[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
jaxws-undertow-httpspi-1.0.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2015-07-07 12:03:44 |2016-08-24 09:51:04



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
jaxws-undertow-httpspi-1.0.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
jaxws-undertow-httpspi-1.0.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3600adc9aa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
jaxws-undertow-httpspi-1.0.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3762203847

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
jaxws-undertow-httpspi-1.0.1-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3600adc9aa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
jaxws-undertow-httpspi-1.0.1-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3762203847

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

Nils Philippsen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG),
   ||1205261



--- Comment #5 from Nils Philippsen  ---
*** Bug 1366269 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205261
[Bug 1205261] jbossws-cxf: Upgrade to 5.1.3.Final
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-07-07 12:03:44



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Thanks!

I'll fix the issues at import time!

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: jaxws-undertow-httpspi
Short Description: Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge
Upstream URL: http://jbossws.jboss.org
Owners: goldmann
Branches: f22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248



--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1181081, 652183
   ||(FE-JAVASIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181081
[Bug 1181081] wildfly: Upgrade to 8.2.0.Final
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
  Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
  pulled in by maven-local
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
 Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 LGPL (v2.1 or later), *No copyright* Apache (v2.0). Detailed output
 of licensecheck in /home/gil/1205248-jaxws-undertow-httpspi/review-jaxws-
 undertow-httpspi/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/share/maven-metadata
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-metadata
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
 when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from 

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
ISSUES:

- Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
  Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
  pulled in by maven-local
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java

[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.

jaxws-undertow-httpspi.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/jbossws
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden

Please, use: http://jbossws.jboss.org/

jaxws-undertow-httpspi-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
Javadocs - Java docs, Java-docs, Avocados

Please, use: Javadoc

Please, remove Group tags are unneeded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1205248] Review Request: jaxws-undertow-httpspi - Undertow to JAXWS 2.2 HTTP SPI bridge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review