fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1200889] Review Request: lpod-python - a python library implementing the OpenDocument Format standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200889 David Tardon changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1200893 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200893 [Bug 1200893] Review Request: odpdown - a generator of OpenDocument Presentation files from markdown -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
